Amanda Knox

632 Words2 Pages

Amanda Knox Amanda Knox is innocent! The whole incident is a big mess, the Italy police do not have enough evidence. The evidence that Meredith Kercher was found dead to Amanda Knox is not enough. Kerchers blood was found on a knife that Amanda used but it was only a tiny spec of blood. The break in was not enough to say other wise if it was fake. The two of them had lived in an apartment together and they touched and used everything. Nobody would be surprised if Kercher had cut herself on accident and that's how blood got on the knife.

Amanda Knox to this day is a free women living in the united states. Not a lot of people realise that she is free for a reason, she is innocent. If Amanda was guilty she would be more soft about everything, she would continually cry and cry. Which she does cry during trials but if you put yourself in her shoes and you got blamed for killing one of your friends that you lived with everyday then what would you do? Rudy Hermann Guede's evidence was found in the room of the murder. …show more content…

I believe that Rudy didn't wanna do it alone and he didn't do it alone. Rudy figured that Amanda wouldn’t have done it. She is weak and would have went straight to the police with it. Rudy need someone bigger with muscles. Kercher was stabbed in the neck, this small teenager would have struggled so hard to have done this. In the evidence it points out that after you kill someone then the body is covered up, mostly by women. I'm a male and I feel that if I ever killed someone or had to kill someone then Id cover them up. The feel that the Italy police had a big problem walking into this as

Open Document