Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Martin luthers kinghs personal philosophy
Martin luther king jr justice essay
Martin Luther King and Unjust Law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Martin luthers kinghs personal philosophy
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr wrote a letter to fellow clergymen after being arrested for civil disobedience in Birmingham, Alabama. I agree with his statements towards the differences between just and unjust laws. A just law is one that abides by the law of God and the moral law. An example of this is when the majority party puts a law into place and are willing to follow that law along with the minority. On contrary, an unjust law is not put into place for the sake of the majority and the minority. An unjust law seems unfair to the group that is least likely to be represented. These laws are not made for everyone that's why Dr. Martin Luther King didn't have a problem with breaking unjust laws because they were just that, unjust. Unjust means not behaving according to what is morally right and fair. He says that there is a difference between law, just and unjust and with morality (good and bad). Dr. King also says that it's …show more content…
one thing to knowingly break laws but does not feel like one must obey unjust laws. He actually states that it's ones moral responsibility to disobey and obey unjust and just laws, respectively. I agree fully to what he said in response to his actions being untimely. In my opinion, there is really never a perfect time to stand up against the oppressor. Dr. King stated that the Birmingham’s mayoral election was coming up in March, and they decided to postpone any further action until after the Election Day. I feel as though the longer we wait, the longer the results will take. On the other hand, I disagree with Dr. King’s argument about police and Negro recognition. Dr. King was too optimistic towards a lot of things as he stated but definitely towards this. I felt that he shouldn't have been expecting them to recognize the courage of the Negro sit inners. Even though everyone knew whether they admitted it or not, they knew that these people were very strong-minded, daring, and courageous for being nonviolent in their protests. They wanted equal rights and they were determined to get them. Dr. King led them, but he put too much faith into people who were against him. What he was doing was morally right and should have been recognized by many more back then. He was the civil rights leader but there were so many people against him. They were out abusing him and his followers when they would make their protest and Dr. King still had faith in them. I disagree with his views towards the oppressors.
In the bible it does say that we must love our neighbor. Even if they do wrong to us, we must not do wrong in return. It says that even if you only do good to the people that do good to you, you are no better than your enemy. This is the only disagreement I have with Dr. King’s letter. His expectations were too high for them and he felt let down every time they didn't comply with what he thought. This to me is only hurting him emotionally. It’s better to set your expectations lower so that if they did anything positively towards his movement then that's a plus, but if they don't it’s not really a loss. This protects yourself emotionally and mentally. I guess that's why Dr. King is known for being persistent and actually brought results to segregation. He had these high expectations because he believed the things he was fighting for would one day happen. Our perspectives on recognition are different. I don't expect anyone to recognize me, if they do it’s a plus and if they don't it a not a
loss. I can relate a few themes from this letter written in 1963 to a few current issues in society today. There has been numerous acts of violence in the black community. These include Trayvon Martin in Florida, Mike Brown in Ferguson, incidents in Cincinnati, and Baltimore. For instance, Trayvon Martin was a young African American male who went to the store wearing a black hood over his head, to buy skittles for his little sister. George Zimmerman, a Caucasian male called the police saying that he seen a suspicious boy (Trayvon) he never seen before, walking. The police told him not to follow Trayvon but he did anyways. In result of this, the two of them began to fight and George Zimmerman shot him three times in the back, killing him. He went to court and was later found not guilty. This is an example of racial profiling. Trayvon was assumed to be a threat to the community just because he was black with a hood on. There are many instances in the World today that relate to themes in this letter. In the past, African Americans were not giving the rights as U.S citizens as stated by Dr. King in many instances. Even today having accomplished marvels, there has still been many injustices taken place. This letter gives great insight to people and issues back in 1963. It shows the courage, determination, and perseverance of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and his people.
In this excerpt, King conveys the prejudiced feelings that every African American would feel in this kind of society, which causes the reader to automatically feel sympathy towards the cause. Martin Luther King Jr.’s approach towards ending segregation was not only tactful, it was forthright in the ideals of racial equality. His argument holds such strong logic, that it seems like it is unchallengeable. This letter is solid proof of the intelligence and passion that contributed greatly towards African Americans gaining the rights they fought for, and rightfully deserve.
Martin Luther King guilts the clergymen for the first time when he brings up their moral wrongness. King says that he has a “moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (4). He summarizes why laws are just or unjust by stating, “A just law is a man-made code that
King insist that all of the laws ought to reflect the societal moral concerns. In this particular letter, he is making that point in the most explicit manner. He touches on sameness and equivocally states that the law is a form that expression of morality. For instance, he says that separation is a sin yet the law encourages it, and that laws itself is not only unjust, but also sinful. Dr. King also makes a number of dissections which bring out the good quality any legal mind must possess.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. received a Nobel Prize and was honored by the President of the United States for his contributions to society. On the other hand, he was prosecuted, convicted, incarcerated, and had his sentence had to be reaffirmed by the Supreme Court. It is hard to understand why he was incarcerated if what he did was noble. When we take into account these manifestations of the government's attitude towards Martin Luther King, we can safely make the assumption that the government is not always justified in the laws that it creates. Our government's original purpose was to keep order and ensure freedom to its people.
History has encountered many different individuals whom have each impacted the 21 in one way or another; two important men whom have revolted against the government in order to achieve justice are Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. Both men impacted numerous individuals with their powerful words, their words carried the ability to inspire both men and women to do right by their morality and not follow unjust laws. “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” by David Henry Thoreau along with King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, allow the audience to understand what it means to protest for what is moral.
The tone set by Dr. King in the part of the letter where he describes “pent-up resentments and latent frustrations,” and where he recognizes the “vital urge” being suppressed, is very passionate. His passion shines through loud and clear. The way Dr. King feels is, in fact, quite clear throughout the entire letter, yet the overriding sense of reason and logic that anyone can relate to is ever apparent. As he describes the unrest he finds in his community, the community as a whole really; he explains that he did not encourage them to “get rid of your [their] discontent” he instead encouraged them to, “make prayer pilgrimages to city hall;… go on freedom rides,… and try to understand why he [they] must do so”; these quotes from the letter point out the ways Dr....
King gets his point across, that segregation is unfair and morally not right, and that man has a responsibility to act against unjust laws, by using many different strategies throughout the letter. He uses logos, pathos, and ethos to do so. While using these devices he shows emotion, gives logic to his reasoning’s and gives credibility as well. First and foremost, King calmly responded to the statement from the clergymen that his non-violent direct action was “unwise and untimely”. King logically does so by describing the situation where the negro leaders tried many times to negotiate with the city fathers to remove racial barriers, but the promises never held true.
Slave owners in the South were some of the most cruel and inhumane human beings out there. They used many tactics to maintain a prosperous system of slavery amongst them. Like many, Frederick Douglass was born a slave. Deprived of as much as possible, Douglass knew not much more than his place of birth. Masters were encouraged to dispossess slaves of any knowledge and several of them did not know their birthdays or other personal details of themselves. The purpose of this was to keep slaves as misinformed of anything other than labor as possible. Slave owners knew the dangers that would upraise if slaves became literate and brave enough to fight for freedom.
Martin Luther King Junior's letter from a Birmingham Jail was an expression of his encouragement for protest against tradition and established laws and a justification for his actions. King, a leader of a civil-rights group that supported protest against traditional views, encouraged protesting against tradition and established laws that are unjust. In his letter from Birmingham Jail King states: "It was illegal to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany. Even so, I am sure that, had I lived in Germany at that time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers. If today I lived in a Communist country where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed, I would openly advocate disobeying that country's anti-religious laws." This excerpt shows that King encourages protest because in some situations he deems it necessary, be it in Hitler's Germany, a Communist country, or any situation in which injustices are occurring. In the last sentence of the excerpt King openly admits that he would protest against established laws or traditions. King was against the traditional views and unjust laws, which discriminated against him and his fellow people.
Dr. Martin Luther King addressed many topics in, “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. He answered all the issues that were aimed towards him in a very skillful and well thought out manner. These issues came from, “A Call For Unity”, which was a letter published by eight local clergymen expressing their feelings about what Dr. King was doing. One concern in particular that King did an outstanding job of confronting was that of the clergymen’s anxiety about him breaking the law. King addresses the question of, “How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?” by clarifying that there are just and unjust laws. He also goes on to explain the difference between the two, the effect of unjust laws on the people that they are aimed towards, as
When MLK was taken in to custody, he was charged with “parading without a permit”(King), which really means he was doing wrong because it was a parade against segregation. He was holding a peaceful protest on behalf of the people who did not have a voice for themselves, and he was going to stop at nothing to be heard. MLK, while in jail, was receiving criticizing letters from all over about his protest, he never responded to them until he came across one. Eight Alabama clergymen entitled, “A Call For Unity”, which explained that he should be fighting in courts only and not on the street, wrote the letter. When King writes back that taking direct action is the only way to achieve the true civil rights even if it goes against what is morally right.
Aquinas’s indication that “An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law.” as any law that is not in harmony with the moral law or the `Law of God`.Martin Luther King saw that segregation was not only rooted in unjust laws, but from groups who placed the laws on minorities expecting them to follow. However, these majority groups fail to follow the law themselves, therefore making it unjust. King felt that we should never obey an unjust law. He felt it necessary for us to obey unjust laws in non violent ways in order to gain civil rights, and that the supreme courts were not the way to solve segregation. He made this clear by coming to Birmingham in the first place. King thought it necessary to show direct action. He himself claimed, “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue.” In this quote King makes it clear that he is upset with the way Birmingham has handled the segregation issues, and that nonviolent direct action is the only resort. Sit ins, marches, etc. were now the only tools they could use to lead to negotiation. King chose this path because there were no other
The civil rights movement in the 1950s-1960s was a struggle for social justice for African Americans to gain equal rights. One activist who became the most recognizable spokesperson and leader in the civil rights movement was Martin Luther King Jr, a christian man dedicated to the ideas of nonviolence and civil disobedience. Although the Civil war had officially abolished slavery, blacks were still treated as less than human for many years after. Martin Luther King Jr has positively impacted the world with his peaceful protest approach to gaining social justice; but with the increase of hate crimes being committed, I believe individuals today need to pick up where King left
The first example of the morality issue Dr. King raises is a just law, verses an unjust law. In his essay Dr King describes to his readers the difference between the two. “A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law." Here Doctor King is defending his belief that there is a moral issue in some laws. He defends his statement by giving an example of Germany during the Nazi rule. King discusses what Hit...
The segregation law is unjust and therefor does not need to be followed because it did not come about by democratic process, as the Negro vote was excluded.