Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Corporate social responsibility on society
Corporate social responsibility on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Corporate social responsibility on society
Mattel is a company that’s business is to design, manufacture, and market toys. Mattel toy brands included best-selling brands such as Barbie, Hot Wheels, Matchbox, American Girl, and Tyco, as well as Fisher-Price brands, including Little People, Power Wheels, and a wide range of entertainment-inspired toys (Lawrence and Weber, 2011). According to the text, Mattel had a lengthy reputation of being a responsible toy manufacturing company. Mattel was recognized as one of the best corporate companies and earned honors for being one of the United States best corporate citizens. Mattel is the largest toy company in the world. A market capital of over $5.6 billion and employs 30,000 in 43 countries, with sales in more than 150 countries (Mattel, 2011). In August of 2007, Mattel was hit hard with a huge product recall. The first recall was in regards to a Chinese subcontractor (who produces 65% of Mattel’s toys) for using leaded paint. Two weeks later Mattel had to recall another 500,000 toys. The second recall included almost 20 million toys worldwide (Mattel, 2011). These products contained lead paint or faulty design that allowed magnets to fall from toys. Mattel accepted the blame for the harm that was caused by their faulty products and issued recalls due to lead paint and malfunctioning parts, but parents are responsible for ensuring their children are playing with safe toys.
In the 1990’s Mattel built or acquired production facilities in China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Singapore. In 2007, China was making the majority of toys for Mattel. In China, Mattel tested products both at its own facilities and in special test labs. The company had specific standards with respect to lead in paint an...
... middle of paper ...
...fix the problem by pleasing the most people (Lawrence & Weber, 2011). I believe Mattel learned from this incident and will keep a closer watch on any sub-contractor that they hire. The best way for society to protect children from harmful toy would be for parents to monitor the recall list before purchasing any products. Parents should oversee their child’s play and never leave children alone during playtime. Another way to ensure toy safety is to research schools, daycares and family homes about toys that children are exposed to. Mattel’s unfortunate recalls took the world by storm and parents lost their faith in Mattel. However, as long as the United States oversees the imported toy industry and major brands continue to monitor subcontractors and perform inspections, parents should feel confident that toys brought into the United States are safe for play.
Initially, the technological toys in question do not teach their owners the importance of responsibility. Consider the following question Frank Mullin poses in his article Love In the Time of Robots: “...what does a child
In 2005 Bail capital Partners LLC, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co and Vornado Realty Trust purchased Toys “R” Us, Inc. for $6.6 billion. Toys “R” Us has a strong mission statement that states, “At Toys “R”Us, we love kids. Since the company’s founding more than 65 years ago, kids have been central to who we are and what we do. We approach our business operations with responsibility and integrity, understanding the trust parents place in us to do the right thing and act as a reliable partner as they navigate the various stages of parenthood”(Inc.toysrus.com, 2016. 3.).
Mattel wants to improve their execution of the existing toy business and globalize their brands; extend their brands into new areas; identify new trends, create new brands, and enter new industries; develop people and improve productivity by simplifying processes and maintaining customer service levels. Mattel wants to make a positive impact in children’s lives around the world by using unrivalled creativity and innovation to create high-quality toys that will be loved by children and trusted by parents.
Build-A-Bear Workshop was an American toy retailer, which was founded by Maxine Clark in 1996 in St. Louis, Missouri. Build-A-Bear Workshop main served teddy beard and other stuffed animals, and accessories for teddy bears and other stuffed animals. According to professor Eisner, Korn, Baugher, and graduate student Vojtkova (2011), “Build-A-Bear Workshop was founded 13 years ago on a simple but powerful idea: to create a successful company with heart” (p. C259). In order to differentiate itself from other toy producers, Build-A-Bear Workshop served customers with interactive experience by “allowing its customers to make, personalize and customize stuffed animals od their choosing” (p. C262). As professor Eisner et al. (2011) concluded, “the company (Build-A-Bear) differentiated itself from the competition with marketing initiatives that facilitated stronger connections with its customers” (p. C262) In addition, Build-A-Bear Workshop exercised its focus strategy by narrowing its product lines. Build-A-Bear Workshop earned a big success in the past decades.
In 1945, Ruth and Eliott Handler founded Mattel – one of Americas leading manufacturing companies of today. The idea for the Barbie doll was conceived when Ruth watched her daughter play with adult paper dolls. She noticed the importance of being able to change the doll's clothes, and decided to create a three-dimensional fashion doll, naming her Barbie after Barbara (her daughter). At the time, the toy market was dominated by baby dolls and toddler dolls. Barbie was a new conception that became a worldwide hit. Since her debut in 1959, Barbie has remained one of the most popular toys of all time. There are two Barbie's sold every second, and more than one billion dolls have been sold around the world (Maine, 2000, cited in Slayen, 2011).
This case really takes a look into the world of the movie industry. The entertainment aspects and the motion picture exhibition are massive points that really make this case study interesting. This case harps on the dynamics of the value variables that have an impact on the profitability of movie theater owners. Consumers ultimately decide the way the studio-dominated business model will grow.
The Walt Disney Company is a highly diversified media and entertainment company that has been growing by leaps and bounds since its inception in the late 1920’s. In the past few decades, The Walt Disney Company has expanded into numerous markets and diversified its business greatly. The company states that their corporate strategy is targeted at creating high-quality family content, exploiting technological innovations to make entertainment experiences more memorable, and expanding internationally. Upon studying the happenings of the company throughout the years, it is easy to see that the company is executing this strategy well through numerous strategic moves in the industry.
Ever since the late 1950s, Play-Doh has been a toy for children of all ages. The well know child’s toy has gone through some serious changes during its existence, but the most recognizable is the product’s constant change in ownership. As of today, Play-Doh has gone through a total of five changes in ownership, and now is one of the many popular toys in the vast Hasbro Empire. In their advertisements, Play-Doh encouraged children to use their imagination to create objects that varied from castles and dragons all the way to hair saloons. Play-Doh used bright and vibrant colors with a kid friendly font to help appeal to adolescents in hopes that these children would want their parents to purchase the Play-Doh product. Today Hasbro Company’s advertisements still use these bright vibrant colors and a kid friendly font, but encourage children to go a step further with exploring their imagination by substituting their original ideas of castles, dragons, and many other building ideas with the
In the contents of this case there are several management and safety issues and areas for improvement. One issue is Mattel, Inc.’s responsibility to its stakeholders; to its customers, to its stockholders, to its employees, and to its suppliers. The responsibility to Mattel’s customers is that of producing and selling safe products. Along with the recall on the lead coated toys there were also toys that contained small, but powerful magnets that if swallowed could attract each other and cause serious or fatal intestinal perforation or blockage. These defects were not discovered during the testing of the products. Before this incident occurred Mattel, Inc. was recognized by Forbes magazine as one of the 100 most trustworthy U.S. companies. Too this, Mattel did everything they could to assure that they were doing everything possible to handle and correct this problem. For Mattel’s stockholders, the company had to make sure that the image and reputation was saved and redeemed as soon as possible. With such a massive and extensive recall of potentially hazardous products, that was designed to be safe for children, the stock prices and e...
... in the toy industry is to make toy safety the number one priority and to fulfill the customers’ needs.
Marvel Worldwide Inc., commonly referred to as Marvel Comics and formerly Marvel Publishing, Inc. and Marvel Comics Group, is an American publisher of comic books and related media. In 2009, The Walt Disney Company acquired Marvel Entertainment, Marvel Worldwide 's parent company.
Top managers should be reminded that they are ultimately responsible for the quality of a product and the company. Quality management is one of the keys. By defining quality in operational terms, understanding the costs and benefits of quality, recognizing the consequences of poor quality, and recognizing the need for ethical behavior (Stevenson, 2012), will lead to a more productive operation. If Toys, Inc. specifically doesn’t want to hire additional positions to inspect quality they could outsource to a company such as SATRA whom from its website states, “SATRA can assess the risk of injury from a toy, as well as carry out analysis for the presence of restricted metals such as lead, chromium and mercury(2015).” Quality is the ability of a product or service to consistently meet or exceed customer expectations (Stevenson, 2012). Quality when it comes to manufacturing of toys especially those that have moving parts also brings in safety concerns. “Market watch officials and technological experts have warned parents to pay more attention to the quality of toys they purchase to better protect their children (Hazell, C 2011).” Parents will associate a poorly made toy, especially one that already knows that it’s poorly made by having a trade-in program as potentially dangerous for their son or daughter. Continuing to have customer dissatisfaction will further question the quality of our product and in turn the safety of our
Until recently, Ford Motor Company was in possession of most of the production and distribution of all materials and parts needed to produce cars. Ford Motor Company owned everything from steelworks needed for the frame of the car down to the rubber farms needed for the tires and hoses. Ford Motor Company even retained railways so that supplies and finished cars could be transported to their intended destination (Muthusamy, 2014). However, owning all the supplies in the world would be ineffective if the company was not capable of using its resources in the appropriate manner. For that reason, Ford Motor Company revolutionized the Industrial Era with its concept of the assembly line which would enable it to dominate its industry for a long
Yes, I do believe that Mattel acted in a socially responsible and ethical manner with regard to the safety of its toys. Back in the 1980’s when Mattel started to shift production to Asia, they were using outside contractors. This concerned Mattel, as they thought the contractors might start imitating and reproducing their products. In the 1990’s Mattel acquired or built production facilities in China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Singapore. In 1997, Mattel developed a detailed code of conduct, they called it, The Global Manufacturing Principals. The principals covered both the Mattel factories, their contactors, and suppliers. The principals addressed primarily labor issues, such as wages, child labor, and health and safety.