Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Inspector calls inspector analysis
Inspector calls inspector analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Responsibility is explored in JB Priestley’s play ‘The Inspector Calls’ by showing the contrasting opinions of the younger and older generations. The older and younger generations in the story take the Inspector’s messages differently. Mr Birling and Mrs Birling both choose to protect themselves, where Mr Birling tries to hide from his responsibility by saying if he were to be responsible for something that happened due to a choice made two years ago, it would be a very awkward world. Mrs Birling shrugs off responsibility by telling the inspector that the father of the unborn child is responsible for looking after Eva, not her charity organisation. Eric and Sheila are the young members of the family, and both are honest and admit their roles in the …show more content…
death of Eva Smith. When Mr Birling and Sheila learn about the role they played in the suicide of Eva Smith, their responses are juxtaposed.
Midway through act one, Mr Birling is interrogated by the inspector. The inspector proclaims in front Eric and Gerald that due to Mr Birling’s decision to fire Eva after going on strike (pg 172) “I can’t accept any responsibility. If we were all responsible for everything that happened to everybody we’d had anything to do with, it would be very awkward, wouldn’t it?”. Mr Birling’s response to the inspector’s accusation shows that he couldn’t see that he had any responsibility for what happened to Eva afterwards. This notion is contrasted to Sheila's response (page 179) “I felt rotten about it at the time and now i feel a lot worse. Did it make much difference to her?”. Sheila showed elements of responsibility, although belatedly, eventually realising that her actions in Milwards had a devastating impact on Eva Smith’s life. JB Priestley’s use of contrasting responses shows Mr. Birling’s outdated opinion that he doesn’t hold any responsibility for an event that occurred two years before his confession. Sheila's response is far more responsible towards her actions of which she is extremely guilty
of. Mrs Birling’s response to the death of Eva Smith is directly contrasted to her son Eric. Priestley makes it known to the audience that the father of the child is Eric, whilst Mrs Birling condemns the unborn child and forcefully indicating that it is to blame. Before Eric’s reappearance in act two, Mrs Birling states that (page 198) “I’ll tell you what I told her. Go and look for the father of the child. It’s his responsibility”, this statement shows that Mrs Birling, the older generation, are trying to shift the blame to protect themselves. This view is contrasted with Eric’s confession that (page 214) “the fact remains that I did what I did”, this shows the younger generation's ability to admit their faults where the older generations try to cover up any information that could negatively affect their social status. Gerald spends most of his time during the end of the play trying to protect himself by trying to prove that the inspector is fake, he is more concerned about saving his social appearance rather than changing it, unlike Sheila who accepts her role in this ordeal. We see during the finale of the play Gerald trying to save face by proclaiming that (page 215) “Did we? Who says so? Because I say - there’s no more real evidence we did than there was that that chap was a police inspector.”. Sheila rebuttals “Of course there is”, this contrasting opinion of responsibility for Eva Smith’s death outlines Gerald’s inability to accept the role he played in Eva’s death. This is continued when Gerald tries to dispute the legitimacy of the inspectors photograph (page 216) “But how do you know it’s the same girl?”. Sheila points out that it doesn’t matter if the photograph is legitimate or not, (page 219) “Everything we said had happened, really had happened. If it didn’t end tragically, then that’s lucky for us. But it might have done”. Sheila’s statements contrast Gerald's to show that she is prepared to accept her wrongdoings and are capable of changing her behaviour to greater benefit society, but Gerald still remains suborn and chooses to dis-prove the Inspectors existence although it wouldn’t change his actions. The play ‘Inspector Calls’ explores the idea that society must accept responsibility for each other by contrasting the younger and older generations, and how they each respond to the Inspector’s accusations. We see in the play, the older generation (including Gerald) hide from their responsibilities while the younger generation, Eric and Sheila both choose to accept their roles in Eva Smith’s death and change their perspectives to better help one another.
There would be more of an effect on the audience at the time, as it
At the start of the extract, Priestley creates dramatic tension when Mrs Birling says, “ Certainly. And he ought to be dealt with very severely-.” Certainly shows that Mr Birling believes the man who was responsible for impregnating Eva Smith and stealing money for her was entirely at fault and should receive all the punishments associated with her death. However, Mrs Birling is interrupted
A Comparison of Characters of Mr. Birling and Inspector Goole in J.B. Priestley's An Inspector Calls
The characters in ‘An Inspector Calls’ are mainly upper-middle class (Mr and Mrs Birling, Gerald, Sheila, Eric), but the Inspector is middle class and Eva Smith is working class. Most of the characters in ‘An Inspector Calls’ have varied opinions about social classes, but there are mainly two sides. The first main opinion is that the upper-middle class are the most important and the lower working classes are not important and that it doesn’t matter what happens to them (this is the view of Mr and Mrs Birling and Gerald). For example Sheila and Mrs Birling need to be protected from the horrid things such as Eva Smith’s death because they are upper-middle class, whilst Eva Smith doesn’t need to be protected from horrid things in life because she is working class. The other opinion is that although they are working class, they should still be treated fairly even if they are different classes and that Eva Smith’s death is very tragic even if she wasn’t upper class (this is Eric, Sheila and The Inspector’s...
In act 1, while Arthur Birling was giving advice to Eric and Gerald, an Inspector gives them a visit to investigate a young working-class girl’s suicidal death. This is very important because later on, we find out how J. B. Priestley has linked the girl’s death to all the Birling family members.
Wells, both of whom references are made to in the opening pages of the play. A lot of the tension in the play is between Birling and the Inspector, both of who are powerful figures in the household and are both vying for dominance, creating a lot of tension. This is symbolic of the global struggle between capitalism and socialism, the Inspector represents Priestley's socialist views, and Birling, the antithesis of the Inspector represents capitalist views, which is made clear through his speech "the interests of Capital steadily increasing prosperity." When the Inspector is there, Birling is very fast to drop the blame on someone else, insisting "I can't accept any responsibility" which is a complete contrast of what the Inspector says, telling the family to "share the blame among yourselves when I have left" This constant conflict, which is often at the heart of the dramatic genre itself, makes sure there is tension whenever the two characters are talking to each other. This conflict is not the only one within the play.
technology and how a man should live. He says 'A man has to make his
In 1946, Britain was not in the best state, after two heavy conflicts (WWI and WWII), many towns had suffered damage during the Blitz. The political situation was about to change massively with a Labour government, 1946, the same year ‘An Inspector Calls’ was performed. The two wars had promoted the idea of equality and many were keen to try and end the social problems that were attributing to the class system. Priestley used his ‘surroundings’ and the problems at the time to write ‘An Inspector Calls’.
JB Priestley’s intent in ‘An Inspector Calls’ was to convey the attitudes of socialism to the minds of the society in the Edwardian Era as he was a passionate believer of the concept. Priestley has attempted this through the employment of ‘Inspector Goole’ in the play. In the play drama is displayed through a variety of methods for the interest of the audience and the communication of personal views from JB Priestley.
talks with. He is a man who has come to the Birling's house to do his
The whole family’s actions are the cause of Eva’s death however the message about responsibility the Inspector presents is only take on board by Eric and Sheila. In conclusion, Priestley clearly gets across his message of responsibility towards others in the play. A clever script cunningly executed points out Priestley’s views to the audience. ‘Responsibility’ is the focal point of the play and is consistently addressed at the end of each interrogation, but the Birlings fail to recognise this.
was genuine and this allows the audience to almost predict their own ending; how will the family react to the arrival of the real Inspector? Will they acknowledge this as a chance to admit to their mistakes or will they try and conceal their guilt? I thoroughly enjoyed studying An Inspector Calls and have learned a great deal about how society has changed and how moral ideals have evolved over time. I found the play effective although because of the way in which society has developed Priestley's morals may not be applicable to life today. As wealth and power have become increasingly more important socialist feelings of responsibility for one another have been progressively weakened.
In fact, many of the events that involve Eva Smith are revealed to the Birlings by the Inspector: "This girl was going to have a child" It can be argued that the Inspector uses his knowledge of the events to induce confessions from each of the other characters, so that they are able to see the consequences of their actions. They also reveal all of their wrong-doings to their family in the process. This public confession is often thought to be a deliberate method used by the Inspector to create conflict amongst the Birlings, stripping away the image of a 'happy, middle-class family' that was presented at the beginning of the play: "…You're not the kind of father a chap could go to…" This conflict amongst the family members, as well as the knowledge provided by the Inspector allows each of the characters to develop. Mr Birling, for example, becomes more and more irritable as the play progresses, revealing his stubbornness and lack of compassion for others. Sheila on the other hand is not only remorseful, but also becomes much more confident and out spoken: "Sheila, I simply don't understand your attitude.
The Inspector, straight form his introduction, is commanding and authoritative. Upon his entrance he creates, “…at once an impression of massiveness, solidity and purposefulness.”(PG.11) The Inspector continues to create this impression as he progresses through his speeches and through his interrogation of the family. The Inspector remains confident, sturdy and composed, while people around him crumble and fall to pieces. His ‘solidity’ is proven by the fact he remains on task despite numerous attempts from Birling to digress from the points he is making. The Inspector is told to appear ‘purposeful’; this is shown where he explains to Birling that Birlings way of thinking “Every man must only look out for himself,” is not the case, and all warps of society are interlinked. The view is best illustrated in the Inspectors final speech, where he says, “We don't live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other.”(p.56). This idea is one that Priestley, himself believed in deeply, and many of Priestleys writing shared this very theme.
Through his play Priestley endeavoured to convey a message to the audiences, that we could not go on being self obsessed and that we had to change our political views. He used the Birling family as an example of the Capitalist family that was common amongst the higher classes in 1912, who took no responsibility for other people and he showed this with the power of Socialism, represented by the inspector; the uneasy facade put on by the Birling family to cover up their real flaws and how they have treated those whom they considered to be lower class could not stand up to any scrutiny without shame for what had happened, showing that they know they have been wrong.