I can imagine a perfect world. A world where morality is of upmost importance in our dealings with each other, where morals are critically examined, and debated with reason as well as passion. This world would be a pinnacle of human achievement. A pinnacle that we are nowhere near. Why is this? Well, in today's society, morals are often associated with obeying the law, and since laws are legislated by politicians, they are subject to politics. Laws are not right in and of themselves, and morals are not a matter of a majority's opinion. Some matters that are in the domain of charity are done through politics, often citing morality as a reason. Where exactly does charity fit in with morals? With politics? In this paper I will explore the meaning of morality, its justification, and its scope as it pertains to our lives. I will also spend some time explaining how politics, laws, and charity relate to morality, and how politics often assume charitable roles.
Before diving head first into the issues surrounding morals and morality, it is important to have a clear idea of exactly what morals and morality are. First, morals are a set of rules that tell us which actions are permissible and which actions should be denounced by all people. These rules are not a matter of pure personal opinion, feeling or taste. Jan Narveson states in Moral Matters: "[w]hen you have an opinion about morals, it isn't just an opinion about what you, in particular, are to do. For it is also an opinion about what everybody else should do" (MM, 12). Second, these are rules that govern over everybody, not a single individual, or group, or society. If morals did not apply to everybody, what would be the point of acting morally? Most people might act morally, an...
... middle of paper ...
...y want to do is not only be charitable ourselves, but also to encourage charity from others. This would promote the image of your society as not only a just society, but a kind one as well.
Morality is about rules, rules that everybody agrees to abide by because it is in their interest. I have presented here some reasons why one isn't necessarily morally compelled to obey the law. I have explained why politics and morals, and politics and charity cannot mix. Unfortunately, these are merely a few reasons why a real moral society has not been realized. Morality is very complex, subject to many differing points of view. While understanding the issues presented here hopefully contributes to better moral practices, there are still many issues facing proper morality.
Works Cited
MM: Narveson, Jan. Moral Matters. Peterborough: Broadview Press, 1993.
Though individuals live by and react similarly to various situations, not all people have the same morals. I can relate to instances where I have supported a belief, regardless of the criticisms that arise, all because my choice is based upon personal morals. The same can be said regarding Debra J. Dickerson as she expresses in her novel, An American Story. In Carol Gilligan’s “Concepts of Self and Morality,” she states, “The moral person is one who helps others; goodness in service, meeting one’s obligations and responsibilities to others, if possible without sacrificing oneself” (170). After considering this statement, I strongly feel that Gilligan’s proposal lacks the depth to accurately characterize the moral person, but I am able to accept the argument raised by Joan Didion. Her essay entitled, “On Morality,” clearly provides a more compelling and acceptable statement in describing the moral person by saying, “I followed my own conscience, I did what I thought was right” (181). Joan Didion’s proposal is precise and acceptable. It is obvious that as long as people follow what they believe is the right thing to do, and approach the situation maturely, their actions can be considered examples of morality, and they can then be considered moral human beings.
To begin, “On Morality'; is an essay of a woman who travels to Death Valley on an assignment arranged by The American Scholar. “I have been trying to think, because The American Scholar asked me to, in some abstract way about ‘morality,’ a word I distrust more every day….'; Her task is to generate a piece of work on morality, with which she succeeds notably. She is placed in an area where morality and stories run rampant. Several reports are about; each carried by a beer toting chitchat. More importantly, the region that she is in gains her mind; it allows her to see issues of morality as a certain mindset. The idea she provides says, as human beings, we cannot distinguish “what is ‘good’ and what is ‘evil’';. Morality has been so distorted by television and press that the definition within the human conscience is lost. This being the case, the only way to distinguish between good or bad is: all actions are sound as long as they do not hurt another person or persons. This is similar to a widely known essay called “Utilitarianism'; [Morality and the Good Life] by J.S. Mills with which he quotes “… actions are right in the proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.';
We immediately learn that Miss Moore is not the average Harlem teacher. She is educated herself, along with being very opinionated. The children explain that she has nappy hair and no makeup, probably signifying that she was a...
Morality derives from the Latin moralitas meaning, “manner, character, or proper behavior.” In light of this translation, the definition invites the question of what composes “proper behavior” and who defines morality through these behaviors, whether that be God, humanity, or Martin Luther King in “A Letter from Birmingham Jail.” Socrates confronted the moral dilemma in his discourses millennia ago, Plato refined his concepts in his Republic, and leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi would commit their life work to defining and applying the term to political reform. Finally, after so many years, King reaches a consensus on the definition of morality, one that weighs the concepts of justice and injustice to describe morality
Explain, with specific examples from the novel, How the writer’s descriptions of location and setting reflect the changes inJane Eyre’s character. In this essay I will explain how Charlotte Bronte manages to change the mood and feelings in Jane Eyre’s character by the description of the location and setting. Throughout Jane Eyre, as Jane herself moves from one physical location to another, the settings in which she finds herself vary considerably. Bronte makes the most of this by carefully arranging those settings, to match the differing circumstances Jane finds herself in at each.
Stillinger, Jack. “The Hoodwinking of Madeline: Skepticism in The Eve of St. Agnes.” Twentieth Century Interpretations of the “Eve of St. Agnes.” Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Pgs. 67-94
Every human being carries with them a moral code of some kind. For some people it is a way of life, and they consult with their code before making any moral decision. However, for many their personal moral code is either undefined or unclear. Perhaps these people have a code of their own that they abide to, yet fail to recognize that it exists. What I hope to uncover with this paper is my moral theory, and how I apply it in my everyday life. What one does and what one wants to do are often not compatible. Doing what one wants to do would usually bring immediate happiness, but it may not benefit one in the long run. On the other hand, doing what one should do may cause immediate unhappiness, even if it is good for oneself. The whole purpose of morality is to do the right thing just for the sake of it. On my first paper, I did not know what moral theories where; now that I know I can say that these moral theories go in accordance with my moral code. These theories are utilitarianism, natural law theory, and kantianism.
Wuthering Heights Is a book by the famous author Emily Bronte who was born on July 30, 1818. The book was first published in London in 1847 as a three volume set. The author in the three volume set was printed under the alias Ellis Bell. In fact Bronte’s real name didn’t appear until 1850 on an edited commercial version. Although today Wuthering Heights is regarded as an American classic when it first came out it had mixed reviews because it went against the Victorian standards.
However, that does not stop Miss Moore from attempting to educate the young students. Miss Moore decides to show the children around, in which they stop at a toy store. Sylvia and all the other children become confused by the outrageous prices, eventually, they decide to enter: “But I feel funny, shame. But what I got to be shamed about? Got as much right to go in as anybody.” Sylvia can feel how different she is compared to the people that normally shop there. For the first time in her life, she is incredibly aware of her low economic status and her race. Sylvia feels mad and confused about it and eventually sulks away to think about everything she just learned. The first-person narration is important in the text because it is incredibly powerful to read young girls experience in discovering what it means to be poor and black in modern society. In literature, we rarely receive that perspective. In fact, the audience feels empathy for Sylvia because, before the trip to the store, she had no idea how different she was compared to whiter, richer
Morals are having principles or habits with respect to right or wrong conduct (“Morals”). Having morals is something that people can have or lack. In religion, believing in a god with morals is a necessity. In Ancient Greece, however, Greek religion believed in gods and goddesses with immoral behaviors.
Being African American in America is one of the hardest things a person will ever have to endure. Luckily, those who are born in America and are able to dodge the “African American” bullet, naturally have a greater advantage than African Americans. Do not mistake this opinion as self-hate, pity, or even a cry for sympathy. In Toni Cade Bambara’s “The Lesson”, it is implied that the children of the story are wild, African American city kids who are growing up in poverty. Although I find “The Lesson” to be very interesting and full of my favorite literary devices, (such as imagery, euphemisms, and diction) I am slightly offended by the portrayal of the characters and their actions. I am bothered by the negative light shed on the issues with poverty,
The ultimate problem is that people’s perceptions are so skewed. We tend to believe that it is bad to harm others and good to help them, which is right but limiting your judgment of one’s morality based on this is not very effective. We tend to believe in reciprocity, the idea that when someone does something good we expect something back. Instead of relying on getting something back, why not juts do good to be good. We value loyalty to a group we believe in such as religion, which we also see as an authority. We get so hooked to what is accepted by the authority that we just end up following whatever it is deemed to be right or good by them. There is no formula for morality. We have to understand that morality is a mere trick of the brain and can be influenced by many factors.
When one has morals, they have principles that define what is right and wrong. A society can have a set of morals, but individuals can also have their own morals. Often these morals overlap with each other, and the society as a whole benefits from it. But in other cases, the morals of society and individuals contradict, causing a disruption. Harmful effects can protrude from a multifaceted sense of morals.
The play is set in a small town in Norway that has just begun to develop the wings it needed to expand and become prosperous. This is in the most part due to The Baths; a business Dr. Stockmann and his brother Peter began, to cure the sick through spa treatments and rest. At the beginning, it seems as though The Baths had just begun to take off. The play is set in the Stockmann’s kitchen where Mr. Billings, a close friend and member of the People’s Herald, is having dinner. He is then joined by Hovstad, also a member of the People’s Herald, and in the absence of Dr. Stockmann they discuss the future of The Baths. The Mayor, who is also Thomas’ brother, stops in unexpectedly to have a word regarding The Baths. Since Dr. Stockmann has not yet arrived home from his walk with his sons; Billings, Hovstad, and the mayor begin to discuss future events. Hovstad explains to the mayor that he can see nothing but good in the future for the town, and that Dr. Stockmann had been holding an article he had written that was sure to spark interest in his recent discovery.
Soon after the doctor holds a town meeting to tell everyone about the baths. The mayor and Aslaksen, the newspaper printer, try to keep him from speaking. The doctor begins a long lecture in which he condemns the foundations of the town and the tyranny of the majority. The people find his speech offensive and revolt against the doctor. The next morning the doctor’s house is vandalized and all the people who supported him earlier now oppose him. Instead of leaving the town the doctor stays in the town to defy authority. His family is supportive and he says, “that the strongest man is the man who stands alone.”