Ethics is a moral principle that governs a person or group of people’s behavior. Philosopher’s thoughts were on what makes one act right or wrong and how does the act affect our soles. But not everyone is the same, they all think and act differently especially from the era that Aristotle and Confucius lived in. How can one completely understand the nature of humans when everyone walks different paths and have different beliefs. There are many a concepts of what is wrong and right. Taking what doesn’t belong to you is wrong. Wanting an access of something is frowned upon. Taking a life is wrong, treating a person like property is wrong. Paying your taxes is right, helping a child or elderly is right thing to do. Showing someone you care, giving …show more content…
Philosophy was an activity that people would seek to understand the fundamentals of truth, relationships with others and themselves. Philosophers will ask, seek answers, and argue the answers to the questions they are seeking the truth for. There are so many philosophers from Aristotle, Confucius, Plato, Socrates, to Thomas Hobbes. Who all had quotes that have been taught and have a lot of meaning, Aristotle quoted-“At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst”; a man who has no boundaries is a dangerous person, he also quoted-“the roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet”; it is hard to study and have a family but the outcome is wonderful. Confucius quoted- “Success depends upon previous preparation, and without such preparation there is sure to be failure”; being prepared for what life might through at you if not you wont concur. Plato quoted-“Good actions give strength to ourselves and in spire good actions in others”; one good deed spreads like wild flowers. Socrates quoted-“To know, is to know that you know nothing That is the meaning of true knowledge”; knowledge is the key to unlocking doors that can take you any were, the more you know the more you don’t know. Thomas Hobbes quoted- “Understanding is nothing else than conception caused by speech”; understanding can be caused by speech in many ways …show more content…
The question that rises is why didn’t someone say something sooner? Did those people have self worth, did they have the given morals to make the right decisions. For the most part no, the Enron case Arthur Andersen the auditor knew what was going on, he knew how bad the accounts were. The subordinates knew as well but followed what Arthur was doing. They didn’t speak up because of the ethics within the organization the employees did not speak up against the wrongness. If the code of ethics within the business pushed for the rightness and Andersen lead by example we can assume that the case would of ended much differently and Enron would not of reached the magnitude that they did. The ethical moral all depends on how children are raised, and were how they are brought up. What their parents believed in, and how to act, to stand up for one’s self and stand up for ones beliefs. The more businesses using a stronger code of ethics will have a stronger internal business community. For example Samsonite one man started a suite case company and treated his employees just as if they were his family and customers. The respect, honesty, and loyalty stayed with the company to this day. Samsonite is known for their luggage but in the business world they are known for their code of
Ethics is defined by as the “branch of philosophy dealing with values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions
Ethics is a doing and learning experience which causes us as humans to keep an open mind to change. Generally, ethics ask us to live mindfully, to think how we act and even how we feel or do things, which can change the outcome. Sometimes we go down certain roads, which may be harder or make things more complicated or complex instead of making an easier option we just take the easier way out, usually the way that calls for
After news of the scandal of Enron, one of the hottest items on e-Bay was a 64-page copy of Enron’s corporate code of ethics. One seller/former employee proclaimed it had “never been opened.” In the forward Kenneth L. Lay, CEO of Enron stated, “We want to be proud of Enron and to know that it enjoys a reputation for fairness and honesty and that it is respected (Enron 2).” For a company with such an extensive code of ethics and a CEO who seemed to want the company to be respected for that, there are still so many unanswered questions of what exactly went wrong. I believe that simply having a solid and thorough code of ethics alone does not prevent a company from acting unethically when given the right opportunity.
The main similarity between Socrates, Buddha and Confucius, is that they stressed the importance of honor and integrity. All three of them taught a form of the golden rule. The golden rule is “Do not do to others what you would not like them do to you” (Clarken, 2010). Socrates was a philosopher in Athens, and he encouraged people to reflect on ethics, morality and knowledge (Tignor et al. p.197). Morality and ethics are what people believe is right, and what people believe is wrong. Buddha also known as Siddhartha Gautama, believed in the ascetic life, and that life is full of faith to reach nirvana. Nirvana is enlightenment and the absent of pain (Tignor et al. p. 177). To be able to reach Nirvana, people have to follow Buddha’s teachings known as the four truths and emptiness. Confucius believed that humans behaved ethically because it is in their makeup to do so. He also highly believed in respect for the elders or
Ethics are the principles that shape individual lives in modern society. It is a subjective idea that seems to have a standard in society. Ethics and morals are the major factors that guide individuals to make right and wrong choices. Something that is morally right to one person might be the very opposite of what another person would view as right. There are many factors that can trigger a change in an individual’s view of morality.
Philosophy can best be described as an abstract, scholarly discourse. According to the Greek, philosophia refers to ‘love of knowledge’. This is an aspect that has involved a great number of clever minds in the world’s history. They have sought to deal with issues surrounding the character of veracity and significantly exploring the endeavors to respond to these issues. This paper seeks to compare and contrast the philosophy of Aristotle with that of Confucius. This is with a clear concentration on the absolute functions of these philosophies and how they take care of the particular responsibility of a person and the broader society and the resultant effects on societies (Barnes, 1995).
Confucius and Hsun Tzu are both prominent figures in Chinese history who lived in different time periods but ended up with the same ideas. The environment that they grew up in was quite similar in characteristics and so it is no surprise that their teachings were similar as well. There are mainly two ways that their ideas are similar: their focus on ancient texts and ancient sage kings and also their view on learning. Confucius and Hsun Tzu shares many similar characteristics but they have one fundamental difference which is their view on human nature.
Ethics can be set apart as the subject to have many different categories, some of them could be good and evil, up or down, high and low. Ethics tells us what is the better option not just for ourselves nor generation, but for the human race as a whole. We are to make good representative of all and not just to yourself, do good so that good can be spread out throughout the whole universe and make it a universal law. In other words set the ground rules to acting morally enough to make your life a life worth living, with goodness in what we do and create. What I would consider a good foundation or knowledge of ethics could be explained with the moral philosophy of Aristotle and Emmanuel Kant, what I will cover here won’t be considered to be everything nor something, I will shimmer the subject on how these two stand in their own philosophy.
Ethics is a broad branch of philosophy which deals with the moral behavior. In this regard, actions are classified according to the consequences they result to, internal characteristics as well as the character exhibited by the actions in the end. Three ethical systems are used to judge actions between the wrong and the right. I will concentrate on utilitarianism that is widely used over the world.
What is the ethics of the business? It is moral theories that govern groups’ behavior and rational analysis of morality. In fact, there are three main core values in ethics which are life, happiness and ability to achieve goals. People view the world in a selfish and ethical way. Selfish way is when the person only cares about their own core values.
Ethics are the set beliefs and values of an individual which they apply to circumstances relating to morality. To act in an ‘ethical’ manner, an individual must display integrity by doing what they believe to be right.
With the imagination of hyper competition need of the business ethics emerged because there is a brutal competition due to globalization. Organizations want to increase their market share and profits, they didn’t consider about the cost to others. And now a days misconducts can happen with the creative knowledge of the people. Enron case is an example for this. Once Snickers, Nike also used child labor for manufacturing process since the low cost of it. But this is not only reason to have a trend on business ethics. In past businesses were simple but today businesses has become very complex. So people within the organization have very little relationships and organizations are not giving sufficient importance for employees but only to
[1] Ethics is defined as “the code of moral principles and values that governs the behaviour of a person or a group with respect to what is right or wrong” (Samson and Daft, 2005, p.158)
When asked what is the definition of ethics, many responded that being moral meant doing the right thing. But how can we justify what is a good action and what is a bad action? All humans were created equal, but our principles, and ways of thinking can be extremely different. Some may say doing the right thing means following your heart, your inner feelings and intuition. But emotions can be misleading. Others say in order to do what is the morally right thing means to follow the law and do what is right by society, to be accepted. But today’s society is judgmental and can be corrupted with numerous opinions due to the diversity of cultures. So what does it mean to be ethical? Being ethical means doing what is right in terms of virtues, fairness, duties, responsibilities, obligations, and moral believes all which derived from cultures and family backgrounds.
Ethics is a system of moral principles and a branch of philosophy which defines what is acceptable for both individuals and society. It is a philosophy that covers a whole range of things that have an importance in everyday situations. Ethics are vital in everyones lives, it includes human values, and how to have a good life, our rights and responsibilities, moral decisions what is right and wrong, good and bad. Moral principles affect how people make decisions and lead their lives (BBC, 2013). There are many different beliefs about were ethics come from. These consist of; God and Religion, human conscience, the example of good human beings and a huge desire for the best for people in each unique situation, and political power (BBC, 2013).