My Philosophy: My Personal Philosophy Of Education

1821 Words4 Pages

Introduction What is the purpose of education? A question that has been asked for centuries and defined in many ways; each theorist will argue their views on education is unsurpassed, yet it remains a question, that the future of our children depends upon. My personal philosophy of education is to create an environment that allows every child the freedom and ability to discover, create and pursue their interests; ultimately becoming the best they can, for an evolving and unpredictable future. Within this framework, the purpose being to encourage learning through children’s interests, by personalising education for the individual and interlacing subjects to engage and entice learning. While discussing my personal philosophy of education, I will explain the aim of education, consider the role of the teacher and the learner and present effective teaching methods and practices for within the classroom. This essay will demonstrate that Dewey, Friedman, Neill, Noddings, Robinson, and Zhao, support my personal philosophy and prove in contrast with the theories of Skinner and Rousseau. Aim …show more content…

Skinner’s approach to education did not account for all styles of learning as he disregarded the activities of the mind. Although his reinforcement methods may work with some students, this approach does not work for all, and this is why I believe in taking a learner-centred approach to education, as it can cater all learning styles. Each child brings unique learning preferences, and strategies need to be used to cater to their needs. Dewey believed, students learn best by doing through hands on experience, catering to the kinesthetic learners. A student-centred approach can accommodate all learning preferences; teachers must ensure it is adapted appropriately, allowing the learner opportunities to engage in the lessons and promote their curiosity in all subject

Open Document