Mars Cannot Be Colonized

748 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Negative impacts of colonization

Mars Cannot be Colonized—Not Yet It has been exactly 45 years since any man has set foot on the Earth’s Moon. Now, after almost half a century, Mars One has released their plan on sending the first humans on a one-way trip to Mars in attempt of colonizing the red planet. While this will become a great feat for humankind if it is successful, there are numerous downsides to colonizing Mars, including a dysfunctional society, extremely high costs and unfit living conditions. Despite the Benefits, Mars cannot not be colonized because the disadvantages of colonization entirely outweigh the advantages.
To begin with, Mars will not have a functional society. In the text it states that “If tickets to Mars are going to start at $500,000, clearly some …show more content…

There are numerous reasons as to why Mars is not ideal for human beings. First of all, the temperatures on Mars are immensely low. The surface temperatures recorded close to the equator range from -94℉ to -148℉; however temperatures at the poles can reach upto -284℉(Walker). Compare this to the lowest temperature EVER recorded on earth, which is -128.6℉. Moreover, the atmosphere of Mars is very thin. This means that the surface is vulnerable to dangerous radiation waves emitted by the Sun. It also allows even the smallest of meteors and asteroid to easily enter the planet’s atmosphere and destroy whole towns. In addition to this, the shortage of oxygen is yet another reason to not colonize Mars. Furthermore, the weather on Mars is severe; dust storms are frequent on the red planet.(Walker) Opponents believe that technology can solve all these issues to make life sustainable on the Earth. They claim that if we have technology to launch humans to over 140 million miles away, then why can’t we develop technology to keep humans alive. While this may be true, humans are not perfect, so isn’t the technology created by them. Hence, accidents and malfunctions can happen. A failure in the machine such as the suit or oxygen supply tank can be “lethal”. (Walker). Therefore, Mars should not be colonized because of the dangerous environment of

Show More
Related

  • Argumentative Essay: Should We Go To Mars?

    382 Words  | 1 Pages

    Starting with Mars being too dangerous. Colonists could be exposed to radiation which can result in cancer, brain damage, tumors, sickness, or death. Secondly, Mars has a lower gravity than Earth which means over time colonists would lose bone mass, have a weaker immune system, and have a weaker heart and body. Lastly, colonists would be in a closed environment for a long periods of time which could lead to mental problems according to NASA and Mars One.

    Read More

  • Space Exploration Dbq

    1189 Words  | 3 Pages

    To me, this emphasizes the fact that we continually embark on useless space voyages instead of considering the problems at hand. I can support this because the cost of space voyages is at the minimum of $500 to the maximum of $700 million. Found in Source B, on page 201, paragraph 3, lines 14-15 “It costs $500 to $700 million every time the shuttle flies.” This is a large sum of money, that has the capability to help many, yet we do not do this. If you can possibly visualize this, many people can find new homes, get well fed, and give their children a future to look up to, instead of wasting the money on a government project. In fact, the National Census Bureau of Statistics claimed over 46.5 people fell in poverty since 2014. Also stated, it would roughly take $175.3 billion to completely eliminate poverty. This is a tremendous amount of money, although we could have easily reduced this amount of money by limiting space exploration. Found on page 202, paragraph 3, lines 24-28 it is stated “The space station costs upward of $100 billion, yet its critics call it a “station to nowhere.” It has no clearly defined scientific purpose. Once, President George H.W. Bush’s science adviser was asked about the benefits of doing experiments in weightlessness and microgravity. His response was, “Microgravity is of micro importance.” This showing, space exploration had no importance whatsoever compared to the amount of people dying every

    Read More

  • Mars Colonization

    606 Words  | 2 Pages

    The best argument for exploring and colonizing on Mars can be summed up in one colloquial phrase, “don’t put all of your eggs into one basket.” To elaborate, all of humanity is on Earth. Earth is enormous, but it is still just one place. A medium-sized earthquake in Japan was enough to cause millions of dollars in damage and end thousands of lives. And when Mt. Vesuvius erupted in 79 AD, the ash clouds blocking out the sun all around the entire planet for weeks.

    Read More

  • Comparing The Martian And Nasa's Perseverance Mars Rover

    911 Words  | 2 Pages

    In both the Mark Watney world and our world, there are many complications when it comes to space travel. Not only is it dangerous for the astronauts, but there's a lot of planning and thinking that goes into traveling to Mars. 140 million miles is a long flight, but the larger complications arise when you actually arrive. With the atmosphere being so thin and the lack of oxygen, it is not able to support human life or a means of transportation back to earth. These problems don't stop both the fiction and nonfiction NASA from working to find solutions to these problems.

    Read More

  • Should We Colonize Mars Analysis

    1722 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many rovers have been sent to the surface to see if it is in fact capable of supporting life, either unknown to us or us. Scientists have turned toward Mars to search for any life forms to prove humans could actually survive on its surface. While it is possible for us to survive with current technology, if we were to travel to Mars, it wouldn’t be a life of luxury. Michael Gainer in his article “Should We Colonize Mars?” discusses the downfalls of the climate. Mars’s climate is much more hazardous than Earth’s with many long lasting hurricanes, high levels of radiation, and poor, if any, farming soil. Colonists would be living in pressurized bubbles and would need special suits to step outside. It would be difficult to get around and medical supplies may not always be readily available. Outside there would be no trees whispering in the wind, no singing birds, no skin burning summer days. No deep blue oceans, no rapid running rivers, cold refreshing lakes or streams. Looking out the window one would see miles upon miles of reddish-beige sand blowing in the

    Read More

  • Going To Mars In Meg Thacher's Martian Metropolis

    1095 Words  | 3 Pages

    We have to go, and we have to figure out a way to colonize it. Because Earth isn't always going to be here. Martian Metropolis by Meg Thacher is a science fiction book about how it would work if we were to colonize Mars. It touches on the reasons, and ways that it should/would work. In the second paragraph of Martian Metropolis it states: "One is survival of our species.

    Read More

  • Colonizing To Mars Essay

    631 Words  | 2 Pages

    Did you ever think we should go to Mars? Well, we should colonize to Mars! My reasons are it’s a good back-up plan, it has many minerals and land, and we might even find something there, maybe even life! Let me explain my reasons.

    Read More

  • Why We Should Go To Mars Rhetorical Analysis

    1004 Words  | 3 Pages

    Space travel is both fascinating and terrifying. The mystery of outer space captivates nearly all children and many adults. Neil Armstrong’s first words from the moon are iconic and will forever be engrained in the history of mankind. With the end of the Space Shuttle program many people have wondered if America’s space travels are coming to a close. Is space travel going to become a thing of the past? Kim Stanley Robison believes that the future of space travel, specifically an interplanetary mission to Mars, is not only fascinating, but necessary. In his short essay, “Why We Should Go to Mars”, Mr. Robinson starts with acknowledging that reasons for a mission to Mars “range from good to bad to terrible” (Robinson). He defines the range of common arguments which he believes are outlandish and seems to be wholly against the idea. His tone quickly changes as he presents what, in his opinion, are not only good but the best reasons as to why a Mars mission is not only a good idea, but a needed one.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Colonizing Mars

    632 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mars is our next best hope in life on another planet. Because of science mankind can grow and harvest plants in the modified mars soil, make a thick warm atmosphere, and drink no frozen mars water. Mankind can grow and flourish more as a species with this idea of colonizing mars. With more scientific advancements we can colonize mars and we will colonize mars.

    Read More

  • My Adventures in My Blue Chair

    545 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mars is an interesting topic for me, it represents an upcoming change in human engineering- a change in our thinking. Sitting in my blue chair, I ask myself questions. What do we do with our little red planet? Do we colonize it? Make it like our Earth? Or do we ignore it,...

    Read More

  • Mars One Project

    685 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mars: it’s our closest neighbor in the solar system. It’s also called “The Red Planet”, it’s home to the biggest mountain in the universe, and in ten years, Mars’s ground is set to be touched by human boots. A private company called Mars One plans to put humans on Mars by the year 2026. Mars One isn’t perfect, though. The project to colonize Mars is not a good idea, not because it’s a fantastical plan, but because the company carrying out the idea is not ready for the mission. Mars One’s plan to put humans on Mars just won’t work because of the many flaws in the company’s plan, such as: an unrealistic timeline, irrational budget, and an overall lack of preparedness for their ambitious plan to civilize the red planet.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Martian Colonization

    537 Words  | 2 Pages

    Martian colonization is a risky proposition. So risky, in fact, that a group of Islamic leaders in the United Arab Emirates issued a religious ruling saying Muslims should not go to the Red Planet. The General Authority of Islamic Affairs and Endowment (GAIAE) ruling compares a Mars mission to suicide, and says that those who attempt it can expect the same consequences in the afterlife. In fact, GAIAE went so far as to claim that those seeking to escape God's judgment on Mars would be unable to do so, saying: "This is an absolutely baseless and unacceptable belief because not even an atom falls outside the purview of Allah, the Creator of everything." Martian colonization is certainly dangerous.

    Read More

  • Personal Response Outline

    203 Words  | 1 Pages

    SP3/Reason3: The important reason, the first of group who colonize in the Mars is not the astronauts but there are

    Read More

  • Terraforming Mars for Human Habitation

    1154 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... The problem with the gravity of Mars is that weightlessness can make you sick. Meaning that because humans are so adapted to the conditions here on Earth, such a drastic change will make them sick. Adaptation will have to occur, meaning that the stations on Mars might have to somehow mimic the conditions of Earth. Works Cited http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terraforming_of_Mars http://www.universetoday.com/9497/magnesium-could-be-a-source-of-fuel-on-mars/. http://www.mars-one.com/faq/health-and-ethics/will-the-astronauts-have-enough-water-food-and-oxygen.

    Read More

  • Robots Vs Humans: Reducing Costs in Space Exploration

    879 Words  | 2 Pages

    Amitai suggests that space exploration can still occur, but at a reduced price. His main point that justifies this statement is “the main costs of space exploration arise from the fact that we are set on sending humans, rather than robots”. Why do robots need to be? Well, Amitai suggests that the reason why space exploration is at such a high cost is because humans require much more assistance than robots. Amitai explains how humans need to come back to earth, so transportation is needed and this is not cheap.

    Read More

More about Mars Cannot Be Colonized

Open Document