A merger is the combining of two separate firms to merge into one firm. Usually when two firms merge, the smaller firm will merge into the larger firm. Only the acquiring company retains its identity.
There are
An acquisition refers to the purchase of a company’s assets or the controlling shares of a company by the acquiring company.
Types of mergers:
Horizontal merger:
This is a merger between two firms in the same line of business. These firms are always competitors.
Vertical merger:
This is a merger that exists when an entity merges with one of its suppliers forming a buyer seller relationship. For example, a merger between a company that produces furniture with a company that produces wood.
Conglomerate merger:
This is a merger that exists between unrelated firms from different industries. Both firms carry out different activities and are not competitors.
For example, a brewing firm merging with a clothing industry.
Process of mergers and acquisitions.
Process of mergers and acquisition is very important because the process can greatly affect the benefits that a company would gain through mergers and acquisitions.
The process is divided into different phrases.
Phase 1
This is the business valuation stage. In this stage, the acquiring party should assess the situation of the their firm and its future capabilities. Will the company be able to maintain its market share, the return on capital or there core competencies? If not, then a merger and acquisition would be necessary.
In this stage, the business should be valued and analyze whether a merger will help improve the firm’s valuation or whether the firm should use internal growth instead.
The business should access the roles, it expects the merger to perform, and ...
... middle of paper ...
...e firms merged to increase their market share. Hp was stronger on the consumer side compared to Compaq while, Compaq was stronger on the computer (pc) business and the commercial side if the companies merged, each would concentrate on their strengths and this would increase their market share.
Why they failed.
Hp had begun to miss its long-term goals and its estimates in the growth of both the pc markets and the business were very optimistic. The management failed to achieve what the merger had to offer and this caused the price of the stock to fall. Hp found it hard to overcome the problems that were associated with the strategic integration because hp had only been concentrating on its operational integration.
Recommendations
Hp should critically analyze their strategic integration and come up with solutions to the integration problems faced.
Proper explanation of the current situation, involving the type and extent of the current problems. And the merger will bring progress over the current situation.
In the year of 2005, the companies eventually found a way to make it easier for the companies to combine without having any major issues or problems. Unfortunately, around the year of 20010 the merging com...
Conclusion In my opinion, the failure of the mergers and acquisitions depends on the culture and operational difference between the two firms.
A merger is a partial or total combination of two separate business firms and forming of a new one. There are predominantly two kinds of mergers: partial and complete. Partial merger usually involves the combination of joint ventures and inter-corporate stock purchases. Complete mergers are results in blending of identities and the creation of a single succeeding firm. (Hicks, 2012, p 491). Mergers in the healthcare sector, particularly horizontal hospital mergers wherein two or more hospitals merge into a single corporation, are increasing both in frequency and importance. (Gaughan, 2002). This paper is an attempt to study the impact of the merger of two competing healthcare organization and will also attempt to propose appropriate clinical and managerial interventions.
It is proper to present a business definition of merger as it found on legal reference with the ultimate goal in the pursuing of an explanation on which this paper intents to present. A merger in accordance with the textbook is legally defined as a contractual and statuary process in which the (surviving corporation) acquires all the assets and liabilities of another corporation (the merged corporation). The definition go even farther to involve and clarify about what happen to shares by explaining the following; “the shareholders of the merged corporation either are paid for their share or receive the shares of the surviving corporation”. But in simple terms is my attempt to define as the product or birth of a corporation on which typically extends its operation by combining with another corporation. So from two on existence corporations in the process it gets absorbed into becomes one entity. The legal definition also implied more than meet the eye. The terms contractual and statuary, it implied a process on which contracts and statuary measures emerge as measures to regulate, standardized, governing or simply at times may complicate whole process. These terms provide an explicit umbrella and it becomes as part of the agreement formulating or promoting a case for contracts to be precedent, enforced or regulated in a now or in the future under a court of law under the Contract Business Law Statue of Practice. As for what happens to the shares of the involved corporations no more explanation is needed as the already actions mentioned clearly stated of the expectations of a merge’s share involvement.
In this industry, companies need to provide a national network, meaning that there are significant economies of scale to be made with a merger. For example, when T-Mobile and Orange decided to merge, their ambition was to combine both networks, eliminate duplication and create a single super-network. Furthermore, they said it would provide the customers with a bigger network and better coverage .
Merging two companies does not exchange any cash between each other. Merging is usually done in free of cost; this is a likely reason for the high revenue made by the AT Kearney despites challenges faced to them.
According to a North American dictionary entry vertical integration is defined as “merging of companies in supply chain: the merging of companies that are in the chain of companies handling a single item from raw material production to retail sale” (“Vertical Integration,” 2009). Though the definition of vertical integration is quite simple the concept is much more complicated than one may think. There are four strategic factors that must be established by business leaders before the implementation of vertical integration can take place that must be well-thought-out in order to achieve any level of success. The factors that influence vertical integration are economic, market, operational, and strategic.
Acquisition analysis includes determining consideration transferred, goodwill (or gain on bargain) and fair value of assets at the date of acquisition. When Woolly Ltd purchased Jumper Ltd; they paid more then the consideration transferred (fair value of assets less liabilities) of the entity, thus there was goodwill provided. Business combination valuation entries occur when assets or liabilities fair value differs from their carrying amount at the date of acquisition. As Jumper Ltd had assets with a higher fair value than carrying amount; there was reasoning for BCVR entries. Intragroup transactions come about through the transferal of assets or liabilities such as inventory or dividends from the subsidiary to the parent or visa versa (within the group). When Woolly Ltd and Jumper Ltd conduct intragroup transactions, as separate legal entities these transactions are recorded as normal however, from the point of the group these transactions are internal and therefore are not recognized by external users, thus the transactions must be eliminated. Finally, non-controlling interest occurs when the parent owns less than 100% of the subsidiary, however this is not relevant to Woolly Ltd as ownership of Jumper Ltd is 100%. These steps are
As the business, people put it, to maximize the wealth of shareholders (Peavler, 2016). This could be done by pursuing more of an immediate reason that will realize the shareholders wealth maximization goal. However, this main reason may fail to be realized as most mergers depict negative results.
Before the alliance the two firms were in totally different market and they were also in different country but the industry was of same type. Both of the firms were aware about their future plan and lacking.
When two companies decide to combine forces and become one bigger, richer mega company, it is called merging. This process forms a new company, combining the money and ideas of what used to be two different entities into one. This, however, is not the only thing that results from merging two different companies, and since we will be discussing the merging of two companies in the pharmaceutical industry, the impact will be incredible. Of course, the merging of two companies will not only have positive impacts but it will have many negative side effects as well. Furthermore, depending on the size of the merging companies and the goals of the people leading these companies there will always be contradictions according to the long-term goals or short-term goals depending on what both parties’ interests are. Our company, Verduga Inc. is contemplating to merge with Coronado-Salinas Inc., so before we rush into such a merger we must contemplate the positive and negative aspects of such a move. When it comes to mergers there are always many possible positive and negative impacts due to the effects of merging; these effects more widely impact the fields on research and development, on employment and management, stocks and shareholders, monopolization, and ingenuity.
Mergers mean two or more companies combining together to form one business or firm. There are six different types of mergers: Horizontal, Vertical, Conglomerate, Market extension, Product Extension and Diversified activity.
The first two do not require the acquired business unit to be connected with the existing units; the second two depend on connection. Although the concepts are not always mutually exclusive, the way in which they generate value for the corporation is different for each. The portfolio management balances current business activities with new industry acquisitions. Its success is undervalued acquisition meets attractiveness and COE test. The challenges are: increased capital market competition, need for industry specific knowledge, and growth of the company and diversity. The restructuring seeks underdeveloped or sick companies and industries. Its successes are: utilize and pass the three tests and ability to find undervalued companies with growth potential. Its challenges are: restructurer exposed to more risk, time limit for success, hold onto a restructured company, and growing depletion of restructuring pool with increased competition. The transfer of skills involves activities important to competitive advantage. With transferring skills, business activities are similar enough that sharing knowledge would be meaningful. However, skills must be useful to key business activities and must be beyond competitors’ capabilities. The ability to share activities has been a potent basis for corporate strategy because sharing often enhances
The acquisitions process starts from obtaining the necessary raw materials to make a product and ends with the delivery of the product to the buyer. Acquisition and Supply Chain Management encompasses activities such as contract administration, product procurement and manufacturing, and logistics.