Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The courage of soldiers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The courage of soldiers
I am claiming that some of the people in the annex showed hope and courage and not just saying something and do something about it. The people in the annex are showing courage. The way mr frank was showing courage was when they heard a person down stairs doing something they weren't supposed to do. out of all people mr frank went to go see what was happening. Then i realized even if he was to get caught he still almost risked everyone's life if the robber had to have seen him there family would have got caught earlier than they did and killed. Mr frank also risked meip and everyone else that was helping hide them. Mr Frank asked Mr Kraler how was it left? and what did you tell him?Mr frank was asking all those questions because he knows that the man was the stealing the stuff that ran when they heard him. The only reason he asked for more money is because he knows about Mr Frank and his family living in the annex and if they don't give him what he wants he is going to tell the german so all of them …show more content…
Then Anne says “i have intuition”. meaning that she is feeling something for peter and she feels like her mom is holding her back from hanging out with peter. because her mom thinks her and peter are doing thing that she does not approve of. Because Anne’s mom is still treating her like a baby. “ Aren’t you afraid you’re disturbing him?” “i have intuition”Anne does not really care what her moms says she only listens to her father and when anne’s mom was just trying to keep anne away from peter because she thinks that she is never going to see her daughter anymore because she is always in his room so she tries to talk her out of going to talk to peter but when anne puts her mind to doing something she will eventually get to it. I am claiming that some of the people in the annex showed hope and courage and not just saying something and do something about
This connects to the theme ¨Speak up because you never know what might happen¨ and shows how if they were would have spoke up and suck together things could may be different. He said, ¨When the Nazis came for the communists, I remained silent: I was not a communist.¨(Niemoller, 1,2,3). Also, ¨When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out.¨(Niemoller, 13,14). This is an clear examples of the theme and explains it
You can show courage in many different ways. Courage means when you are brave and even though your scared you still do it. In this case Mr.Frank and Peter do. Mr. frank shows it by being brave enough to go downstairs and risk getting caught just to catch the burglar. On the in the same way peter shows courage to. Peter shows courage because he goes out of the Annex to get things and he always risks getting caught to.
In the Holocaust, people did not stand up against Nazi Germany and actually supported them by being silent simply because they didn't oppose it. Today, 9 million Syrians have been forced to escape from their homes to find shelter away from the devastating violence. We need to show the Syrian people that the world still cares about Syria, We need to show our support for the millions of Syrian children, women and men who are living through this horrifying crisis by standing up for Syria.
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
Lives were taken, the happiness and peace was robbed from the town and the people within, and relationships saw their last day. The impacts of these sacrifices are results that we have no control over. We could all be thinking that a decision we made was vital to the situation, but it could actually just cause more hardship. In the grand scheme of things, the most crucial question is: what sacrifices are actually worth
... which would increase morale of both the troops and the population. He also uses a metaphor and emotive language to slightly exaggerate the forces victory but it makes the evacuation sound such as an extreme success with the language emphasising the men’s ability to hold their morale; which was shown in source C where the men were firing upon enemy aircraft. He also focuses on the men’s lives rather than the major losses of equipment, which although gets a mention it is encompassed mid-sentence since it is not seen as much of a failure as the men’s lives being saved is a success, this is important as it is the major deliverance that Taylor was mentioning in his quote. He also claims that the forces refused to accept defeat, however this claim is entirely contrived since the evacuation was a final resort after defeat to the German forces in Europe
When Anne’s family and others moved into the Annex, Miep brought them daily food rations. This was a difficult and dangerous job as food was lacking and one could not buy any food without a ration coupon that is issued by the Germans. Miep also hid two other Holocaust victims. Meaning they had to find food for more people, which was hard when the food was scarce.
Wayman states how Roosevelt refused safety to Jewish refugees, in example, he failed to order the bombing of railway lines leading to Auschwitz. This is an example of an opportunity Roosevelt could have seized. Wayman states, “America's response to the Holocaust was the result of action and inaction on the part on the many people. In the forefront was Franklin D. Roosevelt, whose steps to aid Europe's Jews were very limited. If he had wanted to know, he could have aroused substantial public backing for a vital rescue effort by speaking out on the issue. If nothing else, a few forceful statements by the president would have brought the extermination news out of obscurity and into the headlines. But he had little to say about the problem and gave no priority at all to rescue” (Wayman 311). Wayman is stating that even speaking about the topic and being public about it can lead to
Through the Holocaust and through the fighting, the hunger and the fear, those persecuted managed to hold on to hope, the one thing no Nazi could break. Though the camps were liberated in 1944-1945, the horrors had already been committed. The death counts of the Nazi prisoners go as high as 13 million, but even with this the Jews still held out hope, still kept fighting, even as they were dragged from their homes into the Death Camps that awaited them, And it is for this reason that none will ever truly forget all the atrocities, horrors and, most importantly, the victims.
Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Wiesel gave a speech called, “Keep Memory Alive.” This speech shares the message: “Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormented.” Which basically means that staying neutral, or silent helps the “bad guy” or “bully.” And if we keep silent we are encouraging the silence of the victims. Elie Wiesel is a Romanian-born Jewish writer, professor, and political activist. He spoke this speech in Oslo on December 10, 1986. Elie speaks about how someone should not stay silent in any wrong doing. He speaks not just for himself but for the survivors and the children of the survivors. He himself is a holocaust survivor who doesn’t want people to forget what him, his family, his friends, and even complete strangers had to go through, therefore, he created the speech “Keep Memory Alive.” The writer illustrates his theme of this speech by giving a memorable tone using a flashback with a young boy and his father going through the tragedy of the holocaust.
Opposing views claim that people during the Holocaust should of gone with the flow and should of let the Nazis push them around. Others believe that if the victims would of went with the flow they would have mixed in; however, they would have to do what the Nazis told them to do. Some commodities they were told to do included manual labor, walking the death marches, and to go without eating for days. Even though these people had to do these things, they would have blended in, and it would of been less likely for the people to get hurt or killed by the terrible Nazis. Believing that you could sit back and not deal with the situation is not the way to stand up for yourself. The people should have fought back and fought back powerfully!
Nicholas Kristof continues using sentimental appeal to draw the audience emotion out. He wants the audience to understand the desperate and fear of the refugee lose their life. In a way, Kristof using the audience emotion as his own personal gain to his column. By using sentimental appeal, he brings the audience to do something that may help the refugee even if it small or to protest about it. Kristof said, “It was the Nazis who committed genocide, but the U.S. and other countries also bear moral responsibility for refusing to help desperate people.” Kristof is basically saying what make us any different than the people who slaughter thousands of Jewish if we won’t do anything to stop the killing. Are we really going to sit back and let history repeat itself? If we have the power why aren’t we doing something useful, we can save the refugees. Are we
It is not the fault of the oppressed but the fault of the spectators. In the past millions of people were killed by the Nazi’s in the Holocaust after being titled undesirable and blamed for Germany's defeat in WW 1. Today however, we have recognized these deaths and now honor all who had died in the Holocaust. We must always stand up for the oppressed and if we don't we should also be blamed for the injustice .
Fled from their homes. Terrified for their lives and treated less than, just because of their religion. This is what millions of people went through during WWII. Today we will, in particularly, look at life in the secret annex of Anne Frank. It was frightening, tense, and there was a lack of freedom. Life in the annex was other things as well, but let us “dive in” a little deeper into the topics previously mentioned.
They were forced to steal yet the police were there to stop them. No one was there to help them. They couldn’t leave, they had no where to go and no way of getting there. Their employers evacuated so there was no job left for them, no money. The police weren’t helping them get to safety. They could wait for hours to get provided rations but waiting that long meant death for some and these conditions were harsh on the children. Watching them drag a dead body away was heartbreaking because so many people could have prevented this but nobody thought about the working poor, those that didn’t have