Comparing stories can lead to revelations about human nature.This is true for the two stories the Lord of the Flies and Divergent. Lord of the flies and Divergent prove that human nature is selfish and not open to unique people.
Both Divergent and the Lord of the Flies convey the idea of stereotypes. Comparing the stereotypes in these two story may lead to revelations on human nature. For example Divergent is set in a world divided by factions; Abnegation, Amity, Dauntless, Candor, and Erudite. The main character Tris originated from the selfless people of Abnegation. Tris learns that she is Divergent(owning more than one faction trait) and must decide what type of person she is, while keeping her divergence a secret. Divergent is frowned upon by the stereotypical leaders in the story and could be dangerous. The Erudite leader Jeanine was too selfish to realize that unique people such as Divergent are the ones who would solve the mystery of their unique lives.
Similarly to Divergent, Lord of the flies indiscreetly focuses on the stereotypes of the id, ego, superego, christ figure, and The devil figure. The phrases “the nice guy always finishes last” and “the survival of the fittest”, may be used to
…show more content…
describe this story. The story is about a group of stereotypical school boys trapped on an island that “try” to work together to survive. Of course the id, Jack, and the superego, Piggy, do not get along, forcing piggy to be the odd one out. Unfortunately Jack's selfish ways and hatred towards piggy’s unique ways, causes piggy to plummet to his death. Leaving the nice guy to finish last and the fittest to survive. This comes to show that stories conveying stereotypes can prove that humans are selfish and not open to unique people. Novels commonly have characters that manipulate one another to reach certain goals. This is also shown in these two stories, whereas Jack manipulated most of the boys to think that there was a beast on the island, but Piggy, Ralph, and Simon were not fooled. He was seeking power out of selfishness and hated Piggy, Ralph, and Simon for choosing different. He then manipulated the other boys to kill Simon and Piggy and attempt to kill Ralph. In addition to this Divergent also displays a character that uses manipulation to reach certain goals. This example, Jeanine was protecting a secret that the Abnegation threatened to release. She then Manipulated the Dauntless brains to destroy the abnegation for her own selfish reason. She disagreed with the divergent who did not fall for her manipulation. This further proves that manipulation takes part in human nature of self involvement and judgment. Typically there is a good and bad in all characters in a story. This is true for these two stories. Tris in Divergent was probably the best character in the story yet she had her bad moments. Although she was small and defenseless she seeked revenge on a competitor that had brutally beat her. She selfishly wished for him to feel pain and worked to her advantage so that it could happen. On the other hand, Piggy from the lord of the flies was partially responsible for Simon's death. Though he chose to deny it for his own selfish reason. The Good and bad in people also proves that human nature is selfish and not open to unique people. As a result, this information leads to a theory.
Lord of the flies and Divergent prove that human nature is selfish and not open to unique people. This shows that it takes little effort to be selfish and judgemental, but it takes a whole lot of strength to be selfless and non judgemental. Jack naturally pushed Piggy aside, whereas Piggy had to deal with the other end of the situation. Jeanine easily seeked power and disliked divergent, and Tris had a tough battle against her to secure divergence safety. Both Piggy and Tris traveled down bumpy roads to be selfless and allow their judgment to appreciated. This proves the theory that it takes little effort to be selfish and judgemental, but it takes a whole lot more strength to be selfless and non
judgemental. Not only can a theory be created based off of the novel world, the real world expresses this as well. The real world also proves that human nature is selfish and judgmental. This shows that it takes little effort to be selfish and Judgemental, but it takes a whole lot of strength to be selfless and non judgemental. This can be proven based off of observations of the process of bullying. The bully takes little effort to selfishly think of him/her self first. Judgment towards unique people also comes natural to a bully. On the other end of the process, the phrase “turn the other cheek”, comes into work. For the case of the one being bullied, strength is the key to doing just the opposite of the bully. As a result the real world is also an example of the theory of what little effort it takes to be selfish and judgemental and how much more strength it takes to be selfless and non judgemental. After reviewing this information this is proof that human nature can influence people's judgment and self involvement. This was proven by the real world and the novels Divergent and the Lord of the flies. As a result two stories can lead to revelations about human nature.
The character Piggy in William Golding's novel Lord of the Flies serves as the intellectual balance to the emotional leaders of a group of shipwrecked British boys. Ironically, their new society values physical qualities over intellectual attributes whereas it is the rational actions that will lead to their survival. Piggy's actions and the reactions from his fellow survivors foreshadow his eventual death. Lord of the Flies is overflowing with creative symbolism, surrounding every event and character; Piggy is no exception. From being the representation of scholars to the comparison with Prometheus, Golding ensures Piggy's short life is well remembered.
Lord Of The Flies is possibly one of the most complex novels of the twentieth century. This complexity and depth is evident when the characters are compared to the psychological teachings of Freud. The book shows examples of this psyche in the characters Jack, Piggy and Ralph and how they change during their time on the island.
Importance of Leadership Leadership is something that stands out in people. In a group, people tend to look for the strongest person to follow. However, the strongest person may not be the best choice to follow. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, Ralph and Jack each have leadership qualities. Jack is probably the stronger of the two; however, Ralph is a better leader.
The novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding used a group of British boys beached on a deserted island to illustrate the malicious nature in mankind. Lord of the Flies dealt with the changes the boys underwent as they gradually adapted to the freedom from their society. William Golding's basic philosophy that man was inherently evil was expressed in such instances as the death of Simon, the beast within the boys, and the way Ralph was fervently hunted.
For all their differences the Lord of the Flies and Simon have one singular trait in common; they both know what the pig’s head really means for the boys on the island. At first glance, the Lord of the Flies is just a pig’s head on a stick, however it is so much more than that. The moment Jack and his hunter’s kill that pig, a part of them is lost forever and this lost part is their moral sense of right and wrong (149).
...society. Yet, bleakly and ironically, he observes that the very accomplishments that civilize us, and progress us beyond the likes of animals, indeed allow for a greater range of possibilities within human savagery. However, the Lord of the Flies is not a fatalistic statement on the insurmountable nihilism of humankind. At the novels open-ended conclusion, a thread of human diplomacy remains, however close to extinguishment by the barbarian. This fraction of hope is an invocation to humankind, so that it can find its humanity. It is a conjuring of the goodness that lies within all of us, and a plead to examine the path that we have chosen to take as a species. But above all, the Lord of the Flies is a conjecture about our future downfall made by a man who has witnessed in his life the atrocity and carnage that is potential at the hands and in the souls of people.
Much of history’s most renown literature have real-world connections hidden in them, although they may be taxing uncover. William Golding’s classic, Lord of the Flies, is no exception. In this work of art, Golding uses the three main characters, Piggy, Jack, and Ralph, to symbolize various aspects of human nature through their behaviors, actions, and responses.
Civilization struggling for power against savagery was shown throughout Lord of the Flies. These opposite mindsets are shown battling while determining who had the right to speak during assemblies, when the group hunted pigs, throughout the struggle over Piggy’s glasses, and finally with Simon’s death. These polar opposites are shown throughout these examples and reveal the desperation of clinging to civilization while savagery took over the actions of the some of the boys in Lord of the Flies.
Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding, is a novel about British schoolboys, who survived on an island after the plane crash. This novel is an allegory: It is a literary work in which each character, event, or object is symbolic outside of the novel. It is allegorical in the level of society in terms of three major symbols. The conch symbolizes civilization, and helps to possess an organized law and order. Next, Jack, as the main antagonist in the novel, represents a savage in the society. Furthermore, the fire signifies the return of civilization and conflicts within the society. Thus, Lord of the Flies is an allegory for society since it represents good governance, humanity’s innate cruelty, and struggles to the return of its civilization.
Lord of the flies was about a group of boys getting stranded on an island. There was basically to groups I like to identify them as the “civilized group” and the “savage ones”. In this paper I will tell you examples of civilization and savagery in lord of the flies. From the conch to the pig head to the boys that are there .There are mean examples of this theme so let’s get started.
One of the main themes in William Golding's 1954 novel Lord of the Flies is that without civilization, there is no law and order. The expression of Golding's unorthodox and complex views are embodied in the many varied characters in the novel. One of Golding's unorthodox views is that only one aspect of the modern world keeps people from reverting back to savagery and that is society. Golding shows the extreme situations of what could possibly happen in a society composed of people taken from a structured society then put into a structureless society in the blink of an eye. First there is a need for order until the people on the island realize that there are no rules to dictate their lives and take Daveers into their own hands. Golding is also a master of contrasting characterization. This can be seen in the conflicts between the characters of Jack, the savage; Simon, the savior; and Piggy, the one with all the ideas.
This paper will explore the three elements of innate evil within William Golding's, Lord of the Flies, the change from civilization to savagery, the beast, and the battle on the island. Golding represents evil through his character's, their actions, and symbolism. The island becomes the biggest representation of evil because it's where the entire novel takes place. The change from civilization to savagery is another representation of how easily people can change from good to evil under unusual circumstances. Golding also explores the evil within all humans though the beast, because it's their only chance for survival and survival instinct takes over. In doing so, this paper will prove that Lord of the Flies exemplifies the innate evil that exists within all humans.
Books and movies can be sort of similar but they can not be exactly the same. The books can give more detail than the movies and sometimes the movies leave out some of the most important little things. The book Lord of the Flies is about young boys, ranging from six to twelve, who crashed on an island and they are learning how to survive until they get rescued. The main characters, Ralph, Piggy, and Jack, are helping all the younger boys, until eventually there starts become tension between Ralph and Jack. Later on in the book, the boys split into two tribes and most of the boys leave Ralph’s tribe, so it is just Piggy and him. Everybody who joined Jack’s tribe you could tell that they were losing their humanity. In the movie you can visually
There will never be two books that are exactly same, but readers will often find that some books may have characters who share the same qualities, ideas, and personalities. But then, there will be books where the characters are exact opposites of each other. In Lord of the Flies and Into the Wild, there are characters who have absolutely no similarities whatsoever. We have Jack, from Lord of the Flies, who is a shy, sensitive, sheltered boy. We also have Christopher Johnson McCandless, from Into the Wild, who is an intelligent, idealistic young man. Even though they both have to do with being alone, the characters are so different. During this essay, the two books will be compared and contrasted on the differences.
The award winning novel, Lord of the Flies, shows how the defects in human nature can affect how people behave. Defects in human nature cause the boys to do uncivilized acts without thinking. These acts may not be meant to harm anyone, however their unthoughtful actions can cause harm others. The acts of savagery in the book the Lord of the Flies can be traced back to the defects in human nature.