With a positive mindset, almost all Millennials will become tolerant of immigrants through interracial and cultural interactions. Because the ease of connectivity with immigrants, Millennials learn more about immigrants ' cultures and tradition. Through understanding immigrants ' background, less tolerant Millennials may change their ideology as they understand more about culture. The culture and ethnicity that surround Millennials influences the way they "formulate their ethical thinking and develop intentions concerning their behavior" (Smith & Clark, 2010, p 2). Because being immersed in culture, Millennials develop an idea of tolerant and can dismiss xenophobia. Those who are unsure of their opinions can solidify their standing on immigration …show more content…
Immigrants who recently immigrated to America may not know English fluently. This language barrier limits communication as they do not speak the same languages. This cause immigrants to "stay within a circle of" culturally similar people (Wan Shun Eva Lam, 2006, p 177). Being in an unfamiliar environment and unable to speak the same language deter communication. Language is a very complex entity and without an understanding of language, communication and intention is obscure (Katz, 1947, 17). Without a valid form of interaction, it will be harder to influence Millennials; however, there are forms of breaking the language …show more content…
There are two type of friendship: homophilic, friends because of same identity, or heterophilic, friends because of interest or proximity (Maxwell, 2002, p 268). Because of an influx of immigrants, Millennials are surrounded by immigrants. Along with Millennials being more optimist and open minded, the presence of a different culture sparks interest, helping form a heterophilic friendship. Because of immigration and Millennials attitudes, friendship between two different culture is plausible and doable, promoting the development of tolerant and acceptance in
Marion Winik’s “What Are Friends For?” expresses the characteristics of friendships and their importance in her existence. Winik begins by stating her theory of how some people can’t contribute as much to a friendship with their characteristic traits, while others can fulfill the friendship. She illustrates the eight friendships she has experienced, categorized as Buddies, Relative Friends, Work Friends, Faraway Friends, Former Friends, Friends You Love to Hate, Hero Friends, and New Friends. In like manner, the friendships that I have experienced agree and contradict with Winik’s categorizations.
Previous generations of Americans scored much higher than other democracies in regards to duty-based citizenship. Today, we score higher in both duty-based and engaged citizenship (Dalton 2008, 141). We’re also far more tolerant of citizens of developed democracies, though we often have difficulties applying this to groups we dislike (Dalton 2008, 152). Our higher tolerance could, in large part, be contributed being a diverse nation. Tolerance is challenging to measure simply because it can be defined differently for each country. The best method for cross-cultural studies is the “content-controlled” measure, asking individuals which groups they disliked the most and their tolerance level toward that group. Engaged citizenship seems to increase tolerance (Dalton2008, 154).
In the21st century, Amazing changes in communication has affected interpersonal relationships. Some prefer to use technology like Facebook, Line, and Wechat to communicate with their friends rather than talking in person. Communicating with technology will make them alienated. Interpersonal relationships are also important by personal talking, which may lead to improve relationships. In her essay, “Connectivity and Its Discontents”, Sherry Turkle believes technology weakens interpersonal relationship among friends, and relatives. In “Mother Tongue”, Amy Tan claims talking with her mother and husband in a personal way can improves their relationship. Using technology to communicate will alienate and widen the distance between friends; talking
For more than 300 years, immigrants from every corner of the globe have settled in America, creating the most diverse and heterogeneous nation on Earth. Though immigrants have given much to the country, their process of changing from their homeland to the new land has never been easy. To immigrate does not only mean to come and live in a country after leaving your own country, but it also means to deal with many new and unfamiliar situations, social backgrounds, cultures, and mainly with the acquisition and master of a new language. This often causes mixed emotions, frustration, awkward feelings, and other conflicts. In Richard Rodriguez’s essay “Aria: Memoir of a Bilingual Childhood”, the author describes the social, cultural and linguistic difficulties encountered in America as he attempts to assimilate to the American culture. Richard Rodriguez by committing himself to speaking English, he lost his cultural ties, family background and ethnic heritage.
It is true that the more people from different cultures that are in a given area, the more the cultures are diversified. However, with all realities, some claim that immigrants dilute the American culture. Indeed, they cause some changes to the culture. Nevertheless, these changes can bring a wealth of attraction and a source of beauty for the country that everyone should be proud of. It is obvious that every single immigrant in the US has his own culture and way of life. When all these are added together, they form a very rich culture. In addition, they bring various interesting aspects such as food, music, literature, etc. That makes the Americans rich in cultural knowledge. The importance of cultural diversity is that it teaches the people to understand each other’s views, interests, and ideas and helps people view the world in different ways. This would finally lead the society to work towards each other’s interest, mutual goals, and objectives. Tamar Jacoby in his article “Are Today’s Immigrants Assimilating in U.S Society, Yes,” he said that, “Those who are coming now are people who understand cultural fluidity, understand intermarriage and find that a natural, easy thing. This maintains unity and balances in the society” (411). Once this stage is reached, all the problems would be solved. Then it can be said that America has reached a true democracy, echoed by
Many immigrants have closer ties to their home country. This affects the people that they talk to in America and how often the talk to people that don't speak their native language. “Dawb was already attending...High School, … early fifty percent of the student body … many of whom were Hmong.”(Yang 56). If you talk a lot with other immigrants from your home country it is most likely that you don't want to go out of your comfort zones and want to with other people that are like you. “… Compared with results from 2002, more immigrants say that they spend time with people from their birth country and have closer ties there.” (Bittle 45). You are also more likely to spend more time with them. “ It is the 1960s … The men are huddled … overhearing. French, English, and Kreyòl commingle. French, I understand. English … is from that of an American child. Kreyòl, the language of my birthplace, is a mystery. Kreyòl predominates…” (Benoit 31). Immigrants also call their family and friends back in their home country a minimum of once a week. This has increased by 12 points, 40% from 28%. It is very difficult for many of the immigrants to get to know other people that aren't from their home country. If the immigrants were to be more comfortable and know these people, than the immigrants would learn the customs.
One element that greatly affects an immigrant’s experience in a new country is how they are viewed and treated by the people of that country. In the article President Obama: “Immigrants and Refugees Revitalize and Renew America”, President Obama is giving a speech at a naturalization ceremony in Washington, DC. He is welcoming new citizens from many different countries. Immigration being a popular topic in America today, President Obama brought some good points about it to our attention. In the speech, President
To function in a new country, the immigrants have to learn the country 's language. This is why the parents in Pat Mora 's “Immigrants” focus on speaking to their children in “thick English” (line 7). They do not think it is necessary to teach their children their own native language, instead they “whisper in their dark parent bed” (lines 10-11). They do this to make their children fit in;
In recent years, large numbers of immigrants have migrated into the USA from Mexico, Philippine, Vietnam, China, and other counties. As of 2009, immigrants comprised 12.5% (38.5 million) of the total U.S. population (Batalova and Aaron par. 7). In 2011, the U.S. Census Bureau found that 50.4% of children younger than the age of one were Hispanic, black, Asian American, or belonging to other minority groups (Morello and Ted par. 2), and more than 60 million people who are 5 years old and older spoke a language other than English at home (Camille 3). Faced with the cultural diversity brought by immigrants, many nativists worry that the United States will lose the English language as an important core of a common cultural unity. With the help of organizations such as U.S. English and ProEnglish, the English-only movement is experiencing its second resurgence since the 1980’s.
Current studies suggest that intergenerational relationships (Umberson, 2002) are gradually becoming more important to Mexican - Americans (Swartz, 2009). Mexicans enjoy the intergenerational growth between first-generation immigrants and their second-generation children (Duncan & Trejo, 2011). Next of kin to their parents, the U.S.-born second generation experiences remarkable increases in English skills, educational accomplishment, and income and prefer to speak English rather than Spanish, and by the third generation most Mexican Americans no longer speak Spanish at all. (Duncan & Trejo, 2011).
I built upon my cross-cultural experiences as I befriended exchange students from Belgium, Japan, and Korea. Each time, the friendships enriched my appreciation and understanding of not only my own culture, but the very concept of culture. What falls under the cultural blanket can vary from person to person, and I found it to be very interesting that while one person could claim lan...
“Communication problems, beyond the obvious language differences, became a real barrier to honest dialogue”.
Culture has a big impact on how we all fit in as individuals in today’s society, and since this assignment is about that I decided to include some of my own experiences to illustrate my point of view and compare it with those of my classmates and some of the readings.
Most nations experience some sort of immigration, be it from a neighboring nation mired in conflict, or from someone seeking better economic prospects across the globe. Regardless of circumstance, the question inevitably arises about how to deal with these new countrymen. A hotly debated issue for many years, certain corners of American political discourse center around the idea that in order to protect the dominant culture, policies ought to be in place that coerce immigrants to adopt the customs of this, their new home, while abandoning traits distinctive of their place of origin. This reactionary mindset that values assimilation over integration and the preservation of uniqueness of culture is harmful to immigrant groups themselves, and American society as a whole. Rather than attempting to construct a common identity amongst vastly different groups, the behaviors and beliefs that make certain groups different ought to be celebrated and respected, as these differences constitute the true American identity and provide a richness that allows America to continue strengthening.
...ents go on addressing them in their natural language, but the children reply in English. What the children of immigrants end up with is not a compromise, not a blend. They end up pure and simple with the language and culture of their peers” (pg. 30).