Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Symbolism as a literary tool essay
Short story essay analysis
Importance of symbolism in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Born in Berkeley, California, Michael Oppenheimer published the short story, “The Paring Knife”. A paring knife is small, sharp, and ideal for peeling or carving. It is also lightweight and comfortable. The couple in this story face hardships in their relationship. The narrator points out, “While I cleaned the kitchen floor, I remembered something that happened four years before that explained how the knife had gotten under the refrigerator” (Oppenheimer 188). Was the paring knife used during the fallout between the couple? The narrator utilizes a small knife in “The Paring Knife” to symbolize an incision in their relationship. Within the incision, there is blood as well as a cure. (Meyer 188) To start off in “The Paring Knife”, the couple’s dinner leads to the penetration from a knife. The atmosphere in their home gives a clear vision of comfort and trust. The narrator comments, “We had eaten a large dinner and had drunk many glasses of wine” (Oppenheimer 188). Dinner between two people in love is sentimental. It is the sharing of intimate thoughts and feelings, especially when the exchange is on a mental or spiritual level. This moment shows they share a strong bond. It is similar to breaking bread as it brings the couple together as one. There is love and happiness in the air, …show more content…
yet soon there is tension. The tension is thick like bread; the knife can easily cut through it. The storyteller states, “ We thought we would make love, but something happened and we had an argument while making love” (Oppenheimer 188). The narrator gives insight about the disagreement with the woman he or she loves, but leaves out the specific details about what caused the tension. The battle of minds causes the paring knife to officially slice open the wound. Secondly, the commotion between the couple in “The Paring Knife” illustrates blood from a cut. The hemorrhage starts when the narrator admits, “I said some very hurtful things to the woman I love. She kicked at me in bed and I got out and went into the kitchen” (Oppenheimer 188). An intoxicated woman is dangerous when hurt. Depending on how much a couple drinks, determines how big a fight turns out. The relator does not give any evidence about what he or she says to their woman during the argument. The possible cause of the conflict can be an affair, hate, or maybe betrayal.
Although the reason is abundantly unclear, the couple is slowly peeling apart. The narrator’s anger is uncontrollable as he or she admits, “I became incensed”(Oppenheimer 188). As blood does from a deep cut, the relator’s anger is gushing out relentlessly. An unruly fight between the narrator and the dishes is caused by their anger. The imagery in this scene is gloomy and frigid. In order for the picture perfect couple to redeem their relationship, the wound needs stitches. Lastly, by placing the knife back under the refrigerator in “The Paring Knife”, implies to the couple’s healing
cycle. The narrator writes, “ I was about to ask the woman I love if she remembered that incident when she came in from the next room and without saying a word, picked up the knife from the table and slid it back under the refrigerator” (Oppenheimer189). The actions of the woman symbolizes there is no reason to sweat the small things in life. By throwing the knife back under the refrigerator tells the narrator that the woman has moved on and does not want to discuss the long forgotten events. Whatever led them to the dispute, the couple is able to forgive but never forget. Even though there was an incision, it was not big enough to tear them apart. The knife was small as well as the issue in the argument. The couple is mature enough to leave the past in the past and restore what was broken. However, the narrator claims, “Nothing much was broken, but the floor was very messy” (Oppenheimer 188). Although this quote refers to the mess of the dishes, it is very well relatable to the couple’s relationship. A mess is nothing comparable to being broke. Once something is broke, it is hard to put the pieces back in place. Also, fighting is the key ingredient to love. A couple that fights together stays together. It shows the couple has the power to survive. In addition, many years ago highlights the couple’s ability to throw the small things under the table and stay together through thick and thin. In literature, a symbol is a person, object, or event that suggests more than its actual meaning. In “The Paring Knife”, Michael Oppenheimer uses a small knife to relate to the couple’s feud. A relationship has plenty of setbacks. How the couple handles those setbacks, either makes or breaks the relationship. The many possible reasons why the couple had an argument while making love are still unclear. Furthermore, the essence of the title emphasizes the ups and downs of relationships. Some relationships are torn apart due to a knife wound to the heart or back. Other relationships, as Oppenheimer illustrates in this short story, the couple redeems their love by sticking the knife back under the refrigerator.
This one act play is solely about two people who used to be in a relationship, namely Vernon and Lucy. Vernon invited Lucy for a lunch at his place and prepared steak as their meal. The reason Vernon invited Lucy was because his hope for reconciliation and fulfillment for his sexual desires as a man. The scene begins
Through the use of symbolism, and characterization that involves an instance of imagery, the author advocates this notion through the newlywed’s decision of neglecting her personal feminine taste to make her husband’s preferences her own, and embracing her title of submissive partner by kissing the hand. Also, the choice of words to describe each partner differs tremendously, as the author seems to give more importance to the man by making him appear handsome, and particularly strong. On the contrary, the young woman appears to be weak and minor, which supports this idea of submissive women in a couple through the perception of the woman being way behind her husband. This story demonstrates a great symbolic significance when it comes to the hand, which can lead to other important ideas surrounding the message the author is trying to
The husband was also selfish in his actions. With good intentions, the wife had planned a surprise for him, but he was not pleased. “Instead, he was hotly embarrassed, and indignant at his wife for embarrassing him” (13). When the narrator describes the husband at the beginning, he has a “self-satisfied face” (3). Embarrassment is a result of feeling self-conscious. Because of his self-conscious nature, he assesses first how the few people in the restaurant will view him because of his wife’s actions. He does not prioritize appreciation for his wife’s effort and care, but rather sees the worst in her misguided actions. The husband’s selfishness causes him to be prideful, which in turn causes him to destroy his relationship with his wife through his actions.
In his work "The Cook, the Thief, his Wife and her Lover", Peter Greenaway displays the complexity of his main character Georgina. We witness her constant struggle to break free from her hateful and disgusting husband. She realizes her pernicious dependence on Albert. His coercion, oppression and abuse make Georgina's life unbearable. Her need for freedom is expressed in her involvement in a sexual relation with a man completely different from her husband and his cronies. Their relationship begins silently and is based almost entirely on sex. Sex gave her a measure of control in a world in which her real influence was limited and problematic (Giddens, p.70). The happiness that the lovers derive from the closeness, affection and tenderness of their sexuality are things that Georgina was missing in her inauthentic life. Passion appears as a strong element in their liaison and till the circumstances allowed them to make love unnoticed, their relationship was a carefree and happy experience. When their affair was discovered by Georgina's husband and Michael was afterwards brutally killed, Georgina is left with her confused feelings, unable to assess the real value of the relationship she had with Michael.
J(ulius) Robert Oppenheimer (b. April 22, 1904, New York City--d. Feb. 18, 1967, Princeton, N.J., U.S.), U.S. theoretical physicist and science administrator, noted as director of the Los Alamos laboratory during development of the atomic bomb (1943-45) and as director of the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton (1947-66).
In the novel, the theme of marriage is a fundamental one. The actual meaning of this marriage, however, receives differing clarifications. In a book by Alice van Buren Kelley, for example, an interpretation of the Ramsays’ marriage by Herbert Marder is considered: “Herbert Marder feels that Virginia Woolf ‘viewed marriage from two
J. Robert Oppenheimer is a very good scientist because he has a passion for learning ever since he was a young child. "From the ages of seven through twelve, Robert had three solitary but all-consuming passions: minerals, writing, and reading poetry, and building with blocks. By the age of twelve, he was using the family typewriter to correspond with a number of well-know local geologists about the rock formations he had studied at central park" (Bird, 14). He loved to collect rocks when he was little, labeling each with their scientific names. The way he has achieved the admiration of geologists and rock collectors showed his brilliance in his early years. Ever since his grandfather gave him the encyclopedia of architecture, Oppenheimer has developed a deep love for blocks, which would come in later on in the construction and design of the atomic bombs. During his school days, Oppenheimer would "receive every idea as perfectly beautiful" (Bird 22). He loved to learn, and was skipped a few levels because of his brilliance.
Hamlet began to prepare dinner because he believed his mother was not going to be home for some time. While Hamlet was prepping dinner he heard a knock on his front door, it was the love of his life Ophelia. Hamlet and Ophelia have been best friends since they were children and they share a deep connection with each other, the kind of connection that no one believed would ever be broken. When Hamlet saw it was Ophelia at the door he told her to go away and that he needed to be alone. Ophelia was also devastated that Hamlet’s father had been killed because he was involved in her life as well but she didn’t argue with Hamlet and left him alone at his house. An hour later Hamlet’s mother showed up with a frozen pizza for dinner, but no other groceries. Hamlet asked where his mother had been and she told him she was at Ophelia’s father’s house planning funeral
...er. Even as wise and intelligent as Charlotte is, she still identifies with the ideas of her time about marriage. Charlotte, serving as a basis of time’s views allows the reader a glimpse into the institution of marriage in the Regency Era. Charlotte more than emphasizes just how radical Elizabeth was for her time, since she was willing to wait for the perfect man rather than settle. As a contrast, she helps Austen create a unique relationship in Darcy and Elizabeth. Austen disproves Charlotte’s and the general society’s pragmatic belief in a likely unhappy marriage. Through Charlotte’s marriage Austen gains a more cynical and realist voice she shows that the heart does not always have to be consulted with for a comfortable union. However, she also proves that a happy marriage is possible in spite of personal imperfections as is the case with Darcy and Elizabeth.
The short stories “Souls Belated” and “The Yellow Wallpaper” have in common ‘Marriage’ as main theme. However, the marriage is treated quite differently in both short stories. In "Souls Belated", Lydia chooses to take control of her destiny, to deviate from conventions and to choose what is good for her. She is the strongest character of the couple. Whereas, in "The Yellow Wallpaper", the name of the main character who is also the narrator of the story is not known. She is identified as being John’s wife. This woman, contrary to Lydia in "Souls Belated" is completely locked up in her marriage. This essay will first describe and compare the characters of Lydia and John's wife in the context of marriage, and then it will look at how marriage is described, treated and experienced by couples in these two short stories.
To start, think about what kind of cutting you will be doing and keep it in mind throughout the guide. There are two types of cuts – push cuts and pull cuts. The first is when you push a knife through an object to make a cut, such as slicing a fruit or a vegetable in half. The second is when you have to pull the knife through to finish the separation, such as cutting rope or cutting bread. A paramedic may find themselves doing more of a pull cut, while a handyman uses both due to the variety of tasks at hand. Keeping this in mind helps you narrow down your options of choosing the best pocket knife for your everyday purposes.
“The first thing you find out when your dog learns how to talk is that dogs don’t got nothing much to say.” The Knife of Never Letting Go by Patrick Ness is about Todd Hewitt, the last boy in Prentisstown, and it’s not only his dog, Manchee’s thoughts that he can hear. Because of the widespread of a virus, the men of Prentisstown can hear each other’s thoughts all the time, called The Noise. One day, Todd stumbles across a pool of silence moving through the marsh at the edge of Prentisstown. The pool of silence is a girl. There are no girls in Prentisstown and finding her meant that Todd must run away from the only home he has ever known, but is Prentisstown hiding something far greater?
This scene focuses on the grown maturity of love between Romeo and Juliet. The love between Romeo and Juliet can be described as an overpowering almost violent force wrought with overflowing passion that takes precedence over all other values, social loyalties or feelings. In a sense, this particular scene is a reverse balcony scene where Romeo must leave instead of Juliet. The lovers placate each other through reversals of thought, giving in to each other’s will. The willingness to give anything for every second together including death is the essence of the scene. Romeo lacks the capacity for moderation of emotions and feelings.
Similar snapshots of this one moment will be mirrored throughout different families and times both past, present, and future. There are moments of absurdity that occur in any family. Sitting stacked upon each other on a plush and comfortable couch, my Mother, Sister and I depict such a moment. When gazing at this particular photograph, one feeling overwhelms me: love. Simply stating “love”, however feels over-rated and unspecific. Just saying “love” is akin to comparing a puddle on a sidewalk to the ocean, the depth of the ocean cannot be explored through a mere puddle. My affection for this picture lies in the evident familial bond and caring that is displayed. There is this understanding between
... a device to contrast the other couples and their relationships. Austen develops their relationship at the first town ball; she describes their actions to indicate that they are falling in love. During the time period, men and women had to meet at formal occasions like a dinner or ball and there was always a very strict code of conduct in romance. When Mr. Bingley danced with Jane twice everyone concluded that he was genuinely interested in her. Whereas when Mr. Darcy chose not to dance with Elizabeth everyone concluded that she had been insulted. Love was considered less important than marriage and women were forced by society to find suitable husbands. Elizabeth thinks Jane should act naturally to Mr. Bingley and her love will be seen, but Charlotte Lucas thinks Jane should be very assertive and not let the chance of financial security slip through her fingers.