NCAA Football Playoff System
Thesis: The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) formula has been used to determine the top twenty-five teams in NCAA Division I college since 1998. Many think this system is inadequate and should be changed. The alternative is a playoff system that would give more of the top teams a chance to be named the NCAA football National Champion.
I. BCS formula
A. Computers
1. Where they’re from
2. How they work
B. Polls
1. Where they’re from
2. How they work
C. Schedule strength
D. Team losses
E. Putting the formula together
II. Why the BCS formula should be changed
A. BCS is inadequate
1. How it’s unfair
2. Problems within
B. Give top teams a chance
C. Fans, players, and coaches views
III. Playoff format
A. Determining teams playoff seed
1. BCS formula
2. Conference leaders
B. How playoff would work
1. 8 team playoff
2. 16 team playoff
C. Why a playoff would be better
The end of the NCAA Division I college football seasons is near and there are still five undefeated teams in the nation, how can five teams play for top honors in the sport? The answer is easy, a football playoff system to crown the champion. The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) formula has been used to determine the top twenty-five teams in NCAA Division I college since 1998. Many think this system is inadequate and should be changed. The alternative is a playoff system that would give more of the top teams a chance to be named the NCAA football national champion. A playoff system would give the NCAA Division I football postseason a little more than twenty meaningless bowl games and a national championship game to wrap up the season, but to get to that I should first explain how the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) formula works to determine the top twenty-five teams in the nation.
First there are eight computers that are used in the BCS computer system today to determine this part of the ranking system. Out of the eight computers only the seven highest rankings are used for one team, then the seven rankings (worst ranking dropped) are averaged out respectively. All of these computer rankings are determined through eight newspapers and sports specialists. These computer rankings are how these eight sources rank the top twenty-fi...
... middle of paper ...
...eight-team or sixteen–team playoff would incorporate properly into the college football season. A playoff would give top teams that are not ranked number one or number two an opportunity at winning the desirable title of NCAA Division I national football champions. With the BCS system in operation until 2006 the college football playoff system will have to wait a few years until it can be initiated into the world of the NCAA.
“Works Cited”
Brewer, Breck. “It’s Time to Bring on the Brackets.” n. pag. 4 Apr 2003. .
Edwards, Brad. “figuring Out the BCS isn’t as hard as it looks.” 15 Aug 2002. n. pag. 8 April 2003. .
Giles, Alex. “The Proposed Marriage of the BCS and a Playoff Format.” 19 Nov. 2002. 4 sections. 8 Apr. 2003. .
Kerkhoff, Blair. “Special Report: College Officials Say Yes to Playoffs.” Kansas City Star. n. pag. 8 Apr. 2003. .
Rosenblatt, Richard. “Playoff Looming, But BCS Viable Despite its Flaws. Chicago Tribune. 10 Jan. 1999:5.
Sherman, Ed. “NCAA Football Playoff Arrives At ‘Study’ Stage.” Chicago Tribune. 22 Jan. 1994:1.
Vilona, Bill. “College Football Playoffs Not in the Picture.” Pensacola News Journal. 23 Jul. 2000. n. pag. 4 Apr. 2003. .
With the annual debate revived by fans and sportswriters, the involvement of the federal government, and the financial benefit that bowl games offer schools, the issue of wheatear to replace the Bowl Championship Series with a playoff system continues to be one of the most discussed aspects of college football. Most people agree the Bowl Championship Series should be replaced by a playoffs, however there are a few who believe otherwise. The Bowl Championship Series works, and college football has never been more successful, thrilling, popular, or more enjoyable than ever. The Bowl Championship Series is fairer, safer and more effective than a playoffs.
In 1986, it was hinted that people were giving money to Southern Methodist University to bolster the football program. After this was confirmed, the NCAA began taking action and started its own investigation into the program. Upon completing their investigation, they found that all prior allegations were true and began sanctioning the program. On February 25, 1987, the SMU football program, already the most penalized program in history, received the harshest sanctions ever hande...
The NCAA is a global, and well-known company that regulates collegiate sports with thousands of universities across the country. The NCAA organizational assessment shows its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats relative to all competitors. In this current market environment, I assessed and prioritize what strengths and weaknesses were most important and which strengths have to continue to grow and what weaknesses needed to be mitigated. It is tough for the NCAA to have great competition due to the fact that it is far beyond any competitions and doesn’t seem to show any sign of slowing down soon. Issues, whether political or ethical, or whatever the case may be, as long as the NCAA continues to analyze its “SWOT” then they will always be the leader in the current market
CRAFT KEVIN, “The Enduring Lesson of Michigan's Fab Five: Winning Really Isn't Everything.” APR 10, 2013.
The Web. The Web. 8 Mar. 2014. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. http://www.askmen.com/entertainment/special_feature_250/270_5-things-you-didnt-know-march-madness.html>. NBC News.
Spillane, Matt. "COLLEGE RECRUITING MAKES HEADLINES FOR CHEATING AND DISHONESTY." Www.academic.marist.edu/mwwatch/spring08/articles/sports/sports12.html. 10 Nov. 2011. Web. 14 Nov. 2011. .
Gregory, Sean. "The Real March Madness?." Time 181.11 (2013): 60. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Apr. 2014.
Jealous, Benjamin Todd. "Lessons from an HBCU’s Demise." The Conversation. N.p., 9 Sept. 2013. Web. 14 Nov. 2013.
Suggs, Welch. "NCAA Faces Wave Of Criticism Over Crackdown On Payments To Players While In High School." 17 Mar. 2000
Do you think picking your 4 favorite types candy is hard? Wouldn’t it be easier if you where able to chose your favorite 8 types of candy? Well right now it is like that with college football playoff system. During the BCS era they had one game between the 2nd and 3rd ranked teams and the winner would play the number 1 ranked team for the national championship. All the brad new FBS does is add one more game therefore only adding one more team, so instead of just adding one more team to the mix, this is still unfair. What they should add 5 teams to the 3 team mix to make the system fair. The recently removed BCS only allowed the top 3 teams to compete for a national championship but the new FBS is allowing 4 however, this is still a problem. These really affect small schools because “Undefeated mid-major schools and one-loss teams from major conferences still likely to miss the playoffs” (Douglas). The national championship is the championship of all college sports in every sport, and every year every college team in and a few out of the nation tries to compete for the national title. However some undefeated schools due to “easy schedules” do not get the same chance as one or two loss big schools that have slightly tougher schedules. In the NCAA basketball tournament “March Madness” over 60 teams get to play and compete for the national championship and they play multiple games every day so there should be no reason for football to not be able to have at least 8 teams instead of just 4. The NCAA college football playoffs should allow 8 teams to compete for the national championship instead of 4 because: It gives more teams a chance to compete, it makes more money for the schools, and it gets players more NFL attention and will get...
Now, with all of the conditions known, we can start to apply properties of the CTMC to rank college football teams. Before starting anything, the state space has to be identified. The state space is simply just a list for all the possible states in the system. This list consists of all teams in college football that played against at least 2 FBS (Football Bowl Subdivision) opponents. I chose such a specific guideline so that teams that only played one game were left out as to avoid skewed or peculiar results. We now need to define the transition rates between the states. The transition rates here will simply be the number of points scored by one team against another as the rate of going from one state to the other. These points scored by
Scores and Daily Analysis from Sports Illustrated. Warner. Web. 10 Sept. 2011. Miller, Amanda. "
How many of you enjoy college football, specifically the college football playoffs? Well if you do, you are not alone, last year, in the college football playoff debut, the semifinal games averaged 28 million viewers per game, and the final had 33.4 million viewers. Not only that, the playoff final also earned the highest ESPN ratings, for a sporting event ever. So it's safe to say that the college football playoff with four teams was successful and knocked socks off many US citizens. For starters, the Number 1 overall seed, Alabama was considered unbeatable and played a distraught yet encouraging Ohio State buckeye squad, and to all sports fans surprise the buckeyes defeated the crimson tide, showing that a number 4 overall team is just as good as a number 1 overall team.
Back on the second Monday in January of this year, a college football national champion was crowned in Atlanta, Georgia. However, there is a vocal crowd of football fanatics that proudly wear the black and gold of the University of Central Florida who think otherwise. The Knights marched their way through the season without a blemish on their record. UCF fans roared with enthusiasm as their team held off Auburn University in 2018 Peach Bowl on New Years’ Day. While the BCS trophy was hoisted by another team from the state of Alabama, Central Florida faithful quickly boasted of beating a team that defeated both of the BCS National Championship finalists.
The ball soaring towards the basket; flying all the way from half-court. Bang! The ball slams off the backboard and plunges onto the rim as 70,930 people fall into shock. Will the impossible happen? Unfortunately for the upstart Butler Bulldogs, Gordan Hayward's desperation heave at the buzzer of the 2010 NCAA National Championship game was 3 inches off the mark, allowing perennial power Duke to walk away with their fourht National Championship. However, Butler's magical run shows why the NCAA Tournament is such a great event and why it does its job as a fair way to decide the National Champion. Meanwhile, three months earlier, Boise State is stuck at home, wondering what could have been as they watch Alabama and Texas get the opportunity to play for the National Championship. Boise State was undefeated. The BCS system, which decides the two teams who get to play for the title in college football, is considered by many to be iniquitous and believe the sport should switch to a playoff format similarly to what is used in college basketball.