Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Unbearable Lightness of Being CONCLUSION
Themes of The Unbearable Lightness of Being
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Unbearable Lightness of Being CONCLUSION
Milan Kundera's The Unbearable Lightness of Being
In an interview he gave after the reprinting of one of his later novels, Milan Kundera said, most eloquently, that ?the stupidity of the world comes from having an answer for everything? the wisdom of the novel comes from having a question for everything? (qtd. in O'Brien 4). This statement is one most indicative of the unique authorial style found in all of Kundera?s works, particularly his most famous novel The Unbearable Lightness of Being. Unlike previous traditional, non-autobiographical novels, Kundera chooses to indirectly reveal himself as the narrator, who, while omniscient in the control of his characters, poses questions of deep philosophical interest that even he cannot answer. This method has become problematic, however, as many critics have wrongly proclaimed this technique to represent the author?s hatred for the totalitarian regime under which his novel was written; in doing so, not only have they wrongly labeled Kundera ?a passionate defender of Western culture? (Angyal 4), but they also have ignored the larger, philosophical issues that Kundera attempts to accomplish in the novel. While many of the themes in the novel undoubtedly reveal the totalitarian regime for what it is, it will be argued that the role of the intrusive author serves to create a sense of play and freedom of movement that digs deeper than history or politics to get to the heart of more important philosophical issues.
An analysis of Kundera?s structural functions and choices within The Unbearable Lightness of Being will provide a closer view of the openness, or ?play? he strives for. One of the primary functions of Kundera as an intrusive narrator in the novel is to establish his characters as creations of his own mind. Whereas in traditional novels, the fictitious characters are assumed to be real in some imaginary world, Kundera almost immediately admits that ?it would be senseless for the author to try convince the reader that his characters once actually lived?they were born of a stimulating phrase or two from a basic situation? (39). His characters were created in light of the author?s contemplations. However, this does not automatically make the characters flat ?types?, as some have argued. To the contrary, the author?s admittance of the characters as fictional creations whom he has pondered very deeply lend ...
... middle of paper ...
...ly ignored, it is important to understand Kundera?s purposes outside of this historical context. This is the fundamental purpose of the intrusive author figure in The Unbearable Lightness of Being: to strip the traditional novel of kitschy, political codes and grind beneath the surface to greater, more complicated questions of existence that, while unanswerable by the author, are more fruitful pursuits than historical or political messages. The philosophy can be summed up in Sabina?s mantra, ?On the surface, the intelligible lie; underneath the surface, the unintelligible truth.?
Works Cited
Angyal, Andrew. ?Review: The Unbearable Lightness of Being.? MagillOnLiterature.
EBSCOHost Research Databases. Online. Available: http://web22.epnet.com. 1-5.
Kundera, Milan. The Unbearable Lightness of Being. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, Inc., 1984
O?Brien, John. ?Milan Kundera: Meaning, Play, and the Role of the Author.? Studies in
Contemporary Fiction. Fall 1992. Vol. 34, Issue 1. 1-20.
Pichova, Hana. ?The Narrator in Milan Kundera?s The Unbearable Lightness of Being.?
Slavic and East European Journal. 1992. Vol. 36, Issue 32. 217-226.
Since the emergence of literature, thousands upon thousands of characters have graced our imaginations. From trouble maker Bart Simpson of the celebrated cartoon television series The Simpsons to Mr. Darcy of Jane Austen’s renowned novel Pride and Prejudice, the world has witnessed a plethora of characters in literature. Khaled Hosseini, author of The Kite Runner, and Billy Collins, distinguished American poet, as well as countless other authors, share the utilization of characters in their literary works. The manner in which these authors use the literary element of characters varies immensely.
The novel is nurtured with a very soft but sophisticated diction. The essay itself portrays the author’s style of sarcasm and explains his points in a very clear manner. In addition, the author has used vocabulary that is very easy to understand and manages to relate the readers with his simplistic words. The author is able to convey a strong and provoc...
O'Brien's writing style is so vivid, the reader frequently finds himself accepting the events and details of this novel as absolute fact. To contrast truth and fiction, the author inserts reminders that the stories are not fact, but are mere representations of human emotion incommunicable as fact.
In the novella Anthem, Equality demonstrates a desire to learn, and although his teachers reprimand this action, he declares, “We wish to know...We asked so many questions that the Teachers forbade it” (Rand 23). Furthermore, Equality wonders, “what— even if we have to burn for it…what is the Unspeakable Word?”, epitomizing his determination to unveil society’s secret regardless of the consequences (Rand 51). His statements establish conflict within himself as he yearns for clandestine knowledge, but recognizes that society forbids his ardor. Similarly, in Fahrenheit 451, Montag begins to doubt the government’s views on literature, proved when he states, “There must be something in those books, things we can’t imagine, to make a woman stay in a burning house” (Bradbury 51). Montag’s proclamations introduce a battle within himself because he must now decide whether to conform to society’s ban on literary works or transgress by exploring a book’s contents. Because the government in both Anthem and Fahrenheit 451 restrict certain knowledge from its citizens, Equality and Montag face the internal conflicts of deciding whether to comply with society’s dictums or to contravene laws in order to find this
This novel and film commentary analysis or interpretation will be first summarised and then critiqued. The summary will be divided into twenty- four episodes. While summarising it is well to remember that the film was made out of the book.
In final analysis, Ray Bradbury’s, Fahrenheit 451 is an engrossing futuristic tale of an oppressive society, in which reading is considered criminal conduct. Bradbury uses his figurative language to bring the society to life where he introduces Clarisse, who plays an essential role, just for Montag. As the audience reads the novel, they can notice what Clarisse’s morals are, how her youth and questions awakens Montag to change for the better, and lastly, the purpose as to why she must be silenced.
The central figures in these three works are all undoubtedly flawed, each one in a very different way. They may have responded to their positions in life, or the circumstances in which they find themselves may have brought out traits that already existed. Whichever applies to each individual, or the peculiar combination of the two that is specific to them, it effects the outcome of their lives. Their reaction to these defects, and the control or lack of it that they apply to these qualities, is also central to the narrative that drives these texts. The exploration of the characters of these men and their particular idiosyncrasies is the thread that runs throughout all of the works.
Montag's boldness grows after he encounters a woman who is willing to die because of her believe in books. As the author says, the woman refuses to leave the house and ignites the fire that burns her together with her books. After witnessing this, Montag starts to doubt his ability to continue to work as a fireman. Instead, he becomes more fixated on trying to share his views about books with other people. For instance, Montag shares a revelation with his wife that there is a man behind each book. He says, "And I thought about books. And for the first time I realized that a man was behind each one of the books" (49). This revelation proves that Montag has transformed enough to express his thought of how important books are to people. He is no longer afraid of what his wife will think of him because of sharing his thoughts. In fact, he is convinced that sharing his thoughts with his wife will help to reduce the social divide between them. Montag doesn't only perceive books as the solution to his personal life but also as a possible answer to the problems facing the society such as the warfare in the book. To present his argument on the importance of books to his wife, he asks rhetorical questions such as "Is it true, the world works hard, and we play? Is that why we're hated so much?" (70). These questions intend to show how the people's hatred for books in this society is responsible for the warfare in
1970, pp. 7-8. Rpt. In The Chelsea House Library of Literary Criticism. New York.:Chelsea House Publishers, 1988.
While “The Wish to Be a Red Indian” and “Rejection” are different in structure but similar in style, they convey the same desire for escape. The two vignette seem to belong in Franz Kafka’s “Meditation” because of they have this conception of escape. After all, to meditate is to escape the physical world in order to look within oneself. Entertainment in general, including the practice of reading novels for enjoyment, is a form of escapism that allows people to relieve themselves from the banal aspects of daily life.
Through this sympathetic faculty, a writer is able to give flesh, authenticity and a genuine perspective to the imagined. It is only in this manner that the goal of creating living beings may be realized. Anything short of this becomes an exercise in image and in Kundera’s words, produces an immoral novel (3). The antithesis of liv... ...
As Marlow assists the reader in understanding the story he tells, many inversions and contrasts are utilized in order to increase apperception of the true meaning it holds. One of the most commonly occurring divergences is the un orthodox implications that light and dark embody. Conrad’s Heart of Darkness brims with paradoxes and symbolism throughout its entirety, with the intent of assisting the reader in comprehending the truth of not only human nature, but of the world.
Without personal access to authors, readers are left to themselves to interpret literature. This can become challenging with more difficult texts, such as Joseph Conrad’s novella Heart of Darkness. Fortunately, literary audiences are not abandoned to flounder in pieces such as this; active readers may look through many different lenses to see possible meanings in a work. For example, Conrad’s Heart of Darkness may be deciphered with a post-colonial, feminist, or archetypal mindset, or analyzed with Freudian psycho-analytic theory. The latter two would effectively reveal the greater roles of Kurtz and Marlow as the id and the ego, respectively, and offer the opportunity to draw a conclusion about the work as a whole.
Both Conrad’s, “Heart of Darkness”, and Coppola’s, “Apocalypse Now”, profoundly illustrate the journey of man into their inner self and man’s encounters with their insanity, fears and demise. The novella and film are comprised of numerous pivotal themes that facilitate the understanding of the deeper meaning of both works. Fundamentally, theme is an extensive message or idea expressed by an author and is a crucial element of literature since it sheds light on universal concepts. The most striking parallels that can be formulated when comparing themes in both the novella and the film are associated with human nature. Specifically, Conrad and Coppola incorporate theme of hypocrisy in order to portray man’s incredible potential for evil.
When reading The Unbearable Lightness of Being, I was often confused about the meaning behind Tereza’s dreams. During my class discussion, I learned about the Freudian dream analysis and heard several perspectives behind Tereza’s dreams. This new information clarified why she acts the way she does.