Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on neuroplasticity
The theory and principles underpinning neuroplasticity
Essays on neuroplasticity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on neuroplasticity
Intelligence is one of the greatest strengths of mankind. It allows you the ability to imagine incredulous ideas, formulate leading theories and technologies, and is generally accepted to be one of the most important qualities a person may possess. Thus it makes sense that human beings would pursue medical enhancements to increase their intelligence. This technology is seen in the story “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes in which the main character undergoes an experimental surgery to increase his intelligence at the cost of his social and behavioral ability and physical health. Although this technology may seem like science fiction, it theoretically could be a realistic option for the future.
The correlation between intelligence and the physical construct of the brain is very complex and not well understood. However, according to an article presented by NBC News, “They have discovered that the brains of people with high IQs tend to be highly integrated, with neural paths connecting distant brain regions, while less intelligent people's brains build simpler, shorter routes” (Wolchover). With this knowledge, scientists have a general understanding that people possessing greater intelligence quotas have brains with greater neural connections. This is also revealed by Dutch researchers examining the connections of the brain as well. “After analyzing the brain as an incredibly dense network of interconnected points, a team of Dutch scientists has found that the most efficiently wired brains tend to belong to the most intelligent people” (Callaway). Using this information, we can assume that by somehow altering the amount or length of neural connections could in fact alter a person’s level of intelligence. “When the brain mechani...
... middle of paper ...
...thics 35.10 (2009): 611-15.
JSTOR. Web. 17 Nov. 2013.
Callaway, Ewen. "Speeding up Brain Networks Might Boost IQ." NewScientist. 09 June
2009. Web. 18 Nov. 2013.
Chant, Ian. "Could a Neural Implant Correct Errant Thoughts?: Scientific American."
Scientific American. 09 May 2013. Web. 18 Nov. 2013.
Dillow, Clay. "A Dose of Embryonic Cells Could Induce Infant-Like 'Plasticity' in Brain,
Allowing It to Rewire Itself Like New." Popular Science. 29 Mar. 2010. Web. 16
Nov. 2013.
Levaux, Ari. "Experimenting With Nootropics to Increase Mental Capacity, Clarity." The
Atlantic. 30 Jan. 2012. Web. 18 Nov. 2013.
Linden, David J. The Accidental Mind: How Brain Evolution Has given Us Love, Memory,
Dreams, and God. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2008. Print.
Wolchover, Natalie. "What If Humans Could Be Made Twice as Intelligent?" Msnbc.com.14
Jan. 2012. Web. 17 Nov. 2013.
This required discussion that is regulated by the Nuremberg Code. In Flowers for Algernon the two doctors do not know exactly how to perform the procedure. The doctors also did not tell Charlie the effects that would later happen to him. It is an amazing idea to get your intelligence increased but it is not proven that it works, so it would be very dangerous. Increasing intelligence should not be performed until it is clear what the effects are and it needs to be safe. If the operation does work very successfully on the patient, the patient could do very sufficient things like building a car, curing cancer, or any disease. If the operation works successfully on you, you might tell or share the idea with your peers and they might want to have the operation performed too. They might go and get the operation performed and something may happen to them. The end of the operation could be misleading, as well as fatal. The operation is also not worth all of the money you paid if it isn’t permanent and only lasts for a few months, or does not turn out
In his article, “None of the Above: What IQ Doesn’t Tell You about Race” journalist Malcolm Gladwell refutes the notion that intelligence is based on genetics and argues that IQ is not just based on an individual’s level of thinking but also on the location where an individual resides. In 1984, James Flynn discovered that over the years, the IQ of people around the world had been increasing by three points per decade. This is now known as the Flynn effect. The IQ fundamentalists around the world believe that IQ score shows an individual’s level of thinking and it is based on genetics. However, Flynn effect disproves this
General intelligence tends to relate to various degrees with each other (Cohen 2012). An example of this is that if an individual is good in math, they may also be good in spelling. In this weeks reading we reviewed several different models of measurement of intelligence. In regard to these theories and general intelligence (g), the theories are various but have commonality and overlap. The Spearman's two-factor theory is if a test has high correlation with other test than the measurement of g is highly saturated (Cohen, 2012). The greater the importance of g on a test, the better the test is believed to predict intelligence
In the popular “Darwin’s Theory” survival of the fittest was the key role in evolution, but does that include intelligence? Robert Ehrlich discusses the evolution of intelligence in his article “Are People Getting Smarter or Dumber?” Through several standardized testing, it is easy to see the rapid incline of passing students in the past few years. IQ scores have also been on the incline. The rapid inclination of IQ score has become known as the Flynn Effect. The Flynn Effect seems like solid supporting evidence for evolution, but the Flynn Effect has flaws. It is impossible to narrow down why humans are achieving high IQ scores. Many factors could play into the high IQ scores such as test taking skills. The high IQ scores correlate with the amount of standardized testing. Since students are taking several standardized tests a semester, they are becoming test savoy. In actuality, scientists are believing humankind is becoming
It may seem that some people are just “plain stupid” or “oh my goodness you're so smart”, but that’s not the case. In an article I recently read called” You Can Grow Your Brain” scientist have done many tests to prove that the brain is just like a muscle.
Intelligence tests have been developed by scientists as a tool to categorize army recruits or analyze school children. But still discussing what intelligence is, academics have a difficult time defining what intelligence tests should measure. According to the American researcher Thorndike, intelligence is only that what intelligence tests claim it is (Comer, Gould, & Furnham, 2013). Thus, depending on what is being researched in the test and depending on the scientist’s definition of intelligence the meaning of the word intelligence may vary a lot. This essay will discuss what intelligence is in order to be able to understand the intelligence theories and aims of intelligence tests.
If you had the chance to triple your I.Q, would you take it? Not knowing the consequences or how long this boost of intelligence will last? In the story “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes, the main character Charlie Gordon did. He took that chance. I agree that he should have had the operation. In my opinion the operation had both positive and negative effects.
In the short story “Flowers for Algernon” Charlie Gordon is a lab subject for a new surgery that will triple his IQ founded by Dr.Nemur and Dr.Strauss. Before the surgery Charlie was very feeble minded, not being able to pick up on social ques, not being able to properly read or write, and not being able to tell the difference from when people were laughing with him or at him. At first Charlie's idea of intelligence was just to have the basics of reading and writing. As the story progresses, after his surgery is completed Charlie slowly starts to learn more information about Math, English, History and many other subjects to an extent where he had become smarter than the doctors that once looked down on him as just a test subject. At the peak of Charlie’s intelligence he
Right now, human beings are artificially enhancing humans to the way they like. In “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes many examples of why we shouldn’t artificially enhance intelligence are shown. One reason why doctors and scientists shouldn’t artificially enhance intelligence is that it can cause the test subject to be so smart that no one wants to be friends with them. Another reason why doctors and scientists shouldn’t artificially enhance intelligence is that it can cause the test subject to want to die. Therefore, doctors and scientists shouldn’t artificially enhance intelligence.
“The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination.” - Anonymous. In Flowers for Algernon, by Daniel Keyes, Charlie, the protagonist is a thirty-seven-year-old man with a low IQ. In Flowers for Algernon, Charlie goes through a life-changing surgery that will make is IQ go above two-hundred. Before the surgery, Charlie was oblivious and outgoing. He was not aware people were making fun of him, and he was always wanting to make new friends and do absurd things. But after the surgery, Charlie was reserved and aware of what went on around him. He was always inside doing experimentation, and he became aware of the things people were saying about him. Charlie goes through many changes throughout this story.
You are risking the life of Charlie Gordon in order to triple his intelligence. Charlie should not undergo this procedure. Charlie has needs that need to be taken care of, but I do not think that this procedure is needed. This operation is such a drastic change for Charlie, it would not be good for him. Some may say that Charlie should do the operation, as it will give him more opportunities in life. However, when equality is maintained, nobody can be treated to suit their needs. Is that what we want for Charlie? His needs are far more different than those around him, and even if he says he wants to be treated equally, I don’t think that he actually wants that. Even he says and believes that when he is treated to suit his needs he is in a better
On the ‘nature’ side of the debate is the psychometric approach, considered to be the most dominant in the study of intelligence, which “inspired the most research and attracted the most attention” (Neisser et al. 1996, p. 77). It argues that there is one general (‘g’) factor which accounts for intelligence. In the 1880s, Francis Galton conducted many tests (measuring reaction times to cognitive tasks), (Boundless 2013), in order to scientifically measure intelligence. These tests were linked to the eugenic breeding programme, which aimed to eliminate biologically inferior people from society. Galton believed that as intelligence was inherited, social class or position were significant indicators of intelligence. If an individual was of high social standing, they would be more intelligent than those of a lower position. However he failed to show any consistency across the tests for this hypothesis, weakening his theory that social class correlated with intelligence. Nevertheless, his creation of the intelligence test led many to continue to develop...
The other side to this controversial debate is the idea that intelligence is influenced ...
This intelligence helps me better understand myself because I am pretty good at math and it is something that I typically enjoy. This intelligence also says that I am a very structured person and I like organization. I like to know what is going on and how everything is going to work before I start anything. A teacher that I am very close with is very structured and that is why we get along so well with each other. This intelligence affects me negatively because I do not like things that or assignments that are relatively broad or unspecific. I am a person who does not like to make mistake so I like instructions and criteria to be thorough and well explained. The classroom has definitely cultivated this intelligence because with almost everything there are instructions and examples. I am getting into a part of my life where people are not giving me step-by-step directions or instructions and I have to learn to be more independent. From the bestcareermatch.com chart of careers that correlate with the multiple intelligences there are 3 careers that I would happily pursue. Being an accountant, a detective, or a lawyer are the careers that would appeals to me and two of them are options that I have already considered. Being a lawyer is my top career choice right not and I have also considered being an accountant
Thought out our lives, we are faced with many different learning experiences. Some of these experiences have made a better impact than others. This can be attributed to everyone’s different multiple intelligences or learning styles. A persons learning style is the method though which they gain information about their environment. As a teacher, it is our responsibility to know these styles, so we can reach each of our students and use all of the necessary methods.