Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Recruiting violations in college sports
College sports ethical dilemmas essay
Ethical issues towards college athletes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Recruiting violations in college sports
College recruiting is something that was created for the good of college sports, but is often used for such unethical actions that will make anyone with a soul cringe. In 2004, University of Colorado’s athletic department used alcohol, drugs, and sex to lure recruits during official campus visits (Gerdy). These actions are immoral on a number of levels, and should not be tolerated. If this type of behavior continues to be seen in college sports, then serious changes need to be made. Illegal recruiting that takes place in NCAA athletics is unethical, gives colleges unfair advantages, and jeopardizes player’s eligibility.
First, illegal recruiting in NCAA athletics is tremendously unethical. “The extremely high stakes of recruiting can sometimes compromise the values that coaches need to teach: honesty, integrity, and loyalty” (Spillane). No matter how high the stakes, there is no reason to put all morals and values aside for the sake of a college sport. Whether it is a low level recruit or a superstar, it all has to deal with the same principle, meaning that if the coach doesn’t regard the two recruits equally he isn’t doing his job right. As expectations for the coach begin to rise and job security decreases, it tempts the coaches to go out and attain the recruits no matter what the cost (Spillane). Although a coach may be susceptible to losing his job, it is better to be fired than to give up all of their morals and integrity. If a person is to give up all of their morals for any reason, it truly shows what type of person they are. Also, as explained in Modern Sports Ethics by Angela Lumpkin, there may not be any moral obligation for a coach or recruiter to make the right choice (66). Therefore, the coach’s character becomes ...
... middle of paper ...
...ate Athletic Association." Issues: Understanding Controversy and Society. ABC-CLIO. Web. 1 Nov. 2011.
DiSalvo, Jack, and Theresa Foy. DiGeronimo. College Admissions for the High School Athlete. New York: Facts on File, 1993. Print.
Gerdy, John. "Illegal Recruiting." Issues: Understanding Controversy and Society. ABC-CLIO. Web. 1 Nov. 2011.
Lumpkin, Angela. Modern Sports Ethics. Santa Barbara (Calif.): ABC-CLIO, 2009. Print.
Spillane, Matt. "COLLEGE RECRUITING MAKES HEADLINES FOR CHEATING AND DISHONESTY." Www.academic.marist.edu/mwwatch/spring08/articles/sports/sports12.html. 10 Nov. 2011. Web. 14 Nov. 2011. .
"USC to Appeal NCAA Ruling." USC News. Web. 14 Dec. 2011. .
Leitch, Will. “AAU Coaches No Longer Pretending College Hoops Isn’t Corrupt.” New York Sports. 22 Mar., 2010. Web. 04 April, 2011.
There are thousands of high school football players across the nation, and a handful of them have what it takes to play at the college level. Those that do have the raw talent normally get reached by college football recruiters and coaches. The NCAA, the National College Athletic Association, has many rules and regulations especially surrounding the rules and conduct of recruiting student athletes. Men's football takes the most notice, as well as basketball, of all collegiate sports in the U.S. today (Smith, 2015). According to Langelett (2003), the NCAA limits each school to 85 football scholarships. With a limited number of scholarships available, schools spend a considerable amount of time and money on recruiting players.
Van Rheenen, Derek. "Exploitation in College Sports: Race, Revenue, and Educational Reward." International Review for the Sociology of Sport 48.5 (2013): 550-71. Print.
Imagine fourteen and fifteen year olds verballing to colleges, yet I am still sitting here having a hard time what I am going to wear to school student athletes should not be able to be recruited until their junior year because, One players develop at all different ages, next they are not emotionally ready to handle being pressured to decide on what college or c issues they can't comprehend at a young age. second reason is some student- athletes are not as fully developed athletically and academically as other and so they get recruited earlier and then the late bloomers miss the window of time in their class getting recruited. Finally my last reason is it's not good for the school Therefore college coaches should not recruit athletes prior
In my previous two speeches I explored the issue of paying college athletes and the ethical and moral implications it has. In this paper I will formally address the issue using historical background, and, after showing both sides of the argument, I will convince you, the reader, that paying college athletes is a moral justice through the ethical theories of Deontology.
The athletes at these institutions bring in tons of money into their school every year and deserve compensation. These Universities are exploiting these athletes by not giving them back what they make for their school. The numbers say it all when it comes to the scamming of the athletes by their own schools. In 2004, over 40 schools brought in more than $10 million, with 10 of them bringing in over $30 million. Several athletes around the nation are worth more than $1 million to their school(Brown). Both of these statistics are proof that while these athletes are essential to their schools, they are still kept out of the revenue. Even though these Universities won’t pay their players, the schools still have no problem giving their coaches some money. In 40 U.S. states the head coach of the basketball or football program is the highest paid public official(Edelman). Over the past 20 years, there has been a major increase in the popularity of college athletes. From 1989 to 2004 there was a 27% increase in ticket revenue(Brown)...
People believe that paying college athletes will ruin the tradition and innocence of the game. However, people forget that Olympians get paid, and most of them are amateur athletes. "Gold medallists from the United States receive a minimum of $15,000 for their success (from the U.S. Olympic Committee and the national governing body of the winner's sport), USA Today, Final Ed." These Olympians can also capitalize on endorsement deals and other additional bonuses, most of which are illegal in college athletics. The innocence of the game is already in jeopardy, in a June 24th, 1996 issue of The NCAA News, " Studies indicate that 75 percent of underclassmen have received cash or gifts from an agent." That’s a pretty high number, three out of every four are involved in illegal activities involving agents, and 90...
Suggs, Welch. "NCAA Faces Wave Of Criticism Over Crackdown On Payments To Players While In High School." 17 Mar. 2000
College athletes are manipulated every day. Student athletes are working day in and day out to meet academic standards and to keep their level of play competitive. These athletes need to be rewarded and credited for their achievements. Not only are these athletes not being rewarded but they are also living with no money. Because the athletes are living off of no money they are very vulnerable to taking money from boosters and others that are willing to help them out. The problem with this is that the athletes are not only getting themselves in trouble but their athletic departments as well.
Pennington, Bill. "Expectations Lose to Reality of Sports Scholarships." nytimes.com. New York Times, 10 Mar. 2008. Web. 17 Dec. 2013.
Luzer, Daniel. "College Guide: The Profit in College Sports." The Washington Monthly. N.p., 18 Sept. 2013. Web. 8 Apr. 2014.
Student athletes should not be paid more than any other student at State University, because it implies that the focus of this university is that an extracurricular activity as a means of profit. Intercollegiate athletics is becoming the central focus of colleges and universities, the strife and the substantial sum of money are the most important factors of most university administration’s interest. Student athletes should be just as their title states, students. The normal college student is struggling to make ends meet just for attending college, so why should student athletes be exempt from that? College athletes should indeed have their scholarships cover what their talents not only athletically but also academically depict. Unfortunately, the disapproval resides when students who are making leaps academically are not being offered monetary congratulations in comparison to student athletes. If the hefty amount of revenue that colleges as a conglomerate are making is the main argument for why athletes should be paid, then what is to stop the National Clearinghouse from devising unjust standards? Eventually if these payments are to continue, coaches, organizations, and the NCAA Clearinghouse will begin to feel that “c...
The NCAA has core values for preparing its young student athletes either during their time in school, the real world and protecting their interest while they are in college. The NCAA has a long list of rules and protocols pertaining to student athletes and one of those long lists is recruiting players. Abundance of athletes from high school, in hopes of taking their skills to another level, enter the collegiate level for competition as the biggest gateway into the professional circuit: the NBA or NFL. The very skilled athletes especially in sports like basketball and football gain much attention from paid recruiters from abundance of different universities and colleges in hopes they commit to going to said school. In attempt to keep recruiting fair, the NCAA has placed rules and guidelines on how to recruit players. According to the NCAA website under their recruiting bylaws, “The NCAA supports student-athlete well-being by promoting a fair recruiting environment that limits intrusions into the lives of student-athletes and their families”. Commonly, it’s the top recruits, the best of the best players from either basketball or
“The college basketball world was turned upside down on Sept. 29 when the the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York laid out findings from an F.B.I. investigation that uncovered mass corruption, bribery and wire fraud involving some of the sport's top programs.” (Rapaport). NCAA scandals have made the college basketball rules and playing style become corrupt. Scandals can be in many forms and have different types of penalties depending on the situation. In a normal scandal coaches want to recruit players and in order to do this the coach might give the players bribes or other things that will make them come play for their program. Also, sometimes the universities may make classes easier for the athletes to pass so
On average, a scholarship is worth $25,000 a year, and over the course of four years, it totals $100,000 (Marshall 1).” On paper, this sounds like a lot of money, but what people do not take into account is the athletics part that consists of injuries, which can lead to your scholarship revocation. In all honesty, the statistics show that many athletes only last 2 years at their original college, either for not making the cut, politics, or injuries. For the players, the field is a dog-eat-dog world; if you do not put in all your time into the athlete part of student-athlete, someone else will gladly take your place. Many of the critics think being an athlete is not a full time job. Yet, if you take a step into a collegiate football player’s life, you see the facts are that you wake up before classes to attend a mandatory gym session, after mandatory conditioning session, and an hour later you have class till about 4p.m., then the long anticipated practice, after that you have mandatory study hall. Where is the time to work a part time job? There is none! College athletes put 40 hours on average into athletics per week (Smith 21).” The point here is a scholarship does not equate to money in the bank. It leaves them dead broke. Now, on the road the team can give a whopping $7 for meal money to a player, anything more than that is an NCAA violation. So how much money is exploited off these gifted athletes? Well for one, the highest paid public employees in 39 different states are the coaches themselves (Gaines 2).” College coaches earn an average of $1.64 million per year, the highest paid being Nick Saban, with an annual salary of $10.9 million (Tracy, Marc, and Rohan).” What happened to the critics saying athletes need to be doing it for the love of the game? These athletes are dead broke, putting their blood, sweat, and tears into their sport, some not being able to enjoy a movie, food, and going