Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cultural and linguistic diversity in classrooms
Multicultural and bilingual education
Linguistic and Cultural Diversity in Language Education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cultural and linguistic diversity in classrooms
“Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” writes Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence. While such a remark applies to many situations, and thus has been the basis upon which this country was built, it remains true for the theory of a national school curriculum. Those proposing a standardized canon of books for American high school students surely do not believe in this liberty our Founding Fathers wrote about. Having all students read the same English books, no matter class, community, or background is not allowing for the pursuit of happiness that occurs when allowed to choose your own literature. There should not be a set national canon of books that all American students read and teachers and schools should have the ability …show more content…
Every school is different and serves a particular purpose for its students, and the books read in English classes should reflect that purpose. At my own all-girls high school, we have read highly feminine books, such as Alcott’s Little Women and Bronte’s Jane Eyre, two novels that I have yet to hear being read by any of my peers at a traditional, mixed-gender school. While we do read many other diverse selections from literature, these two books are well-loved by most of my school and relatable on many levels. This tailoring of books to their population is extremely beneficial for the students and will help them to enjoy and discover more in their reading assignments. Likewise, a national book canon will not allow for the distinction of curriculum based on course difficulty. Students in an Advanced Placement literature class may need to read different titles than a regular course or a course designed for students with learning difficulties. These ideals are instrumental in the design of curriculum and such course variances are not met by a national canon. My dad is a teacher at a school where an overwhelming majority of the students are immigrants and English as a Second (even third) Language learners. His students should be reading the multicultural literature that Kira Isak Pirofski speaks about, helping them to integrate themselves into our culture with stories of people doing likewise (Source E). They should not be reading Beowulf in its original Old English, an act that would most likely deter their education, rather than promote it. It is for all these reasons, school structure differences, course distinctions, demographic variances, and many more that schools should read book selections that are tailored to their differences and mission. A national curriculum would hinder this
“Who gets to decide what I get to read in schools?” This question was brought up by Dr. Paul Olsen in a recent lecture. This question inspires many other questions revolving around the controversy of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. It makes one wonder if books like The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn should be included in high school curriculum even with all the controversy about them or are they better left alone. Should The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn be taken off of school reading lists because of a single word when it has so much more to offer students? The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn should be included in high school English curriculums because it is relevant to current issues, it starts important conversations about race
Fisher, Jerilyn, and Ellen S. Silber. Women in Literature: Reading Through the Lens of Gender. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press, 2003. Print.
Fegar, Mary-Virginia. “I Want to Read: How Culturally Relevant Texts Increase Student Engagement in Reading.” Multicultural Education, 13:3 (Spring 2006): 18-19. [E Journal]
conceptualizations of gender in literature are situated in a culture and historical context ; the
Overall, we see the textbook companies being pulled in multiple directions fearing influence from powerful lobby groups to create bland textbooks, which have limited multiple viewpoints, and controversy. Loewen, talks about only the good traits of historical figures like Woodrow Wilson, instead of showing both sides. Tyack presents a similar viewpoint, that textbooks are all about American Acceptualism and that we as society did no wrong. Lastly, in the Lindaman piece, each nation does the same thing in order to show their nation is good light or limit the dirty laundry of their past.
To accurately determine what an educational institution should do with a book that contains some degree of cultural or moral shock is to analyze what the purpose of these institutions actually is. “Some parents brought the town’s segregated past and their dissatisfaction with the present into the discussion about the book” (Powell, 1). It is true that people from areas where slavery once ran rampant will be emotionally distressed with books like The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. This may be understandable, but ultimately, schools are not purposed to dampen the discomfort of specific students and their families. Education Assistant Professor Jocelyn Chadwick states, “‘you have to remind them you are there to defend the text and not solve social issues’” (Powell, 1). Alleviating the cold reality from members of the community is neither a responsibility of educators nor a pedagogical concern. For the teachers and professors, the education of students, through whatever methods and textbooks, should far outweigh any of the culturally or morally shaky backlash that could follow. However, some disagree with this. “The CHMCA officially objected to The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn on the grounds that ‘the prejudicial effect of the racial characterizations outweigh any literary value that the book might have’...
Reading literature, at first, might seem like simple stories. However, in works like William Faulkner's “A Rose for Emily,” Katherine Mansfield's “Miss Brill,” and Kate Chopin's “The Storm,” the female protagonists are examples of how society has oppressive expectations of women simply because of their gender.
Flynn, Elizabeth. Gender and Reading: Essays on Readers, Texts, and Contexts. Johns Hopkins, 1986. 280-281.
Throughout my education I’ve come to realize that best practice indicates the need to incorporate stories, plays, poetry, dictionaries, newspapers, textbooks, informational books, and the rest to allow each learner the opportunity to engage in the exploration of in range of texts. I also must provide time for the student to respond to, reflect upon, and discuss what they are reading and writing. One of my strongly held beliefs is that the best learning experiences occur when the student takes ownership of the learning. I truly believe that students need to be included in setting individual goals, making decisions about independent reading choices, and selection of activities to demonstrate learning.
Wadsworth, S. (2009) ‘Louisa May Alcott and the Rise of the Gender-Specific Series Books’ in Montgomery H and Watson N (eds), Children’s Literature Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan in association with Open University, pp.39-48
Censorship in School Libraries The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional.
Moreover, a society is not portrayed as a fair society unless ideas and opinions are flourished individually and equally through the society. According to the 1st Amendment of the United States, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” which means that “prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,” is unfair to us and violates the freedom of “the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” (Source F). If students don’t have the right to be free and explore through different types of books then that is dehumanization against our society. According to student surveys, a substantial amount of teens were gathered to read books that were considerably banned in school and this was their response after the survey; “I really liked how it was written. Also I really liked...
The struggles female characters endure can be related back to everyday life in society Females in literature can serve as inspirations for readers when they are properly developed and represented fairly. In contrast, a misogynistic view of woman in literature can further perpetuate ideas of inequality. Strong female role models are important and books that marginalize female characters contribute to internalized misogyny.
Schools must decide how to teach the standardized curriculum. Schools must figure out how to mesh a standardized and non-standardized curriculum. Can students guide their own curriculum and perform well on tests?
Little Women by Louisa Alcott would definitely appeal to women of all types and ages. Little Women appeals to a broad audience, its full of the values and beliefs, and it paints a very real picture of most American’s lives at the time.