Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relationship between nature and society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relationship between nature and society
Sustainability requires a 360-degree transformation of mankind's lifestyle and thought process. The previous weeks during course Sociology, 301 Global Environment Sustainability educated me about multiple inventions and gadgets to end global warming. However, week three of Sociology 301 Global Environment Sustainability broaden my understanding and most defiantly, transformed and enhanced my understanding of how to achieve sustainability. For example, week’s three information help me understand sustainability does not mainly develop through manmade technology. Therefore, what supports sustainability on planet earth? Sustainability depends on mankind’s attitude toward nature. Week three’s writers and speakers informed me of the common attitude …show more content…
Lappe argument is clearly understandable; for example, Mark Tran noted the feelings of Vandana Shiva facts against GMO. Tran wrote Shiva views of GMO as human means of an easy way out (2013), but in reality GMO production only aids in environmental disadvantages. For example, Tran stated GMO have transformed pests into super insects, therefore requiring more and different types of chemicals to kill new types of super insects from crops (2013). Henceforth, today’s agriculture continues to be saturated with chemicals and thus furthering mankind from sustainability. Additionally, the nutrition contributes to an unhealthy human being. Also food industries are focused at developing more processed junk foods in today’s world. Therefore, both Tran and Lappe expresses Food Corporation miss the mark of ecofriendly. Therefore, Tran’s and Lappe’s ideas points to fact many industries are not thinking like an eco-system. By inculcating a lifestyle as an eco-system corporation will understand the earth. Accordingly, Thich Nhat Hanh stated “When we garden, we can learn how to grow certain plants next to oar vegetables and flowers that will ward off harmful insects, deer and rabbits without hurting them” (2008). Therefore, Hanh supports that humans need to understand the earth in order to support sustainability. Henceforth, learning to understand the earth requires effort, but doing so will remind humans of the importance of earth. Applying these ideas in communities throughout the world will promote sustainability. For example, if community members continue to learn about the earth, this will promote efforts to protect it.
Thich Nhat Hanh stated the importance of nature for the human health. Hanh explained humans in the city are away from nature (2008). Therefore, humans become less aware of the endangerment of nature. By constant involvement of nature in human life is beneficial for sustainability. Promoting Hanh beliefs will transform community members’ involvement to care
Shlomo Yitzchaki is one of the most influential rabbis in Jewish history. Born in Troyes, France in 1040, Shlomo Yitzchaki grew up Jewish and learned from his father. When his father died in 1046, Shlomo Yitzchaki lived with his mother until 1057 when he married his wife and joined the Yeshiva of Yaakov Ben-Yakar. Since then he has become a staple in Jewish learning and Jewish history. Today we know him as Rashi. Rashi was and is very influential to Jewish scholars because of the way his commentary spread, the simplicity and variation of his commentary, and the controversy of his method that is still discussed in modern times.
The two essays by Michael Pollan and Curtis white talk about climate change in regards to the relationship between the environment and human beings. Although the two essays share the same topic, they take the subject and engage the readers in totally different points of views. Pollan’s essay talks about global and ecological responsibility being a personal virtue while Curtis discusses the socio-economic or political issues underlying sustainability (Pollan; White). These two essays are very different in terms of voice; however these pieces of writing are both important for people all over the world to read. Climate change and environmental disasters are a real issue. Just this year, there have been more storms, cyclones, earthquakes and typhoons all over the world. One cannot look at the state of many developing counties where the majority of the population is exposed and vulnerable to the effects of climate change. This issue on developing a viable solution for the problem of anthropogenic gases and global warming is long from being found. Not only this, many people do not want to hear about this issue since they do not think it is real. Unless people have tangible proof that their cars, thermostats and aerosol cans are contributing to climate change, they are not going to give up their lifestyles. By synthesizing the two essays, one can see that there is a need for change and that it is not an issue which should be dealt with in terms of ecological factors or even personal virtue. The social, economic and political factors affecting this problem and the move towards real sustainability should also be a topic that will raise awareness.
Thich Nhat Hanh , the author of The World We Have: A Buddhist Approach to Peace and Ecology, is a Buddhist monk. He was born in Hue, Vietnam. He wrote this book to inform the people on Earth about the environmental issues we currently have. He believes that people in the world are like sleepwalkers, who are unaware about the environment. Everything in the world is related to each other. The same thing applied for human; everyone in this world is related and linked to each other like brothers and sisters. Since we all share the Earth, the water and the sun, he points out that we have to be responsible and protect the environment, because everything supports each other in order to adapt to this planet. Although his ideas to practice the mindfulness seems impossible and ridiculous to some people when they first read a few chapters of this book, they are actually possible to practice and succeed. As he indicated in his book, many people and even countries have been practicing his ideas, and that will gradually improve the environment that we live in.
“Where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails, and where any one class is made to feel that society is an organized conspiracy to oppress, rob and degrade them, neither persons nor property will be safe”( Douglass). This famous quote epitomizes the philosophies of Frederick Douglass, in which he wanted everyone to be treated with dignity; if everyone was not treated with equality, no one person or property would be safe harm. His experience as a house slave, field slave and ship builder gave him the knowledge to develop into a persuasive speaker and abolitionist. In his narrative, he makes key arguments to white abolitionist and Christians on why slavery should be abolished. The key arguments that Frederick Douglass tries to vindicate are that slavery denies slaves of their identity, slavery is also detrimental for the slave owner, and slavery is ungodly.
Sustainability is becoming a major debate in the united states and in the world as a whole. People are becoming more conscious of their surroundings and want to conserve the environment in order to keep the Earth healthy and to maintain diversity among the environment. In Christian Weisser’s “Sustainability,” he goes on to explain what sustainability truly is. Weisser does a good job in using pathos to persuade a typical college student in the validity of sustainability.
...ade, and how it got to his or her plate. Even when people are eating healthier foods, most are still unaware of why it is important to eat organically and locally. They do not realize what a huge contribution just one person is when they eat a diet based on organic and local foods. When you put into a perspective how much money is spent on just 3 months worth of food for one person that is from global supermarkets or fast food restaurants, you realize how much damage that is to the environment by supporting foods that are unnatural, unethical, and damaging to soil. A majority of people, especially Americans, is very unaware of how this is a serious issue. By educating people and encouraging them to eat for peace instead of pleasure, slowly and hopefully the world can change into a cleaner, healthier, and safer place, in which everyone can gain awareness and happiness.
When we were talking about vegetarianism the time right before Thanksgiving break many arguments were put forth for the idea. The one that stuck to me the most was the arguments made by Tom Regan. For the other arguments I thought about them but they did not have me think about what I eat. With Regan’s essay it was the first time I actually took the time and thought about what I eat and if it is immoral.
Generational conflicts, political strife, environmental regulations, stakeholders in big oil, and many more hurdles affect the push to fully sustainable economies around the world and even here in America. In a world where coal, oil, and natural gas are limited, countries are gobbling it all up as fast as they can before other poorer countries come on the grid. Even though America and other countries gobble up these resources the life of the people is still a struggle to meet basic needs. Sustainability is an intermingling of resource use and protection of the “quality of life”, it is met by using resources sparingly and by recycling or reducing the use of other non-renewable resources to provide for our immediate need, but also to conserve and protect the needs of the next generation and to improve the quality of all the lives to come.
zombies are also really easy to kill, and Klosterman points to this as being a potential reason why zombies are growing in popularity (Klosterman 41). Klosterman continues to make a point of how other types of monsters, such as vampires, can create a personality in which we can start to like them; while zombies on the other hand, can’t talk and don’t really have much of a personality, therefore you can’t start to like them (Klosterman 41). Klosterman compares zombies with our everyday lives, the part of our lives that are so mind-numbingly simple, we’d rather be dead. He states we can relate to killing zombies because it’s like reading through emails, or filling out paperwork. We’d rather not do it, but we have to (Klosterman 41).
Germ-line engineering(GLE) is the reason for which we have created so much human developmental progress. Even when not used for medical purposes, GLE is a powerful tool that humans have practiced and mastered for decades that is capable of advancing the human race to parameters that evolution alone could not reach. In the next 1000 words, I will argue that GLE for non-medical purposes is morally obligatory. I will present some objections to my claim, then I will respond to those objections accordingly, ultimately proving that GLE is morally obligatory because we can achieve changes that will not only help humanity, but improve it in drastic ways.
Quaide's argument shows that cellphones should not be allowed in the beautiful scenery because people often use them for not emergencies, but for socializing and business. I would disagree with what she as to say because sometimes people have a business, family, or even an emergency that they must attend to and having the cellphone can allow them to enjoy the outdoors, but yet also being responsible and taking care of business. With the newer generations coming along and the centuries getting bigger, technology is advancing. As technology advances people become more revolved around it and it becomes part of their everyday life. If this place had service for example, people could attend to important things having to do with their job or what not, while enjoying time at the amazing outdoor monument. Mount Rainier should have cell service in order for people to attend to emergencies, socializing, and business.
During the course of the semester we have examined a myriad of environmental issues, specifically our impact on the world both globally, and locally. We have considered the implications of not changing our cultural behaviors and some of the consequences that are coming to bear now and forecasted for the future. The significance of the discussion has come to bear on my personal experience, the lenses from which I make decisions that either continue the march towards continued environmental degradation or the hard right hand turn I must make towards sustainability on a global level starting here and now.
"The science of human sustenance is inherently a social science. Neither physics nor chemistry nor even biology is adequate to understand how it has been possible for one species to reshape both its own future and the destiny of an entire planet."(Overpopulation Is Not the Problem By Erle C. Ellis Sept. 13, 2013) Modern technology gives us the opportunity to start an Environmental Revolution. This revolution consists of innovative green technology. Humanity has already taken a step toward this change implementation of solar powered energy and smart cars are only a few examples. The goal that plans to be reached are more efficient advancements of technology, smarter planning both in urban and regional areas as well as policies that support industrial
The most common definition of sustainability is living in a way that meets the social, economic, and other requirements of the current population as well as ensuring the same requirements will be able to be met for future generations. Living sustainably is something that affects every person on the planet. The way we live now affects our lives today, as well as the future population. Some people believe that sustainability and living green will not matter to them as the effects of their actions will not manifest in their lifetime, but this assumption is incorrect. Currently two-thirds of the services provided to us by nature are declining, 85% of all fish stocks in the ocean are overexploited, depleted, recovering or fully exploited. There was a 38% increase in annual global carbon dioxide and it will take 50+ years for the ozone layer to get back to pre 1980 levels. Global warming is one example of long-term change in the environment that has been caused by humans. Other examples are the introduction of nonnative and invasive species, land development, and changes in water quantity and quality. Statistics according to the article Resilient People Resilient Planet. There is no guarantee that if people continue to live the way they are living, things will continue to be sustainable. However sustainability is not just about the environment, social and economic aspects are equally as important to creating a sustainable world. (Figure 1). In this paper I will explain what it means to live sustainably, why it is a problem, challenges and how humans can live more sustainably.
Environmental philosophy tries to make sense of the unexamined values, assumptions and ideologies behind humanities treatment of the environment and, in doing so, aims at helping to elicit an effective human response to related issues (Curry, 2011). Environmental philosophy, has gone beyond being merely an academic pursuit, now requiring the world’s population take moral responsibility for the damages caused by their industrial advances on natural systems.