Abstract
In this experiment methyl-3-phenyl-2-propenoate was prepared using a Wittig reaction. Benzaldehyde and methyl (triphenylphosphoranylidene) acetate were used to give a final product. 0.33g of methyl3-phenyl-2-propenoate was found at the end of the experiment therefore the percentage yield of methy-3-phenyl-2-propenoate is 62%. The Rf value of benzaldehyde was found to be 0.85. The Rf value for methyl-3-phenyl-2-propenoate was found to be 0.83, the Rf values are almost the same therefore the product does contain benzaldehyde. The solvent that was used is 70:30 hexane ethyl acetate.
Aim
The aim of this experiment is to synthesise methyl-3-phenyl-2-propenoate
Introduction
Wittig reaction is a reaction between a ketone or aldehyde with phosphonium ylide to form an alkane and
…show more content…
Percentage yield = actual yield × 100% Theoretical yield
Actual yield in moles= 0.33g/162 = 2.03×10-3mol
Percentage yield = (2.03×10-3/5×10-3) × 100% =0.41%
Reaction of benzaldehyde with methyl (triphenylphosphoranylidene) acetate
Mechanism of a Wittig reaction
Table1: Rf values for tlc with 70:30 hexane ethyl acetate sample Rf value a b
Benzaldehyde 0.85 34 40
Methyl-3-phenyl-2-propenoate 0.83 33.2 40
B P
Figure1: TLC plate of benzaldehyde and methyl-3-phenyl-2-propenoate
Key: B= Benzaldehyde P= Methyl-3-phenyl-2-propenoate
In a small reaction tube, the tetraphenylcyclopentadienone (0.110 g, 0.28 mmol) was added into the dimethyl acetylene dicarboxylate (0.1 mL) and nitrobenzene (1 mL) along with a boiling stick. The color of the mixed solution was purple. The solution was then heated to reflux until it turned into a tan color. After the color change has occurred, ethanol (3 mL) was stirred into the small reaction tube. After that, the small reaction tube was placed in an ice bath until the solid was formed at the bottom of the tube. Then, the solution with the precipitate was filtered through vacuum filtration and washed with ethanol. The precipitate then was dried and weighed. The final product was dimethyl tertraphenylpthalate (0.086 g, 0.172mmol, 61.42%).
The unknown bacterium that was handed out by the professor labeled “E19” was an irregular and raised shaped bacteria with a smooth texture and it had a white creamy color. The slant growth pattern was filiform and there was a turbid growth in the broth. After all the tests were complete and the results were compared the unknown bacterium was defined as Shigella sonnei. The results that narrowed it down the most were the gram stain, the lactose fermentation test, the citrate utilization test and the indole test. The results for each of the tests performed are listed in Table 1.1 below.
The spots moved 3.8cm, 2.3cm, 2.1cm, 1.8cm, and 2.5 cm, for the methyl benzoate, crude product, mother liquor, recrystallized product, and isomeric mixture, respectively. The Rf values were determined to be.475,.2875,.2625,.225, and.3125, for the methyl benzoate, crude product, mother liquor, recrystallized product, and isomeric mixture, respectively. Electron releasing groups (ERG) activate electrophilic substitution, and make the ortho and para positions negative, and are called ortho para directors. In these reactions, the ortho and para products will be created in a much greater abundance. Electron Withdrawing groups (EWG) make the ortho and para positions positive.
The percent yield of products that was calculated for this reaction was about 81.2%, fairly less pure than the previous product but still decently pure. A carbon NMR and H NMR were produced and used to identify the inequivalent carbons and hydrogens of the product. There were 9 constitutionally inequivalent carbons and potentially 4,5, or 6 constitutionally inequivalent hydrogens. On the H NMR there are 5 peaks, but at a closer inspection of the product, it seems there is only 4 constitutionally inequivalent hydrogens because of the symmetry held by the product and of this H’s. However, expansion of the peaks around the aromatic region on the NMR show 3 peaks, which was suppose to be only 2 peaks. In between the peaks is a peak from the solvent, xylene, that was used, which may account to for this discrepancy in the NMR. Furthermore, the product may have not been fully dissolved or was contaminated, leading to distortion (a splitting) of the peaks. The 2 peaks further down the spectrum were distinguished from two H’s, HF and HE, based off of shielding affects. The HF was closer to the O, so it experienced more of an up field shift than HE. On the C NMR, there are 9 constitutionally inequivalent carbons. A CNMR Peak Position for Typical Functional Group table was consulted to assign the carbons to their corresponding peaks. The carbonyl carbon, C1, is the farthest up field, while the carbons on the benzene ring are in the 120-140 ppm region. The sp3 hybridized carbon, C2 and C3, are the lowest on the spectrum. This reaction verifies the statement, ”Measurements have shown that while naphthalene and benzene both are considered especially stable due to their aromaticity, benzene is significantly more stable than naphthalene.” As seen in the reaction, the benzene ring is left untouched and only the naphthalene is involved in the reaction with maleic
2-ethyl-1,3-hexanediol. The molecular weight of this compound is 146.2g/mol. It is converted into 2-ethyl-1-hydroxyhexan-3-one. This compounds molecular weight is 144.2g/mol. This gives a theoretical yield of .63 grams. My actual yield was .42 grams. Therefore, my percent yield was 67%. This was one of my highest yields yet. I felt that this was a good yield because part of this experiment is an equilibrium reaction. Hypochlorite must be used in excess to push the reaction to the right. Also, there were better ways to do this experiment where higher yields could have been produced. For example PCC could have been used. However, because of its toxic properties, its use is restricted. The purpose of this experiment was to determine which of the 3 compounds was formed from the starting material. The third compound was the oxidation of both alcohols. This could not have been my product because of the results of my IR. I had a broad large absorption is the range of 3200 to 3500 wavenumbers. This indicates the presence of an alcohol. If my compound had been fully oxidized then there would be no such alcohol present. Also, because of my IR, I know that my compound was one of the other 2 compounds because of the strong sharp absorption at 1705 wavenumbers. This indicates the presence of a carbonyl. Also, my 2,4-DNP test was positive. Therefore I had to prove which of the two compounds my final product was. The first was the oxidation of the primary alcohol, forming an aldehyde and a secondary alcohol. This could not have been my product because the Tollen’s test. My test was negative indicating no such aldehyde. Also, the textbook states that aldehydes show 2 characteristic absorption’s in the range of 2720-2820 wavenumbers. No such absorption’s were present in my sample. Therefore my final product was the oxidation of the secondary alcohol. My final product had a primary alcohol and a secondary ketone
...e 3. Both letters A and B within the structure of trans-9-(2-phenylethenyl) anthracene, that make up the alkene, have a chemical shift between 5-6 ppm and both produce doublets because it has 1 adjacent hydrogen and according to the N + 1 rule that states the number of hydrogens in the adjacent carbon plus 1 provides the splitting pattern and the number of peaks in the split signal, which in this case is a doublet.1 Letters C and D that consist of the aromatic rings, both are multiplets, and have a chemical shift between 7-8 ppm. 1H NMR could be used to differentiate between cis and trans isomers of the product due to J-coupling. When this occurs, trans coupling will be between 11 and 19 Hz and cis coupling will be between 5 and 14 Hz, showing that cis has a slightly lowered coupling constant than trans, and therefore have their respective positions in a product. 2
Discussion The reaction of (-)-α-phellandrene, 1, and maleic anhydride, 2, gave a Diels-Alder adduct, 4,7-ethanoisobenzofuran-1,3-dione, 3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-5-methyl-8-(1-methylethyl), 3, this reaction gave white crystals in a yield of 2.64 g (37.56%). Both hydrogen and carbon NMR as well as NOESY, COSY and HSQC spectrum were used to prove that 3 had formed. These spectroscopic techniques also aided in the identification of whether the process was attack via the top of bottom face, as well as if this reaction was via the endo or exo process. These possible attacks give rise to four possible products, however, in reality due to steric interactions and electronics only one product is formed.
A weak peak was at a position between 1600-1620 cm-1 can also be seem in the IR, which was likely to be aromatic C=C functional group that was from two benzene rings attached to alkynes. On the other hand, the IR spectrum of the experimental diphenylacetylene resulted in 4 peaks. The first peak was strong and broad at the position of 3359.26 cm-1, which was most likely to be OH bond. The OH bond appeared in the spectrum because of the residue left from ethanol that was used to clean the product at the end of recrystallization process. It might also be from the water that was trapped in the crystal since the solution was put in ice bath during the recrystallization process. The second peak was weak, but sharp. It was at the position of 3062.93 cm-1, which indicated that C-H (sp2) was presence in the compound. The group was likely from the C-H bonds in the benzene ring attached to the alkyne. The remaining peaks were weak and at positions of 1637.48 and 1599.15 cm-1, respectively. This showed that the compound had aromatic C=C function groups, which was from the benzene rings. Overall, by looking at the functional groups presented in the compound, one can assume that the compound consisted of diphenylacetelene and ethanol or
This week’s lab was the third and final step in a multi-step synthesis reaction. The starting material of this week was benzil and 1,3- diphenylacetone was added along with a strong base, KOH, to form the product tetraphenylcyclopentadienone. The product was confirmed to be tetraphenylcyclopentadienone based of the color of the product, the IR spectrum, and the mechanism of the reaction. The product of the reaction was a dark purple/black color, which corresponds to literature colors of tetraphenylcyclopentadienone. The tetraphenylcyclopentadienone product was a deep purple/black because of its absorption of all light wavelengths. The conjugated aromatic rings in the product create a delocalized pi electron system and the electrons are excited
After performing the second TLC analysis (Figure 4), it was apparent that the product had purified because of the separation from the starting spot, unlike Figure 3. In addition, there was only spot that could be seen on the final TLC, indicating that only one isomer formed. Since (E,E) is the more stable isomer due to a less steric hindrance relative to the (E,Z) isomer, it can be inferred that (E,E) 1,4-Diphenyl-1,3-butadiene was the sole product. The proton NMR also confirmed that only (E,E) 1,4-Diphenyl-1,3-butadiene formed; based on literature values, the (E,E) isomer has peaks between 6.6-7.0 ppm for vinyl protons and 7.2-7.5 ppm for the phenyl protons. Likewise, the (E,Z) isomer has vinyl proton peaks at 6.2-6.5 ppm and 6.7-6.9 ppm in addition to the phenyl protons. The H NMR in Figure 5 shows multiplets only after 6.5 ppm, again confirming that only (E,E) 1,4-Diphenyl-1,3-butadiene formed. In addition, the coupling constant J of the (E,E) isomer is around 14-15 Hz, while for the (E,Z) isomer it is 11-12 Hz. Based on the NMR in Figure 5, the coupling constant is 15.15 Hz, complementing the production of (E,E)
Brandon Meas Block: B Day 4 Lab day 1 5/12/17 Lab day 2 5/23/17 Lab Day 3 6/2/17 Lab 9: Acids and Bases Purpose: The purpose of the lab is to calculate the concentration of a known acid. Using the data collected from this lab, you will calculate the molarity of the acid. Introduction:
PGLO Write Up Purpose The full on purpose and meaning of the PGLO lab was to see and watch transformation happen and to understand it. Transformation is when there’s a genetic alteration in a bacterial cell, or a alternation in a cell.
The materials that were used in this lab included a 100/1000 μL micropipetter, 4 agar plates with pre-poured LB broth , ice bath, hot water bath, micro centrifuge tubes, sterile loops, UV light, as well as pGLO plasmids and E.coli.
The percentage yield gained was 70% from the Fischer Esterification reaction, which evaluates to be a good production of yield produced as the reaction is known to be reversible where conditions such as the concentration of the reactants, pressure and temperature could affect the extent of the reaction from performing. These white crystalline crystals were tested for impurity by conducting a melting point analysis and taking spectrospic data such as the IR spectra, HNMR and CNMR to confirm the identification of the product. These spectrospic methods and melting point analysis confirmed the white crystalline crystals were benzocaine.
After observing that all of our test results were positive, we knew that in our compound unsaturation was present, there were primary or secondary alcohols, methyl ketones, and an aldehyde. Keeping this in the back of our minds, we grabbed the derivatives and tested the melting points of each. When determining the melting point of the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone derivative, we observed it to be exactly at 106°C. With this in mind, we also tested the melting point of our semicarbazone derivative, which turned out to be around ~101°C. After obtaining these numbers, we took a look at the Table J.1 and found the numbers that matched up best with our IR results, various tests, and melting point results. We determined that our Unknown sample A was actually Octanal; the structure of which is drawn