Multitasking Synthesis

924 Words2 Pages

Multitasking kills everyday activities. The ability to distract yourself and work on two or more things at once is, overall, a difficult task. It prohibits the quality of student academics, occupational tasks, or enjoyable hobbies/interests. It is argued that multitasking can only benefit the academic or employment career of an individual; Truthfully, multitasking is nothing more than a distraction to academics/employment careers as they lose the ability to learn, lose motivation to focus, and it physically makes it impossible to focus on one thing. The younger generation lives in a world where everything and anything can be reached by a simple search on their phones. This is both a blessing and a curse, as students have the ability to never …show more content…

These audience members are there for a specific reason, yet they truly aren’t there. Even if writing an email at the exact moment is the most beneficial thing, the audience loses whatever the speaker is saying. In Source E, a woman is drawn working with six sets of hands. Besides her happy face, her only set of eyes are focused straight ahead. As her hands work in the background, it makes the viewer question how accurate her work could be. Despite working on six things at once, her main focus seems to be on the item directly in front of her. In this setting, the quality of work isn’t her focus, the quantity of items being done is what she is accomplishing. The issue with multitasking is that the focus goes off of trying to make the product the best, into working on the most things to complete it all in a similar time. This is hard as the quantity goes up, the quality and the focus one might’ve had is now dropped almost …show more content…

In Source D, Karen Bradley writes about how multitaskers are constantly shifting focus and activities. This is an important ideology as it addresses the fact that multitasking is just a myth. Researchers proved this when they did a study on measuring tasks and switching between two. They found that between switching tasks, they all seemed to lose time. This proves that multitasking doesn’t make a job easier per say, and it just complicates the mind. In Source F, the writer writes arguing how multitasking is better for academics and the employed, however the last sentence enlists a question. How can multitasking not be a distraction from the main activity, but be the main activity without it causing a loss of focus? If you focus on multitasking, you aren’t focusing on your main job. This psychology promotes a problem with your brain signals. What do they do with the following? How do they support it? Multitasking isn’t achievable as it makes people jump from one activity to the next without completing a task. To conclude, multitasking is somewhat of a mythic distraction popularized to excuse the denial of

Open Document