Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of hallucination
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Mental Illness in The Turn of the Screw “Mental illness leaves a huge legacy, not just for the person suffering it but for those around them.”- Lysette Anthony. In the book The Turn of the Screw by Henry James, the governess is suffering from some form of mental illness to where she is hallucinating ghosts. She is very confident in her thoughts, so she thinks anything that she is seeing, everyone else is seeing. The governess makes up ghosts in her mind that are following the kids she is in charge of, and she ends up hurting both of them herself. In the story, the governess is the only person that ever claims to see the ghosts. The governess is alone outside when she first sees the ghost of Peter Quint, and is alone in the hallway at night …show more content…
when she first sees Miss Jessel. But, later in the story when she sees the Miss Jessel again, Mrs. Grose and Flora are present and they both claim to see nothing. Miles distracts the governess and lets Flora escape from her. The governess and Mrs. Grose finally find her at the pond in their backyard and the governess claims Miss Jessel is present. Mrs Grose says, “ She isn’t there, little lady, and nobody’s there- and you never see nothing my sweet!” (71). Mrs. Grose is looking right where the governess says Miss Jessel, is but she can not see anything. This shows that the governess is making up these figures in her mind. The governess believes that the ghosts are following Flora and Miles, but both the children deny ever seeing ghosts. The governess is the only person in the book to see the ghosts of Peter Quint and Miss Jessel which can lead us to believe that she is hallucinating these figures. Miles and Flora are only hurt when the governess interferes with them. When, the governess confronts Flora and tells her that Miss Jessel is following her, Flora wails, “Take me away, take me away- oh, take me away from her [the governess]!” (71). Flora becomes so spooked that she can’t sleep or relax without thinking the governess is going to come around her and frighten her again. Flora becomes so sick from the lack of sleep that she has to leave the estate with Mrs. Grose. At the end of the book, Miles gives up on pretending there are no ghosts, so he goes along with the governess and asks her where Peter Quint is at. The governess hugs Miles so tightly to “protect” him, that she ends up smothering him and he dies in her arms. The governess becomes over protective of the children and believes she can save them from these figures that she has made up, but in reality she is the only thing hurting them. There is no evidence that Miles and Flora are actually interacting with ghosts, the governess assumes they do.
Throughout the whole book, the governess is assuming things about the children. From what Mrs. Grose tells her about Miles getting kicked out of school, she assumes he is bad. Knowing he is bad, she assumes that he is talking and planning with ghost because that is what a bad kid would do in her mind. Then, she assumes that Flora likes her without any confirmation. The governess says, “I felt quite sure that she [Flora] would presently like me. It was part of what I already liked Mrs. Grose for herself” (8). This shows that she is so overconfident of her thoughts that she, at first, has no doubt that Flora and Mrs. Grose like her. Later in the story, the governess see the ghosts and automatically thinks the children are seeing them. She never asks the kids if they see the ghosts she is confident that they are there. She is so over confident in herself that she does not ever think that the ghosts could just be hallucinations of her mind. Flora is eight and Miles is ten, so they are still childish and when they run away or try to pull a joke on the governess is not out of the ordinary. The governess blames their behavior on ghosts without even thinking that they are acting this way because they are young. The governess is so caught up in herself and what she thinks is going on, that she is not in touch with
reality. The governess is so caught up in what she thinks is happening and what she thinks she sees that she loses touch with reality. This makes it clear for the reader that she could be suffering from some sort of mental illness where she imagines hallucinations. She is overconfident in herself and ends up hurting both the children while trying to protect them from hallucinations of her mind.
One issue which, like the rest, can be answered in more than one way is why Mrs. Grose believes in the Governess when she tells her about her ghost encounters. Usually one would second-guess such outlandish stories as the ones that the governess shares throughout the story, yet Mrs. Grose is very quick to believe our borderline-insane narrator. One of the explanations for such behavior could be the underlying fact that Mrs. Grose and the governess have a similar socio-economic background, therefore making them somewhat equal even if the governess does not always seem to think that way. This fact makes them susceptible to trusting and believing each other, and to believing that the ghosts are there, for the people that the ghosts are presenting used to be servants and therefore from a similar socio-economic background. To add on to that, Bruce Robbins proposes in his Marxist criticism of The Turn of the Screw that the idea of a ghost is synonymous to that of a servant, subconsciously making the two lower-class workers of Bly more vulnerable to believe that the ghosts were real; in other words, servants were ghosts....
The existence of the ghosts in The Turn of the Screw has always been in debate. Instead of directly discussing whether the ghosts are real or not, this essay will focus on the reliability of the governess, the narrator of the story. After making a close examination of her state of mind while she is at Bly, readers of The Turn of the Screw will have many more clues to ponder again and to decide to what extent the governess can be believed. While critics like Heilman argue that there are problems with the interpretation that the governess was psychopathic, textual evidence incorporated with scientific research show that the governess did go through a period of psychical disorder that caused her insomnia, out of which she created hallucinations.
As humans, we can’t help but to jump to conclusions, but the governess’s assumptions are too misguided and are taken too far without substantial proof. When she first arrives at Bly, she automatically infers that Ms. Grose, although not showing any hint of it, is relieved that the governess is there and simply “wish[es] not to show it” (7). This could be the case, or, as it would seem to any sane person, Ms. Grose could just be unmoved by the governess’s arrival. Her second assumption with Ms. Grose is when they agree on one thing and the governess assumes that “on every question [they should] be quite at one” (9). Some people can hope that a person may have similar ideas to them, but they wouldn’t expect to agree on everything all the time. People understand that we all have different views, but obviously the governess does not. Then, the governess goes on to guess that Miles got kicked out of school because “he’s an injury to others” (11). She has no specific proof that shows he was kicked out for any reason but she is quick to make the inference. She hasn’t talked to the school, the uncle, or even Miles himself to find out what happened, but instead goes along with her own imagination. She also makes many assumptions about the ghost when she hasn’t even been talking to them. She deduces the ghost of Peter Quint “was looking for Miles” but she only had a feeling to base that off of
In the governess's insane pseudo-reality and through her chilling behavior, she managed to bring downfall to Flora and Miles, the children of Bly. With compulsively obsessive actions, irrational assumptions, and demented hallucinations, the governess perceived ghosts bearing evil intentions were attempting to corrupt and destroy the children she had taken the role of care for. In reality, the governess herself brought tragedy to the children through her own selfishness and insanity.
The sickness of insanity stems from external forces and stimuli, ever-present in our world, weighing heavily on the psychological, neurological, and cognitive parts of our mind. It can drive one to madness through its relentless, biased, and poisoned view of the world, creating a dichotomy between what is real and imagined. It is a defense mechanism that allows one to suffer the harms of injustice, prejudice, and discrimination, all at the expense of one’s physical and mental faculties.
Through out the short novella, 'The Turn of the Screw,' by Henry James, the governess continually has encounters with apparitions that seem to only appear to her. As Miles' behavior in school worsens so that he is prevented from returning, and as Flora becomes ill with a fever, the governess blames these ghosts for corrupting the children, Miles and Flora, and labels them as evil and manipulative forces in their lives. But why is it that these ghosts only seem to appear to the governess even when the children are present at the time of the sightings by the governess? Evidence from the short story leads the reader to believe that the ghosts are not real but are merely the evidence of the fragmenting sanity of the governess.
with Mrs. Grose, she learns that they are ghosts and former employees of the Gentleman
The governess sees a woman on the other side of the lake and jumps to the conclusion that Flora has seen her and is choosing to act like she didn’t. The child was playing with a boat and had her back turned to the lake. Why would she think that she had to have seen her? There is no proof and does not even ask the child if she saw anything. She automatically assumes it’s Miss Jessel, the previous governess who died and that she is after Flora. She tells her story to Mrs. Grose drawing her in more deeply into believing her crazy hallucinations and Mrs. Grose asks her if she is sure its Miss Jessel and the governess replies “Then ask Flora—she’s sure!” and then immediately comes back to say “no, for God’s sake don’t! She’ll say she isn’t—she’ll lie” ((James 30). She comes to the conclusion that the child will lie about it when there is no reason to suspect that she would. Again, this is her jumping to conclusions, because there is not any proof to say that the children have seen or know anything about the ghost’s. “Thus a very odd relationship develops between the governess and the children, for the more she loves them and pities them and desires to save them, the more she begins to suspect them of treachery, until at last she is convinced that they, in league with the ghosts, are ingeniously tormenting her’ (Bontly 726). “The ghosts appear, thus, when the governess is both aware of the corruption which threatens the children and convinced of her own power to preserve them untainted” (Aswell 53). It’s the governess fabricating all this up in her mind again so she can play the part of
According to a Freudian psychoanalysis of the governess, we understand that there is much more occurring than just a haunted estate. The reader knows what is occurring...
...t want to be the only one who does. It is another feeble attempt to prove her sanity to herself and to others. However, because she “is so easily carried away”, she soon believes that the children do in fact see the ghosts by reading into their every remark and behavior. By piecing all of this together, the governess proves to herself that she is not insane. The governess in The Turn of the Screw, is a highly unreliable narrator. From the beginning of the story, her energetic imagination is displayed to the reader. With this knowledge alone, it would not be irrational to conclude that she had imagined the appearances of Peter Quint and Miss Jessel. However, these facts in addition to her unsubstantiated inferences allow the reader to intelligently label the governess as an unreliable narrator. Works Cited Poupard, Dennis. “Henry James.” Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism: Volume 24. Ed. Paula Kepos. Detroit: Gale research.; 1990. 313-315.
Funny thing is, Miles shares all of those characteristics at the end of the story. One scene that I found to be particularly interesting was when the governess described the moment of silence between her and Miles quite peculiarly, “It was the dead silence of our long gaze at such close quarters that gave the whole horror, huge as it was, its only note of the unnatural. If I had met a murderer in such a place and at such an hour, we still at least would have spoken. Something would have passed, in life, between us; if nothing had passed, one of us would have moved. The moment was so prolonged that it would have taken but little more to make me doubt if even I were in life” (James, 59). The words, “unnatural,” “murderer,” and “horror” all have ghostly implications. What is also creepy is the fact that the governess even doubted whether or not she was alive at the end of that quote when she said, “The moment was so prolonged that it would have taken but little more to make me doubt if even I were in life” (James, 59). With all of these implications of death lingering around this one quote, it’s fair to say that death will be present in story and ghosts will play some part in it. What’s weirdest of all, is that the governess thought that she would’ve had a more entertaining conversation even if she was speaking to a murderer, which emphasizes the strange silence in the
After finding Flora and seeing Miss Jessel across the lake, the governess exclaims to Flora, “there, there, there, and you see her as well as you see me!” (120). Flora later says, “I don’t know what you mean. I see nobody. I see nothing” (122). Still, the governess believes that the children know about the ghosts. Later, the governess tells Mrs. Grose, “They know [about the ghosts]—it’s too monstrous: they know, they know!” (51). The governess, without evidence, wholly believes that the children are lying to her, and her paranoia increases the more she
In another conversation with Mrs. Grose, the governess rebukes a comment with “Won’t, if he has the chance, turn on me? Yes, I venture still to think it” (219). The governess is questioning the integrity of Miles, and the relationship they have together. Here is another instance of James leaving the characters to wrangle with ideas in their own heads. This can relate back to the ambiguity James uses. The governess's insecurity over her relationship with Miles elicits several subjects of contention in the book. The self doubt prominent in the Governess’s life is projected onto the reader, which reflects an eerie feeling on to content. With every close relationship being called into question, an ominous feeling is cast onto the tale that escalates how frightening scenes are. The themes of insecurity and trust can also play hand in hand. A lack of trust in Flora also exacerbated the insecurity of the Governess. The governess discusses a sighting by saying “Miss Jessel stood before us on the opposite bank exactly as she had stood the other time” (212). This is ignored by Flora, which is indicated by the Governess thinking “The revelation then of the manner in which Flora was affected startled me in truth” (212). With the children not admitting to sightings of the ghosts, the governess is just further driven into a realm of questioning and self doubt. Though James
She tells Mrs. Grose about her wariness of the children when she claims that “their unnatural goodness; it’s a game… it’s a policy… and it’s a fraud!” (James 41). She makes ridiculous accusations that these innocent children are secretly in a scheme with ghosts. The governess allows her skepticism of the children to control her thoughts, despite the children denying her claims. She does not trust the children, and she starts to believe the ghosts are out to get them. She unreasonably blames the children for acting up, becomes obsessed with the idea that they are up to no good, and worries that something bad will happen. Her unreasonableness, obsession, and excessive worries contribute to her insanity. The governess also admits that “in the state of my nerves… I must have gripped my little girl with a spasm” (James 41). At this point in the story, she is distressed because she believes Flora is lying, so she lashes out and hurts her. Even if it was unintentional, she still acted irrationally on the spot due to her current unstable mental state. This sudden, unreasonable action shows her extreme mental instability because she is unable to control her actions. On top of being delusional, the governess also acts senselessly upon her delusions, which clearly reveals her
Gothic literature, such as Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, was written to oppose the romantic literature that was popular during the time it was written. The romantic literature is centered around idealism and perfection in society, whereas gothic literature is focused on what is imperfect and supernatural. In Frankenstein, the main character, Victor Frankenstein, has anything but an ideal life. A series of misguided events lead to the immoral creation of an eight foot tall superhuman that destroys Victor’s family. Through her use of spur of the moment, rage filled actions, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein displays the effects of mental illness on a person’s morality. The cause of these actions and those ensuing include bouts of hysteria, narcissism,