Human Nature Vs. Good In Lord Of The Flies By William Golding

647 Words2 Pages

Some people act like human nature isn't as bad as it may seem, but it brings a lot more problems into a society than one person originally thought. Author William Golding argues in the novel that human nature is more evil than good. Throughout the novel he uses many examples to display, but it leaves people to wonder if what he says is true about human nature. Despite most people believing that human nature isn't harmful, Golding and other research have proven that human nature is more evil than good. In the Lord of The Flies, Golding revolves the whole book around the idea that human nature is more evil than good. The main way he displayed this idea was by using the character Jack and in the book, he stated, "You cut a pig’s throat to let the blood out... Otherwise you can’t eat the meat” (Golding 31). This quote near the beginning of the book establishes how being isolated from society starts harming the way the boys think. This is accurate because Jack starts acting just a few days isolated from society and starts not knowing what is right from wrong. Jack also said later in the book, “Anyway, you don’t hunt or build or help- you're a lot of crybabies and sissies” (Golding 82). This further displays how human nature affects people in a negative …show more content…

In Lord of The Flies, savagery plays a big part in the novel, and it proves how isolation can make kids lose sense of what is right or wrong. In the book, a chant is repeated as a cult by saying, “Kill the pig”. Cut her throat. Spill her blood” (Golding 69). This chant being repeated in the setting before killing a kid during it, proves how it can affect kids in such a negative way. This idea of savagery was displayed in Animal Farm by using the chant, “Four legs good, two legs bad” (Orwell 17). This goes on to display how the usage of chants brings savagery into any situation and how following someone's bad example can lead to being very ruthless or

Open Document