Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion for suburban sprawl
Conclusion for suburban sprawl
Conclusion for suburban sprawl
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion for suburban sprawl
Two great internal migrations lie at the center of postwar history in the United States: the movement of rural southern blacks to cities in the North, South, and West, and the movement of whites to the suburbs. Though the roots of these migrations long preceded the postwar period, both population shifts were greatly accelerated by World War II. This relocation of people and resources remapped the racial, economic, and political geography of American cities. Postwar metropolitan growth followed a pattern of
The most significant political, economic, and spatial transformation in the postwar United States was the overdevelopment of the suburbs and the underdevelopment of the cities. Simply put, where you lived determined your access to goods and services and the amount of taxes you would pay for them.
Urban deconcentration or horizontal development (beginning primarily with residential decentralization, but eventually progressing to include commercial and industrial development outside the urban center) progressed as a result of shifting government and private capital away from urban centers to the suburbs, the hardening of racial segregation in residential patterns, the concentration of African Americans and other ethnic minorities in central cities,
American capital, as the commerce and manufacturing that drove
…show more content…
postwar consumerism grew increasingly mobile. The combination and interaction of political, economic, and demographic change turned cities and suburbs into battlegrounds over the most pressing and unresolved issues of twentieth century American history: race and economic power. What happened in the suburbs was fundamentally intertwined with the processes that shaped what happened in the city, including the concentration of African Americans and other ethnic minorities in central cities, the hardening of racial segregation in residential patterns, and the huge shift of government and private resources away from the city and towards the suburbs.
Suburban ascendancy radically altered the geography of America’s political economy, decentralizing wealth and power away from their traditional location in urban hubs and concentrating the poor in the central city. At the same time, the suburbanization redrew racial and ethnic
boundaries. Suburbs also played a distinct role in the redrawing of racial and ethnic boundaries and in the rise of social movements ranging from the New Right to the Black Panthers. In the process, suburbanization has transformed the articulation of race, class, and gender—traditional categories for understanding the American experience—reshuffling them into newer, more complex arrangements. Both internal migrations were accelerated as a result of the Great Depression and accompanying New Deal legislation, and again saw even faster development as a result of World War II. In 1950 a quarter of all Americans lived in suburbs. A decade later that number accounted for fully one-third of the United State’s population, and by 1970 it had become a solid majority. This concentration of voters has effectively led suburbanite concerns to dominate national politics. Crabgrass Frontier represents the classic synthesis of suburbanization in America, which subsequent historians have taken as a starting point. Kenneth T. Jackson defined suburbanization from an urban perspective as urban deconcentration, rather than as a development separated from the city. He traced the evolution of American suburbs from their earliest manifestations in the first half of the nineteenth century to their present form. Crabgrass Frontier described the ways in which technological changes, public policies, popular culture, and individual desires combined to transform patterns of metropolitan development in America through the processes of urban deconcentration.
In the book The Great Inversion, author Alan Ehrenhalt reveals the changes that are happing in urban and suburban areas. Alan Ehrenhalt the former editor of Governing Magazine leads us to acknowledge that there is a shift in urban and suburban areas. This revelation comes as the poorer, diverse, city dwellers opt for the cookie cutter, shanty towns at the periphery of American cities known as the suburbs. In similar fashion the suburbanites, whom are socioeconomic advantaged, are looking to migrate into the concrete jungles, of America, to live an urban lifestyle. Also, there is a comparison drawn that recognizes the similarities of cities and their newer, more affluent, residents, and those cities of Europe a century ago and their residents. In essence this book is about the demographic shifts in Urban and Suburban areas and how these changes are occurring.
After the end of World War II, the United States went through many changes. Most of the changes were for the better, but some had an adverse effect on certain population centers. Many programs, agencies and policies were created to transform American society and government. One of the greatest transformations to American society was the mass migration of families from the inner cities to the suburbs. This was thought to make for a better quality of life and a stronger nuclear family.
The last big effect that comes from the urban housing reform is that it makes it difficult for people to get out of those areas. Living in urban projects is not a place where many people wish to be but they have no choice if they can’t afford to get out of the area. Some people re only able to afford living in those areas or cannot get a job that pays high enough to move to someplace else. This has created a vicious circle of the areas becoming more run down and more
Although the Housing Act of 1949 was passed with good intentions it can be seen that it lead to unforeseen complications that would exacerbate the urban crisis. Affordable high-rise housing, that was meant to bring more people into the city instead, forced the people who could afford it to move out into the growing suburbs and the poor to quickly demolish the poorly built maintained structures. As a result of displacement and previous Supreme Court decisions blockbusters would move African Americans into previous white neighborhoods which caused the movement of segregated districts within the cities to change. In the end the only thing that changed were the placement of black and white districts, the growth of suburbs, and empty lots where affordable housing once stood.
“Could suburbs prosper independently of central cities? Probably. But would they prosper even more if they were a part of a better-integrated metropolis? The answer is almost certainly yes.” (p. 66)
It started with a governmental incentive of getting America out of the Great Depression. Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) was “signed into law by FDR, designed to serve urban needs” (Jackson, 196). This law protected homeownership, not only that, “it introduced, perfected, and proved in practice the feasibility of the long-term, self-amortizing mortgage with uniform payments spread over the whole life of the debt” (Jackson, 196). Because of this new law, it was cheaper to buy a house than rent. Then came the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) that encouraged citizens to reside in new residential developments and/or areas with FHA-approved features, like Levittown. Mass-produced cars and cheap gasoline made the option of moving to a suburban area more of a reality for many families because now they can think to live such a lifestyle. With cars, come commuters who needs accessible roads to drive to and from work, to go grocery shopping, etc. which mean that the government need to pave roads for such commute to happen. “The urban expressways led to lower marginal transport costs and greatly stimulated deconcentration,” (Jackson, 191). As Jackson expressed, “The appeal of low-density living over time and across regional, class, and ethnic lines was so powerful that some observers came to regard it as natural and inevitable,” (190). Urban areas were becoming too crowded, too heterogeneous, more and more crimes were breaking out everyday; this is not an ideal living condition for a lot of people so moving to a bigger, more spread out area is a great contestant. Therefore, some of the key factors that explains the growth of the suburbs are housing policy (FHA & HOLC), mass-produced houses, mass-produced cars, cheap fuel, and government funding
“They are willing to sell themselves in order to find a better life for themselves or
The United States of America is the best place for immigration. The history proved that the United States was the dream land, the place of chances. That started when Europeans escaped form their countries because there were no jobs and no safe places to live. America became the best choice for people who were looking for political asylum, jobs, or freedom, but after a few generations something changed the Americans look to immigrants as strangers and they forgot where they are from because America is multicultural place and immigration movement should be understandable, but this is not the case. Governments should develop good laws for immigrants by giving rights to immigrants to stay in America, to protect them, and to allow people who deserve to come to America.
Every year, hundreds of thousands of immigrants, legal and illegal, from around the world, come to the United States. These immigrants come because they want a chance at a better life; others are refugees, escaping persecution and civil wars in their home country. Many people believe the United States is the best place to go. There is more freedom, protection, and benefits, which seems like a good deal to immigrants. But the large number of immigration is affecting the current citizens of the United States. Taxpayers are forced to pay for the welfare and schooling for many of these immigrants, some who are illegal aliens. Some citizens believe that immigration can be hazardous to the environment. Others blame crime, poverty, and overpopulation on immigration. About sixty-eight million immigrants have been added to the United States since 1970, and it is estimated that 130 million people will be added over the next fifty years. The government has tried somewhat to restrict immigration but the laws are still too lenient. Nearly every other advanced country in the world is moving quickly towards stabilized population or has already achieved it. The United States is moving towards it very slowly. This country would have to reduce immigration down to 255,000 a year to do this (Beck 1). If nothing is done to stabilize the immigration to this country, what will become of population in the next decade? The population will continue to grow even faster - not due to births, but to massive immigration to this country. Immigration can become a serious problem to this country if the government does not produce stricter laws.
Plato one said “This City is what it is because our citizens are what they are”, to imply that the people within the city or country are the ones that dictate what goes on in the city not the city itself. St. Louis falls into this category because cities were once the focal point of the national agenda and presidents sought to increase the importance and services of the city. This was done in St. Louis with programs being created, unions and the attention that the World’s Fair brought to make St. Louis one of the best cities in the early 20th century. However, as suburbanization was happening the focus of the nation was to the growing middle class and suburbs. St. Louis was afurcted by suburbanization because their population dropped and their services’ did too. This was displayed in the late 20th century until present day where the local economy has dropped and racial issues rising. Suburbanization and major transportation issues have attributed to the downfall of St. Louis.
In The Origins of the Urban Crisis, Thomas J. Sugrue discusses many different issues from housing, racism, and social class to employment in the postwar era. His findings bring the reader a better understanding of how Detroit went from being a city that was the center of mass production that formerly led the country to economic desertion to becoming the urban crisis rife with many serious problems. The writer suggests that the source of this crisis originated from intricate political, cultural and economic factors around the time of World War II. Detroit literally went from good to bad then very ugly as we know it to be today.
In White Flight, author Kevin Kruse studies white Atlantans’ movement away from the inner city to the suburbs. According to Kruse, this movement began as white flight and morphed into what he calls “suburban secession.” Kruse makes a convincing argument that white flight occurred as African-Americans were pressed by a shortage of housing in traditional black neighborhoods, and encouraged by the rising tide of the civil rights movement, to seek residence in traditionally white city neighborhoods. White residents at first resisted these movements and then retrenched in suburbs that made
The cities of late-nineteenth century America swelled in numbers with immigrants coming for labor, African Americans escaping the discrimination they faced before the Civil War, and farming families with labor being moved to companies instead of individual families. From different sources, like eastern Europe, to the same sources, like Ireland, China, and Mexico, immigrants poured into American cities in search for jobs, which were mainly concentrated in the cities, especially since most immigrants didn’t have substantial funds to move rural communities and the ethnic communities within cities created an environment of acceptance that may be unavailable in rural communities. Also looking for acceptance or at least an end to violence and oppression,
(Their impact) Many families left the city and moved to the suburbs to escape the huge population
Hartshorn and Muller researched the spatial evolution of the freeway era to be able to analyze the spatial economy of the suburban landscape. Out of this research they identified five distinct growth stages. First was the formulation of the bedroom community (1945-1955). The residential construction during this stage was caused by the postwar demand. The commercial expansion to the suburbs during this time was rather limited. The independence stage (1955-1965), where the economic activity increased dramatically because of the relocation and creation of office/industrial parks on the periphery. Between 1965-1980, was classified as the catalytic growth in which they believe was the most transformative of the landscape because of the increase in services, jobs, and retail (the shopping malls). The fourth ...