Momaday And D Brown Analysis

477 Words1 Page

In N. Scott Momaday’s and D. Brown’s separate passages, they describe different views on the landscapes in Oklahoma. Momaday’s purpose is to reveal that in the midst of harsh surroundings, reverence can be found within.. Brown’s purpose is to explain how the relationship of nature is destroyed over time. Momaday creates not only a harsh tone, but also a spiritual one in order to reveal to the reader that the landscapes unforgivable qualities hide its sense of awe; while Brown adopts a mourningful tone in order to convey the landscape’s hopelessness and despair. Momaday’s diction first off presents nature’s brutal abilities on its surrounding land; he describes how the shrubbery and growth “writhe with fire,” and that the grasshoppers and insects “pop out like corn” in order to “sting the flesh” of observing victims. The words “writhe in fire” represent the suffering nature bestows on the land and in order to show how horrible it is to be there. The grasshoppers “popping up like corn” portrays them as an overwhelming force that engulfs everything, while the words “sting the flesh” the insects unforgiving attitude for their prey. However, Momaday shifts; he illuminates …show more content…

He describes how the sun “bakes” the earth, the grasshoppers “consume the parched grass,” and how the prairies are full of “endless desolation.” The word “bakes” exhibits nature’s hostility to its surrounding lands. The grasshoppers eating the “parched grass” convey how on top of the grass slowly starving and dying, it has to deal with the grasshoppers devouring it as well; which emphasizes nature’s unforgivable attitude towards the land. The words “endless desolation” reveal that the land is nothing but despair, and that it is full of endless agony and suffering. This bleak description expresses a miserable tone that deduces the reader’s mind to believe the landscape is barren and

Open Document