Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of moral development
The importance of moral development
The importance of moral development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of moral development
In the story of Frankenstein, Victor decided among all other possible things, to create “human life”. What brought him to want to make such an atrocity? The answer is his conscience. In his deeply scientific mind, he has the means and knowledge like no other. His level of intelligence is some of which humans long to grasp, throughout their entire lives. However, having this vast abyss of intellectual superiority comes with its own set of disadvantages as well. One of which, being that he must not decide whether he should create a creature off of selfish interest, rather consider its benefit to society. Had Victor backed himself up with research, he may have been knowledgeable enough on the topic of human creation, to know that a person’s emotions …show more content…
cannot be fine-tuned. Once the monstrosity was brought into the world of the living, the initial reaction went a lot nicer than expected.
However, throughout the story, the monster becomes self aware, and begins to murder close relatives of Victor’s. It seems as though the monster has been created to a similar build as Dr. Frankenstein himself. It acts out, and has no sense of morality, which makes you wonder whether the doctor second guessed himself when deciding if bringing the creation into the world, was such a great idea. Anthropomorphic existence is programmed with the ability to make decisions, however not to distinctify whether one is morally right, or wrong. Other sides may argue that humans know the decisions that they are making, and are fully aware of the adverse side effects that can become a common occurrence when selecting a genuinely negative outcome, even after possessing the knowledge of knowing that it is bad. Conscious but conditioned decisions are influenced by the subconscious mind. These decisions are based on past experiences, our culture, peer pressuring, and media …show more content…
advertising. Much is to be said about the dismal state our minds drifts into in the decision-making process. When the brain goes into a sort of “Auto-Piloting” mode, personal morals and beliefs become blurred, in comparison to the known correct response to data. Most resolutions are mapped out in the psyche of our minds, but are not actually thought out well enough to be backed with information. Some settlements are immediately decided, because a huge fraction of humanoid actions are dictated by external influences, habits and subconsciousness. Within the lifespan of human life, we encounter many external influences that go hand-in-hand in dictating the future actions you may do some day. According to some researchers, your brain makes up its mind on a decision, ten seconds before the decision making process is needed, to be used effectively. In this given time frame of small time, there is no time for the brain to form a cognitive function fast enough, including decision making. Therefore, all decisions that need to be immediately completed/responded to in the stimuli, are already ready to be answered once the topic of area comes up. Dr John-Dylan Haynes and colleagues conducted an experiment in which the brains of 14 volunteers were analyzed while they performed a decision-based task. The volunteers were asked to press one out of two buttons when they felt they needed to. Each button was operated by a different hand. At the same time, a stream of letters were presented on a screen at 0.5-second intervals, and the volunteers had to remember which letter was showing when they decided to press their button. After the researchers analyzed the data, the earliest signal the team could pick up started around seven seconds before the volunteers reported having made a correct decision. Because there is a delay of a few seconds in the imaging, this means that the brain activity could have begun as much as ten seconds before the conscious decision. The signal came from a region called the frontopolar cortex, at the front of the brain, immediately behind the forehead. With the data presented, and the fact that that amount of volunteers was used for data-tasking, it is a possible theory that the mind really does consider all possible solutions that may appear. During the period of the 1980s, the late neurophysiologist Benjamin Libet, conducted an experiment similar to those of John-Dylan Haynes. Libet used a similar set-up to Haynes, but with just a singular button whilst measuring electrical activity in his subjects' brains. He found that the regions responsible for movement reacted a few hundred milliseconds before a conscious decision was made. Following Libet's study, it has been criticized in the past decades for the method of measuring time, and because the brain’s initial response might have been a broader preparation for movement, instead of activity relating to a specific decision. Haynes and his team further improved Libet’s previous method by asking people to choose between left or right. Because moving the left and right hands generates distinct brain signals, the researchers could show that activity genuinely reflected one of the two decisions. Within the above two experiments, a lot was to be said about the response times of normal human beings. Even though Libet’s study may not have been all that reliable, due to the circumstance in which the brain waves were measured, Haynes’ experiment was further improved making it a reliable source in deciding the conscientious decision-making process. Becoming conscious also means that a questioning of negative behaviors, actions and habits are substituted for more positive ones. Consciousness gives an amazing sensation of control over life which is very motivational and empowering. A sense of consciousness is a way of clearing out your mind of all negative thoughts. In doing so, a person may question their own morals, and attempt to correct whatever possible problem they may have socially, and mentally. Taoism can be tied to consciousness, because disciples of the Taoist faith, emphasize living in harmony with the Tao. Meaning, they seek religious solace with the mind. When religious solace is found from the Tao, the person of that set religion themself, sees a clearer, more conscience view of their mind, thus abolishing the possible “demons” that are plaguing the mind of that individual. Relatively speaking, living more consciously is all about making more deliberate decisions, without having the subconsciousness, habits, society and the environment affect the life that is lived. It is more about knowing what purpose in life is and the realization on how to live a life that makes a person happy, without living in the past or worrying about the future. A way of greatly restricting the negative effects that come along with negative thoughts, one could use the path of least resistance. The path of least resistance is an option of accomplishing goals in an easy fashion which is typicallly chosen over a path that has the option of investing hard work, effort and time into our leap towards the accomplishment of our aims.
One thing the path of least resistance is not is, a conscious decision. More likely than not, external factors or our subconsciousness influenced us to make this unconscious decision. Choosing the path of least resistance does not involve evaluating what tasks need to be done and trying to figuring out what possible barriers could keep someone from reaching their goal and does not involve the creation of personal strategies to accomplish the
goal. In conclusion, after reading the story of Frankenstein, an obvious connection of conscious and unconscious decision making, truly influenced Victor as a whole, even though he chose the wrong pathway, without weighing out the possible cons of this brash decision. He made many mistakes along the way of creating his final product. Even after the creation stages of his project, he continued the trend of bad decisions, when he decided to construct a female counterpart to the monster. These many wrong decisions cost him the lives of his beloved family members, and his best friend. It is very conclusive that Victor did not analyze, research, and prove that his experiment would not end in a bust. He was just “banking” on the creature coming out perfectly, so he may best seen as an absolute scientific mogul.
Although some critics say that the monster Victor has created is to blame for the destruction and violence that follow the experiment, it is Victor who is the responsible party. First, Victor, being the scientist, should have known how to do research on the subject a lot more than he had done. He obviously has not thought of the consequences that may result from it such as the monster going crazy, how the monster reacts to people and things, and especially the time it will take him to turn the monster into the perfect normal human being. This is obviously something that would take a really long time and a lot of patience which Victor lacks. All Victor really wants is to be the first to bring life to a dead person and therefore be famous. The greed got to his head and that is all he could think about, while isolating himself from his friends and family. In the play of Frankenstein, when Victor comes home and sets up his lab in the house, he is very paranoid about people coming in there and finding out what he is doing. At the end of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, Victor says:
Although the Creature later went on to commit crimes, he was not instinctively bad. Victor’s Creature was brought into this world with a child-like innocence. He was abandoned at birth and left to learn about life on his own. After first seeing his creation, Victor “escaped and rushed downstairs.” (Frankenstein, 59) A Creator has the duty to teach his Creature about life, as well as to love and nurture him. However, Victor did not do any of these; he did not take responsibility for his creature. One of the first things that the creature speaks of is that he was a “poor, helpless, miserable wretch; I knew, and could distinguish, nothing; but feeling pain invade me on all sides, (he) sat ...
Mary Wollstonecraft, mother of Mary Shelley and author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, held the firm belief that women were equal to men. As such, it is hard to imagine that the daughter of a prominent women’s right advocate would only portray passive and disposable women in her novel, Frankenstein. Despite this, the story only includes women such as Justine Moritz and Elizabeth Lavenza, “each of whom relies upon male intervention and agency to save them” (Cadwell). While it can be argued that these women were used to show the flaws of misogyny, on the surface they each provide nothing more than character development for the male leads or a means by which to further the plot.
In Frankenstein, Victor’s monster suffers much loneliness and pain at the hands of every human he meets, as he tries to be human like them. First, he is abandoned by his creator, the one person that should have accepted, helped, and guided him through the confusing world he found himself in. Next, he is shunned wherever he goes, often attacked and injured. Still, throughout these trials, the creature remains hopeful that he can eventually be accepted, and entertains virtuous and moral thoughts. However, when the creature takes another crushing blow, as a family he had thought to be very noble and honorable abandons him as well, his hopes are dashed. The monster then takes revenge on Victor, killing many of his loved ones, and on the humans who have hurt him. While exacting his revenge, the monster often feels guilty for his actions and tries to be better, but is then angered and provoked into committing more wrongdoings, feeling self-pity all the while. Finally, after Victor’s death, the monster returns to mourn the death of his creator, a death he directly caused, and speaks about his misery and shame. During his soliloquy, the monster shows that he has become a human being because he suffers from an inner conflict, in his case, between guilt and a need for sympathy and pity, as all humans do.
How are the themes of good and evil explored in Chapters 16 and 17 of
Upon first discovering how to make life, Victor is overwhelmed with excitement and pride, feeling as though he has unlocked the greatest power on earth. His imagination is “too much exalted” by this newfound ability, and thus determines there is no “animal as complex and wonderful as man” for him to attempt as his first creation (Shelley 43). Frankenstein does not contemplate how he will react to or interact with the human he gives life to, or that he has created an extremely twisted parent-child relationship by creating a human from dead bodies. His general lack of concern regarding the consequences of his remarkable yet dangerous power is the root of the rest of the conflict between him and his monster throughout the rest of the novel, and it exemplifies Shelley’s underlying theme that science should not be pushed past morally and psychologically safe boundaries.
After Frankenstein discovered the source of human life, he became wholly absorbed in his experimental creation of a human being. Victor's unlimited ambition, his desire to succeed in his efforts to create life, led him to find devastation and misery. "...now that I have finished, the beauty of the dream had vanished..." (Shelley 51). Victor's ambition blinded him to see the real dangers of his project. This is because ambition is like a madness, which blinds one self to see the dangers of his actions. The monster after realizing what a horror he was demanded that victor create him a partner. "I now also began to collect the materials necessary for my new creation, and this was like torture..." (Shelley 169). Victor's raw ambition, his search for glory, has left him. His eyes have been opened to see his horrible actions, and what have and could become of his creations. As a result, Victor has realized that he is creating a monster, which could lead to the downfall of mankind. His choice is simple, save his own life or save man.
He toils endlessly in alchemy, spending years alone, tinkering. However, once the Creature is brought to life, Frankenstein is no longer proud of his creation. In fact, he’s appalled by what he’s made and as a result, Frankenstein lives in a perpetual state of unease as the Creature kills those that he loves and terrorizes him. Victor has realized the consequences of playing god. There is irony in Frankenstein’s development, as realized in Victor’s desire to destroy his creation. Frankenstein had spent so much effort to be above human, but his efforts caused him immediate regret and a lifetime of suffering. Victor, if he had known the consequences of what he’s done, would have likely not been driven by his desire to become better than
native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his
Frankenstein and Science & nbsp; & nbsp; Science is the knowledge gained by a systematic study, knowledge which then becomes facts or principles. In the systematic study the first step is observation, the second step hypothesis, the third step experimentation to test the hypothesis, and lastly the conclusion whether or not the hypothesis holds true. These steps have been ingrained into every student of science, as the basic pathway to scientific discovery. This pathway does not hold as to the good or evil intention of the experiment. Though, there are always repercussions of scientific experiments.
The novel Frankenstein written by Mary Shelley is a work of fiction that breaks the ethics of science. Ethics is defined as rules of conduct or moral principles which are ignored in the story. The story is about a person named Victor Frankenstein who creates an artificial being. Victor abandons the being out of fear and the being is left to discover the outside world on his own and be rejected by people making the monster go on a violent rampage. Victor’s decision would affect him later on by the monster killing his loved ones causing Victor to suffer. Then Victor chooses to seek revenge on the monster and this choice will bring him to his death. In novel Frankenstein one might say that the main character, Victor, breaks the ethics of science when he plays God by creating his own being.
Victor Frankenstein is originally a happy character that loves to learn and read a large variety of books. He was a fiery individual who sought to understand all knowledge; regardless of how practical the information was. Evidence of this is when his father tells him not to worry about fictional writers like Cornelius Agrippa. Yet, Frankenstein states, “But here were books, and here were men who had penetrated deeper and knew more. I took their word for all that they averred, and I became their disciple” (21). Frankenstein embodies the movement in science to understand everything, and that is not necessarily a good thing (Storment 2). Frankenstein only understands that this train of thought is bad when he reaches the pinnacle of knowledge and produces the creature. The fruits of Frankenstein’s labor end up costing him the lives of his friends and family, as well as his own sanity. The feeling of guilt thrives in Frankenstein because he knows his work was the direct cause of the chaos in his life. In Frankenstein’s case, his goal of total enlightenment led to his pitiful demise. Frankenstein’s creature was not originally a monster. He is born with good intentions and is a gentle- although atrocious looking- being until he learns of the sins of the human race. The ultimate factor in the creature’s progression from harmless to
Mary Shelley expresses various ethical issues by creating a mythical monster called Frankenstein. There is some controversy on how Mary Shelley defines human nature in the novel, there are many features of the way humans react in situations. Shelley uses a relationship between morality and science, she brings the two subjects together when writing Frankenstein, and she shows the amount of controversy with the advancement of science. There are said to be some limits to the scientific inquiry that could have restrained the quantity of scientific implications that Mary Shelley was able to make, along with the types of scientific restraints. Mary Shelley wrote this classic novel in such a way that it depicted some amounts foreshadowing of the world today. This paper will concentrate on the definition of human nature, the controversy of morality and science, the limits to scientific inquiry and how this novel ties in with today’s world.
For centauries, women have been forced to live life in the outskirts of a male dominated society. During the 1800’s, the opportunities for women were extremely limited and Mary Shelly does an excellent job in portraying this in her gothic novel, Frankenstein. Furthermore, in this novel, Mary Shelly shows how society considers women to be possessions rather than independent human beings. In addition, the female characters rely heavily on men for support and survival, thus proving their inability to do it on their own. Lastly, the female characters in this novel are in many ways victimized by the male characters. In conclusion, in Mary Shelly’s novel Frankenstein, the female characters always fulfill the limited and archetypical roles that are set for them by society.
He created a life, and then spontaneously he quickly decided to run away from his creation. Victor’s actions after creating what he created were really irresponsible, and did not correctly took care of the circumstance’s he put himself in. The creation was never actually evil, but he felt abandoned by what could had been called his father. Frankenstein, the monster, was only a seeker for companionship. He strongly desired to feel loved, rather than abandoned. Society’s evil behavior toward the monster is what altered the monster’s conduct and followed to how he acted.