Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristotle good life theory
Aristotle good life theory
Aristotle good life theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Aristotle good life theory
Aristotle once said, “The ultimate value of life depends upon awareness and the power of contemplation rather than upon mere survival.” The value of life isn’t something that cannot not be priced. In his novel, Unwind, Neal Shusterman showcases how the characters, Connor, Risa, and Lev, are trying to escape their unwinding after their lives being deemed invaluable. Life isn’t something that can be decided for another person whether they are storked, “bad teenagers,” or clappers as shown through Connor, Risa, and Lev in Neal Shusterman’s novel Unwind.
The first way life can’t be judged is through storking. The Bill of Life had a law in it called “Storking.” This law gave the rights to young girls to give up their children after birth if they
…show more content…
were not ready to be mothers or if they were incapable of becoming parents. The law was going into the idea of “finder’s keepers.” Storking is when someone puts a baby on your front porch, knocks, and the homeowner is obligated to keep and raise the child. If you are caught, you must take the baby back. For example, in the novel Unwind, Connor and Risa were running from the police and they found a baby on a front porch that were possibly being storked. The life of a baby shouldn’t be forced upon someone who doesn’t care, however, their life should be given to someone who truly wants them. Another way life can’t be judged is from teenagers not having the capability of being a good person. Bad teenagers are teenagers who don’t understand or know how to control themselves. These sets of teenagers are categorized from their behavior when they are still young and developing. Neal Shusterman states “Connor makes a split- second decision and bolts, pushing the officer against the truck and racing across the busy highway” (18). This quote shows how Connor was being aggressive with the police officer just to get away from the juvey cop unit, and he runs onto a busy highway causing a bad accident. Controlling your behavior will help you go far in life someday. Lastly, a way life can’t be judged is from being a clapper.
Clappers are “young terroists” whose circulatory system have been replaced with a nitroglycerin blend that makes their blood explosive. They are suicide bombers who don’t live for the applause, they die for it. Clappers set themselves off by clapping their hands together, and then explosion begins. Connor and Risa use the thought of clappers to escape from the police officers at the school. Shusterman expresses the quote, “Clappers!” everyone scrams, and the crowd becomes a stampede. Kids bolt, but no one is sure where to go. All they know is that they must get away from the school as quickly as possible” (88). This quote from the novel shows how serious the case of being a clapper is. If any sources of a clapper are present, get away quickly. However, Lev Calder is an example of a clapper. After the chop shop exploded, Lev is held in a cell designed for his specific needs in a high- security federal detention center. This quote states “The cell is padded. There is a steel blast door three inches thick. The room is kept at a constant forty- five degrees Fahrenheit to keep Lev’s body temperature from rising too high. Lev is not cold, though-- in fact he’s hot. He’s hot because he’s wrapped in layer after layer of fire resistant insulation” (323). Lev was apart of the cause of the explosion and the detention center was trying to keep safe. The life of clappers should not go unknown because the major destruction and
deaths they may cause. In conclusion, Neal Shusterman shows many ways the value of life cannot be priced. Life is a precious thing, and you should cherish every moment you have. Connor, Risa, and Lev really did not understand the value of life throughout the novel. Life should not have to be decided by someone else whether you are storked, a “bad teenager,” or a clapper.
Conroy displays his life through his novel, The Lords of Discipline, to give readers a visual demonstration of how life connections can transform the entity of a novel. Conroy's attendance to the Citadel, his family, and the South helped influence his innovative writing style.
Every one is scavenging for the next big gadget- the future is a standard that society strives to have in their grasp. However, Joel Achenbach a former humor columnist solves the mystery of the future in his article, “The Future is Now: it’s heading right at us, but we never see it coming” .he presents a sense of urgency describing that the future is not something that society needs to wait for it happens behind closed doors. He argues that the future is a fast pace entity that occurs all around us. Achenbach proves this point by sticking to his humorous style, with the use of witty allusions to Sci-Fi films.
The sympathy of loss is persuaded as a devastating way on how a person is in a state of mind of losing. A person deals with loss as an impact on life and a way of changing their life at the particular moment. In the book My Losing Season by Pat Conroy he deals with the type of loss every time he plays basketball due to the fact, when something is going right for him life finds a way to make him lose in a matter of being in the way of Pat’s concentration to be successful.
David Malter was part of the Jewish sect that took on a more modern approach. He is very understanding, and he cares very deeply for his son Reuven. Reuven and his father's relationship would be considered healthy by most people. They love each other very much, and they have a very open communication with each other.
“A Summer in the Cage” is a documentary filmed by Ben Selkow that shows his friend Sam battling with a manic-depressive illness known as bipolar disorder. The main theme of this film is the struggles the main character Sam goes through when battling bipolar disorder. Selkow firsts meets Sam while filming a documentary about street basketball. Ever since that day, they became close friends. Sam decided to help make the documentary with Selkow. Selkow begins to realize after spending so much time with Sam that he had something off about him. At this time, Sam was having is first manic episode. When Sam was eight years old, his father committed suicide due to battling the same disorder. Throughout this documentary, Sam tries to escape that same
In the book The Chosen, by Chaim Potok, Reuven Malter is shaped by everyone around him. During this interaction his character becomes more developed and engaging. Through the interactions, it becomes apparent that Reuven’s father is always teaching his child how to improve himself. The conversations between Reuven and his father help prepare Reuven develop the mentality and the personal qualities, such as wisdom, compassion, and tolerance, necessary to become a rabbi.
“I intend to judge things for myself; to judge wrongly, I think, is more honorable than not to judge at all.” What author Henry James meant by this was that it is better to make up one’s mind and have an opinion than to remain complacent, such as the case of Mary Anne Warren. Warren’s arguments for abortion’s possible permissibility are lacking in substance. The aim of my paper is to discuss Warren’s insufficient criteria for personhood and address the problem with her concept of potential personhood. “I argue that it is personhood, and not genetic humanity, which is the fundamental basis for membership in the moral community” (Warren 166).
This novel tells the story of a sixteen-year-old named Blake. One day, when Blake went to Six Flags with his two friends, Maggie (with whom Blake is in love with) and her boyfriend, Russ, and his brother, Quinn, Blake received an invitation to a carnival from a strange, gorgeous girl, Cassandra. Blake thought that the idea of going to the carnival is stupid, until he realized his brother stole the invitation. Blake convinced his two friends to tag along with him, so they could go find Quinn. As the characters entered the carnival, they learned that they have to survive seven deadly rides by dawn.
...This idea respects the adult person in the moral community, not the infant. It can be compared to the idea that it is wrong to destroy someone’s home or natural recourses. (Disputed Moral Issues, p.189).
Mary Anne Warren’s “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion” describes her justification that abortion is not a fundamentally wrong action for a mother to undertake. By forming a distinction between being genetically human and being a fully developed “person” and member of the “moral community” that encompasses humanity, Warren argues that it must be proven that fetuses are human beings in the morally relevant sense in order for their termination to be considered morally wrong. Warren’s rationale of defining moral personhood as showcasing a combination of five qualities such as “consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity, capacity of communication, and self-awareness” forms the basis of her argument that a fetus displays none of these elements that would justify its classification as a person and member of the morally relevant community (Timmons 386).
who were there but learn them in such a way that we are allowed to
“Without Conscience" by Robert D. Hare is one aimed towards making the general public aware of the many psychopaths that inhabit the world we live in. Throughout the book Hare exposes the reader to a number of short stories; all with an emphasis on a characteristic of psychopaths. Hare makes the claim that close monitoring of psychopathy are vital if we ever hope to gain a hold over Psychopathy- A disorder that affects not only the individual but also society itself. He also indicates one of the reasons for this book is order to correctly treat these individuals we have to be able to correctly identify who meets the criteria. His ultimate goal with the text is to alleviate some of the confusion in the increase in criminal activity by determining how my of this is a result of Psychopathy.
...e open to all women at any point of pregnancy, and that the woman reserves the right as a fully conscious member of the moral community to choose to carry the child or not. She argues that fetuses are not persons or members of the moral community because they don’t fulfill the five qualities of personhood she has fashioned. Warren’s arguments are valid, mostly sound, and cover just about all aspects of the overall topic. However much she was inconsistent on the topic of infanticide, her overall writing was well done and consistent. Warren rejects emotional appeal in a very Vulcan like manner; devout to reason and logic and in doing so has created a well-written paper based solely on this rational mindset.
Many arguments in the abortion debate assume that the morality of abortion depends upon the moral status of the foetus. While I regard the moral status of the foetus as important, it is not the central issue that determines the moral justifiability of abortion. The foetus may be awarded a level of moral status, nevertheless, such status does not result in the prescription of a set moral judgement. As with many morally significant issues, there are competing interests and a variety of possible outcomes that need to be considered when making a moral judgement on abortion. While we need to determine the moral status of the foetus in order to establish the type of entity we are dealing with, it does not, however, exist in a moral vacuum. There are other key issues requiring attention, such as the moral status and interests of the pregnant woman who may desire an abortion, and importantly, the likely consequences of aborting or not aborting a particular foetus. Furthermore, I assert that moral status should be awarded as a matter of degree, based upon the capacities of sentience and self-consciousness an entity possesses. In a bid to reach a coherent conclusion on the issue, the moral status of both foetus and woman, along with the likely results of aborting a particular foetus, must be considered together. Given the multiple facets requiring consideration, I assert that utilitarianism (Mill 1863) offers a coherent framework for weighing and comparing the inputs across a variety of situations, which can determine whether it is ever morally justifiable to have an abortion.
Over the duration of the last century, abortion in the Western hemisphere has become a largely controversial topic that affects every human being. In the United States, at current rates, one in three women will have had an abortion by the time they reach the age of 45. The questions surrounding the laws are of moral, social, and medical dilemmas that rely upon the most fundamental principles of ethics and philosophy. At the center of the argument is the not so clear cut lines dictating what life is, or is not, and where a fetus finds itself amongst its meaning. In an effort to answer the question, lawmakers are establishing public policies dictating what a woman may or may not do with consideration to her reproductive rights. The drawback, however, is that there is no agreement upon when life begins and at which point one crosses the line from unalienable rights to murder.