Natural Justice: Not Good For Society

Natural justice makes it too hard to convict the guilty and this is not good for society. Is a statement put forth that suggest that Natural Justice is “not good for society” but in my opinion Natural Justice is a fair and even way to give all in a society a chance to state their position in a case. Justice is considered to be the legal principles of upholding generally accepted rights and enforcing them responsibly, ensuring that equal outcomes are achieved for those involved. Natural Justice Provided a small part of the aspects of equality and Fairness in the justice system.

The words ‘natural justice’ are derived from the Roman word ‘Jus Naturale’, which means principles of natural law, justice, equity, and good conscience which are all considered adequate qualities in the modern day. These principles did not originate from any divine power, but are the outcome of the necessity of judicial thinking, as well as the necessity to evolve the norms of fair play. In English law, natural justice is technical terminology for the rule against bias and the right to a fair hearing. Natural Justice allows the accused to present their case and prove their innocents with out discrimination towards the accused.

Due to the fact that without natural justice people wouldn’t be able to defend them selves after being accused of such accusations. For example: With out Natural Justice, If “Jonny” (Theoretical person for matters to prove such argument) were to be accused of Hat Thievery, “Jonny” wouldn’t be able to defend him self nor would he be able to have a case free of bias or present evidence of his