Quaide's Argumentative Analysis

567 Words2 Pages

Quaide's argument shows that cellphones should not be allowed in the beautiful scenery because people often use them for not emergencies, but for socializing and business. I would disagree with what she as to say because sometimes people have a business, family, or even an emergency that they must attend to and having the cellphone can allow them to enjoy the outdoors, but yet also being responsible and taking care of business. With the newer generations coming along and the centuries getting bigger, technology is advancing. As technology advances people become more revolved around it and it becomes part of their everyday life. If this place had service for example, people could attend to important things having to do with their job or what not, while enjoying time at the amazing outdoor monument. Mount Rainier should have cell service in order for people to attend to emergencies, socializing, and business. …show more content…

With cell service allowed at the park people will be able to get themselves out of sticky situation if be, and get out uninjured or alive. But if the place had cell service in the first place, a live weather report could be broadcasted and shared to warn people who dare to go up the Mount Rainier. In an article about Mount Rainier, it says that they have about 40 to 50 search and rescue missions each year. With the cell phones being used and weather being told this number will shrunk substantially. Hiking up this mountain is not a safe thing. It has lots of snow, dangerous terrain, and awful winds. If the phones could be used people would know if the weather was permitting enough to go up the mountain. Cell phones can be very useful and prevent lots of people every year from getting injured or even

Open Document