Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Relations Between Religion and Science
Reconcile science and religion
Religion and science
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Relations Between Religion and Science
Meaningful Deception
Both religion and science are means to the same end however, religion gives someone the opportunity to change their reality. Their beliefs can become their reality, even if they are based on false information. In Cat’s Cradle, by Kurt Vonnegut, religion is more powerful than science because it allows the people of San Lorenzo to survive oppression through Bokononism. While religion may just be made up lies, it is more beneficial than science, which fails to assist the majority of mankind.
Religion tries to give purpose to people’s lives and unveil some truth about the world in which people actually live. Bokonon tells the people to “Live by the foma that makes you brave and kind and healthy and happy” (vii). His lies
…show more content…
Science primarily focuses on discovering more and more. In a discussion between the main character, John, and a woman named Sandra, John asks, “What is the secret of life”, having heard about a recent discovery. The bartender responds with, “Protein” (25). Science provides the logical answer that does not help anyone. It does not give people hope, it can only give facts which are not always the answer. While discussing Dr. Hoenikker’s opinion on truth, Dr. Breed tells John that, “The more truth we have to work with, the richer we become”, in which John responds with, “Had I been a Bokononist then, that statement would have made me howl” (41). Science believes that the more information that people have, the better society will be. Religion in contrast, sees the truth as painful and tries to stay away from what causes suffering. The more knowledge people have, the more suffering will occur and the weaker society will become. Science disregards emotions and does not relate to people who are in anguish. In a conversation with Miss Faust, Dr. Hoenikker asks, “What is love” (55). Love is the most basic of human emotions. Science as a whole cannot understand or relate to human relationships. They are isolated from others, making it hard for others to understand science. Julian Castle's view of science portrays some truth about how the people feel when he says, “man is vile, and man makes nothing worth making, knows nothing worth knowing” (169). Science does not give valuable information for daily life to the common man. It only gives facts that do not help in any way. Science can only provide the population with generic truths and cannot relate
Bokonon, we learn, is a religion that is made up of "bittersweet lies" (12). "Truth was the enemy of the people, because the truth was so terrible, so Bokonon [the creator of the religion] made it his business to provide the people with better and better lies" (118). We also learn that science takes the opposite opinion. One of the men who helped develop the atomic bomb tells us, "The more truth we have to work with, the richer we become" (36).
In The New Humanities Reader edited by Richard E. Miller and Kurt Spellmeyer. We read about Barbara Fredrickson the author of the book “Love 2.0” copy right (2013). Barbara Fredrickson is a psychologist who show in her research how our supreme emotion affects everything we Feel, Think, Do and become. Barbara also uses her research from her lab to describe her ideas about love. She defines love not as a romance or stable emotion between friends, partners and families, but as a micro-moment between all people even stranger (108). She went farther in her interpretation of love and how the existence of love can improve a person’s mental and physical health (107). Through reading
love of science” is depicted in Aylmer’s passion for science, love for Georgiana, and the difficulty he has handling both passions in his life. At times, Aylmer’s love for science is more evident, and other times his love for his wife is more apparent. Eventually, Aylmer cannot control his passion for science and his love for Georgiana is
Science is the knowledge gained by a systematic study, knowledge which then becomes facts or principles. In the systematic study; the first step is observation, the second step hypothesis, the third step experimentation to test the hypothesis, and lastly the conclusion whether or not the hypothesis holds true. These steps have been ingrained into every student of science, as the basic pathway to scientific discovery. This pathway holds not decision as to good or evil intention of the experiment. Though, there are always repercussions of scientific experiments. They range from the most simplistic realizations of the difference between acid and water to the principle that Earth is not the center of the Universe. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein depicts this very difference in the story of Victor Frankenstein. A scientist who through performing his experiments creates a monster which wreaks havoc upon humanity. Frankenstein concentrating wholly upon discovery ignores the consequences of his actions.
John started off as a Christian and ended up becoming a Bokononist. Bokononism is based on the concept of foma, which are defined as harmless untruths.The religion is formed entirely of lies, but one who believes will have peace of mind and perhaps live a
“The lack of conflict between science and religion arises from a lack of overlap between their respective domains of professional expertise—science in the empirical constitution of the universe, and religion in the search for proper ethical values and the spiritual meaning of our lives. The attainment of wisdom in a full life requires extensive attention to both domains—for a great book tells us that the truth can make us free and that we will live in optimal harmony with our fellows when we learn to do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly.”
Science or a lover, a partner in life and someone to grow old with? Or how about, using science to kill your lover, the partner that’s suppose to live with you until your gray hairs start showing? For Aylmer, the answer was crystal clear. His love for science is what propelled him to push the scientific boundaries too far.
“I just have trouble understanding how truth, all by itself, could be enough for a person.” said John, the main character in Kurt Vonnegut’s novel Cat’s Cradle. In the book, episodes of truth in religion and science seem to result in death, raising speculation of the need for lying to maintain life in the world. The main character John, explores the idea of truth in religion and science, and how truth, and uncut truth, both have different value to them. Through religion and science, truth either serves to give one hope or take it away.
Religion and science are complementary elements to our society. The notion that religion and science should not be merged together, does not mean neglecting to understand the parallel relation between these two concepts and will result in a better understanding of our surroundings. This will put an end to our scientific research and advancement because we will be relying on answers provided by religious books to answer our questions. If we don’t argue whether these answers are right or wrong, we would never have studied space stars or the universe or even our environment and earthly animals. These studies have always provided us with breakthroughs, inventions and discoveries that made our lives better.
Science has played a significant role in the development of society. Other world views, such as Hum...
...wever, in the best interest of advancing education and an enlightened society, science must be pursued outside of the realm of faith and religion. There are obvious faith-based and untestable aspects of religion, but to interfere and cross over into everyday affairs of knowledge should not occur in the informational age. This overbearing aspect of the Church’s influence was put in check with the scientific era, and the Scientific Revolution in a sense established the facet of logic in society, which allows us to not only live more efficiently, but intelligently as well. It should not take away from the faith aspect of religion, but serve to enhance it.
In the article, the author reveals his passion for science began at an early age becoming curious to learning how things work, and as an adult qualified the gratification you receive from its understanding when he states “Doing science is still among my chief pleasures” (Sagan 2). Throughout the article, Sagan reiterates his passion for science while he explains the disconnect in today’s democratic American society due to the movement away from science and into an information and service economy. The author argues from the point of view of how children and adults who do not understand science could be detrimental to society because people are less knowledgeable about the world and have the inability to find new ideas. In a plea, the author explains “…how gratifying it is when we get it…” Sagan’s article in the Washington Post directly aligns with the interest and passion with our protagonist, Victor Frankenstein who says “I read and studied the wild fancies of these writers with delight; they appeared to me treasure know too few besides myself” (Shelley 22). Frankenstein describes his passion to learn the secrets to which nature holds for the purpose of rewards of discovery. And Sagan just like Frankenstein indicates “When you’re in love, you want to tell the world ” and”when we understand and put this knowledge to use, many feel, if not a wild exhilaration, a least a deep satisfaction” (Sagan 3). Although science is not absolute with a definitive answer it is important to collaborate with others thus roping them into thinking about how science integrates into their lives instead of maintain isolation giving no room for
Understanding science and religion historically most individuals would assume that the two differ more than they relate. For decades, there has been the overwhelming debate about the differences between science and religion, and the issues that have set them apart from each other. However, personally, when it comes to the views, and goals of the two they share very similar ideologies and attributes.
There is no denying that knowledge is disputed all the time in our world. Some of the most hotly debated types of knowledge, however, are those that can be considered hypothetical or more abstract. This ties directly into the statement, “Without application in the world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” In order to explore the truthfulness of this statement in this essay, I will focus on the two Areas of Knowledge of Religion and the Natural Sciences by proposing the question, “To what extent are theoretical solutions and ideas useful in our world?” One general reason that all knowledge can be considered useful is because of the cognitive effects and benefits.
Discoveries have been made by individuals using the successes and failures of other individuals to shape their own knowledge and improve treatment methods. The differences among individuals with different religious backgrounds can also shape personal knowledge. Conflicts which lean toward a certain faith can tarnish that faith if people are not willing to fully comprehend the situation as well as the actual belief system. In order for shared knowledge to have any impact on personal knowledge, there must first be shared knowledge. People must be willing to share the personal knowledge which they have gained only from their personal experience. Once that knowledge is shared, people must then be willing to accept it, so consequently it can then shape their personal knowledge, which then will help the world continue to progress and