Socialism And Capitalism In 'An Inspector Calls'

1177 Words3 Pages

‘An Inspector Calls’ was written by J. B. Priestley in 1946 (after the Second World War), set in 1912 at the Birling family home, an affluent family in Brumley. Conflict is immediately introduced as a key theme and I will be exploring the conflict of: Socialism versus Capitalism (responsibility).
In 1946, Britain was not in the best state, after two heavy conflicts (WWI and WWII), many towns had suffered damage during the Blitz. The political situation was about to change massively with a Labour government, 1946, the same year ‘An Inspector Calls’ was performed. The two wars had promoted the idea of equality and many were keen to try and end the social problems that were attributing to the class system. Priestley used his ‘surroundings’ and the problems at the time to write ‘An Inspector Calls’.
In Act 1, the Birling’s are celebrating their daughter’s engagement to Gerald Croft, which would merge two business competitors (the Birling’s and the Croft’s), which would result in higher profits - being the most beneficial to Mr Birling. In Act 1, Priestley heavily relies on the audience’s knowledge of past events for dramatic irony - Priestley uses Birling’s optimism as he raves about Titanic: “the Titanic - she sails next week - forty-six thousand eight hundred tons - New York in five days - and every luxury, and unsinkable, absolutely unsinkable.” which is about go into a world that will avoid conflict. Ironically, Priestley already introduced conflict as Birling’s views conflict with the reality of what is about to cause unease in Britain.
When the Inspector enters, his manner conflicts with Mr Birling’s, as well as his opinion of society. He is relatively reserved, although he is not intimidated to ask questions to the Birling’s ...

... middle of paper ...

...uses Inspector as a device in itself to convey his ideas about socialism and conflict with Mr Birling with those ideas. The main way the Inspector conflicts with Mr Birling is that, Mr Birling is extremely confident and conflict, especially when dismissing the possibility of a war based on his belief of progress as “the world’s developing so fast that it’ll make war impossible” and this conflicts strongly against the Inspector’s own views. Priestley’s conclusion within a conclusion is that if people will not look out for one another in the most smallest of ways, they men will destroy men on battlefields, with ‘fire and blood and anguish’. This is Priestley’s message of direct conflict. This is shown in the microcosm of the dining room in the Birling residence. A message that will be echoed by many - with the Mr Birling’s of society wondering where it all went wrong.

Open Document