Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Motivational interviewing 5 principles
Application of motivational interviewing
Application of motivational interviewing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Motivational interviewing 5 principles
Introduction The motivational interviewing video was very informative. It not only described the five guidelines for conducting the technique, but it also demonstrated how motivational interviewing is done. The insight gained while watching the video allowed self-reflection and even motivated me to change the way I view working with clients. Motivational interviewing is a style in which I am not familiar. However, it makes complete sense to use this approach when the common goal is for the client to make a healthy change and it appears to be very beneficial when working with a variety of client situations. Key Points The most important key point that I gathered from the video, is that motivational interviewing is a client-centered approach that allows the client to be in control of his or her outcomes. This approach demonstrates a level of respect between the client and therapist and allows the client to be authentic and remain in control of his or her destiny with the guidance of the therapist. Miller utilized strategies to pull out what already existed in his client to help work towards making a healthy lifestyle change. He went into the session hopeful and with the knowledge that the client knew himself better than anyone …show more content…
else. Therefore, he worked with him to highlight his strengths. The client displayed ambivalence and he recognized it and was supportive of the client’s freedom of choice to change when the time was/is right for him. Another key point was Miller’s ability to “dance with the client” versus “wrestle with the client”. As mentioned in the video, there were several opportunities for Miller to “wrestle with the client,” but instead he rolled with resistance, which is one of the five guidelines that Miller discussed for motivational interviewing. While using the motivational interviewing approach, the fact that Miller was very respectful and patient with the client stood out the most. Although the client was very chatty, I felt that Miller never appeared to be impatient with his ambivalence. Helpful Information The most beneficial information provided by this model was Miller’s ability to ask open ended questions and the use of his reflective listening skills. In my opinion, these skills laid the framework for developing the trustworthy relationship and allowed the client to be forthcoming with information. The video challenged me to view the confrontational approach in a new way. In my personal life, I often confront or “call individuals out” on their behaviors in efforts to get them to become more aware or change the behavior(s) as an attempt to help. Over the years, I have noticed that the confrontational method is not very effective with everyone. However, I can see the benefits of motivational interviewing. It is a method that can be very empowering for clients and/or loved ones. The “dancing versus wrestling” perspective was most helpful. It is something that I will use while working with clients in the future. The client-centered approach allowed me to view the “true meaning” of client-centered and the benefits that it has to offer. Questionable Not being educated properly on substance abuse, allowed me to feel that was a population that I was not interested in working.
However, after Miller’s video, I feel that it could possibly be an area worth exploring. I cannot say there were any strategies used that did not make sense. I am a motivator by nature; therefore, motivational interviewing is quite intriguing and nothing in the video pushed my buttons. I cannot say that something would not fit with my style of work. However, in the past I have enjoyed utilizing the “righting reflex,” but after gaining more knowledge about working to help individuals create healthy change, I am working towards becoming a more effective practitioner and dissociating myself from the “righting
reflex”. After the session, someone brought up the fact that Miller did not shed light to the client’s drug use. This may have been questionable to some, but after reading the required readings and watching the video, I had a better understanding as to why he did not make that a focal point. What would you do differently? Miller is the expert on motivational interviewing and I am very supportive of his client-centered approach. However, before learning about his approach, I always thought the goal when working with individuals who experience substance abuse was to lead them into the direction of abstaining from the illicit drug(s) or alcohol. Miller’s approach has taught me that ultimately the decision is left up to the client. Although as the practitioner, we are optimistic that the client will become drug free we must be supportive of their decision and be there as a guide to help them along the way. In my opinion, the client-centered approach is more beneficial in actually witnessing change. Conclusion In conclusion, I am happy to have had the opportunity to learn about motivational interviewing. Both, the course readings and video are great tools to increase knowledge about the topic. While reading, I was able to self-reflect and realized although I enjoy helping people, I may have hurt several individuals along the way. My family, often depend on me to be the voice of reason, and I see why my confrontational approach as a way to help may have had an adverse effect. Listening to Miller discuss how he deals with his own ambivalence was very reassuring that I can learn to diminish the “righting reflex”. I also appreciate Miller for stressing the point of not using labels. I feel that labels stigmatize individuals and some use them for their benefit and some are harmed due to labels that are attached to them. Miller also gave very insightful information on how to work with clients who are not as chatty as the client he worked with in the video that was very beneficial. Overall, I feel that the information gathered on motivational interviewing was very insightful. It has allowed me to perceive the way I help people in a different light.
This method is grounded in the strengths perspective, a perspective in which the worker center’s their sessions around the clients’ abilities, gifts, and strengths (Shulman, 2016). Instead of focusing on what is wrong with the client, the worker highlights what is right with the client building on their strengths instead of emphasizing their deficits: the client already has what they need to get better or solve their problem (Corcoran, 2008). The role of the worker in this model is to help the client recognize their potential, recognize what resources they already have, and discuss what is going well for the client and what they have been able to accomplish already (Shulman, 2016). Techniques commonly used in this model, although they are not exclusive to this model, include an emphasis on pre- and between-session change, exception questions, the miracle question, scaling questions, and coping questions (Shulman, 2016). These questions are used for many reasons: for example, the miracle question is used because “sometimes asking clients to envision a brighter future may help them be clearer on what they want or to see a path to problem-solving.” (Corcoran, 2008, p. 434) while coping questions are used to allow the client to see what they are already accomplishing, rather than what they are transgressing (Corcoran, 2008). All
It was an effective film to show that clarifying goals of therapy is another way to provide effective counseling rather than giving advice and solving the clients’ problems. Working with a minority group client, I always try to be prepared, learn about my client culture, background, values, beliefs, create a plan, make sure my client doesn’t feel overwhelmed or discouraged by any of my statements, frame the issue in a personal context, and allow a moment of silence for the emotions to come out.
The definition of motivational interviewing (MI) has evolved and been refined since the first publications on its use as a way to deal with behaviour change. The technical therapeutic definition of motivational interviewing is a collaborative, and goal oriented method of communication with giving specific observation to the language of change. It is intended to reinforce an individual’s motivation for and development towards a particular objective by evoking and investigating the individual's own arguments for change (Miller & Rollnick, 2012). Motivational interviewing was created to enable clients to prepare for changing addictive behaviours like drug and alcohol abuse (Miller & Rollnick, 1991, 2002) and has been viable to lessen other harmful behaviours including tobacco, drugs, alcohol, gambling, treatment
233). From this, clients should want to change as well as believe in their capacity for change. For Jim, he can benefit from motivational interviewing since it can be used to help him overcome ambivalence to change. A collaborative, and nonconfrontational relationship are part of motivational interviewing. This is important for the client Jim in order to respect and encourage his self-determination. Motivational interviewing gives clients like Jim the opportunity to discover their own reasons for making change. One of the principles for motivational interviewing is expressing empathy where it gives clients the chance to freely explore their values, perceptions, goals and the implications of their present situation without being judged. The counsellor who is working with Jim can use active listening skills for expressing empathy in order for Jim to feel like he is being heard. The second principle is developing
What is Motivational Interviewing? Motivational interviewing (MI) is a patient-centered method for enhancing intrinsic motivation to change health behavior by exploring and resolving ambivalence. What will be discussed is how can organizations help the patients change negative behavior to a positive behavioral change, diminishing the lack of motivational behavior. (Miller & Rollnick, 2002) states that we have to help clients overcome their ambivalence or lack of motivation toward changing their behavior in positive way. Also, figuring out a solution on how to overcome this negative behavioral challenge of lack of intrinsic motivation to change. How will we overcome it? by focusing on the MI (Motivational Interviewing) approach, and finding
The Motivational Interviewing film was very informative. I was able to get a clear understanding of what is to be expected by the therapist during a session. The film explained the therapist should engage in reflective listening, develop a growing discrepancy, avoid arguing with clients, roll with resistance and support self-advocacy. Miller believed that this approach was far more effective than traditional methods, where the therapist pushed for change. In contrast, Miller explained that motivational interviewing focused on empowerment and helping clients to become motivationally driven to change. Also, Miller stressed the importance of working alongside clients, a term he referred to as dancing. The process in which the client leads
Next, I am going to discuss the person-centred interventions I exercised through the therapeutic process with my client in session four. Within this I am going to explore how these interventions impacted my client’s responses and how I could improve my skills in future sessions.
Motivational interviewing is a more direct, client-centered approach, and is best used for clients who are showing a great deal of uncertainty about change. The goal of motivational interviewing in human service work is to help resolve the client’s uncertainty about change, encourage change in the client’s life, and motivate the client into change. This is a short term interviewing skill used to gauge where the client is at in the counseling process and where to go forward from there.
Motivational interviewing is based on a client centered approach to therapy that uses open-ended questions, affirmation, reflective listening and summaries to help the client recognize the pros and cons of change and their reasons for resisting change thereby eliminating their ambivalence about change. Once the client deals with their ambivalence the Miller and Rollick believe that the client will be able to make the necessary changes. In addition, motivational interviewing gets the client to argue for change not the counselor. Furthermore, the client not the counselor is responsible for their progress.
Carl Rogers and Gloria 's session was a learning lesson and evidence that the developments in life overtime can have a direct impact on how we evolve as human beings. Various aspects, topics and behaviors that were viewed in this clip reminded me of scenarios that I see on a weekly basis. I myself have struggled with the fear of making the "wrong" decisions, I have seen relationships go astray due to inadequate trust, honesty, and transparency, and I have witnessed immature disagreements turn into full blown arguments and rage simply due to the absence of active listening and the list can go on. This session enabled the viewers the opportunity to see themselves from the client 's perspective which would involve seeing things through her eyes and trying to understand why she feels the way she does based off of signs such as both verbal and non-verbal communication, her diction, body language,
Rebecca Kreman, Bernice C. Yates, Sangeeta Agrawal, Kathryn Fiandt, Wayne Briner, Scott Shurmur, The effects of motivational interviewing on physiological outcomes, Applied Nursing Research, Volume 19, Issue 3, August 2006, Pages 167-170, ISSN 0897-1897, DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.10.004.
People inherently have the power to solve their own problems and come to their own solutions. Clients are expected to play and active role in their own change by being open to expressing their problems,creating goals and ultimately evaluating their progress. Clients often use stories to explore their problems in preparation for deciding which goals they want to set and subsequently accomplish. Each client has specific issues and life experiences which the goal should reflect. Clients are expected to put great effort into discovering a desire that the client has deep convictions about and will commit to putting in the work it takes to change behaviors that are no longer working in their life. When the client discovers what they want to be changed it can become their goal. The goal needs to be important to the client and not something that someone else wants them to change. When ...
Ukachi, Madukwe Ann. "Motivational Interview; Evidence Based Strategy In The Treatment Of Alcohol And Drug Addiction." IFE Psychologia 21.3-S (2013): 174-196. Academic Search Complete. Web. 13 Feb. 2014.
In conclusion, the role-play interview helped me have a better view of my interview skills, including skills that I am able to apply appropriately and those that I have to keep practising. Through this session, I came to know that I am good at using questions to know more about my clients. However, I need to improve my listening skill in order to understand my clients’ points of view. This may also help me to respect their values after learning more about the situations. Therefore, I will be less led by my biases after understanding my clients’ perspectives. Hence, I believe that self-reflections help counsellors to be aware of their strengths and improve their counselling skills in order to help others.
I was really nervous about doing this first practice recording. While I knew how I wanted to start the conversation, I was stressed out about the unknown that comes along with these sessions. I am constantly listening to my friends talk, but how I had to respond for the counseling session was very different than what I am typically used to. I usually give my friends my opinions and advice on how I would handle the situation. It was hard for me to just sit back and let my classmate talk. I wanted to respond to many of her statements, but I had to take a step back and really just listen. In these types of counseling sessions my thoughts and opinions are not important. Rather, the focus should only be on the person you are counseling.