Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Transformational leadership style literature review
Why different leadership styles are important in an organisation
Similarities in autocratic vs laissez-faire leadership styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Transformational leadership style literature review
Choosing the right leadership style of the situation or employee is very important, but just as important is choosing the right leadership style for the organization. Every organization has their own culture and that culture often lends itself to a particular leadership style or styles. If the leadership style your manager uses is in contrast with the culture of the organization there can be difficulties. Not only could this lead to a butting heads between the leadership of the organization, but also the employees are often left confused and bewildered by the conflicting information of what they know of the organization and the instructions they are receiving from their manager. Hiring leaders and management for your organization whose leadership styles fit within the style and culture of the company can prevent many roadblocks in accomplishing goals and following the vision of the organization. Recently I have experienced some negative leadership that seemed to result from a conflict in leadership style. The direct manager of the majority of employees in a relatively small branch of a larger organization had a very laissez-faire leadership style, while the other members of the chain of command within the branch had a more autocratic leadership style. When the other leaders disagreed with the decision or style of the manager they would ask her to change or give different instructions, or give those different instructions to the employee directly. This led to confusion and frustration for the employees when they were unsure of whose instructions to follow or were reprimanded for following the ‘wrong’ set of instructions. As you can imagine an environment of high tempers and high drama was engendered by this lack of united leaders... ... middle of paper ... ...was being used really fit the needs of the employees or company. Different leadership techniques need to be used depending on the situation, but the leadership styles used also need to align with the culture and overall style of the organization or conflict can occur and in the end the goals and vision of the organization are neglected. References Clark, D. (2010). Big dog & little dog’s performance juxtaposition. Retrieved from http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/leader.html Nickels, W.G, McHugh, J.M, & McHugh, S.M. (2010). Understanding business. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies. Szilagyi, A. D. & Schweiger, D.M. (1984). Matching managers to strategies: A review and suggested framework. Academy of Management Review, 9(4), 626-637. Zenger, J., Folkman, J. & Stinnett, K. (2010). Coaching excellence. Leadership Excellence, 27(7), 20-20.
Encarta Dictionary within Microsoft Word defines leadership as,” the ability to guide, direct, or influence people.” Expanding upon that definition, my personal definition is influencing people to follow to achieve a goal, regardless of how unpleasant. Leadership is not something that happens overnight, it needs to be cultivated over time. During that process, it is necessary to identify delinquencies and make adjustments. Reviewing the feedback provided by my LPI/360 assessment, the three areas identified I need to improve on are, praising people for a job well done, actively listening to diverse points of view, and becoming more visible within the workplace.
Today’s organizations require leadership styles conducive to supporting an organization’s culture, competiveness and effectiveness for survival in the 21st century. The depth of leadership presents leaders and managers with the task of understanding and supporting the needs of employees while maintaining strategic goals and missions throughout daily leadership. However, when an organization’s culture falters due to various factors, does leadership style bear the overall responsibility for internal discord?
It holds that various situations require different leadership styles to result in effective outcomes. According to this school of thought, it is the assessment of the competence, as well as the commitment of the leader’s subjects that makes the whole practice a success. As a result, a leader should access the two factors before deciding on either directive or supportive form of management.
Edwin T. Cornelius III defined leadership style as the broad, characteristic way in which a leader interacts with others across in various situations and occasions. (Cornelius, 2006) However, many researchers would agree that leadership style is merely traits and they can change within an organization or between different situations. Annick M. Brennen in an article stated: A study of leadership styles therefore deals mainly with the manner in which the leader carries out his/her leadership functions or roles–the use of authority and power and the approach to the decision-maki...
Situations such as uniting teams and operations to align and work together, the author suggests dominant leadership being most effective. When people are having issues agreeing on viewpoints, fear of punishment is effective as it forces people to find a solution. Dominance puts constant pressure on people to perform whether it’s by an incentive or fear consequence. Though the dominant qualities of leaders prove effective in deadline and controversial crisis, they are also the disadvantages of dominance. The author describes the main issue with dominant leaders is that they are commonly disliked. They tend to be close minded individuals with a single perspective and often do not react well to threats to their authority and can supress the potential of those they feel could surpass them. There are ways to moderate dominance to minimize the negative qualities and the article supports this argument by suggesting that dominant leaders “harness their egos” to limit irrational decision which can arise when they feel their power is being threatened. Jon also suggests that dominant leaders keep an open mind and be and assertive leader, but one that makes their employees “feel
Leadership is the glue that binds any business together, identifying and understanding your type of leadership style can ultimately aid you in becoming a better leader in your professional career. A successful business cannot function without leadership therefore this is a crucial aspect of internal employee development for businesses striving to stay relevant in a crowded marketplace. In addition to recognizing your leadership style every leader needs to look to them and identify what type of personality they have. By becoming an informed business leader you will gain trust and respect of your team to guide them into the future and maximizing potential growth. Throughout this paper I will identify my leadership style and also personality type and how it has affected my personal career growth. Identifying these conclusions is extremely important in crafting company culture.
There are different leadership theories developed throughout the history. Most popular ones are trait theories, behavioral theories, contingency theories, and leader-member exchange (LMX) theory. The author of the post will briefly discuss two theories, Fiedler contingency theory and Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), and compare and contrast their strengths and weakness.
According to organisational behaviour by McShane, leadership is defined as influencing, motivating and enabling others to contribute towards the effectiveness and success of the organisation of which they are members (page 382, McShane).Becoming an effective leader depends on the leader’s leadership style. Successful leaders have vision and charisma, also the leader should have an ongoing personality, talkative, careful and self-disciplined. The leader must also have self-concept with a high self-esteem and a motivation drive which peruses goals that motivates their followers. (McShane pg 382). Leaders should also have integrity, this is when the leaders are truthful and they have a consistency of words and actions. Authentic leadership is very important in a successful leader; the leader must be comfortable and act in a rightful manner with a self-concept that comes from within the leader by being themselves. There are cultural values and gender values when it comes to different leadership styles, research has found out that women and men both have different methods of being leaders such as men are more direct when giving a power speech compared to women who prefer a participative style of leadership (McShane pg 384).Leadership however is based on a technique the leader uses and how they apply it to their followers and not so much about who is following the leader but rather what technique best suits and relates to the followers.
Contemporary management of the business. 7 ed. of the book. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. McComb, S., Schroeder, A., Kennedy, D., & Vozdolska, R. (2012).
Within leadership, there is the opportunity for many issues in itself. Leadership styles and practices, one of the most vital aspects determining productivity in organizations, is truly what sets the standard for every level of management within a company. If a proper leadership style is not chosen and followed to lead a team within an organization, there will be no one to follow and the team will certainly not be successful. The repercussions of poor leadership will certainly make a drastic difference in a company. This can include the needs of not only employees, but
I have had the opportunity to work with leaders of different styles, and by just watching them, listening to them and seeing how the staff reacts; I can gauge what is productive with their staff. I try not to copy or mimic their style and ensure my own style comes through in being consistent, authentic and genuine. I feel by following these traits they give me necessary foundation and help me towards achieving leadership excellence.
A leader sets the tone for those they supervise. Having a weak or ineffective leadership style turns what could be a productive organization into one that lacks direction, is chaotic, and fails to live up to its potential. Incompetent central leadership can also cause a power struggle amongst the other remaining team members. Groups seek leadership; when leaders fail to use their powers others will maneuver to use the power left in the void. This can lead to a power-struggle and backstabbing (Morgan, 2007).
Effective use of leadership styles and models can foster organizational success by increasing motivation, enhancing cooperation, and giving sense of direction to the staff and executives. Building awareness of the various leadership models and styles can help leaders develop their approach to enable them become more effective leader. In this article, six video clips will be examined for the leaderships styles used and their effectiveness for the specific situation.
McHugh, J. M., McHugh, S. M., & Nickels, W. G. (1999). Understanding business. (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Some situations may work in one of the business may actually fail to work in others situations. Each situation demands the best leadership styles to be employed in the firm. There are various business styles which need to be applied in different business situations. The situation in a business is normally having a greater effect on a leader actions which he or she takes as opposed to the personal traits possessed. This is due to the fact that, while personalities may have an inspiring firmness over a period of time, they have slight reliability across business situations. This makes some scholars to argue that process theory of leadership is better than the trait theory of leadership. In most cases, power in the business is misused and this leads to negative impacts to the business and those