Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of civility in society
What do you think about civility
Comparative analysis concepts
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There are many aspects of each story The Maze Runner and Lord of the Flies that deal with the same themes. Each story shows how humans react in situations where a group of people have to band together to try to help each other survive. The Maze Runner is more about keeping each other civilized while Lord of the Flies is more about becoming savage and wild. The Maze Runner is more effective than Lord of the Flies in its exploration of civilization vs. savagery due to being put in a bad situation and instead of going wild, Thomas works with the gladers to overcome his problems and haveing a set of laws laid out so there is order in the community. In The Maze Runner the gladers work together to overcome their obstacles together. “This ain’t got nothin’ to do with no hate or like or love or friends or anything. All we care about is surviving. Drop your sissy side and start using that shuck brain if you got one.” (Chapter 13). This shows that the gladers are putting …show more content…
personal issues to the side to survive. They aren’t worried about their own drama when there is more at stake. “Order,” Newt continued. “Order. You say that bloody word over and over in your shuck head. Reason we’re all sane around here is ’cause we work our butts off and maintain order. Order’s the reason we put Ben out—can’t very well have loonies runnin’ around tryin’ to kill people, now can we? Order. Last thing we need is you screwin’ that up.” (Chapter 15). Even though Ben was sick and not in his right state of mind they still banished him because it's part of their rules and their rules are the only things that have kept them alive for so long. If they bend the rules for one person they have to bend the rules for everyone. Even if the punishments seem harsh they have to be done so that way the gladers can keep order and keep eachother safe, while dealing with all their issues at the same time. In The Lord of the Flies the group of kids need to come together to help each other survive the island, but instead some of them turn savage and try to do more harm for the group than good.
"'Kill the pig! Cut his throat! Kill the pig! Bash him in!'" (CH7) This is only one sign that the group of kids are losing their humanity. No civilized school kid screams about killing a pig unless he's losing his mind. "'Kill the pig! Cut his throat! Kill the pig! Bash him in!'" (CH9). The kids are losing touch with reality. They believe there is a beast on the island with them, and they feel like that if they don’t kill it that it will kill them. Unlike the Gladers in The Maze Runner when put in a bad situation the kids in The Lord of the Flies don’t come together and become stronger. They seperate themselves and grow weaker as a whole. The main character Thomas in The Maze Runner is similar to the character Ralph from The Lord of the Flies. They both try to keep their groups together and overcome their
situations. Thomas rocked back on his heels, then ran his arm across his forehead, wiping away the sweat. And at that moment, in the space of only a few seconds, he learned a lot about himself. About the Thomas that was before. He couldn’t leave a friend to die. (Chapter 18) This shows that Thomas will do anything for his group of friends. He won’t let down the group. "'We've got to have rules and obey them. After all, we're not savages. We're English, and the English are best at everything.'" Here you can see Ralph tell the kids that they do have a set of rules to follow. Throughout the entire story he keeps reminding all the other kids that they are civilized and not savage. The Maze Runner is better example of civilization vs. savagery because Thomas is actually able to keep his group in control and humain. Thomas is willing to die for his group if it means saving someone else's life. Ralph in Lord of the Flies wasn’t able to keep his group in control. They are far more savage then the Gladers, because they started turning on eachother and killing each other instead of helping each other survive. No matter how similar these two characters are you can see that Thomas is more superior in the fact of being a leader. No matter how humain you think you are you always have a savage side.
In The Maze Runner, Thomas recalls nothing of his life except for his name. He finds himself surrounded by a bunch of boys. Like all the other Gladers, Thomas appears in the Glade terrified and disoriented. However, he senses a powerful bond to the Maze. He quickly exhibits courage and confidence when he saves Alby and Minho from the Grievers after they had to spend the night in the Maze.
Comparing stories can lead to revelations about human nature.This is true for the two stories the Lord of the Flies and Divergent. Lord of the flies and Divergent prove that human nature is selfish and not open to unique people.
But just before the cops could take him to get unwound, he runs away preventing his parts from saving lives and keeping his own life instead. In The Maze Runner, Thomas and his friends, after they get out of the maze trials, resent the people behind everything they had just been through, even
Horrendous pain and suffering worthy of masochists is something that any sane person would shy away from. Yet, authors from all eras of time find those experiences pleasing to put down on paper. The Odyssey of Homer, as translated by Allen Mandelbaum, alongside William Golding’s Lord of the Flies are two such works of literature where the author writes about the agonies of their main characters, Odysseus and Ralph, respectively. Odysseus of The Odyssey of Homer and Ralph of Lord of the Flies are two characters who endured the backlash of divine powers and the pain of betrayal, yet they persevered onwards in their journeys towards success, teaching readers it is possible to push on past all of life’s challenges.
...n conclusion, both novels represent the true nature of human kind, with no barriers. The Maze Runner, almost being the modernized version of Lord of the Flies, shows how although there aren't adults in their society, left along humans can flourish and keep a structured society. Lord of the Flies however, deals with a more dark view on human nature, and brings about all of the savage impulses that reside within all humans. The leaders in both novels conduct themselves quite differently, yet it shows that all leaders don't have to be the same in order to "get the job done". Finally, both novels represent innocence in some of their characters. This shows that although everything else may fall apart, some people's true reason in life is to bring about strength and innocence in others. The novels resembled each other, yet still compared and contrasted quite well.
In conclusion, after comparing both a Classic novel and a Modern Novel the Classic novel won the battle between old and new. I personally liked Lord of the Flies a lot more than the Hunger Games because of the way the themes were demonstrated and they way I was lead to view the main characters.
When placed on a deserted island, a group of strangers banded together to try to survive. They decided on a leader, problem-solved, fought off a beast, and formed their own society, even if it was somewhat flawed. This was the situation in the famous TV show, Lost. The Lord of the Flies and Lost are similar in these many different ways, with the exception that the show featured a tribe of adults instead of children. That just proves how difficult it is to maintain order in a society; even the adults struggled with keeping it peaceful and civilized. In Lord of the Flies, William Golding presents a broken society of savage boys fighting one another to suggest that man’s capacity for evil is brought out by the need for power and control.
Have you ever thought about six to thirteen year olds ever acting like savages and turning into a serial killer? After reading Lord of the Flies, this is exactly what happened. Ralph, Piggy, Jack and other kids cash land on a gorgeous island with leaving no trace for the world to find them. Ralph tries to be organized and logical, but in the other hand, Jack is only interested in satisfying his pleasures. Just like in the short story, The Tortoise And The Hare, Lord of the Flies, stands for something. This novel is a psychological allegory, the island, as the mind, Ralph, the leader, as the ego, Jack, the hunter, as the id, and Piggy, an annoying little boy, as the super ego. As we read Lord Of
The movie and the book Lord of The Flies are very similar, but they do have slight differences that differ the movie and the book a lot. One of the major differences is how the boys react to conflict. The differences end up impacting the movie and the overall conflict/resolution. In the book Lord of The Flies I thought it was a very good book.
Another similarity between the two novels is that the parallels between the protagonists and the antagonists are quite similar. Both the novels have a character who willingly gives into his heart of darkness, and a character who sees the savagery of those who are consumed and fights to return to civilization. For example, in the Heart of Darkness Kurtz gave into his heart of darkness and let his evil tendencies take over. He was a one point a man who values morals but gave into his evil side when removed from civilization. Marlow on the other hand also journeys away from civilization but he does not let his values deteriorate such as Kurtz. In Lord of the Flies Jack gave into his evil side and becomes savage like, and begins turning against the ones who were his friends. Ralph on the other hand was not as easily consumed by his evil side. Until his death, Ralph realized the savagery of the others especially Jack.
As a result of twelve year old boys being stranded on an isolated island, they resort to savagery. Two journalists, Eleanor Learmonth and Jenny Tabakoff state in their article, “When groups of people are clinging to life, the greatest threat may be not the harsh environment, starvation or dehydration, but the other survivors standing next to them on the deserted beach or the remote, snow-covered mountain.” (Learmonth and Tabakoff) The boys in Lord of the Flies faced many hardships concerning their surroundings, but their biggest threat was their own emotions that turned them into unrecognizable monsters. In her article, Shulevitz discusses a case study about the effects of loneliness on monkeys and she observes, “…the absence of mothering destroyed the monkeys’ ability to mingle with other monkeys…” (Shulevitz) Such as in Lord of the Flies, the absence of adults destroyed the boys’ humanity and left them unable to compromise with one another. The children were on an island together, although, this does not mean that some of them could not have felt lonely as individuals, such as Piggy. Journalist, Oliver Moody, explains that researchers have found, “A lack of friends is worse for teenagers’ health than taking no exercise…” (Moody 1) This applies to Piggy because along with his physical health issues, he had no friends, and as construed in the novel, he suffered the most, emotionally. As he desperately tried to fit in and be heard, he simply got bullied as stated in the text, “This from Piggy, and the wails of agreement from some of the hunters, drove Jack to violence.” (Golding 71) Nobody liked Piggy the majority of the time spent on the island. Loneliness and isolation provide support of the characters’ insanity throughout Lord of the
Great minds think alike. In Lord of the Flies and Brave New World, both dystopian novels, William Golding and Aldous Huxley confirms this axiom. Whereas Golding perceives the raw evil of human nature quite literally, Huxley, too, illustrates mans’ downfall, but in a different setting. Although they wrote separately, their genius comes together to deliver the same message.
In Lord of The Flies, savagery plays a big part in the novel, and it proves how isolation can make kids lose sense of what is right or wrong. In the book, a chant is repeated as a cult by saying, “Kill the pig”. Cut her throat. Spill her blood” (Golding 69). This chant being repeated in the setting before killing a kid during it, proves how it can affect kids in such a negative way.
There are numerous primitive acts committed in the text the Lord of the Flies, but by far the most savage one is when they killed the piglets mother, and the piglets too. This hanness act shows they have no regard for the innocence of the pigs demonstrating the turn from right to wrong. At the beginning, they are too scared to even kill a pig " because of the unbearable blood" with Jack being unable to stab it (Golding 31) . This however only makes makes him more urgent to prove himself by being savage and has "the compulsion to track down and kill that was swallowing him up" (Golding 51) . Soon, the killings begin and eventually the pig is on a stick sharpened at both ends where the boys dance around it as an offering to the beast.
Its in every nature of human being. In this essay it will be proven that the main theme is “civilization” vs “savagery”, mans inhumanity to man, mans capacity of evil, desire for power, and darkness in settings, in both novels “The Heart of Darkness” by Joseph Conrad and “Lord of the Flies” by William Golding In the novel “Heart of Darkness” mans inhumanity to man portrayed by many characters in the novel. When Marlow see six men’s chained they were treated as inferiors, slaves almost as seeing the sight of men being treated as savages. Marlow compares the white men leading the chained men to devils.