Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The problem of punishment
The problem of punishment
The problem of punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The problem of punishment
Erin Brockovich: Erin Brockovich is the mother of three children; unemployed and desperate for a job she joins a small law firm forcefully by convincing Ed Masry that she is smart and bright who can do a better job than those with a law degree. When Erin gets the job she is in the second level, stage three of moral development known as Interpersonal Concordance. She is trying to be a good mother, who could support and provide the best for her children. However, as the story progresses she enters the third level as she takes on a billion dollar corporation known as PG&E believing in the morals and ethics of doing business. Her endless compassion and resilient efforts to defend the people of Hinkley, makes her enter the sixth stage know as the …show more content…
They cheated, gave bribery to people in order to keep their mouth shut, and conducted their business against all the moral and ethical values of how a business should be. In my opinion all the PG&E staff be it the representative who was sent to discuss the matter with Erin, to their higher ups all were in the first level, stage one known as Self Focused. Their sheer greed for earning profits at the cost of harming the health of the people of Hinkley shows that they lacked moral ethics of doing proper and clean business. The only person who actually did something about what was happening was a guy named Charles Embry, whose pivotal role in the lawsuit tipped the odds in the favor of Erin with the crucial piece of evidence he provided her …show more content…
The harmful effects of using hexavalent chromium to human health and the environment was known by PG&E, however they misinformed the people of Hinkley that they were using chromium 3 which was actually beneficial and safe to use. They kept deceiving the people who were being affected by the side effects that hexavalent chromium had. The company lost one of the largest lawsuit in American history and ended up paying $333 million to the people of Hinkley as a compensation for what they had done. Which again shows that the company officials would do anything in order to satisfy their own greed and need for money, no matter what the
Arnold & Porter chose to sue Pittston rather than the Buffalo Mining Company because the value of the corporation allowed for adequate compensation to the victims. Author and head lawyer for the plaintiffs, Gerald M. Stern, writes that the original goal was sue to sue for $21 million for the disaster to have a material effect on the cooperation (51). To avoid responsibility Pittston attempted to prove that the Buffalo Mining Company was an independent corporation with its own board of directors. The lawyers for the plaintiffs disproved this claim by arguing the Buffalo Mining Company never held formal meetings of the board of directors and was not independent of the parent company. During this case Pittston’s Oil division had applied to build an oil refinery in Maine. The ...
Amanda Knox is innocent! The whole incident is a big mess, the Italy police do not have enough evidence. The evidence that Meredith Kercher was found dead to Amanda Knox is not enough. Kerchers blood was found on a knife that Amanda used but it was only a tiny spec of blood. The break in was not enough to say other wise if it was fake. The two of them had lived in an apartment together and they touched and used everything. Nobody would be surprised if Kercher had cut herself on accident and that's how blood got on the knife.
Erin Brockovich was a woman who had three kids and was struggling to provide for them. She had no choice but to go on a search for a job. Erin managed to find a job working with her lawyer. Eventually, she had a case that had the potential of turning her life around. Erin had people try to get over her, including the lawyer she was working with.
Based on the evidence presented above and the circumstances of the case, I’ve decided that there is not enough strong evidence linking Amanda Knox to the murder of Meredith Kercher. The police were careless with their handling of the evidence, which led me to doubt some of their finding. Since the case relied heavily on physical evidence to convict Amanda Knox, Raffaele Sollecito, and Rudy Guede, the evidence should’ve been taken care of better. Considering that a lot of the evidence found was mishandled in some way, I argue that any evidence that might have linked Knox to the crime isn’t enough for a conviction.
The jury found that “Monsanto had engaged in outrageous behavior, and held the corporations and its corporate successors liable on all six counts it considered - including negligence, nuisance, wantonness and suppression of the truth.” (Crean) Monsanto faced many lawsuits over the harm caused by PCB between 1990 and today.
Based on what I watched and understood in the movie Lars Von Trier’s “Breaking the Waves”, relating it to the Kierkegaardian concept of the teleological suspension of the ethical, Bess McNeill shows ethical acts to her husband, Jan. But the question is, what is ethical? Ethical means that the thing or action which a society follows or a set of standards or norms that to be followed. It is applicable to the universal and it is in ethical that which distinguishes either our action is good or bad. It doesn’t destroy any law or order in the society. In relation to Bess, as the wife of Jan, she did the ethical acts as a wife such as taking care of her husband, doing the household chores, making Jan happy, and doing her sexual obligation to her husband
Each position in criminal justice holds power and responsibility, and therefore, it is very important that said people in those positions do not abuse it. Unethical behavior in the criminal justice system takes away trust and respect from authority, and as a consequence, the law is more easily disregarded if the people lack faith in the system. It can, also, contribute to crime and/or cause citizens to not report crimes. Society should have indubitable confidence in the men and women of the criminal justice system. Law enforcement officers violating even the smallest rule could lead to more serious infractions. Syed (1997) states, "Every instance of corruption bends or violates a rule or law and, similar to the granting of impunity, may contribute to an officer's perceptions of the law as applying differently to different people and increase the ease with which violations can be rationalized." Having less than ethical persons in our criminal justice system can lead to a weakened society, the ruining of lives, and even add to crime.
It was believed that it would be cheaper for PG&E to dispose of the chemicals illegally since the company officials were more concerned with the profits than about people's lives. The hiding of this critical information had tragic consequences for the people involved. PG&E must have realized that they were guilty since they settled the case for $330 million in private arbitration. All in all, it probably ended up costing PG&E more money than it would have if they had properly lined the water pools and taken care of things the correct way in the beginning.
Police ethics are extremely important because ethics are the typical of “fair and honest conduct” (pg 460). People may have a different definition of what is fair and what is honest, and there are different circumstances where officers may not be able to be honest; such as covert investigations. Society in general determines what our ethical standards and moral principles are. Individual morals vary among all of us as they are what we as an individual consider to be right or wrong. We also have morals that are set by society. These are what we as a society consider to be right or wrong and may go hand in hand with individual morals. Morals change as society and people change, therefore we as a country have to adapt to what the changing morals are.
Within the Gilbane Gold case, the major problem is the contribution of water pollution by dumping chemicals to speed production for Z CORP. However, there is doubt as to what extent the company violated city regulations. Tom Richards believes that Z-CORP broke regulations repeatedly but Professor Massin believes that it is not solid evidence. Part of the problem is that two different tests are involved: an older and a less sensitive test which does not break regulations but there is also the newer and more sensitive one which does. The newer test was said that the company just broke city regulations, but not by a large amount.
It was clear that the governments in America would not issue a permit to Union Carbide plant under such circumstances, which lacked severe environmental standards and permitted slum dwellers to live near the plant and so on. Such actions were the ones that led to more deaths. Before the major gas leakage from the MCI unit on December 3, 1984, some people were killed because of phosgene gas leakage. However, no one took it seriously, despite the media report. One of the reasons that people ignore this was because people didnt know the potential danger of the chemical plant.
Ethics is a branch of philosophy that deals with the moral principles and values that govern our behavior as human beings. It is important in the human experience that we are able to grasp the idea of our own ethical code in order to become the most sensible human beings. But in that process, can ethics be taught to us? Or later in a person’s life, can he or she teach ethics the way they learned it? It is a unique and challenging concept because it is difficult to attempt to answer that question objectively because everybody has his or her own sense of morality. And at the same time, another person could have a completely different set of morals. Depending on the state of the person’s life and how they have morally developed vary from one human
Criminal Justice professionals make decisions everyday and they have to be able to recognize when an issue involves ethical considerations. Therefore, in order to recognize these issues and make appropriate and correct decisions, it is important that the criminal justice professional study ethics. In order to make a good ethical decision the professional will have to have the ability to apply knowledge of ethics, know the ethical terminology and the concepts needed in making a good ethical decision.
The question that rises is why didn’t someone say something sooner? Did those people have self worth, did they have the given morals to make the right decisions. For the most part no, the Enron case Arthur Andersen the auditor knew what was going on, he knew how bad the accounts were. The subordinates knew as well but followed what Arthur was doing. They didn’t speak up because of the ethics within the organization the employees did not speak up against the wrongness. If the code of ethics within the business pushed for the rightness and Andersen lead by example we can assume that the case would of ended much differently and Enron would not of reached the magnitude that they did.
In order to understand ethical responsibility, it is necessary to understand the meaning of the word “ethics”. Ethics is the study of moral values, or individual and societal convictions that allow a person to distinguish right from wrong (Macrina, 2005). In a more objective sense, ethics can also be described as the analysis of reasoning—the “logic” behind decision-making. Ethical values are the framework of any civilized society, often resulting in common behavioral codes that are accepted across a particular group or culture (Macrina, 2005). In fact, the study of ethics is not restricted to political or social behavior. Applied ethics, or ethics in the workplace, refer to the compliance with principles found in specific fields or occupations. Scientific professions, like other professions, observe certain ethical standards (Macrina, 2005).