Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of environment in childs development
Role of environment in childs development
How does gender shape one's identity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of environment in childs development
Being a parent is the equivalent of driving down a road in a foreign country. The maps don’t make any sense, directions would be helpful but are sometimes misconstrued, and eventually the frustration has built up enough to cause a break to make room for a good night’s sleep. The end of the road may or may not end where some expected to end up and the scenery might be dismal, but the risk was taken and one can only be happy knowing that they accomplished the task themselves and admire the results of their hard work. So why is it then that a child raised under the very best of circumstances and with lots of love can turn out so abominable and others raised with no support whatsoever become the greatest people history has ever seen? The simple answer is that even though parents may try to do the best for their child, nature is far more important than nurture in the attitude and demeanor of a child when growing up in a modern society.
Take, for example, the case of David Weimer. Born a boy, a botched circumcision caused the parents to consult doctors for options until psychologist John William Money recommended gender reassignment. The then 22 month old David was reborn Brenda after surgery and hormone treatments. Despite her parents trying their hardest, Brenda hated dresses and constantly played with her brothers toys. These events continued until as an adolescence when she was told she was born a man, at which point she opted for gender reassignment yet again. This set of events eventually culminated in David’s tragic suicide due to depression. Anyone can see from this case that David could not be nurtured to become a girl. He was a boy at heart.
Many however, would state that nurture is far more important than nature citing th...
... middle of paper ...
... want. Your child needs structure and discipline, just like every other kid out there. The point is only to allow your child to have input on activities that focus on them explicitly. When planning for your child’s extra-curricular activities, allow them to say that they want to play basketball, not soccer; that they prefer the clarinet to the violin. Allow them to choose whatever activities interest them, not what fits the parent’s agenda. These are all mistakes that any parent, good or bad, can easily make. They are so easy to forget and no parent can claim that they have never done this to their child. Just remember the next time when planning a child’s day to include what they actually want to do in the events. Otherwise a parent can end up with an unruly child whose nature (like most others) is to lash out when forced into activities that they do not enjoy.
On October 9, 1968, a set of twins were born, but separated at birth and ultimately, put up for adoption. The decision to separate the twins came from the adoption agency who wanted to conduct a nature versus nurture experiment; however, the experiment was conducted in secret. However, for unknown reasons, the experiment never developed to fruition. Unaware the child they adopted was a twin; both sets of parents raised a singular child. Thirty-five years later, one twin began a search for her biological mother through the adoption agency, only to find out that she was born a twin. Upon learning her identity, she reached out to her twin and they began the journey of getting to know one another by comparing characteristics that appeared similar such as temperament and mannerism. They even discovered that they both held positions as a film critic and enjoyed almost identical movies.
In the well-received novel “Pudd’nhead Wilson,” Mark Twain skillfully addresses the ancient argument about the origin of one’s character and whether it’s derived from his nature or his surroundings. We can best see this battle between nature versus nurture by inspecting the plot lines that follow the characters Thomas a Becket Driscoll, Valet de Chambre, and Roxana the slave. Thomas was born into a wealthy white family while Roxy birthed Chambers into a life of slavery. It seemed as though each would have gone their separate ways into opposite walks of life, but Roxy secretly swapped the children, which destined each to their counterintuitive fates. Through their words and actions, Tom, Chambers, and Roxy have proven the idea that one’s behaviors and desires are a result of his upbringings and the environment he lives in rather than by his innate nature.
In today’s society, it can be argued that the choice of being male or female is up to others more than you. A child’s appearance, beliefs and emotions are controlled until they have completely understood what they were “born to be.” In the article Learning to Be Gendered, Penelope Eckert and Sally McConnell- Ginet speaks out on how we are influenced to differentiate ourselves through gender. It starts with our parents, creating our appearances, names and behaviors and distinguishing them into a male or female thing. Eventually, we grow to continue this action on our own by watching our peers. From personal experience, a child cannot freely choose the gender that suits them best unless our society approves.
Gibson, B., & Catlin, A.J. (2011). Care of the Child with the Desire to Change Gender-Part 1.
The Battle of Nature vs. Nurture In Nancy Kress' "In Memoriam", the philosophical issue of identity becomes apparent. As a son pleads to his mother to take part in a medical procedure, which wipes your mind clear of memories, the question of "what makes me'me'?" arises. Set in the future, the mother is faced with a decision: whether or not she wants to die as a result of having too many memories, or as a result of having none at all. The son, Aaron, takes quite a different approach however as he feels that it is not a question of death, rather a question of life.
“Some findings, assuming they can be repeated, will not satisfy gay groups who want homosexuality to be seen as purely a genetic trait. Nor will they please commentators who see homosexuality as a choice made by "sinful" people. What they do show is human sexual behavior in all its splendid complexity.” (inspire.in.gov) Nature vs. Nurture is the debate on whether or not an individual is born homosexual or is homosexual based on who they are influenced by and the environment they are in or surrounded by. The ‘nature’ side of the nature vs. nurture debate is based on if an individual is born homosexual. The ‘nurture’ side of nature vs. nurture is if an individual is taught, influenced, or is affected someway by the environment and/or place they live in and who they live with. Either way, the individual is still homosexual.
In the past, this condition (also known as hermaphroditism) was one of secrecy, and it was common for parents to choose their baby’s gender for them and to have doctors remove ovaries from a child whom could grow into a boy, or remove the penis from a baby that showed more sign of being female. There are a variety of different issues that can cause a child to be intersex. Some could be an extra X or Y chromosome or genetic mutation. The issue is that people do not always grow into the gender that they are given, whether they be intersex or not. Despite the either-or categories society has perpetuated on gender, intersex children should be given the choice of which gender they choose to identify with after puberty—for their own well-being, emotionally and physically.
The parent would want the child to make a decision based on what would be the best for them rather than just what the child would want to do. This encourages him to make an independent decision base...
Undoubtedly, humans are unique and intricate creatures and their development is a complex process. It is this process that leads people to question, is a child’s development influenced by genetics or their environment? This long debate has been at the forefront of psychology for countless decades now and is better known as “Nature versus Nurture”. The continuous controversy over whether or not children develop their psychological attributes based on genetics (nature) or the way in which they have been raised (nurture) has occupied the minds of psychologists for years. Through thorough reading of experiments, studies, and discussions however, it is easy to be convinced that nurture does play a far more important in the development of a human than nature.
Successful parenting may be judged by many different standards. Raising a child to be a respectful, mature, and independent adult requires a great deal of effort. There are several parenting styles, and not all lead a child to reaching their full potential. Overpowering sternness leads may lead to a rebellious child, while passive parenting may lead children to inept for the challenges of adulthood. Parenting requires more than teaching children submissiveness, or building of self-importance. Children learn best from a role model who is admirable. Parenting is a great opportunity to set the course of one’s entire life in the right direction.
One in every 2,000 babies born every year are neither male nor female, they are what is known as hermaphrodites. These children and their families are forced into a life of hardship and encounter many conflicts, which need to be addressed. Should the parents choose the assignment of the sex to a newborn child and subject them to a life of surgery and doctor visits? There are 100 to 200 pediatric surgical reassignments every year. Many of these children are subjected to doctor visits for the rest of their childhood. Worst of all, many of these children find themselves resembling or identifying with the gender opposite of that which their parents chose for them.
The Nature versus Nurture debate has been argued in psychology for a long time. As of today, we know that nature and nurture both portray important roles in the human development. The controversy comes into play when deciding whether a person’s development or behavior is due to a persons inherited genes or is influenced by their environment and life experiences. The natural side of the discussion asserts that the facial features and the way of their developed is strictly through DNA/genetics that are transmitted by ancestors. The nurture side of the debate argues that we are born with a clean slate and that all facial features are developed through experience and one’s
Nature vs. nurture has been discussed by philosophers in the past and by scientists more recently. Philosophers such as Plato argued that all knowledge was inherited from your parents and when you were told something you didn’t learn it you were just reminded of it. Aristotle however argued that all humans were born with a blank slate and built on it with influence from there environment. In the 1700’s the empiricists and the internalists took over the argument. They fought through letters explaining there point of views and denouncing the others. This leads to Pavlov coming up with the idea of behaviorism in the early 1900‘s. Behaviorism became the new wave of Psychology and influenced a lean towards the nurture side. It was not effectively argued against until 1928 when Watson published his book. This opened up the floodgates for environmental influences studies. Soon the idea of nurture was the popular excuse for behavior. Studies using animals were the most popular was in which scientists used to prove a theory, or disprove a theory. The newest studies use human twins to prove nature vs. nurture.
Lastly discipline is another very important responsibility. The best thing to do is to pick your battles, because if you are constantly saying “no” your child will tune it out. You also have to be consistent. For example, you can’t let your child eat candy before dinner one night and then tell them not to the next night, you will be sending them mixed signals.
Without Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, nature verses nurture never would have been generated. Charles Darwin’s theory influenced many scientists to study children and their development. This lengthy study led to many important encounters of human nature. With this study, the terms nature and nurture were created.