Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay nervous public speaking
Self - confidence speeches
Characteristics of a great leader
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay nervous public speaking
In the 21st century, society puts a heavy emphasis on the meaning of leadership. What are the qualities of a leader? What are the most efficient methods to produce a leader? A leader is someone who has certain qualities in them that stirs up the masses to achieve a common goal. There are many qualities that are essential for a great leader, but according to, “Top 10 Qualities of Great Leadership- Do You Have What it Takes?” by Aoife Gorey, the top ten qualities a leader must have are honesty, communication, confidence, inspiration, positivity, delegation, commitment, humor, creativity, and intuition. A leader that represents most of these traits is Martin Luther King Jr.
Martin Luther King Jr., born on January 15, 1929, fought for the injustices
…show more content…
According to Aoife Gorey, honesty means that “People want to work for a leader they can trust- a leader that has morals, values, and integrity.” This means that a good leader must be truthful to others and always live by their standards they make. King shows this because he is honest about the action that he's conveying. In his letter, he made two honest confessions. His first confession was his expression of the church. He said that “I must honestly reiterate that I have been disappointed with the church...I felt that the white ministers, priests, and rabbis of the South would be some of ours strongest allies. Instead, some few have been outright opponents.” This shows honesty as King expresses what he was really feeling for the church. He did not believe that the church was functioning its purpose and was saddened by their actions against the Blacks’ nonviolence action for equality. His second confession was that “I must admit that I was initially disappointed in being so categorized. But as I continued to think about the matter, I gradually gained a bit of satisfaction from being considered an extremist.” This means that at first, King was not so happy about being called an extremist but later he realizes that he is indeed. This shows his honesty in himself because he is accepting himself as what he is instead denying it with pointless …show more content…
According to Aoife Gorey, being inspirational, “Gives employees[people] a reason to work, to succeed, and to do their best in everything they could.” This means that a leader is someone who can lift everybody’s morals up, persuade anyone and help influence the people around him to try their earnest. King shows inspiration because in the letter he stated, “But when you have seen vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will and drown your sisters and brothers at whim; when you have seen hate-filled policemen curse, kick, brutalize, and even kill your black brothers and sisters with impunity; when you have seen the vast majority of your twenty million Negro brothers smothering in an airtight cage of poverty in the midst of an affluent society.” This use of language, also known as pathos, draws upon the human emotion such as sorrow, sadness, or melancholy, to convince a person of an argument. Here, King describes his experiences with the interaction between Blacks and Whites in order to aware people the situation Blacks are in. This can help inspire Blacks to work harder to achieve civil equality and may even inspire White to help Blacks acquire their rights after reading the hardships they had
In his "Letter," Martin Luther King Jr.'s ability to effectively use pathos, or to appeal to the emotions of his audiences, is evident in a variety of places. More particularly in paragraph fourteen, King demonstrates his ability to inspire his fellow civil rights activists, invoke empathy in the hearts of white moderates, and create compassion in the minds of the eight clergyman to which the "Letter" is directed.
He remarks on his surprise and disappointment with the church and white Christians in general when he says, “I felt we would be supported by the white church. I felt that the white ministers, priests, and rabbis of the South would be among our strongest allies. Instead, some have been outright opponents, refusing to understand the freedom movement and misrepresenting its leaders” (King 9). This statement is incredibly powerful because he and other colored people have been hurt by the very system that is supposed to be accepting of all people. King thought that people of the church would act as an ally and support the colored people, but they did exactly the opposite. By saying this, King places guilt on the clergymen that hits deeper than individual guilt but on the church as a whole. Clergymen typically have an attitude where they want people to think highly of them and think they are good people, and this opposes that
In any argument that you come across, you are going to show the audience (if it’s one person or a larger group of people) that you are right and try to change their mind or make then look at the subject of topic differently. If King did not have the reader on his side it would have been extremely difficult to get the outcome he was looking for. The way that king was able to get the clergymen to listen to him was making himself their equals by saying, “I have honor of serving as president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, an organization operating in every Southern state with headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia." (701). This was one of the strategies King was able to use. This allowed his audience and fellow clergymen to listen ...
Dr. King begins his letter by acknowledging the clergymen who wrote A Call for Unity in which he said, “I came across your recent statement calling my present activities “unwise and untimely.” (King) In A Call for Unity the eight clergymen called the protesters including Dr. King outsiders. They called the demonstrations, “unwise and untimely” (Carpenter)
In Martin Luther King’s Jr essay “Letter from the Birmingham Jail” he uses ethos, pathos, and logos to establish his argument. First, let’s establish what all these means to the reader. Ethos gives the writer credibility, Logos is establish to the reader at what is logical, and Pathos is established with sympathy. When you think of Justice for all, we tend to think of your constitutional rights for all walks of life. But King is saying that this is not the case for the African American race back in early history. Some may think that King was only fighting the rights of the African American people, but the truth of the matter, he was fighting for all walks of life.
...ng he is in jail for only doing what is right, by trying to achieve what is right through non-violence. The fact that he is in jail is unjust, does not support equality, and does not give them freedom. The Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence as a way of enforcing what they thought was right through non-violence. King was only doing the same as the Founding Fathers in that he was trying to re-establish Christian themes in the United States through non-violence. Therefore, it is a shame for the United States law to be carried out in this way when it was supposedly founded on much different principles. King is brilliantly portraying how he is being more responsible than the United States. The United States has more freedom than anyone other country. King is trying to make them start having responsibility for it.
I have found through engaging in arguments with friends and in classes that a personal point comes across more clearly when you just present your point of view without condemning the other party. People are more likely to listen to a personal opinion or an opposing view of argument when there is no tension. Also, to the audience the argument becomes more credible when one is not attacking the opposing side. King knows that he is speaking to not only the white clergymen, but to the white moderates on a much larger scale. King addresses these moderates, saying that they are often times the most dangerous of his opposition, for at least the extremists know where they stand. He states:
... does an exceptionally good job at making a connection between an African American citizen in favor of equality to people in favor of segregation. He is able to construct a common ground between his readers in many ways. King forces his readers to compare Hitler's genocide agenda to the suppression of African Americans in America. He is also able to connect with his audience on levels such as religion, law, and morality. His use of logic as a method to bypass racist feelings and ideas allows him to get his point across without his readers brushing off his letter as just another attempt for equality. Instead, he greatly influences his readers while they gain a significant amount of respect for his words and ideas.
King also uses pathos to effectively appeal to the reader’s emotions. The most effective usage of pathos is showing how segregation was hard on anyone no matter their age. He describes his interaction with his young daughter, “see tears well up in her eyes when she is told that Funtown is closed to colored children” (King 2). This section is meant for you to see that even simple things are taken away just because of their skin color. The child is seen as innocent in all of this and they still are being punished for something they cannot control. King also uses another approach that focuses more on the horror that African Americans faced by white extremists, “vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers… drown your sisters and brothers… when you have seen hate-filled policemen curse, kick and even kill your black brothers and sisters” (King 2). No one in their right mind would want to endure any of this or have anyone they care about face what these people faced. This creates a sense of guilt and sympathy for the oppressed people. Although he shows many of the sad ways the African Americans were treated, he also uses pathos by creating inspiration for the people. His mother is quoted as saying, “You must never feel that you are less than anybody else. You must always feel that you are somebody.” (Historic World Leaders 3). This also can be attributed to emotions because it creates inspiration for the African Americans, but it also gives the reader some
King identifies himself with the clergymen’s status of religious leader through allusion. He showed he was in the right coming to Birmingham by telling the clergymen that he was one of them. For example when King claims,
In the beginning of his letter he starts with “My dear fellow clergymen” (356) to show common ground to which he shows both the respect and authority toward the clergymen. King explained how much he compares himself to known figures yet he still considers everybody around him as an equals whether they are against him or with him although the clergymen were against King for coming to Birmingham, he treats them with respect and kept an open mind for their criticism. King is also still a human being and is on the same equal ground as anybody else would be which King established others by bringing up “[his] Christian and Jewish brothers” (362) which involves the churches that stood out from the issue. King addresses them as to both being good will and serve God, he includes them as having the same power to make a difference by acting instead of standing by like bystanders. King also sees them as part of issue as much as everybody else—with respect, as a family, and as an equal—King doesn’t look down on anybody although he has made references to well-known figures, he knows his limits and where he
King’s letter was influenced by “Apology”, The Bible, and The Tanakh, some of the most important pieces of philosophical literature in history. Socrates in “Apology” is known to be one of the founders of Western philosophy because he was successful in challenging and persuading his audience. And it is because of Socrates, the art of philosophy is so successful today. King used this source to justify disobedience and defend his reason for his actions as an advocate of desegregation. The Bible and The Tanakh were used as Christian references to justify the moral justification of his actions.
He furthers his credentials by comparing himself to Apostle Paul and referring to Socrates. When distinguishing between just and unjust laws, he says “an unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on themselves” and “a just law is a code that a majority compels a minority to follow and that is willing to follow itself” (Longager & Walker, 2011, p. 258). With this said, and breaking down the premises of the arguments, it is easier to understand the logic behind King’s actions. While they all seem to be connected, using just one appeal is not enough.
He felt that all Americans should be equal and that they should forget about injustice and segregation. He wanted America to know what the problems were and wanted to point out the way to resolve these problems. In his speech, King uses different types of rhetorical guidelines. He uses them to show his points in a better and easier way to understand. At the beginning he successfully uses mythos. A myth has a deep explanatory or symbolic resonance for the audience.
In this quote King explains that a law must not be followed unless it is morally sound. If people blindly follow immoral laws then it can lead to inequality. This quote is powerful in that King compares this understanding of law, to that of Nazi Germany. He is saying that Hitler abided by laws that did not account for moral responsibility, and therefore rationalized his actions. This compares to the laws in the United States, where individuals of color are treated unfair because the law allows it. Additionally, King is influential in the sense that he creates a call to action. He admits that if this was the case, he would not obey the law, and urges others to do the same. His goal is to persuade individuals to take responsibility.