Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Irony in Shakespeare
Emotions in Shakespeare's characters
Why does shakespeare use irony
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Irony in Shakespeare
Emotions are a vital part of what makes human’s separate from the rest of the animal world. They run how a person thinks, acts, and processes information. In Shakespeare’s play Much Ado About Nothing, the characters let their emotions get the best of them and this causes much conflict to arise in the play. The friar, being the only character to stay coolheaded helps to develop the plot of the play with the marriages as well as to aid the theme that using emotions to problem solve leads to disaster whereas using logic causes desirable results.
The Friar is a relatively minor character in Much Ado About Nothing yet he may be the most important because of his ability to solve and resolute Hero and Claudio’s marriage. He is credited with fixing Hero’s marriage to Claudio when he has been wrongfully led to believe that she has had relations with a man prior to their wedding. Shakespeare uses the Friar’s expertise and calm demeanor to differentiate him from the other characters. These characteristics allow him to be able to assess the situation and come up with a plan to fix everything. The other characters in the play do not handle the situation so well. For example, Leonato, Hero’s father, lets his anger take control of him and exclaims, “Do not live, Hero.” (Ado 4.1.122) He is so ashamed of her and angry that she ruined his reputation that he thinks it would be better for her, him, and everyone if she would just die. This extreme display of fatherly anger shows just how horrifying the situation was which makes the Friar’s ability to stay calm that more amazing. He starts his defense for Hero by saying, “Hear me a little; for I have only been silent so long.” (Ado 4.1.154-155) He lets Leonato get all of his anger out befor...
... middle of paper ...
...may have died, or Benedick as well. The Friar was determined to save Hero and Claudio’s marriage, which kept the whole play from falling apart. He did so in a way that was sure to keep Claudio from getting mad at Hero so that it would ensure that they would end up getting married.
In Shakespeare’s play Much Ado About Nothing, the supporting character of the Friar was the key component in tying up all of the loose ends. Even though he had few lines and was only prevalent in two scenes of the play, his strategies and proposals aided in the rescuing of one marriage and the formation of another. He was also responsible for clearing Hero’s name, which affects not only her whole life but her fathers as well. Shakespeare used the Friar to progress the play’s storyline as well as to show how one must use logic and reason to problem solve if you want desirable results.
whereupon finding Juliet in there, and two dead bodies lying on the floor, he needs no persuasion to leave, which he does so in immense. haste. I will be back in & nbsp; The following incident is an example of how the Friar contributed to the deaths of the star-crossed lovers. He marries Romeo and Juliet.
While at the point of the play when Romeo is exiled the Friar seems to be quite aggravated and harsh: “Hold thy desperate hand! Art thou a man? Thy form cries out thou art… Which heavy sorrow makes them apt unto.
The Friar did not take into account the dangers of his actions. Thus making the Friar an inefficient leader. However, returning to the point of the Friar's intentions, one could still consider him to be a good role model of benevolence, good will, and kind-heartedness, as well as a good religious role model. In the first example, although irresponsible, the Friar hoped the marriage would bring the two families together. In the second example, the Friar understood Juliet's predicament, and was only trying to help her, as she was upset enough to harm herself.
Don Pedro and his men return from the war and visit the house of Leonato and his brother, Antonio. This sudden meeting reunites Beatrice with her archrival, Benedick, and it is here that Claudio and Hero fall in love.
The forbidden wedding of Romeo and Juliet could not have happened without the Friar. First of all, the Friar unwisely agreed to marry Romeo and Juliet, even though he knows it will cause later problems. In the beginning, the Friar thinks that "...this alliance may so happy prove/ To turn your households' rancor to pure love." (II iv 91-92) This shows that the Friar has a slight hope of their marriage possibly working. Therefore, he decides to marry the two lovers. However, as time moves on, the Friar lets on that he has regrets about the marriage. The Friar feels that "too swift arrives as tardy as too slow." (II vi 15) In other words, the Friar means that he senses that this whole wedding is happening too fast and starts to have second thoughts. If the Friar had thought this important decision clearly through, he may have prevented many future tragedies. Therefore, the Friar knows all along that, "These violent delights have violent ends." (II vi 9) The Friar knew that this is an impossible situation, which if made possible by himself will without a doubt end up in tragedy in one way or another. Under these conditions, as the Friar predicts, Romeo sinks into a deep depression; as a result of the fact that he cannot see his wife. Similarly, Juliet becomes depressed and is grieving over the truth of her and Romeo's separation. Without the Friar the two lovers would not have been married, which would have prevented both depressions and future problems to come.
In the end some people might blame the friar for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, but the friar was some results of personal choice, because of “faith” they believed they were meant and nothing could stop them from being together in the end, choosing to do the things the friar said that would help the problem of Romeo’s exile. But it all was a matter of personal choice that lead up to these events, and this story is a very good example
Throughout the play Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, the two titular characters fall in love and try to keep their love strong when faced with many difficulties. Death, animosity, lack of free will, misunderstanding, and banishment all bar their love from thriving. In the play’s final scene, Romeo and Juliet commit suicide, both at seeing their love – their only hope – dead. Many of these events are influenced greatly by Friar Laurence, a priest at a church in Verona, the setting of the play. Throughout the play, Friar Laurence displays numerous character traits which show that he is responsible for the play’s conclusion. Friar Laurence is responsible for Romeo and Juliet’s tragic ending because of his selfishness, his interference, and his insincerity.
In William Shakespeare’s play ‘Much Ado about Nothing’, there are many instances of trickery and deception, which seem to surround the whole of the play.
With its entangled double plots and eloquent use of words, Much Ado About Nothing is a story that has the ability to entertain the masses both young and old. Shakespeare’s use of figurative language along with situation creates such vivid imagery for which carries the drama from beginning to end. For example, when we look at Act 1 Scene 1 of the play ...
The Friar is portrayed as an innocent person, who has committed no wrong doings, but this is not the case. The Friars biggest mistake was to marry Romeo and Juliet without their parents consent. Although this is not a crime, it is morally wrong. The friar also committed a crime by trying to make Romeo and Juliet run away, but this plan ultimately leads to doom. He also abandoned Juliet when he heard that the watch were coming, and let her kill herself. Although the reason why he committed these wrong doings was to unite a family and save a couples life, what he did was wrong.
Friar Lawrence is obligatory to the action, character development, and themes of Romeo and Juliet. Without Friar Lawrence, the steps leading up to the tragedy at the end of the story would not have been possible, along with the strong characterization of Romeo. Lastly, through Friar Lawrence, the inevitability of fate and violence being caused by love were able to be emphasized more deeply. Although secondary characters are less important than the main characters, most of them have a strong impact on the story and its meaning.
Barton, Anne. Introduction. Much Ado About Nothing. The Riverside Shakespeare, 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1997. 361-365.
The play, Much Ado about Nothing, is an elaborate network of schemes and tricks. These scheme manipulate the thoughts and feelings of others in order to achieve certain motivations. One example of manipulation involves the complicated relationship between Benedick and Beatrice. The prince of Aragon, Don Pedro, is a matchmaker in the play and enjoys helpings his fr...
In Shakespeare's play, Romeo and Juliet, Friar Laurence has a major role. As a member of the Order of St. Francis, a group of wise and generous priests, Romeo and Juliet trusted Friar Laurence completely, turning to him for advice, and solutions. He was there throughout Romeo’s and Juliet's lives; he married them, came up with a plan to keep them together, and was a friend throughout their tragedies. However, Friar Laurence’s rash action in marrying Romeo and Juliet, his shortsighted plan for rescuing Juliet from an unwanted marriage to Paris, and his fear of committing sin all contributed to the deaths of Romeo and Juliet.
The Friar's occupation required him to help the peasants and overall the less fortunate. He is a man of God, his only necessities should consist of helping others. Chaucer shows the reader that helping people was the last thing on the Friar's mind, “So muchel of daliaunce and fair langage. He hadde maad ful many a mariage of yonge wommen at his owene cost” (Chaucer 211-213). The Friar was more focused on winning the hearts of women rather than doing his job. He seduced women, something that is not familiar with occupation of a Friar. He is by no means religious or holy, he is more of the opposite of who he should be. Again it is explained that the Friar has a way with words, “Ful wel biloved and famulier was he, and eek with worthy wommen of the toun” (Chaucer 215-217). H...