Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on moon landing conspiracy
Apollo 11 conspiracy essay
Essays on moon landing conspiracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on moon landing conspiracy
Carley Bartrum
English 101
Sarah Angleton
15 October 2017 A Walk on the Moon Imagine a life with scarce technology and little advancements around you, when all of a sudden, the United States government decides to send a shuttle to space and land on the moon. Would you believe it happened or would you think it was a hoax? This happened on 20 July 1969, when color television just became something new, wall phones were still a thing, and typewriters were used to write essays. Most people had never even flown on an airplane, let alone a rocket that blasted off into space. The moon was a wonder in the night sky over 238,000 miles away and many disbelieved that any earthly object could reach it. While most Americans were thrilled
…show more content…
People from all over the world watched the Apollo spacecraft go to and from the moon with telescopes. However, conspiracy theorists believe that you should be able to see the items, such as several parts of the Eagle, the U.S. flag, and other mementos left on the moon by Aldrin and Armstrong with telescopes (National Geographic). Although the telescopes could be used to view the spacecraft’s travels, they could not see what was happening on the moon. Calculations disprove the conspiracy theory, as they claim not even the Hubble Space Telescope could see such items on the moon. According to Plait, "even with the biggest telescope on Earth, the smallest thing you can see on the surface of moon is something bigger than a house." Thus, you would not be able to see the items left on the moon like the theorists …show more content…
They point out that the flag appears to be waving , but how could this be since there is no air on the moon? The astronauts explained that they had just planted the flag so it was still in motion when the picture was taken. The astronauts also bent the horizontal rods which created a rippled effect (National Geographic). Then the conspiracists argue the photo is fake because there are no stars seen in the background. Once again, the astronauts explain that the exposure setting on their camera would not film the stars and the sunlight reflected on the moon’s surface had made the stars hard to see (National Geographic). The conspiracists argue about the lighting and shadows in the pictures indicating that studio lighting was being used but the astronauts explain that various sources of light such as the sun, the Earth’s reflected light and light reflected off the lunar module and spacesuits created the effect. One picture shows what appears to be studio lights but scientists explain that these images were simply made by the camera lens reflections. Another issue the conspiracists raise is that there is no crater pictured from the spaceship landing. They argue that a hole should have been created under spacecraft , However, NASA explains that the spacecraft made a soft landing and that the moon’s surface is so tough that
As a result of the successful mission that landed the first men on the moon, called the Apollo 11 mission, many people were inspired to provide commentary on this landing. Although these texts describe unique individual purposes about this landing, they all effectively support their purposes through the use of several rhetorical devices.
Leavitt, K. (n.d.). Do Non-Parallel Shadows in Moon Landing Photos Prove a NASA Hoax?. Yahoo Contributor Network. Retrieved May 6, 2014, from http://voices.yahoo.com/do-non-parallel-shadows-moon-landing-photos-prove-3981262.html?cat=37
The following four texts apart of the Culminating Activity were all related to the Apollo 11 mission in 1969, which had first put a man on the moon. The first article was from the Times of London, and served to describe the events of the moon landing from the astronaut's point of view. The article used anecdotal evidence to describe Aldrin and Armstrong's experience in order to inform the audience of what had occurred, as well as the reactions in several different countries.. The speaker is a from a reputable news source, The Times, and is informing the European audience - as this event was apart of America’s space program, NASA - of the landing as a great success. Although
Once the United States landed Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the moon, it was clear that the U.S. hoaxed the moon landing due to observations being viewed during the live footage of the moon landing. When watching the United States land on the moon, viewers claim to have watched the flag waving on live television. As known, there is no atmosphere in space or on the moon, so why should the flag be waving? NASA clai...
... “of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to earth” The space program fascinates the American people. In the early 1960s whenever space flights were launched during school hours students would gather in gyms and auditoriums to watch the lift offs on television. The race to the moon continued through the 1960s. It is one of the nations single most expensive projects of the decade, costing $56 billion.
Villard, Ray. "Did NASA Fake the Moon Landing?." Astronomy. July 2004: 48-53. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 08 Apr. 2014
No one can physically prove that the US landed on the moon. So, will Americans ever know the real truth about the moon landings? What one's eyes see, one believes. So, from all the evidence that NASA obtained, it proves that they really did send men to the moon in 1969.
In 1961, the United States of America was embroiled in the Cold War with the Soviet Union. This confrontation was taking place not only on land, sea and air, but in space as well. On May 25th, 1961 recently elected US President John F. Kennedy addressed a joint session of Congress, during which he outlined his now famous Man on the Moon challenge. It was through this ambitious dream that the creation of the National Aeronautical Space Administration (NASA) came about, which President Kennedy challenged to put a man on the moon by the end of the decade. Although he didn't live to see the achievement of his dreams, the United States successfully landed Astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin on the moon on July 20, 1969 and brought them home safely1. It was President Kennedy's passionate beliefs that come through not only in his style of writing but in his delivery of the speech that drive home his point and get Congress, Industry and the American people to take up his call to arms.
Sometimes we all feel as if no one person could or would ever truly love us as we deserve. This is the case in the Moon for the Misbegotten. A young, not so attractive, wants to be loved but fears that if she did love, her life would not be as it is now. She fears change and not because she wants the life she is leading but because it means she would have to free herself from who she pretends to be.
As important of an endeavor as travelling to the moon was, a definite purpose to it is not immediately clear. However, it was a remarkable accomplishment for mankind, and the United States wanted to lead it. Millions of people watched the televised event because they knew this was an incredible advancement for humans (Redd). As Neil Armstrong made the first step, he summed up the point that this event would forever be an important achievement to the human race, "That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind" (Armstrong 268). At times it may seem that the development of new technology is stalling, but the moon landing proves that man is and will continue to make advancements. Only 66 years passed between the first airplane by the Wright Brothers and the moon landing (Stimson).
Do you believe in the moon landing conspiracy? There are various theories that skeptics have used to attempt to accuse NASA of faking the Apollo moon landings, although all these simple explanations will prove these theories wrong. The moon landing conspiracy was “claimed” to be a hoax since it was the only time the U.S. has ever landed on the moon was under Nixon’s administration, and the reason for this is after we finally made it to the moon the interest for the USSR else to make it there died out just like the flow of money that had been invested into the missions; skeptics attempt to say that it was faked since even with the technological advances we haven’t been back to the moon, but this is easily proven wrong by simply stating that the lower-orbit missions have potential elsewhere for military purposes. When Apollo 11 landed, it was resting on top of a rock with a thin layer of sand. Skeptics wonder why there are numerous footprints of the astronauts while there is no evidence of the lunar module.
The year before the moon landing, 1968, was one of the most violent and bitter years for American citizens. From the war in Vietnam to the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Americans had begun to lose faith in their divided nation. With the activist riots in Chicago over preventing the election of Lyndon B. Johnson’s Vice-President, Hubert Humphrey, America was filled social unrest until the next year. In 1969, the uplifting broadcast of Neil Armstrong landing safely on the moon had given confirmation that America could still rise from the distress and achieve greatness. The significance of the moon landing became a symbol for the American people of all their nation’s accomplishments.
The Moon Landing Hoax Conspiracy. (n.d.). Moon Landing Hoax Conspiracy. Retrieved April 27, 2014, from http://www.moonconnection.com/moon_landing_hoax.phtml
...lieve that millions of years ago, a piece of rock as big as Mars hit the Earth, and the collision blasted a huge amount of rock into space, and the shattered pieces of rock went into orbit around the Earth. Over millions of years, the rocks clumped together to form the moon, and now it is not the pieces of rock that orbit the Earth, but the moon itself. Scientists, Native Americans, and many other people have their theories of how the moon became, but none have been proven. Scientists have studied the moon for many years, and have proven many theories, but not this one.
“That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.” It was July 20 1969, the day that reshaped our nation and gave us unparalleled dreams for the future. The impact of the day goes far beyond our pride and nationalism; that day would change space exploration and technology forever. Just like a shooting star, that day would give us a glimpse of hope. A chance to see an event so breathtaking and defying, it would be man’s greatest accomplishment in the 20th century. As millions of people watched from their TV sets, a rush of euphoria came over the nation as Neil Armstrong stepped foot on the surface of the moon. It was the first time in the history of mankind that we would step on the surface of another celestial body. John F. Kennedy dared us to dream, he inspired the nation to reach for the moon, to set ourselves apart from the rest of the world. The Space Race was symbolic of many things. Our future as the technically dominate nation was secured in place; just as secure as Old Glory would be, when she was driven down into the soil of the moon. We not only reached the moon, we conquered it as a nation; united.