Nature Vs Nurture In Frankenstein Research Paper

1289 Words3 Pages

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a novel about the struggle of acceptance, yet the debate between nature and nurture as well as whom the real monster actually is shines through. Shelley brings the serious juxtapositions of acceptance and rejection, companionship and isolation, and their consequences to readers’ attention through the encounters between man and monster. Victor Frankenstein’s creation is left in isolation and forced to live through everyone’s hatred towards him. Because the monster is a dismembered, strange looking creature made from body parts, many people who meet him are frightened and therefore do not want to form a relationship with him. This can be very damaging to someone, monster or not. The monster’s character is directly …show more content…

Frankenstein grew up in a loving family; even saying, “no youth could have passed more happily than mine” (Shelley 21), while the monster was left alone during his period of infancy. When the monster thinks back on his first moments of life, he recounts that “no father had watched my infant days” The monster is not created evil, but it is through his interactions that he is nurtured into his disturbing behaviors. In the way Shelley portrays the monster, she evidently believes the only way he could have ended up murderous is due to “his hideous physique [which] has made him a social outcast” (Bentley 325). From the beginning, the monster was set up in such a way that it would be almost inevitable that he ends up troubled. One of the earlier encounters with his monster ends with Frankenstein running away from him in fear of his ugliness. At one point, he even questions his existence by asking “who was I? What was I? Whence did I come? What was my destination?” (Shelley 104). The monster was brought up in such a way that he had no choice but to wonder why his creator made him and treated him this way. Psychologically, being abandoned by the person who was supposed to be his protector. Society is to blame for causing the monster to become inherently evil. Their inexcusable behavior ruined the monster and caused him to wallow in self-pity for the majority of his

Show More
Related

  • How Does Mary Shelley Create Sympathy For The Monster In Frankenstein

    612 Words  | 2 Pages

    In most novel and movies monsters are known to be evil, committing numerous crimes against humanity and are normally the ones that we don’t sympathize with. However, this novel carefully shows the reader that monsters can be good creatures, with a decent heart and act based on the actions of others. The novel shows how the monster should be pitied, rather than criticised. Mary Shelley's “Frankenstein” manages to create sympathy for the creature through speech, actions and mistreatment the creature suffers.

    Read More

  • Nurture vs. Nature in the Novel "Frankenstein"

    415 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Frankenstein, various themes are introduced. There are dangerous knowledge, sublime nature, nature versus nurture, monstrosity, and secrecy and guilt. I chose a main theme as nature versus nurture. Nature is some traits that a person is born with, and nurture is an environment that surrounds a person. The novel indirectly debates whether the development of individual is affected more by nature or by nurture through Victor and the Monster.

    Read More

  • Nature vs. Nurture: A Study Through Frankenstein

    1100 Words  | 3 Pages

    American psychologist and well renowned author Jerome Kagan states “Genes and family may determine the foundation of the house, but time and place determine its form.” The topic of nature vs. nurture is highly known to the English literature community and is classified as a major aspect of gothic works. In the novel Frankenstein the author Mary Shelley uses the monster’s constant rejection from society to demonstrate that an individual’s traits are affected more by their environment and their surroundings than by nature.

    Read More

  • Frankenstein vs Today’s Serial Killers

    1088 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein the protagonist Victor Frankenstein creates a monster. The monster in the novel is deprived of a normal life due to his appearance. Like the creature, some serial killers today are killers due to the same rejection. In the novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley warns that a childhood of abuse and neglect will often result in evil actions.

    Read More

  • Essay Comparing King Lear And Frankenstein

    1827 Words  | 4 Pages

    As Frankenstein is enroute to his pursuit of gaining more knowledge, he states, “I wished, as it were, to procrastinate all that related to my feelings of affection until the great object, which swallowed up every habit of my nature, should be completed” (Shelley 41). Frankenstein’s decision in allowing his intellectual ambitions to overpower everything else in his life leads him to be blinded to the dangers of creating life. He isolates himself from his society when creating the monster, letting himself be immersed in his creation while being driven by his passions, allowing nobody to be near him. The fact that he allows this creation of a monster to consume his total being reveals how blinded he is to the immorality of stepping outside the boundaries of science and defying nature. His goal in striving to achieve what wants to in placing man over nature makes him lose his sense of self as all he is focused on is the final product of his creation. He starts to realize his own faults as after he has created the monster, he becomes very ill and states, “The form of the monster on whom I had bestowed existence was forever before my eyes, and I raved incessantly concerning him” (48). His impulsive decision to make the monster leads him to abhorring it as it does not turn out to be what he has expected. Because he chooses to isolate himself in creating the

    Read More

  • Victor Frankenstein as the True Monster in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    1500 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout Mary Shelley’s classic novel Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein pursues, with a passion lacking in other aspects of his life, his individual quest for knowledge and glory. He accepts the friendships and affections given him without reciprocating. The "creature," on the other hand, seems willing to return affections, bringing wood and clearing snow for the DeLaceys and desiring the love of others, but is unable to form human attachments. Neither the creature nor Victor fully understands the complex relationships between people and the expectations and responsibilities that accompany any relationship. The two "monsters" in this book, Victor Frankenstein and his creation, are the only characters without strong family ties; the creature because Frankenstein runs from him, and Victor because he runs from his family.

    Read More

  • Tragic Hero in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein

    1080 Words  | 3 Pages

    Tragedy shows no discrimination and often strikes down on those undeserving of such turmoil. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, a creature more repulsive than one can imagine is brought to life by a young scientist. Although this creature is horrifying in sight, he is gentle by nature. Unfortunately, the softer side of the creature is repeatedly overlooked and the so called “monster” is driven to a breaking point. Even though the Creature committed many crimes, Mary Shelley’s Creature was the tragic hero of this story because of his efforts rescue the life of a young girl and helping destitute cottagers.

    Read More

  • Frankenstein Nature Vs Nurture Essay

    754 Words  | 2 Pages

    Are nature and nurture required when creating a person? In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the nature vs. nurture discussion is put to the test by the actions of the main character Dr. Frankenstein's creation: a monster. In the novel Dr. Frankenstein is enthralled with the scientific creation of life and creates what he thinks will be a human but actually turns out to have the makings of a monster. Dr. Frankenstein is terrified by his creation and abandons it by running away and leaving it locked up. The monster breaks out of Dr. Frankenstein's confines and goes into the world to explore in his surroundings and hates his creator for not caring for him. By looking at environmental effects on a child's intellectual ability to learn, and a child's inherent sense of direction it is apparent that at birth the human mind is a blank slate.

    Read More

  • Who Is the Real Monster in Frankenstein?

    1708 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...most readers tend to sympathize with Frankenstein because of the way in which he is mentally and physically harmed by his creation. However, one must also realize that while Frankenstein is a victim in the novel, he also exhibits features that make him a monster. These monstrous qualities, however, stem from his passion for science and his desire to create life. Not only does the reader criticize and pity Frankenstein, but the reader also empathizes with Frankenstein’s creation. He was unjustly shunned by society because of his physical appearance. On the other hand, the reader realizes that like Frankenstein, the creation can not be sympathized with entirely. He too exhibits traits that make him appear villainous. It is the duality of these two characters that make Frankenstein and his creation two of the most appealing characters of the nineteenth century.

    Read More

  • “If I cannot inspire love, I will cause fear!”(Frankenstein 17)

    1104 Words  | 3 Pages

    One test for the greatness of a work, whether it be literature, art, or something else , is provocative nature, that asks people to delve deep into the nature to understand. The Odyssey, Iliad, Beowulf, all of those works have stood the test of time, and reached the modern era still still inspiring countless readers with their greatness. Frankenstein is another such work that has stood the tests of time. Since its creation in 1816, there have been numerous recreations of the same story, all focusing upon different aspects of this enduring work. Love and acceptance is a theme that plays inside every interaction of the novel, and permeates through the entire work. The question of whether or not the monster can love is one that is frequently asked. While some would say that the monster can not love, because he is cursed and abandoned by God, those people are wrong. Every being posses the ability to love, and the monster is no exception to this, despite his physical appearance. Frankenstein is set in the perspective of Victor Frankenstein, who despises the monster, so the narrative is skewed to paint the monster in the worst possible light. In examining the novel, the monster can in fact love, and firmly desires to do so, but because of reasons at first beyond his control, then because of his choices, he is never given the opportunity to show his love. The monster, above all things wants to love and be loved, but the world rejects him, thus turning him into the monster that stalks the world.

    Read More

  • The “Other” Creation: Post-Colonialism in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein

    1252 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s Frankenstein (sometimes also known as The Modern Prometheus) is the classic gothic novel of her time. In this eerie tale, Dr. Victor Frankenstein – suffering from quite an extreme superiority complex – brings to life a creature made from body parts of deceased individuals from nearby cemeteries. Rather than to embrace the Creature as his own, Frankenstein alienates him because of his unpleasant appearance. Throughout the novel, the Creature is ostracized not only by Frankenstein but by society as a whole. Initially a kind and gentle being, the Creature becomes violent and eventually seeks revenge for his creator’s betrayal. Rather than to merely focus on the exclusion of the Creature from society, Shelley depicts the progression of Dr. Frankenstein’s seclusion from other humans as well, until he and the Creature ultimately become equals – alone in the world with no one to love, and no one to love them back. Frankenstein serves as more than simply a legendary tale of horror, but also as a representation of how isolation and prejudice can result in the demise of the individual.

    Read More

  • Sympathy for the Monster in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley

    411 Words  | 1 Pages

    In this essay I am going to answer ‘how and why does Mary Shelley make the reader sympathise with the character of the monster in her novel Frankenstein’.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Nature Vs Nurture In Frankenstein

    1010 Words  | 3 Pages

    When it comes to the development of someones behaviors and mannerisms the argument of nature versus nurture often emerges. In Mary Shelley’s horror novel Frankenstein, published in 1818, the antagonist, Frankenstein’s Monster, is the epitome for the nature versus nurture argument. The story takes place in Europe where Victor Frankenstein, a mastermind of science, takes his studies to the next level by giving life to a creature that resembles a deformed man; he then abandons his creation. Frankenstein's monster becomes a murderous fiend, but the question remains, was he born this way or did his environment shape his abhorred ways? Though we cannot discount the influence of nature or hereditary in the monster’s case, people become who they are

    Read More

  • Frankenstein Nature Vs Nurture Essay

    943 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nature vs nurture has been one of the oldest arguments in history, in Frankenstein, Mary Shelley attempts to take sides on the argument by analyzing the development of a new creature in an already critical society. Shelley shows the character’s development from a kind hearted being to a vindictive monster due to the cultural perception of beauty. As the monster builds his identity, he finds himself in a hostile environment, society’s rejection of his physical appearance turns his benevolent heart into a resentful one.

    Read More

  • Frankenstein Reflection

    1095 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mary Shelley Wollstonecraft, in the summer of 1816, tells the world a story she claims owes its life to her husband, their two friends and her own inner author, which is accredited to her literary parents. She tells a heartbreaking story of a misbegotten creature with no sense of belonging and no companions. She tells of an unloving creator, one who wishes he had not been so foolish in his creation, and who hates that which he has created. Mostly, however her riveting tale seeks to point to the horror created by society, that of people unloved and uncared for, meting out miserable existences until either the upper class citizens take pity, if they are “pleased” by them, or else, until their lives are over. The monster in Frankenstein is

    Read More

More about Nature Vs Nurture In Frankenstein Research Paper

Open Document