Introduction Human beings are characteristically faced with a myriad of activities that have to be accomplished on a daily basis. Some of these activities are well structured, based on one’s scheduled activities at work, while others are vague. One common notion is that women perform much better at multitasking activities as compared to their male counterparts. This argument appears to stem from the fact that women inherently engage in many household chores on any single day and that man cannot adequately handle such chores with the level of efficiency exuded by their female counterparts. Nevertheless, the debate on the existence and benefit of multitasking persists. Multitasking is a fallacy because no single human can efficiently multitask …show more content…
Sherry Turkle premises that it is hard to multitask, especially in a learning environment because the resultant outcome is of a lower quality as opposed to working on an individual task to completion and then starting on another task. Turkle explicitly states, “And the more you hear educational specialists talking about multitasking as though it is a big plus… [when] actually … doing a piece of hard work, really [gets people] to know the truth” (para. 95). In essence, Turkel means that many people that argue that multitasking provides a positive impact because two or more activities are addressed at the same time is gross misinformation. Primarily, working on two or more hard tasks causes one to think twice about multitasking. For one to address these tasks, one has to sit still, be quiet, and focus on the task at hand, otherwise, they will spend more time on these tasks and yield poor …show more content…
The human mind cannot handle two tasks at the same time. Actually, humans characteristically assign time to a given task prior to switching to another task. Kristanto and Abraham posit, “[the human brain possesses] a limited processing channel in the brain; therefore, the results of information from multitasking are usually capped and not optimized” (666). This means that the time allocated to each process kept being interrupted and so does the required level of concentration for addressing the problem. Consequently, the amount of time and effort used in addressing a problem in a multitasking activity is reduced significantly. Addressing a problem requires uninterrupted concentration in order to develop a way around the problem while exploring the dynamisms, the weaknesses of each possible solution, and the ultimate best option. It is apparent that the human brain processes a plethora of information within a second that cannot be equated with writing. The solutions and ideas generated when seeking a solution mostly remain the mind with only a handful of these thoughts being jotted down. The main problem with this brain activity is that most of these thoughts are kept in the short-term memory of the brain, which is like information being stored on a Random Access Memory (RAM) on the computer. The information easily erodes and the retrieval process is quite hard. Besides, the information stored is
As human beings, it is becoming more of a second nature to us to multi-task. As the world is technologically advancing more and more every day, there are becoming more distractions. Social-media is flourishing, reality TV show ratings are going up, and humans even unintentionally check their phones every two minutes. In this day of age, multi-tasking is proving to promote inefficiency rather than productivity.
In the chapter “Attention Deficit: The Brain Syndrome of Our Era,” from The New Brain, written by Richard Restak, Restak makes some very good points on his view of multitasking and modern technology. He argues that multitasking is very inefficient and that our modern technology is making our minds weaker. Multitasking and modern technology is causing people to care too much what other people think of them, to not be able to focus on one topic, and to not be able to think for themselves.
In the article,“Multitasking is actually kind of a problem for kids and adults” by Hayley Tsukayama the author went into detail about how parents and their children view their personal media habits. One of the ways that the parents and children viewed their media habits as was feeling the need to respond to texts and notifications immediately. “More than 1,200 parents and teens surveyed, 48 percent of parents and 72 percent of teens said they felt the need to respond to texts and notifications immediately, almost guaranteeing distractions throughout the day” (Tsukayama). This article can be connected to “The Epidemic of Media Multitasking While Learning” both of the articles discussed the different factors of media multitasking among individuals. The article from The Washington Post website gave great insight on multitasking and rather it is bad for students when it comes to learning. I believe that the issue being discussed is very relevant because if students are easily distracted by technology while in their learning environment it results in them not learning
Many would remark that multitasking is a skill that can be trained like all others. However, a lot of neuroscience has went into proving that multitasking is a myth altogether. The article “The Myth of Multitasking” is written by Nancy K. Napier for Psychology today is here to debunk the myth of the brain’s capability to multitask. The article states that the brain is incapable of doing two things at once. Instead, the way that we fool ourselves into thinking that we can multitask is how quickly our brain switches from one task to another. Our brains can’t perform tasks simultaneously as our focus is a narrow beam. So, to compensate for this, our brain switches between these two tasks very quickly, almost as if we are doing them at the same
David Silverman provided four main reasons why multitasking can be a reliable source for doing many tasks at once. The first reason is multitasking can help a person collect pieces of information faster. Silverman used the example of him getting contact from a customer to make a slide, but wasn't available so his employee started on the slide. After reading his email, Silverman and his employee accomplish the slide within thirty minutes. This example shows how in a certain time a person can collect information quicker from doing another task. The second reason is multitasking can help a person from any distractions or interruptions from doing the tasks
Students may easily lose their attention and concentration with easy access to such incredibly rich store of information. With such new technologies as television, internet and social networks, people nowadays tend to multitask more often as they have easy access to a large amount of information. However, such easy access may sometimes be a distraction. Study “Your Brain on Computers” reports that heavy multitaskers perform up to 20% worse on most tests compared to performance of light multitaskers. Working efficiency of people, who multitask, is claimed to be significantly lower. The same is with concentration. (Crovitz 353) As a result, they are not engaged in working process. Students tend to be easily distr...
Technology is prevalent in our personal and professional lives. Everywhere we go; there are multiple screens and multiple distractions. How is productivity when being inundated with information and devices? There seems to be some bragging rights associated with multitasking, however many would argue the opposite. The following examines how multitasking negatively influences personal and professional productivity and how we should make changes to reduce digital distractions.
Due to the nature of this study, two separate, different, experiments were done with two mutually exclusive groups of participants. These experiments were based off of two key hypotheses. The first being that these researchers wanted to replicate a previous study performed on this topic, but in a more controlled manner (Sana, et. al., 2013). The second hypothesis that these researchers desired to test was how the multitasking of a classmate would indirectly affect a student’s learning ability (Sana, et. al., 2013). In their studies the researchers used the manipulation of either using a laptop to strictly take notes or to use the laptop and complete tasks while taking notes as the independent variable. The dependent variable for this study was measuring the student’s comprehension of the lecture material presented.
In the article, “Multitasking Can Make You Lose…Um…Focus,” Alina Tugend centralizes around the negative effects of multitasking. She shows that often with multitasking, people tend to lose focus, lack work quality, have an increase in stress, and in the end she gives a solution to all these problems. Tugend conveys her points by using understandable language, a clear division of subjects, and many reliable sources, making her article cogent.
A.) Many people think multitasking is a way of life and think juggling multiple tasks at once
Performing well in at certain tasks and retaining information both require a high level of attention. Multitasking requires that this attention be divided amongst different tasks. As a result, the some of the attention used for a certain task must now be used for other tasks, which affects the factors needed to complete it. Referring to an experiment that was discussed earlier, Wieth and Burns (2014) stated that even with the reward, the promise of incentive could not override the limits of people’s attention. Retaining information requires undivided attention. The key word is ‘undivided.’ According to this experiment, it is nearly impossible to have the same high level of focus while working on multiple tasks that a person would while working on one task. Once someone has reached the end of their attention span, their performance begins to falter. In a final experiment involving media multitasking and attention, Ralph, Thomson, Cheyne, and Smilek (2014) stated that multitasking can lead to mind wandering and lapses in attention, which distracts people from their tasks. These results show that once their attention is divided, it can lead to distractions and difficulty completing different tasks. It is difficult to complete one assignment while focusing on several others at the same time. Multitasking affects the attention needed for a task, which can affect everything
sufficiently. They found that a person multitasking does not complete a task as well or any
Today we live in a society where everything is seconds away from us. With the advances and affordability of quality technology, you would be hard pressed to find someone without a smartphone, laptop, or tablet, possibly all at the same time. Because of the accessibility we find that, in our tech-savvy culture, multitasking has not just become an art form of sorts, but rather an expectation. In the article “Multitasking Can Make You Lose…Um…Focus,” Alina Tugend sets out to explore the idea that although multitasking appears to show productivity, it could be doing the opposite. Throughout her article, Tugend uses studies done by neurologists and psychologists to show how in a world that sees multitasking as an expectation it has actually made us less efficient. She proposes, through studies, that although you might be working on multiple tasks it is as if you’re playing tennis with multiple balls (Tugend, 725).
Alzahabi, Reem, and Mark W. Becker. "The Association Between Media Multitasking, Task-Switching, And Dual-Task Performance." Journal Of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance 39.5 (2013): 1485-1495. Academic Search Complete. Web. 18 Feb. 2014.
An area of everyday experience where divided attention is very relevant is the question of whether we can drive and talk on a mobile phone at the same time. The answer is a quite obvious ‘yes’ but the argument is that when doing this we put ourselves and others in danger because we’re not very good at it. We struggle to attend to both tasks simultaneously and to carry them out effectively. Our attentional capacity is being exceeded, often with catastrophic results (Strayer & Johnston, 2001).