Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender inequality issues in america
The golden rule and the kantian ethics
Thesis on intersectionality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender inequality issues in america
The document is written by Meridel Le Sueur about her personal feelings about the female aspects of the “Great Depression.” When discussing the “March” she clearly stated that there were many women who felt the same as she did about marching with strikers about industrial jobs. The feeling Meridel Le Sueur had was that of fear, confusion, individuality, and hypocrisy of the state and federal government. The questions that Le Sueur raises are clear due to the philosophy of the United States which is “The Golden Rule”, “Humanity”, and “Truth” towards the people especially in times of need. Considering the frame of reference she did not like (along with many other White women) could not understand that the reciprocal exchange of humanity no longer existed due to the crisis of the “Great Depression.”
The implications of her questions was a reality of rude awakening of physical fear towards herself if
…show more content…
she did not soon choose a side to appeal toward simply for a state of survival. Le Sueur worked at a soup kitchen operated by the industrial strikers. The men would literally go out and not return for 8, 10, 12 hours at a time. There were days when men would return unharmed and days when men would return with minor and fatal injuries sustained in the fight for reasonable wages and reasonable work environment. The most powerful lines in the document are “our life seems to be marked with a curious and muffled violence over America, but this action has always been in the dark, men and women dying obscurely, poor and poverty marked lives, but now from city to city runs this violence, into the open, and colossal happenings stand bare before our eyes, the street churning suddenly upon the pivot of mad violence, whole men suddenly spouting blood and running like living sieves, another holding a dangling arm shot squarely off, a tall youngster, running, tripping over his intestines, and one block away, in the burning sun, gay women shopping and a window dresser trying to decide whether to put green or red voile on a manikin.” The reason the lines above were chosen was for emphasis consider the violence toward unarmed Black Americans recently and the riots that followed the theme is the “… muffled violence over America, but this action has always been in the dark, men and women dying obscurely, poor and poverty marked lives, but now from city to city runs this violence, into the open, and colossal happenings stand bare before our eyes…”. In conclusion, this is America that Meridel Le Sueur found out actually existed in the “Great Depression”.
The women’s response had no choice but to be selective in the choice of voice toward and opinion let alone action that would cause any shift in the leadership status of her counterpart the White male. Considering the reference at that time White women had fewer overall equal rights than a free Black man. It is during this time that Le Sueur also noticed the distinction that there was organization but organization in a sense of separation between rich, poor, White, Black, Women and Men yet not for the benefit of helping those in need of economic assistance. She also noticed that if you were a woman with children your opportunities that were not abundant to begin with were reduced drastically because of the parental responsibility of the mother considering the father is gone consistently from the home in search of employment. Her document of how she feels along with many other women during that era is a perfect example of history again returning full
circle.
The black women’s interaction with her oppressive environment during Revolutionary period or the antebellum America was the only way of her survival. Playing her role, and being part of her community that is not always pleasant takes a lot of courage, and optimism for better tomorrow. The autonomy of a slave women still existed even if most of her natural rights were taken. As opposed to her counterparts
The chain of letters reveals the beginning of a major change that will happen in the near future, supporting the development of women's rights. Industrialization had a major impact on the lives of every American, including women. Before the era of industrialization, around the 1790's, a typical home scene depicted women carding and spinning while the man in the family weaves (Doc F). One statistic shows that men dominated women in the factory work, while women took over teaching and domestic services (Doc G). This information all relates to the changes in women because they were being discriminated against and given children's work while the men worked in factories all day.
... fighting for a Jewish cause. This book carefully examines exactly how much Wald distanced herself from her Jewish heritage. Marjorie N. Feld did a wonderful job of portraying Wald as not only a strong, independent woman, but firm in her belief of universalism not particularism. Although the book is written in a highly academic format Feld was able to give the story of Lillian Wald in a matter that allows all who read it to appreciate and understand her work. Wald is the kind of woman all people should hope to meet in their life. After a few pages readers will find themselves intrigued at how well the book was written, Feld inserts quotations from Wald herself that quickly and concisely show the kind of woman she was. This book should be read by anyone who has an interest in the progressive era, women’s rights, or simply the rights of all the world’s diverse people.
2. The leading topic of the book is the history of the convention, which took place in 1848 and its further impact. First, the author starts from an introductory chapter, which describes in details the sufferings of women of that time. It is the first example supporting the diversity of topics touched by the author. For example, the McMillen mentions that the majority of women did not have any right to vote, receive the same amount of payment for the work they did equally with men, or hold property. All these issues have a relation to economic and political aspects, which penetrated the society of that time. In addition, throughout the book, the author mentions class divisions and discrimination based on race. All these discussions represent the book’s intention to touch on political, socia...
Women have always been large part life. In fact, they are the ones that keep it going which is why some argue that women should be greatly respected. This idea has been around since the beginning of time, but unfortunately they have been treated the exact opposite and it was not up to the 1850’s that women got their rights. Before this time they were used as tools and had no say in anything important. It did not matter if they were smart or not nor did it matter if they beautiful or ugly, they were always lower than men. Voltaire uses Cunegonde, the old woman, and Paquette to show their mistreatment and the mistreatment of all women. They were raped and abused regardless of their wealth or political stance. These characters are not very complex
Working was the strategic to acquire the money, which according to the poster is the main key to achieve an independence. The message in the poster “Now I can buy the things I love” expose the dependency of women in the poster’s time; even though the time of slavery was done by the nineteenth forty’s women were economically slaves of their husband and the stereotypes of the society. To illustrate, women could not buy nothing unless their husband gives them money to do it. That it is why, the poster is so relevant and significant to women because it opens a pass to walk into the independence and change the typical role of the women. The poster gives a clear message of now women can buy or do the things they love for their own merit and money, also the poster indicated a solution for the dependency of the women. The woman in the poster has the answer in her hand, a paycheck is the passport to the independence, but also is the passport to the government to cover the hole in the industries and factories had it, for the cause of the decrease of human resources. During the war men were required to go to the war and fight for their country; however, this brought as a consequence a lack of people to work, then women were the best alternative to cover the hole of lack of workers. Society realized than women could do more than be a housewife and women had the poster as a
The contrast between how She sees herself and how the rest of the world sees Her can create extreme emotional strain; add on the fact that She hails from the early 1900s and it becomes evident that, though her mental construct is not necessarily prepared to understand the full breach against Her, She is still capable of some iota of realization. The discrimination encountered by a female during this time period is great and unceasing.
Women, in general, were expected to be able to run their homes, taking care of their spouses and children in whatever form was needed at the time. They were looked down on as uneducated without the ability to understand the more intricate knowledge of politics and the running of businesses of any kind. They had no rights except for what they received from the graciousness of their husbands. Their opinions did not matter, in the long run and they were treated as inferior, expected to stay in their place unquestioning and unassuming.
This was the start of a new age in the history for women. Before the war a woman’s main job was taking care of her household more like a maid, wife and mother. The men thought that women should not have to work and they should be sheltered and protected. Society also did not like the idea of women working and having positions of power in the workforce but all that change...
...hin women’s movements there still was never a conclusion and a truly fair treatment of women. To this day women have not been treated equals to men. This has been a constant battle for the past one hundred years and until the women are treated same as the men there will continue to be a problem between the two genders.
The French Revolution was a period of time in which France underwent many changes, many which could be considered revolutionary. France’s whole system and way of being was completely changed. New ideas were proposed everyday. An idea is revolutionary when it is a new idea, when it is something that has never been thought of before. The Declaration of the Rights of Women written by Olympe de Gouges on September 1791, was one of the ideas proposed to the National Assembly (Hunt, Web 1). The document proposed that since the French Revolution was all about finding equality for all people, women should be equal to men and therefore, should have the same rights as men did. Women at the time live in terrible conditions. They had little access to education, and therefore could not enter professional occupations that required advanced education, were legally deprived of the right to vote, and were not considered citizens (Class Discussion Notes). If equal rights were not given to women, the French Revolution had not reached its full potential, according to Gouges. She expressed this idea in her document, saying, “This revolution will only take effect when all women become fully aware of their deplorable condition, and of the rights they have lost in society” (Gouges, Web). Anyone that questioned the Revolution was immediately put to death (Class Discussion Notes). If Gouges’ document and ideas were important enough to catch the attention of the National Assembly and for her to be put to death, her ideas could be considered important and revolutionary (Britannica, Web 1) But, the document was not revolutionary. The Declaration of the Rights of Women was not a revolutionary document because its ideas were taken from other people and were no...
In the mid nineteenth century America was going through an age of reform. The person who would be the center of these reforms would be the women in society. Women soon realized that in order to make sure that all the reforms went through they would need more power and influence in society. The oppression and discrimination the women felt in this era launched the women into create the women’s right movement. The women fought so zealously for their rights it would be impossible for them not to achieve their goals. The sacrifices, suffering, and criticism that the women activist made would be so that the future generations would benefit the future generations.
Led by Clara Lemlich, 20,000 immigrants, mostly young women, demanded a twenty percent pay raise, a fifty-two hour workweek, and a closed shop (59). Their cause gained a significant amount of attention and caught the eye of wealthy progressive reformers, such as Alva Belmont and Anne Morgan, who perceived the strike as an opportunity to also advocate their own objective: women’s suffrage. Wealthy elites like Carnegie and Sumner may have believed that efforts to change the natural order are futile, but Morgan claimed that after learning about the details of the strike, she and other women wouldn’t be able to live their lives “without doing something to help them” (72). These affluent women demonstrated their support from both sides of the spectrum, from modestly distributing ribbons and buttons, to Alva Belmont’s contribution of her several cars to a parade for the striking workers (682) and the pledge of her mansion as surety for the bail of four strikers (76). Without the aid of these women, it was doubtful the strikers “could have lasted much longer without progressive money” (70). However, frustration arose amongst picketers as these progressive reformers turned a strike based on class struggle into a “broader feminist revolt” (68). Morgan blamed the strikers’ treatment on the inability for women to vote, not their inability to unionize (67). Striker’s retorted, asking
At one of Paul’s demonstrations in DC, they are speaking to women factory workers who are not aware that they should be able to vote for something like having a fire exit in the factory. Gaining the support from working class women was very important to the movement because these women are at the brunt of society’s negative views and are most affected by the societal hardships. Paul’s feminist movement received additional support from Ida B. Wells, an African American women rights activist, as long as they were allowed to march with the white women, not behind them. Although this minute aspect of the movie did not thoroughly discuss the racist issues also present at the time, it made me think about Sojourner Truth’s speech ‘Ain’t I a Woman?’ Representation from all races and social classes is imperative in the fight for women’s equality because African American women are women too, color does not matter.
She asks the question ‘what is a woman’? and how it has to do with the way the nerves feed the brain. The way she is supposed to help her husband. She is very strong in the way she sees women because she wants there to be more women doing the same things as men. She asks why are women losing their femininity when there are women in Russia who are doing construction. This is a valid question because women are quite capable of doing the same things that men are allowed to do. Beauvoir wants to get down to what it means to be a woman. The belief is that if there is a woman, then there is a feminine solidarity. Beauvoir looks at the concept of a woman, but she does not see her as a single woman, but a bunch of women who will fight discrimination together. A woman does not exist, women together, are capable of a lot more than what they are given credit for. A feminist consciousness is what is required, to think that women are capable instead of underestimating them. There are struggles for blacks that need to be addressed. Marxists need to be understood as a unit. Feminists must become a unified consciousness just like these groups. Beauvoir does not believe that there is a single women that exists, unlike Showalter. Beauvoir asks what it means to be a feminist, and whether there is there a standard of femininity. The conceptualism has lost ground for the common woman. If femininity is in danger that means that