Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of special education
Reasons why it is important for a teacher to study special education
Impact of special education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of special education
Special education students often lack the necessary mathematical skills needed to be independently successful in the secondary classroom. These students face challenges in applying the basic math skills needed as well as retaining basic math skills from grade level to grade level. Lack of understanding, in addition to causing classroom difficulties, can cause other personal and social dilemmas for the special education students. Lack of motivation, anger, lack of self value, and other disruptive behaviors may occur as a result of the difficulties the special education students have in the classroom. In order to help these students to overcome poor problem solving skills, effective strategy based instruction is needed. Teachers look to research for effective strategies to successfully instruct these students (Maccini & Strickland, 2010).
Finding meaningful problem-solving strategies that can motivate and extend special education students’ knowledge is often an issue for secondary educators. Special educators look for ways to change instructional practices for students with specific learning disabilities in the area of math. Special educators advocate for changes in instructional practices for students with learning disabilities in math that reflect a more balanced approach to instruction (Bottge, Kwon, LaRoque, Rueda, & Serlin, 2007). Research has shown that strategies can improve student performance in the area of math (Maccini & Strickland, 2010).
In 2000, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) proclaimed that schools should help students become confident in their ability to tackle difficult
MATH STRATEGIES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENTS
problems, eager to figure things out on thei...
... middle of paper ...
...109.
Cormier, P., Carlson, J.S., & Das, J. P. (2008). Planning ability and cognitive
performance: The compensatory effects of a dynamic assessment approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 437-449.
Iseman, J. S. & Naglieri, J. A. (2011). A cognitive strategy instruction to improve math
Calculation for children with ADHA and LD: A randomized controlled study. Journal
of Learning Disabilities. 44(2), 184-195.
Maccini, P., & Strickland, T. K. (2010). Strategies for teaching algebra to students with
learning Disabilities: Making research to practice connections. Intervention in School
and Clinic. 46(1) 38-45.
Zirkle, M. L. (2005). The effects of SMART board interactive whiteboard on high school
students with special needs in a functional mathematics class. Retrieved from
http://downloads01.smarttech.com/media/research.pdf
School leaders and faculty are responsible to ensure engaging, rigorous, and coherent curricula in all subjects, accessible for a variety of learners and aligned to Common Core Learning Standards and/or content standards. As a special education program for severely disabled students including all these requirements in curriculum that is differentiated for the array of needs in the school isn’t easy. In response to the suggestions made by Ms. Joseph the principal decided that the best way to address it while still attending to the needs of the school would be to created an inquiry team that will research the findings in order to help with the decision making.
Whenever learning about this project for SMED 310, I wanted to pick out a learner who I knew had a low self-concept and low self-efficacy in their mathematics ability. After thinking back over the years, I remembered a friend I had in high school who had struggled with their math courses. Matthew Embry, a freshman at Western Kentucky University, is looking to major in Sports Management. Whenever I was a senior in high school, we played on the same sports team. Throughout my senior year, I helped him with his Algebra 1 class. When I would help him after a practice, I could tell he struggled with the material. As a mathematics major, I have taken numerous math courses. By teaching him a lesson dealing with football, Matthew was able
Another confound that may impact the results of this study could be the testing effect. Repeated testing may lead to better or worse performance. Changes in performance on the test may be due to prior experience with the test and not to the independent variable. In addition, repeated testing fatigues the subjects, and their performance declines as a result (Jackson, 2012). Because the professor is interested in determining if the implementation of weekly quizzes would improve test scores, an experimenter and/or an instrumentation effect may also affect results.
... prevent the student from becoming frustrated (Scheuermann & Hall, 2012). This is appropriate for John because it has already been determined that he has a performance deficit and is not motivated to behave in math class due to his frustration that he does not understand the concepts. This method of instruction could ultimately help John improve his math skills rather than forcing him to continue to struggle with math. Since John is in an inclusion classroom with several other students, John’s teacher may not always have the opportunity to provide John with one-to-one instruction; therefore, other evidence-based interventions should be implemented when one-to-one instruction is not available.
Warger, C. (2002). Helping students with disabilities participate in standards- based mathematics curriculum. ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education, Council for Exceptional Children. 1-5. Retrieved October 3, 2004, from ERIC Digests full-text database.
Students with learning disabilities can learn; each student has his or her own strengths and weaknesses. Educators must continue to focus on the strengths of each student and building on them, creating a stronger student and person. Identifying the weakness is at the core of getting a student help with their learning disability, but after this initial identification and placement, the focus should shift to the strengths and adjusting the student’s schoolwork to reflect these strengths. For instance, if a student is weak in reading but has wonderful group interaction skills and is good with his or her hands, the students' reading tasks should then be shifted to reflect these st...
All teachers dream of the classroom filled with fifteen tranquil, enthusiastic students, all with their note books out and pencils prompt for note taking. This is the classroom where everyone works together, at the same pace, and without any interruptions or distractions. This is the ideal classroom setting. The only problem with this picture is that it does not exist. Students are all different. Kids all learn different ways, and at varying paces. Both Physical and Learning Disabilities can hinder a child’s learning speed and hold them back from the rest of the class. It can be very difficult to identify a child with a learning disability because students can often be misunderstood and labeled as unmotivated and lazy. These students are often ignored and not given enough individual attention, and therefore they experience difficulty and frustration all throughout their education. Teaching students with learning disabilities takes a knowledgeable and understanding teacher and often requires adaptation of the curriculum. The education of these students often needs so much “constant attention and fine tuning if they are to succeed,” (Mather, 3) that they hold the rest of the class back. It is these cases that students should seek an adaptive classroom program and individual attention to work on their problematic areas. The bottom line is these students cannot be allowed to fall through the cracks of our educational system. They need positive reinforcement and individual attention so that they are confident in class and productive when they do their work.
In today’s educational environment, all students expect to receive the same level of instruction from schools and all students must meet the same set of standards. Expectations for students with learning disabilities are the same as students without any learning difficulties. It is now unacceptable for schools or teachers to expect less from one segment of students because they have physical disabilities, learning disabilities, discipline problems, or come from poor backgrounds. Standardize testing has resulted in making every student count as much as their peers and the most positive impact has been seen with the lowest ability students. Schools have developed new approaches to reach these previously underserved students while maintaining passing scores for the whole student body. To ensure academic success, teachers employ a multi-strategy approach to develop students of differing abilities and backgrounds. Every student is different in what skills and experiences they bring to the classroom; their personality, background, and interests are as varied as the ways in which teachers can choose to instruct them. Differentiated instruction has been an effective method in which teachers can engage students of various backgrounds and achieve whole-class success. When using differentiated instruction, teachers develop lesson strategies for each student or groups of students that provide different avenues of learning but all avenues arrive at the same learning goal.
The NCTM began in the mid-1970’s and was a public voice of mathematics education that supported teachers, and tried to ensure learning of the highest quality for all students. This council set in motion a much needed discussion and debate about math in America’s school system. The NCTM set criteria for excellence rather than singular prescriptions for implementing “new best ways” (Wilson). In the 1980’s the focus of mathematics shifted to more of a critical thinking basis. In 1989 the National council of Teachers of Mathematics released a groundbreaking document, the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (Burris 2012). This completely changed the standards for mathematics in schools. These standards advocate methods that emphasized mathematical power: conceptual understanding, problem solving, reasoning, connection building, communication, and self-confidence developing (Wilson). There were numerous changes, including 13 curriculum standards that were set to address both content and emphasis. One common theme to the NCTM Standards and to the recent changes in mathematics education is that “the study of mathemat...
With this promise came serious concerns over education taught students ranked 28th in the United States out of 40 other countries in Mathematics and Sciences. 80% of occupations depend on knowledge of Mathematics and Science (Week and Obama 2009). In order to ensure that educators have enough money to fund the endeavor to be more competitive with the rest of the world in Mathematics and Science, President Obama will increase federal spending in education with an additional 18 billion dollars in k-12 classrooms, guaranteeing educators have the teachers, technology, and professional development to attain highly quali...
Special education is no longer restricted to schools that cater for specific disabilities. Increasingly mainstream classrooms must cater for a diverse range of abilities and be inclusive of children with disabilities, therefore providing special education (Heward as cited on Pearson Prentice Hall, 2010). In catering for all children within a class, teachers also need to provide intervention as necessary. Intervention according to Heward (as cited on Education.com, 2011) intends to reduce, eliminate and/or limit the hurdles faced by students with disabilities that may prevent them from maximising their learning and becoming productive members of society. This essay will discuss how teachers can provide all three kinds of intervention; preventive, remedial and compensatory on behalf of individual students who may require it (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2010). Each type of intervention will be explored with examples to demonstrate the possible use of each one and the potential issues that may be associated with them.
Mercer, C.D., Mercer, A.R, & Pulen, P.C. (2011). Teaching students with learning problems. New Jersey: Pearson. Page 4.
... a sense of accomplishment, something they cannot get through direct instruction alone. This sense of accomplishment will raise their mathematical self-esteem. This can, in turn, help students appreciate and enjoy mathematics even more. Few would argue against the idea that any teaching strategy that gets students to believe in themselves and enjoy the subject is a good one.
Education is a profession which requires a teacher to be able to communicate with a multitude of students on a variety of levels. There is not a class, or student for that matter, that is identical. Therefore, teachers must be able to identify and help educate students from all different types of backgrounds and at different levels. Teaching a singular subject presents difficulties, but teaching students with disabilities should not be one. There are three main teaching areas that need to be focused on when teaching a student with a learning disability. Teachers need to focus on the strategies that will assist students with reading comprehension skills, writing skills, and maintaining appropriate behaviors in a classroom setting.
Allowing children to learn mathematics through all facets of development – physical, intellectual, emotional and social - will maximize their exposure to mathematical concepts and problem solving. Additionally, mathematics needs to be integrated into the entire curriculum in a coherent manner that takes into account the relationships and sequences of major mathematical ideas. The curriculum should be developmentally appropriate to the