Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on agency theory
Essay on agency theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on agency theory
What is agency and how does it affect women in history? Agency is defined as the ability of a person to act for him/herself and this can be a tool to examine the power of women in history. In Trying Neaira, it tells the story of a prostitute during the period of the years 400 B.C. to 340 B.C., who has limited agency in her life. To explore why Neaira has limited agency the book gives evidence in three key periods of Neaira’s life. These three periods can be labeled as life as a Prostitute, life as a Hetaira, and Protection under Stephanos. From the analysis of these three periods, you can see the impact of others on Neaira’s life and how she has little choice in what she can do and that is why she lacks agency. Neaira was possibly left out …show more content…
Once sold to these people Neaira becomes what is called a Hetaira, a high-class courtesan. Under the ownership of these two men, Neaira receives more luxury and control over her life, but she is still at the beck and call of her owners. Her first taste of freedom of choice is when these two men want to liquidate their assets. While it is a controlled choice between paying 2,000 drachmas her freedom or be sold for cheap to a brothel. Obviously, lead into one choice Neaira seeks to pay out the 2,000 drachma settlement. Neaira, however, could not simply afford that sum, and thus called in favors of former clientele. The biggest help came from Phrynion, who probably paid the majority of the sum. While free from her duties as a sex slave she still owes Phrynion a debt which is paid off as her services as a Hetaira. As a Hetaira, Neaira had unparalleled freedom when compared to the common Athenian woman. The societal norm was to protect the women and hid them from lecherous eyes. The most important aspect was for these Athenian women was the ability to birth citizens. Since Neaira was not a citizen, she was able to attend parties, eat with men and go out in public and Phrynion made sure of that.“Phrynion may indeed have crossed a line when he had sex with Neaira in front of an audience, making a show of her subjection to …show more content…
Stephanos was a possible sycophant and political figure connected to Kallistratos, who was able to give Neaira the safety and protection to return to Athens. Neaira’s relationship with Stephanos can be described as a Hetaira, but many enemies saw it as one of a married couple. Her children were taken by Stephanos as citizens and even married off to other citizens. Citizenship is an important part of the Athenian culture and is thus an important part of identity The question of citizenship is brought up against Neaira and her children and is why they are brought to trial consistently. “Athenian litigants were required, de facto if not de jure, to speak in court themselves. Women, of course, were represented in court by their kyrioi.” (133) Neaira was unable to defend herself and was at the mercy of the ability of Stephanos to prove her innocence. Stephanos also has had many litigations with Theomnestos, Apollodoros, Phrastor, and Epainetos. Through these litigations ending in arbitration or court, Stephanos gained enemies in the likes of Apollodoros and Theomnestos. “Revenging themselves against Stephanos, according to Theomnestos, was precisely what he and Apollodoros were after in bringing suit against Neaira.” (126) It also turns out that revenge on Stephanos was a perfectly acceptable reason for charges against Neaira. Neaira may not have done anything wrong, but because of her
When thrown into a foreign country where everything new is particularly strange and revolting, the Price family would be expected to become closer; however, the exile from their homeland only serves to drive the family farther apart. In Leah’s case, as a impressionable child in need of guidance in a dramatically foreign country, she remains loyal to her father, idolizing his close-minded ways. This blind devotion unknowingly
A main theme presented in “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe is that Montresor shows obsession with the murder of fortunato. This is exemplified by Montresor’s precise planning, carefulness and slowness of speed in the process.
He treats Aminata with respect and provides her with more freedom. In Charleston, Aminata is able to recover confidence in herself which was lost during her time in previous settings. This is shown when Amniata first arrives to Charleston and enquires about other slaves; " Do you have other slaves? ' I asked. He flinched 'One other. But my wife and I prefer the term servant. And we don 't treat our servants rudely. In our home you will find none of the barbarism of St. Helena Island ' " (264). This illustrates that Lindo has a vastly different opinion towards slaves than Appleby does. He has a higher regard towards Aminata and feels as though she deserves to be treated much better. Because of this, Aminata is able to regain motivation along with positivity for her future . She is also now aware that there are people who are not as cruel towards slaves . Moreover, Charleston also positively influences Aminata as she is given the opportunity to further educate herself, "After Lindo finished our lessons about arithmetic, coins and keeping ledgers his wife began tutoring in the art of write"(292). In effect, this not only allows Aminata to gain additional knowledge which can help be more successful in the future as she has more valuable skills to offer. But it also helps her see the potential she has and that there is a possibility of a better future, one in which she is
Parry, Joseph D. "Interpreting Female Agency and Responsibility in The Miller's Tale and The Merchant's Tale." 80.2 (2001): 133-67. Academic Onefile. Web. 16 May 2013.
Women in antiquity did not have an easy lot in life. They had few, if any, rights. Surviving early records of the civilizations of antiquity from ancient Greece, Egypt, China, and Rome suggest the diversity of women’s roles differed little from region to region. There were a few exceptions, mostly concerning women of nobility and the city-state of Sparta. Excluding the rare instances mentioned most antique women were generally limited on education, mobility, and almost all possibilities interfering with domestic or childbearing responsibilities. The limited social roles of women in antiquity suggest the perceived c...
The question of women’s agency, in moving history holds a long history dating back to the ancients, then turning away from that in small degrees during the Renaissance. Most notable in this change comes from the capital of education, the Italianate states. Home to rife differences in attitudes towards women, it also hosts the origins of the discussion around women’s purpose. The current field largely finds inspiration from writers during the American 1970s women’s rights movement, and it shows in the modern origins and their influence. However, the field’s creation date loom farther back than such a recent movement, easily dating back to Plato and Aristotle. Beginning with a negative view of the female sex as inferiority, the study of women and their rights progressed to Giovanni Boccaccio’s creation of female biography in 1374, and further developed with a female voice in 1405 under the pen of Christine de Pizan. Clearly, none of the prestigious scholars could have predicted the alterations and growth of the discussion surrounding a people group often considered subhuman.
Medea and Lysistrata are two Greek literatures that depict the power which women are driven to achieve in an aim to defy gender inequality. In The Medea, Medea is battling against her husband Jason whom she hates. On the other hand, in Aristophanes' Lysistrata, the protagonist Lysistrata plotted to convince and organize the female gender to protest against the stubbornness of men. In terms of defining the purpose of these two literatures, it is apparent that Euripedes and Aristophanes created characters that demonstrate resistance against the domination of men in the society.
She places in people the desire to have sexual relations and causes fear in men of the power of seduction by women. Her marriage to her husband was ignored as she had affairs with immortal and mortal men. Her infidelity in her marriage places her on the side with Greek men, rather than Greek women because only Greek men were able to cheat on their wives; not the other way around. In conclusion, the three important rules discussed in this paper that Greek women were required to obey, can be seen in the myths of the goddesses Hera, Athena, and Aphrodite. Whether or not the Greek goddesses obeyed or did not obey these rules, their importance to the Greek culture is ever strong.
Greek women, as depicted as in their history and literature, endure many hardships and struggle to establish a meaningful status in their society. In the Odyssey, Penelope’s only role in the epic is to support Odysseus and remain loyal to him. She is at home and struggles to keep her family intact while Odysseus is away trying to return to his native land. The cultural role of women is depicted as being supportive of man and nothing more. Yet what women in ancient Greece did long ago was by far more impressive than what men did.
Though not the focus of epic poetry, the female characters of this ancient genre play a central role, as they have a great influence on the male heroes they encounter. In a genre which idealizes manliness and heroism—that is, acts of courage, strength, and cunning— women are set in opposition to these ideals and therefore less respected. At the same time, women who attempt to take on more “masculine” roles are vilified. Here, antagonist is defined as anyone in opposition to the hero’s goals. Female agency—their free will and ability to wield power—is directly related to their role in epic poetry; that is, the more agency a female character has, the more antagonistic of a role she plays. This agency is often enacted through sexuality or supernatural
For centuries women have fought to obtain basic civil rights and today, they are still fighting to obtain equal rights. From the right to vote to their right to birth control, women have always been trying to assert their own independence in order to expand their freedom. While much progress has been made, there is still room for improvement. However, the evolution of women’s rights and the role of women is mirrored in literature and can be used to illustrate the progression throughout history. Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex is no different. Through the character Jocasta, Sophocles creates a counterpart to Oedipus and uses her to reveal the oppression of women by contrasting her and Oedipus’ relationships and reactions to the prophecy. Throughout the play Oedipus Rex, Sophocles illustrates Jocasta’s vulnerability and supportive nature in order to women as fragile, doting, and obedient wives and mothers to facilitate the necessity of self-assertion.
It states that the boys were from a previous marriage, which is consistent with the earlier story that Neaira had three daughters, and Stephanos has clearly accepted his sons as his offspring. The questions arise mostly over the conspicuous case of the second daughter. The rejection of her former husband and the court case that tries to claim her as the daughter of an alien, but given away in marriage as a full Athenian citizen. Stephanos would not testify that she was his daughter, which points to the fact that Neaira is an alien, but also that Stephanos recognizes the law and just has a concubine relationship with Neaira. It also makes clear the position that women are to hold, as his reasoning for divorcing her was that she was not a proper woman, and her husband felt that he had been cheated. This story may have been shaped in a way that her husband realized that her poor manners indicated her lack of citizenship, as was a popular belief that non-citizens were uncivilized barbarians, but more likely it is the case that her poor manners were a primary reason for her dismissal from her husband’s house. This can be reaffirmed by the acceptance of their son as the heir to his
In Greek classics, it is common knowledge that in that era women and men were considered unequal. Men were superior, and in most cases women were not even fit for citizenship. It is in this atmosphere and time period that Aristophanes wrote Lysistrata. The play itself is supposed to be a comedy, although the actions of the women do not seem amusing. Instead, the women’s actions, especially the main character Lysistrata, seem incredibly brave. Lysistrata rounds up her “troop” of all the women in Athens and a Spartan woman. They take charge of the acropolis and refuse to settle for anything less than a peace treaty to end the war. The only problem with this is, in ending the war, they will be bringing back the men from their duty and end up in the same social caste system as they were from the beginning. Aristophanes seems to make the point that – the only power women hold is their sexuality (Rex Par. 7). The Athenian women can withdraw from their husbands for however long they like, they still end up givi...
Women’s lives are represented by the roles they either choose or have imposed on them. This is evident in the play Medea by Euripides through the characters of Medea and the nurse. During the time period which Medea is set women have very limited social power and no political power at all, although a women’s maternal and domestic power was respected in the privacy of the home, “Our lives depend on how his lordship feels”. The limited power these women were given is different to modern society yet roles are still imposed on women to conform and be a dutiful wife.
"Power and Women in Lysistrata: Character Analysis of Lysistrata." Article Myriad. Web. 25 Mar. 2011. .