Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The white man s burden
Spanish conquest perspective
Christianity's impact on Native Americans during European colonization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The white man s burden
The meeting between Hernán Cortés with the Spanish expedition into Tenochtitlan, the Mexican imperial city under the reign of Montezuma has brought a vivid depiction of the conflict and contention between these two forces that would prosper a range of different accounts and perspectives of the incidents that would consequently follow during and after the clash. Bernard Sahagún wrote the ‘Florentine Codex’ which depicts these series of events from the accounts of the indigenous and Spanish population that are based around his religious motives and interpretation of the truth. This is different Cortés own account of events through his personal letters to Charles V which aims to provide substantial justification for his acts in Mexico under a positive humanistic light. Both these sources become targeted by Inga Clendinnen on their flawed weaknesses and ambiguities within their work. These composers provide a contrast of images describing the actual events of the meeting but it is when these texts are examined collectively that we as the reader can gain insights into the past that would have not been possible if the sources were interpreted independently.
These pieces of work present different models of European-native relations displayed by Cortés and Montezuma. The portrayal of Spanish arrival to Mexico is seen by Cortés in his letters as an act of colonisation and to expand the Spanish Empire securely under Emperor Charles V as a vassal state (Cortés 1986, Pg. 87). Their belief in this ‘white man’s burden’ to civilise the indigenous Aztecs is supported this in the meeting through the exchange of gifts (Cortés 1986, Pg. 85) which in their context portrayed submission. To the Aztecs however, the meeting could have instead been repr...
... middle of paper ...
...versions of the same meeting could of been interpreted so differently between the Spanish and the native accounts under separate cultural and religious between Christians and Aztec Sun worship and how the awareness of the methods and extents taken to record by Sahagún and Clendinnen show a resistance that was never mentioned by the Spanish. A collaboration of thoughts and interpretations can enrich our understanding of interaction between the Spanish and the Aztecs.
Works Cited
• Clendinnen, Inga. "Fierce and Unnatural Cruelty." In New World Encounters. Berkley: University of California Press, 1993. Pg. 12-23.
• Cortés, Hernán. "The Second Letter." In Letters from Mexico. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986. Pg. 83-87.
• Sahagun, Bernard. "The Conquest of Mexico." In Florentine Codex: Book 12. Santa Fe: The School of American Research, 1975. Pg. 43-45, 65.
In this section his initial thoughts show through. “But losers matter, especially in the history of early America.” Many different regions of early America are examined in their years of early conquest when native populations started their descent. The biggest theme throughout the section is the effect that conquistadors and explorers had on the native population in their search for gold and glory. The information that is given is not typical of what is learned of early America, but tries to really focus on the most important figures of the time and there voyages. For example, when talking about the Plains nations and there explorers, Coronado and De Soto a tattooed woman woman is brought up who had been captured by both explorers at different times and different places, but little is known about her. “Of the tattooed woman who witnessed the two greatest expeditions of conquest in North America, and became captive to both, nothing more is known.” This point captures the main idea of the theme and what many know of this time. Horwitz aims to point out the important facts, not just the well known
Teja, Jesus F. De La. A Revolution Remembered: The Memoirs and Selected Correspondence of Juan N. Seguin. Austin: State House Press, 1991.
It is amazing how two people can witness the same event and come away with two distinctively different interpretations of said event. However, the letter from Cortes and the Florentine Codex do exactly this. They both describe the same event, but from different perspectives. Hernan Cortes was a Spanish Conquistador who caused the fall of the Aztec Empire by conquering Tenochtitlan which is now known as the present day Mexico City. He took their leader, Moctezuma, captive that led to a massive riot which ended with a lot of death. Although, the Florentine Codex covers the same event, it has a totally different tone and view of things. While both the letter from Cortes and the Florentine codex discuss the same incident, no one see’s everything
“The Conquest of New Spain” is the first hand account of Bernal Diaz (translated by J.M. Cohen) who writes about his personal accounts of the conquest of Mexico by himself and other conquistadors beginning in 1517. Unlike other authors who wrote about their first hand accounts, Diaz offers a more positive outlook of the conquest and the conquistadors motives as they moved through mainland Mexico. The beginning chapters go into detail about the expeditions of some Spanish conquistadors such as Francisco Hernandez de Cordoba, Juan de Grijalva and Hernando Cotes. This book, though, focuses mainly on Diaz’s travels with Hernando Cortes. Bernal Diaz’s uses the idea of the “Just War Theory” as his argument for why the conquests were justifiable
C. W. Hackett, ed., Historical Documents relating to New Mexico, Nueva Vizcaya, and Approaches Thereto, to 1773, vol. III (Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1937), 327-35.
8. Meyer, Michael C., et al. The Course of Mexican History, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
The downfall of the Aztec Empire was a major building block of the Spanish colonial empire in the Americas. Spain’s empire would stretch all the way into North America from the Southwest United States all the way up the Pacific Coast. The unfortunate side effect of this was the elimination of many nations of indigenous people. The three major themes shown in this conquest really give deeper look into the anatomy of this important historical event. Without context on the extent of native assistance given to Cortez in his fight with the Aztecs, a reader would be grossly uniformed. The Spanish conquest was closer to a civil war than an actual conquest. Until reading detailed personal accounts of the fighting it is difficult to judge the deadly effectiveness of the Spaniards technological superiority. Without it is difficult to imagine 500 conquistadors holding thousands of native warriors at bay. Once the greed of Cortez and greed in general of the Europeans one understands that if it wasn’t Cortez if would have just been a different man at a different time. Unfortunately fame and prosperity seem to always win over cares about fellow human beings
Bowden’s idea of why this happened focused mainly on the old misunderstood traditions of the tribes living in Mexico. He shows how the friars, churches and icons took the blunt of the revolts force. Bowden points out the religious differences and similarities be...
In schools, students are being taught wrong information. “Our gods were vanquished after the fall of Tenochtitlan as were our traditions. Our warriors and nobles were eradicated, our children starved and our women ravished by the white conquerors and their allies.” (157). In books across America, the Spaniards were said to be good people, but the way that Huitzitzilin described what happened, shows the complete opposite of how the Spaniards actually were.
In the first part of the document, Cortés and his men spend their time at Montezuma's palaces. Seeing the extravagant wealth of the Aztec king, Cortés begins his seduction (all the while knowing that Montezuma believes that he may be the fulfillment of a prophecy). He embraced Montezuma with the greatest reverence and "…told him that now his heart rejoiced at having seen such a great Prince, and that he took it as a great honour that he had come in person to meet him and had frequently shown him such favor" (World History: Castillo, 247). Cortés and his men are brought into the house of Montezuma and all of his riches are now at their disposal to observe and share in. Montezuma tells Cortés: "Malinche you and your brethren are in your own house…" (World History: Castillo, 247). The wealth of Montezuma is magnificent. Each soldier is given tw...
Guadalupe in 1531." The Heath Anthology of American Literature. Ed. Paul Later. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1998. 475-82.
Callery, Sean. The Dark History of the Aztec Empire. New York: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark, 2011. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, and Scholars Woodrow Wilson International Center for. “The Mystery of Aztec Sacrifices.”
Life in Mexico was, before the Revolution, defined by the figure of the patron that held all of power in a certain area. Juan Preciado, who was born in an urban city outside of Comala, “came to Comala because [he] had been told that [his] father, a man named Pedro Paramo lived there” (1). He initially was unaware of the general dislike that his father was subjected to in that area of Mexico. Pedro was regarded as “[l]iving bile” (1) by the people that still inhabited Comala, a classification that Juan did not expect. This reveals that it was not known by those outside of the patron’s dominion of the cruel abuse that they levied upon their people. Pedro Paramo held...
On November of 1519, the Aztec leader Montezuma, received reports of small mountains floating off of the Mexican coast. Was it Quetzalcoatl, the legendary figure who had one day promised to return from across the ocean? In his distress, Montezuma sent messengers bearing gifts to ...
""The Art of Cruelty"" The New York Times Book Review, 31 July 2011. Web. 27 Nov. 2011.