Matthew And John's Gospel Comparison

367 Words1 Page

Lastly, Gospels are to give a complete picture of Jesus but both Gospels give a different view on Him. Since they are two different writers, there are two different perspectives on Him. Matthew presents Jesus as the Messiah or a promising king. Everything revolves around the statement of Jesus as the Messiah as Matthew references each prophecy that shows through Christ’s own teachings on His kingdom. This becomes evident when Matthew explains “that it might be fulfilled which was spoke by the Lord through the prophet” (Matthew 2:5). It also explains that the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem, for “thus it is written by the prophet” (Matthew 1:22). Most of Matthew’s writing often indicate slight detail in the life of Jesus and finish with a connection on how the event is a fulfillment of prophecy. In contrast, John’s Gospel introduces Him to reader as the eternal Father and the eternal Word. John proves this with the statement of :"in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in …show more content…

But if the Gospels are thoroughly researched in depth, it becomes evident that the two writers were targeting different readers. Matthew writes for a Jewish audience, while John directs his book to all Christ-believers around the world. Another evident difference is the central theme that each Gospel relates to. Matthew’s major theme is Jesus fulfilling the Old Testament prophecy. While John continuously writes about belief in Jesus is required for salvation, making this his central theme. The last difference seen between both Gospels are the perspective of Jesus that is portrayed throughout the book. Matthew presents Jesus as a Messiah but John describes Jesus as the Son of God. With just knowledge from two Gospels on Jesus, they provide one clear message that Jesus is one, true Son of

More about Matthew And John's Gospel Comparison

Open Document