Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of falklands war on britain
Operation logistics in the Falkland war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of falklands war on britain
Introduction
The Magnitude of the Falklands/Malvinas conflict in 1982 between Britain and Argentina dictated that both employ a handful of military operational arts particularly logistics, command and control. In the heart, of the 1982 conflict in the contentious issue of the Falklands/Malvinas islands ownership, Command and control, and logistical functions featured prominently among the operations and preparations of both warring parties. According to Hime (2010, 4), “Ownership of the Falklands/Malvinas Islands since their initial discovery has always been determined by force, with British control last established in 1833 following the expulsion of the Argentine gunboat Sarandi, and its contingent of soldiers, convicts from the penal colony at San Carlos, and Argentine settlers”. The bone of contention arose from Argentina’s quest to reclaim the Falkland Islands. Consequently, this potential invasion threat called for the British Marines to be prepared to counter any military, bureaucratic, or logistical threat posed by the Argentines.
According to Thomson (1991, 2), Britain learned of the invasion threat on the actual year of the conflict, April 1982. In light of all these occurrences, both countries relied on the command and control, and logistical, military operational functions prominently. The essay focuses on how both countries used the two functions in the planning, synchronization, and conduct of the operation. In the command, and control function the paper expounds on the factors that influenced and determined command and control compositions in both Britain and Argentina. From the logistical aspect, the treatise seeks to expound on the issues that both Argentina and Britain faced, the logistical issues, and the cons...
... middle of paper ...
...e incorporation of up to 65 ships and 15,000 troops was a fruitful logistical move for the British in the second operation. Similarly, the illustrations demonstrate how organized command structures combine to achieve mission objectives. Argentina’s initial conquest was perpetuated by and organized combatant command. In the second invasion, the hierarchy of command from the prime minister to the deputies in the British Army led to the reversal of the initial outcome of the invasion.
References
Gatchel, L, T. (2001). Operational Art and Task Force Operations during the Falklands/Malvinas Conflict. The United States Naval War College.
Hime, D, N. (2010). The 1982 Falklands-Malvinas Case Study. The United States Naval War College.
Thomson, J. (1991). The Lifeblood of War: Logistics in Armed Conflicts. The United States Naval War College. 249-288; 371-374.
COL Prescott’s role in the Battle of Bunker Hill, or more correctly know as the Battle of Breed’s Hill, is a great example of how to properly execute mission command. An overview from The Cowpens Staff Ride and Battlefield Tour (Moncure) reveals a number of operation and strategic objectives that the American militia had to consider. In this instance, COL Prescott takes charge of 1200 men with instructions to defend against incoming British forces that were seeking to occupy the surrounding hills during the Siege of Boston campaign. COL Prescott utilized a variety of steps in the operations process that contributed to his expert utilization of mission command over his forces. Through various sources from published works by experts on the subject, COL Prescott’s mission command demonstrates its effectiveness in his understanding of the situation against the British, his visualization to create an end state for t...
One of Currie’s most impressive and important achievements had come during the winter or 1919-17, while he was still a divisional commander. By analyzing the fighting he had witnessed on the Western Front, Currie had drawn up what proved to be a blueprint for tactical success. In a paper, Currie synthesized the best of British and French concepts, and with many of his own beliefs based on personal experience. Under Sir Arthur Currie, the Canadian Corps emerged as an outstanding formation on the ...
With careful planning, co-operation, good leadership and courage, Currie managed to bring out the characteristics of a well thought out success at Vimy Ridge in April of 1917 (Dancocks, 1985). Sir Arthur Currie’s responsibility was to command the 1st Canadian Division (Hyatt, 1987). He pushed his troops to undergo rigorous training and to prepare themselves by using a life-size course, with every trench marked by tape and a flag (Dancocks, 1985). Currie designed very accurate maps and he had a small-scale plasticine model built so that it could be studied by all soldiers. Arthur Currie insisted that his division’s knowledge of the enemy was excellent (Dancocks, 1985).
Stewart R. W. (2005). American Military History (Vol. 1). The United States Army and the
Stacey, C. P. Six Years of War: The Army in Canada, Britain and the Pacific.
Brigade General Scales, Robert H. JR. Certain Victory. The U.S. Army in the Gulf War.
In order to receive a victory in the Battle of the Bulge, General Patton used Mission Command Analysis in order to understand how he can be successful for this mission. The first thing of understanding t...
Brown, Jerold E. Historical Dictionary Of The U.S. Army. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press, 2001. eBook Academic Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 29 Jan. 2014.
Schubert, Frank. Center of Military History: San Juan Hill. 1998. http://www.history.army.mil/documents/spanam/BSSJH/Shbrt-BSSJH.htm (accessed 12 3, 2013).
All of these supplies were the most significant to the soldiers because they were the most important to their survival.... ... middle of paper ... ... Works Cited Hynes, Samuel Lynn.
O’Brien, Tim. “How to Tell a True War Story.” The Things They Carried. Boston and New York: Mariner Books, 2009. 64-81. Print.
Air Force Special Operations The United States of America is a powerful and well known force throughout the world. It has become a superpower of nations in just about three hundred years, being one of the newest nations in existence today. Its military reaches out into several countries in the globe and holds a presence as a peacekeeper and wielder of democracy. Of the US military’s five branches, the Air Force is the ruler of the skies, keeping control of the earth’s aerospace. Without the Air Force Special Operations, the military could not complete operations as effectively or efficiently as it potentially could.
This statement begins to expose the fear felt by Britain of the imposing German fleet. Due to the militaristic views of Europe, many countries desired to have more power and control, by any means possible. This hunger initiated the Naval Arms Race, in which nations believed as one country increased its naval powers, they too were obliged to increase their armed forces, to maintain a balance of power. The British had dominated the seas and many far off colonies because of their naval fleet, granting them immense power. As the Germans began to propose a new and vast naval fleet, and France and Russia formed a new alliance sparking suspicion in Britain, Germany quickly became a threat to British supremacy. This created a chain reaction of stressed importance upon naval arme...
The Office of The Secretary of Defense. Joint Military Operations Historical Collection . Progressive Management, July 15, 1997 .
A defined chain of command with equal representation from all the armed services coupled with standardized clear communication and training throughout the branches, results in an elite fighting force with endless capabilities. Efficiency is the major goal behind Joint Warfare and so long as the clear channels of communication throughout the services hold true, this goal is attainable. This efficiency, though almost impossible to fully achieve, was seen during Desert Storm. During the Desert Storm campaign, General Schwarztkopf was Commander and Chief of US Central Command (USCINCCENT). His first order of business was to name component commanders.