Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role and function of law in society
Ethical dilemma legal case
Functions of law to the society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role and function of law in society
Chapter two offers clarity on the subject of legalism and, through the words and actions of Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., chapter two also conveys the dangers of blind obedience. The foundation of legalism is based on a set of laws that are intended to enforce morally correct behavior. Ultimately, in the grand scheme, these laws should protect personal rights, beliefs and safety whilst promoting ethical conduct. However, as Reverend Martin Luther King points out, laws should be carefully scrutinized for unfair and unreasonable policy that may only benefit a limited audience or agenda. If such laws are deemed unjust, doing nothing makes a person an equal contributor in the vain of moral corruption. Throughout the chapter it is shown that
there is not one method that is entirely without flaw however, the United States operates mainly within the idea of legalism as, legalism is most liberal and inclusive to its people. Residing within the opinion of Reverend King; laws that are deemed to be ‘slanted’ out of favor of the people can be challenged and improved through collective voices that speak in a nonviolent, educated and well informed manner. If everyone was silent and laws were allowed to continue at will, this nation would be full of mindless drones. Exercising a collective voice that brings forth positive change within legalism, paints a beautiful picture for future generations.
Martin Luther King guilts the clergymen for the first time when he brings up their moral wrongness. King says that he has a “moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (4). He summarizes why laws are just or unjust by stating, “A just law is a man-made code that
Ashley Sanchez 29659103 Analysis Essay Oppression is defined by the act of subjugating a people and state through means of force- a universal theme explored in both Hobson’s Choice by Harold Brighouse and Letter from Birmingham Jail written by Martin Luther King Jr (Webster). How can one achieve what they term as the ‘good life’ under oppression and is it necessarily worth the consequences that can result from said search? Hobson’s Choice explores the difficulty of finding a good life under the oppression of a father, and how that quest can result in a happier life. Letter from Birmingham Jail tackles a more defined term of subjugation and the danger of finding a ‘good life’ compared to safety and unhappiness under oppression. Ultimately, the search for a good life is derived from the struggle of rising above one’s oppressor, with the personal satisfaction of searching for the good life outweighing the consequences that may arise.
Martin Luther King, Jr.’s famous “Letter from Birmingham Jail” was written to address the public criticism he and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference received from eight clergymen. In his letter, King shows off his fiery emotion throughout his letter. However, King does not force his beliefs upon his readers. Rather, he hopes that his readers will see his perspective on the situation through an emotional appeal. If the readers are able to recognize the injustice and inequality suffered by the African American community, perhaps they can. The fourteenth and fifteenth paragraphs were a true testament to his passion and ambition for equal rights.
On this world, laws can be very important and can be the solution for keeping this nation and other countries together. Without laws, people would just do whatever they want to do and not think twice about it for the simple fact that they would know that there will not be any major consequences. Martin proves why these laws are so important to us and he also explains how they are important. There are many points which he proves that I totally agree with and there are also some things that I do not necessarily agree with
In an attempt to sway his opponents Martin Luther King, Letter from Birmingham Jail essay argues his point of view with passion and conviction as he respectfully appeals to the logical, emotional and spiritual psyche of his critics. King begins his letter by addressing his “opponents” as “My Dear Fellow Clergymen”. The formality of his greeting seeks to build trust and establish a common ground with his audience. He credits the clergymen with being “men of genuine good will,” whose arguments “are sincerely set forth.” He does not attack their character but instead emphasizes that they all share a common profession and a common goal of ending prejudice and racism.
At this point one can distinguish Black?s tendency to unite the opposites, especially evident in his concluding paragraph stating that if all the trends continue, humans are in the advent of a new society, which will be ?at once close and distant, homogenous and diverse, organized and autonomous, where reputations and other statuses fluctuate from one day to the next? (Black 133). The author predicts the future of law, its quantity and style as the meteorologist predicts the weather, observing the environment and making conclusions.
In 1963, living in Birmingham, Alabama was tough to live in due to how segregated it was. Everything from businesses, diners, libraries, churches, and even bathrooms were segregated. Martin L. King went to Birmingham because he was called by affiliates from the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights contacted him in aiding them on a nonviolent direct action program. He wanted to help because of the injustices there and was said that anything unjust in Birmingham ultimately affects everyone. King and others paraded around Birmingham protesting against this when he was arrested for doing so after a court ordered that Martin L. King could not protest in that area. While in jail, he wrote a letter that later becomes a big part of history during the struggles of segregation.
Two great men that inspired thousands and millions to act on their behalf wither it be bad or good. Their words alone made people feel what they felt with out even meeting them. These two men were vastly different form one another but in some ways acted similar. They both led movements and large amount of people to act in ways that they would not have with out them to give them a push. Lets see what these two men that some would call one amidst some of the most inhumane people in the world and the other to be a breaker of chains and father to the civil rights movement.
Martin Luther King Day is a day to remember all of the things that King did in his life including his life story, his “I Have a Dream” speech, and his memorable holiday. People celebrate to salute Martin’s accomplishments and thank him. “A day on, not a day off” has been told to express that the holiday is used to also encourage community service (Schulke). This man changed the timeline of history and clearly left his mark on the world. Next time it’s the third Monday in January, remember that it is not just a regular day; it is a landmark in history.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. When most Americans hear that name the first thing that comes to mind is his “Dream”. But that is not all he was. His life was more than a fight against segregation, it was segregation. He lived it and overcame it to not only better himself but to prove it could be done and to better his fellow man.
Additionally, it is important to understand Luther’s distinction between the Law and the Gospel in order to further explore Luther’s understanding of human freedom. The Law is God’s commands; it allows humans to coexist, limits chaos and condemns sinfulness, though it is not God’s road...
Ordinary people are willing to go against their own decision of right and wrong to fulfill the request of an authoritative figure, even at the expense of their own moral judgment and sense of what is right and wrong. Using a variety of online resources including The Perils of Obedience by Stanley Milgram this paper attempts to prove this claim.
For additional help in understanding his reasoning and thought processes, The Autobiography of Martin Luther King Jr., edited by Clayborne Carson, can give one a sense of exactly why King had such a strong religious background. In fact, the first words of the writing state “Of course I was religious. I grew up in the church. My father was a preacher, my grandfather was a preacher, my great-grandfather was a preacher, my only brother is a preacher, my daddy’s brother is a preacher. So of course I didn’t have much choice” (Carson 1). Furthermore, this work is special because it combines hundreds of King’s writings in order to make a first person narrative of his life. The book skips no part of his life and includes his thoughts and feelings
To the legalists, the human person is always self-interested, motivated by greed and short-sighted. (Chung-Ying) They will always see profit and avoid harm. Given this human nature, social harmony can never be obtained should the state follow an idealistic program to do good. Only strong state control and absolute obedience to authority can ensure social order and subsequent flourishing of the state. Thus, Legalists do not aim to change human nature for they believe it is unalterable. Instead, they want to effectively control the people’s behavior through a set of strict laws and regulations as well as a system of rigidly prescribed rewards and punishments for different behaviors so as to manipulate and employ them for the greater good – social
William O. Douglas said, "Common sense often makes good law." Well that is what laws essentially are, rules and regulations that make sure common sense is followed. One could even say that laws are enforced ethics. Laws serve several roles and functions in business and society, and this paper will discuss those roles and functions.