Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical dilemma in the workplace
Ethical dilemma in the workplace
Ethical viewpoints displayed by accountancy professionals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical dilemma in the workplace
It is unethical for Jack to ask Dave to withhold the ABC costing information from Marsha. To do so, doesn’t empower Marsha to make the most informed decision regarding outsourcing of the gift boxes. Activity-based costing details relevant costs more accurately than a traditional costing system (Hilton &Platt, 2017). It is advantageous to the International Chocolate Company that Dave has performed some ABC studies. Dave does a great job of referencing his ethical duty to his profession to provide Marsha all of the information, including the ABC studies. Giving Jack the studies fist, would be unethical as this hasn’t been authorized, according the Institute of Management Accountants, Inc. Statement of ethical professional practice (Hilton & Platt,
2017). Resolving the unethical issues in this case, require that Dave move forward with sharing the ABC study information with Marsha. Acting unethically would call into question Dave’s competence, integrity and credibility (Hilton & Platt, 2017). To avoid this, Dave should schedule the meeting he suggests, with both Marsha and Jack, where the data can be reviewed and the morale, quality, and reliability of outsourcing can be openly discussed. While, outsourcing can put strain on employment relationships, these challenges can be worked through with effective transitions led by line managers (Mitchell & James, 2017). In this case the benefit of the cost savings may outweigh the challenges of outsourcing the gift box with good leadership through the transition, however, to decide Marsha must have all the information from the ABC study. References Hilton, R.W. and Platt, D.E. (2017). Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment (11th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN 9781259569562 Mitchell, I., & James, P. (2017). Outsourcing transitions and the employment relationship implications. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(4), 614-629. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12146
We all have to do it. It might be for coffee, for a ride at the amusement park, or for the Deadpool movie (longest line ever). Standing in line is, quite frankly, one of the most boring activities that one could have the misfortune of having to partake in. It takes too long, and sometimes the promised reward ends up a disappointment, or worse, unavailable. But what keeps people sane when they are forced to queue (sometimes for hours on end) is the knowledge that everyone else must wait too. Unless, of course, there was a way to circumvent that process. It’s almost universally agreed upon that cutting in line is unethical, but what about paying someone to stand in for you, or even paying to skip the queue?
Which of the six principles in the AICPA Code of Conduct is most related to Article 1.5 of the California Accountancy Act? Explain your conclusion.
When a company decides to execute a strategic decision, the decision will concern its stakeholders, either through the making of the decision itself or through implementation of the decision. Although strategic decisions are generally made "to attain superior performance" (Hill, Charles) improving the welfare of the internal stakeholders, the attainment of this goal may cause the entity to disregard their notion of right and wrong moral principles in order to achieve that goal.
In Marcia Angell’s article, “The Ethics of Clinical Research in the Third World,” she strongly argues the use of clinical placebo-controlled trials done in developing countries are unethical if an effective treatment already exists. Angell believes studies that compare potential new treatment with a placebo controlled group is ineffective and unnecessary. All research studies should offer the best standard of care and give participants the most beneficial outcome and treatment possible. The main priority of a study is not the goals of the research itself, but the well-being of the participants. Angell uses many sources to defend her argument, such as WHO.
So he will keep all of the information he gains confidence. To conduct an ethical study in terms of confidentiality, “the research is able to identify a given person’s response is able to identify a given person’s response but essentially promises not to do so publicly” (Babbie. 1992: 468). When Venkatesh starts interview the residents to see how much they make, he writes it all the information down. After asking everyone, Ms. Bailey office and told to tell all the information. When Venkatesh tells them all the persona information, he breaches confidentiality when he reads his notes of incomes have. The act “I [Venkatesh] went through my notebooks and told them what I’d [he] learned about dozens of hustlers, male and female” to powerful people like J.T. and Ms. Bailey is unethical (Venkatesh. 2008: 200). Venkatesh knows that both hold a lot of power over the community, as they control the crime and resources that come in and out, and are not always honest in how they get their money. It is understandable that Venkatesh wanted to know if the numbers he was coming up with were correct, but he could have gone at it in a different way, like asking Ms. Bailey separately without disclosing any information. This breach in confidentiality causes ‘“he’s [J.T.] taxing every one of them now”’ because of the new information Venkatesh gave
Kyle’s case has many factors that may be significant: His parents’ divorce is still recent, starting middle school, puberty, family environment, etc. There is also a lot of information that is lacking to help me to understand what is needed. There is no information about his school performance, the domestic violence that took place, family relationships, social relationships, or even his interests.
There are many ethical issues in the movie Erin Brockovich. This movie is about a mother of three who uncovers a water poisoning case by Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) in southern California. Once it was proved that the company had knowingly dumped hexavalent chromium into the ground water, the utility company was found liable for a $330 million dollar verdict.
In my future role as a healthcare administrator, ethical decision making will be required to address a conflict or uncertainty regarding competing values , such as personal, professional, organizational, and societal values (Thompson, 2011). Administrators involved in this decision-making process must consider the ethical principles of justice, autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. Healthcare organizations having growing concerns over ethical issues such as:
This relates to ethical issues as it is difficult to decide when confidential information should be shared, as described in my ethical dilemma above.
An ethical dilemma is a complicated situation that involves an evident conflict between moral rules, in which to obey one would result in disobeying another. Sometimes called ethical paradoxes in moral philosophy, ethical dilemmas are often invoked in an attempt to contradict an ethical system or moral code, or to improve it so as to resolve the paradox.
According to the scenario, Jacob and Krystal worked in an ad agency that started five years ago in Topeka, Kansas. The ad agency was barely making a profit and needed a large client, which led the agency to put in a bid for a city government contract. Due to Jacob’s son being sick, he was preoccupied with taking care of his son and left Krystal with most of the work. Krystal prepared the presentation and got with Jacob the day before the final meeting with the client. Krystal knew that Jacob has good speaking skills and they both decided that Jacob would do the presentation. Jacob’s presentation was a success and they successfully sealed the contract. The owners of the company were so impressed and gave Jacob a bonus check of $10,000. Jacob saw this opportunity where he could use the money for his son’s medical bills. However, he knew that Krystal did most of the work and deserved the bonus money. Jacob is disappointed and his situation has left him with a decision on what to do with the money. This case study will pinpoint Jacob’s ethical dilemma and what ethical action he should take. Also, the roles and responsibilities of an employee dealing with an ethical situation as well as the ways of an organization to maintain ethical practices in the workplace
Ostapski, S.A. & Pressley, D.G. (1992). Moral Audit for Diabco Corporation. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(1), 71-80.
Taylor & Pinczuk (2015) notes the following as ethical issues: problems with human relations, failure to speak up when unethical issues and practices occur, potential injustice to minorities, unjust practices in resource management, and supporting regulations as opposed to doing what is the honest, moral and appropriate for the patients and clients. In this respect, the ethical issues faced by nursing leaders in a health care rationing environment revolve around the fact that nursing care costs must be managed at acceptable levels without compromising medical care.
During my Bachelor’s degree, I had to do a final year project. It was a group project. The 4 of us had decided on a topic and then allocated specific topic to each one of us. Three of us did what we were assigned. But the fourth girl always had an excuse for not completing her work. The first few weeks her excuses seemed genuine and as she was our friend, we completed all of her work too. Our ethical dilemma was whether to report it to our project mentor or not. Finally, a few months into the project, we decided that to discuss the situation with our mentor. But, as the fourth person in our group has ‘A’ grade throughout the Bachelor’s program, our mentor found it difficult to believe that the person was not working. After that, our mentor made sure the fourth girl in the group did the work assigned to her, but the mentor also scolded the three of us
The mental status of Jonathan has made him competent and capable of making rational decision to any medical intervention or treatment. This gives rise to an ethical dilemma that the hospital staff and Jonathan’s physician may be facing. Jonathan’s autonomy conflicts with his healthcare team’s commitment to do good to him or in providing care in his best interest. The healthcare team or medical staff may encounter more difficulty because the father of Jonathan appears to be supportive with his decision on the refusal of care and treatment (except for pain management).