Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Loyalty in leadership and management
Military conflict in the revolutionary war
Military tactics in revolutionary war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A good leader is someone who can think with a clear head while under pressure. He is someone who can unite people to a common cause. He should be able to be as good with logistics as he is in battle. He should be able to accept that there are others above him, and when assigned a task to do it faithfully. Finally, he should stay loyal to his cause even during hard or difficult times. Nathanael Greene was one of George Washington’s most trusted generals and close friend. He remained loyal to Washington throughout the entire war. When things started going bad for the colonists, Greene didn’t desert the cause. Instead he fought harder and continued to inspire his soldiers to stay strong. He accepted his position of power humbly, and when it was taken away from him he handled it gracefully (Golway). Nathanael Greene was a strong leader and a loyal friend during the American Revolution. According to Terry Golway, Nathanael Greene was born into a Quaker family. His religion stated that it was wrong to become involved in any sort of warfare. Despite this, Greene was interested in Military strategy from a young age. He taught himself using all the books available to him. When revolution broke out in the colonies, Nathanael Greene was one of the first people to be part of a militia in his town. This showed his loyalty to his country by choosing …show more content…
to fight and be looked down upon by his religion rather than stand by and watch. Greene quickly climbed the ranks in the army to the position of Major General. He was enthusiastic about being on the battlefield. He gained Washington’s trust and became one of his most loyal generals. This is why his demotion to Quarter-master General came as a shock to him. A Quarter-master General’s job is to be in charge of all the supplies for the army. This was a job that Greene hated. However, because of his loyalty Washington and his country, he accepted it gracefully and performed it faithfully and well (Golway). Greene’s career as Quarter-master General didn’t last very long, to his relief, because in 1780 Washington chose Nathanael Greene as the new general of the Southern army. Nathanael Greene “believed in Washington’s strategy of maintaining a regular army to persuade militia to fight.” (Fleming) Washington further shows his trust in Greene’s loyalty in this article by David Hayball. “Once when Washington placed Greene in charge while he went to attend a conference he said: ‘In my absence the command of the army devolves upon you. I have such entire confidence in your prudence and abilities that I leave conduct of it to your discretion with only one observation: that with our present prospects it is not our business to seek action nor to accept one except on advantageous terms.’” Washington’s secretary also stated: “ Greene is beyond a doubt a first rate military genius… and one in whose opinion the general places his utmost confidence.” (Golway) Governor Rutledge of South Carolina once congratulated Greene on his “services under most terrifying difficulties” saying “We now have full and absolute possession of every part of the state: and the legislative, judicial, and executive powers are in exercise of their respective authorities.” (Heathcote) Nathanael Greene’s loyalty was not the only thing that made him stand out from other generals.
One of his best traits was his exceptional leadership. In a research paper by Colonel Brian D. Kerl, he says that a huge part of being a good leader is “the ability to plan and conduct a campaign”. When planning his southern campaign, Greene knew that the geography of the South would play a huge factor in the upcoming battles. He took into account the many rivers, tributaries, swamps and mountains. He even studied the river currents, knowing that the colonial army would need every advantage they could possibly
get. Kerl says that there are four important lessons to be learned from Nathanael Greene’s experiences. The first lesson is that logistics are just as important as tactics. Though Greene may have viewed his time as Quarter-master General master general as a burden, it actually gave him some major tactical advantages over the British. He knew that if he could deplete the British armies resources, they would be much weaker and easier to defeat. The second lesson learned is that you must know your enemy. Greene had fought against Cornwallis while under the command of Washington. Because of this he was familiar with the tactics he used and was able to use them against him. The third lesson that Greene shows us is that militia forces are the best way to regain control of your own home front. These forces could fight the war at home by protecting their communities and homes. They could also help raise support for the war effort from their neighbors. The final lesson is that one must be able to balance ends, ways, and means. Greene was able to use his resources wisely. He attacked in weak spots and sacrificed areas that were not worth defending. When thinking about great leaders of the American Revolution most people will look no further than George Washington. When researching Nathanael Greene, however, one can find that he did much more for the war effort than most first think. He was one of George Washington’s most trusted generals, and closest friend. Some credit him with defeating the British in the southern theater of the war. He was an exceptional leader who was able to rally people to fight and sustain and encourage the small army that he he had to work with. While little known, Nathanael Greene was one of the greatest heroes of the Revolutionary War.
Born in western Massachusetts in 1760, Joseph Plumb Martin was the son of a pastor; at the age of seven, he began living with his affluent grandfather. Almost as soon as the Revolutionary War broke out in the spring of 1775, young Joseph was eager to lend his efforts to the patriotic cause. In June 1776, at the tender age of 15, Martin enlisted for a six-month stint in the Connecticut state militia. By the end of the year, Martin had served at the Battles of Brooklyn, Kip’s Bay and White Plains in New York. Though Martin declined to reenlist when his six-month stint ended in December 1776, he later changed his mind, and on April 12, 1777 he enlisted in the 8th Connecticut division of General George Washington’s Continental Army, led by Colonel John Chandler. He would serve for the duration of the war (until 1783).
Despite the conditions in America, McCullough explains the standstill cause by the Siege of Boston. At age thirty-three, Nathanael Greene was the youngest general officer in the American army. McCullough describes Greene as
town they were heading to, he must come back to the pond and hide in
Washington's selection to be the leader of the Continental Army was the wisest choice that the newly formed Continental Congress could have made. Washington's selection as Commander of the Continental Army did more to win the Revolutionary war than any other decision made during the conflict. His personal character epitomizes perfectly the five traits required in a successful general: wisdom, sincerity, humanity, courage, and strictness. (Sun Tzu p. 65) These five crucial traits will become apparent and Washington's strategy to win the War of Independence is elaborated on further
When the revolutionary war began Few sided with the Whig cause, which was the side of the war fighting for America’s freedom from British rule. Even though Few had little schooling as a child he proved leadership and won a lieutenant-colonelcy, a very high rank in the minutemen army. Few also began to take interest in politics and were elected Georgia provincial congress of 1776. He also was and the state executive, surveyor general, Indian commissioner, as well as served in the Continental Congress general. Few was also reelected to the Georgia assembly.
Nathanael Greene, although not afforded many victories in battles, was a masterful strategist, soldier and statesman. He was able to successfully employ militia, regular, light and mounted units during his command in the South. He built upon the reputation that he made for himself at the beginning of the war in Boston. It is because of this reputation and his ability to produce results that made him the second most important general in the continental army, next only to George Washington.
Robert E Lee is very quick and smart. He knows how to improve the quality of troops and to nullify the Union’s advantage. Lee is willing to make bold and risky moves, and does not let his defeats hinder his performance. General Lee has great relations with his soldiers, and uses his engineering experience to his advantage.
Grant's following campaigns revealed his determination to apply merciless pressure against the Confederacy by coordinating the Union armies and exploiting the economic strength of the North. While Grant accompanied the Army of the Potomac in its ov...
One may wonder exactly what it is that qualities a strong leader possesses. A strong leader is determined, and strong willed. They must be of good judgment, and without bias. They cannot easily be persuaded, and they are firm, yet at the same time, a good lead must also empathize with his subordinates, and have the best interest at heart for said subordinates, at all times. However, with that being said, a good leader cannot be afraid to discipline his subordinates when necessary. Unmistakably, being a leader is a very difficult feat – one which not everyone can accomplish. A leader must be an authority, a friend and a counsellor, all at once. They must be responsible, and always take into account the disadvantages of a situation. Not everyone is suitable to be a leader, whereas, just about anybody can be a good role model.
...rned the essential plans that a leader would need to lead him troops. He also had the morale and spirits to keep the troops ready to fight for the freedom they wanted, as well as his ability to command such troops in placement and tactics.
Without knowing, one could assume Greene’s “Wide-Awakeness and the Moral Life” and “The Art of Being Present” were written modern times. In fact, I thought they were recent articles. In a world that is constantly changing, there are few things that stay the same. And although sameness is the exact thing that these articles argue against, as educators we can use that sense of stalemate to continue to push ourselves and our students.
Leadership is defined as the ability to accomplish a set goal(s) due to the act of inspiring and motivating a group of your peers. Former United States president Dwight D. Eisenhower made famous a quote that stated, “Leadership consists of nothing but taking responsibility for everything that goes wrong and giving your subordinates credit for everything that goes well.” (Notable-quotes.com). One of the most important aspects of the work area is leadership. Without leadership, there will be no guidance to for teamwork and the percentage of successful goal will be slim to none. Becoming a great leader is no easy feat however. An exceptional leader must lock in on specific attributes such as intellect, moral character, and human understanding. It doesn’t seem like much, but for a majority of people it can be almost impossible. These qualities alone listed above are some of many important qualities that will allow a leader to inspire and guide a group of people towards goals successfully.
A leader is someone who makes an effort to help others to become more than they ever thought possible. Great leadership is unlocking that potential of a group, company, or organization. Not necessarily telling them what to do, but really inspire your subordinates to see what they are capable of, and then helping them get there because at one point or another someone inspired us too.
A great leader is someone who possesses confidence, determination, and quick thinking skills. An exceptional leader was a man named Henry V. Henry V took his place in rule at the age of 26 as the king of England. He is very well known due to a famous play which was written by William Shakespeare. During his rule, Henry V was primarily fixated on conquering the French lands for England. The king had excellent determination to push through battles even when faced with an illness. He had great fighting tactics which allowed him to prosper in battles and sieges. With such skillful tactics and strategies, King Henry established strict discipline among his troops. With these traits as well as skills Henry V was a successful leader.
There are a lot of traits that a person must posses to become a successful leader. The examples I am about to present to you are just a hand full of the important traits. The first trait a group should look for in a revolutionary leader would have to be a strong military background, if you are going to war u must have a general of some capacity leading your forces into battle. The second most important trait that a strong leader must have is a good education, back then a good education was knowledge of literature and the ability to read. The ability to read would have given your leader a great advantage, your leader could have read a history book and he would have known what mistakes to avoid. The third most important trait is your leaders ability to command a large amount of people. If you have a leader who cannot control his own army than a defeat is inevitable. Also your leader must want to improve the well being and living conditions for all of his followers. And lastly he must be influential, he must posses the ability to sway the minds of skeptics who do not believe in him or the cause. Being influential has another benefit to it also, an influential person will leave behind people that will carry out your leaders plans in the untimely event of your leader being killed or exiled.